K142236 · Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · NYN · Mar 23, 2015 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K142236
Device Name
BioniCare Hand System
Applicant
Vision Quest Industries, Inc.
Product Code
NYN · Neurology
Decision Date
Mar 23, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5890
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K142236 · Mar 23, 2015
BioniCare Hand System
Vision Quest Industries, Inc.
Prospective multi-center clinical study (investigating physicians' practices)
The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the BioniCare Hand System in treating osteoarthritis of the hand by measuring pain reduction (VAS), functional improvement (DASH), and physical strength metrics in a clinical setting.
Osteoarthritis; Pain reduction; Functional assessment; Open-label study
The BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000, is intended for use by patients with rheumatoid and/or osteoarthritis of the hand as: ● An adjunctive therapy in reducing the level of pain and stiffness associated with pain from rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. ● As an adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the hand to reduce the level of pain and stiffness and to improve the function of the hand.
Device Story
Portable, battery-operated, single-channel transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS). Inputs: user-controlled settings via interface. Transformation: voltage-regulated circuit generates spike-shaped monophasic pulses (100 Hz fixed frequency; 0-15V amplitude). Output: electrical stimulation delivered via electrodes to the hand. Used by patients in home or clinical settings. Healthcare providers monitor patient progress; output provides adjunctive pain/stiffness relief and functional improvement. Benefits: non-pharmacological pain management, improved grip/pinch strength, and reduced stiffness.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multi-center, open-label study (n=82; mean age 64). Primary endpoint: OA pain reduction in index hand over 48 hours. Results: 8-week treatment showed effect sizes of 1.3 for OA pain, 1.2 for patient global assessment, 1.1 for physician global assessment, and 0.5 for DASH functional score. Secondary measures (pinch/grip strength) showed smaller significant effect sizes (0.4/0.3). Study limitations include open-label design and potential placebo effect, partially mitigated by stable baseline NSAID/analgesic use.
Indicated for patients 18+ years with symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis of the hand to reduce pain and stiffness and improve hand function as an adjunctive therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief is a device used to apply an electrical current to electrodes on a patient's skin to treat pain.
Predicate Devices
BioniCare® Stimulator, Model BIO-1000 (k052625, k030332)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the top half of the circle. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines extending from the bottom profile.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 23, 2015
Vision Quest Industries, Inc. Mr. Mohammed Ouerghi Director of OA/RA 1390 Decision Street, Suite A Vista. CA 92081
Re: K142236
Trade/Device Name: BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5890 Regulation Name: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NYN Dated: February 17, 2015 Received: February 19, 2015
Dear Mr. Ouerghi:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{1}------------------------------------------------
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
# Felipe Aquel -S
Carlos L. Peña, Ph.D., M.S. for Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142236
Device Name BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000
Indications for Use (Describe)
The BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000, is indicated for use as an adjunctive therapy in reducing the level of pain and stiffness associated with pain from rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
The BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000, is indicated for use as an adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the hand to reduce the level of pain and stiffness and to improve the function of the hand.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size:16px">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <span style="font-size:16px">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY
| 510(k) Owner: | Vision Quest Industries, Inc.<br>18011 Mitchell South,<br>Irvine, CA, 92614 |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Mohamed Ouerghi<br>Director of QA/RA<br>Vision Quest Industries, Inc.<br>Phone 760-477-8201<br>Mobile 760-691-0168<br>Fax 760-727-5950<br>mouerghi@vqorthocare.com |
| Date Summary Prepared: | 3/23/2015 |
| Proprietary Name: | BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000 |
| Device Name and Classification: | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator<br>For pain relief, Class II, 21 CFR 882.5890, Product<br>Code NYN |
| Predicate Devices: | BioniCare® Stimulator, Model BIO-1000, k052625<br>and k030332 |
| Device Description: | The BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000 is<br>portable, rechargeable, battery-operated, single<br>Channel device that utilizes a voltage regulated<br>output circuit to generate a spike-shaped<br>Monophasic pulse with adjustable amplitude of 0 -<br>15 volts peak and repeating at a single fixed<br>frequency of 100 ± 5 Hertz. The device consists of<br>electrodes, lead wires and a signal generator<br>(BioniCare® Stimulator). |
| Statement of Intended Use: | The BioniCare Hand System, Model BIO-2000, is<br>intended for use by patients with rheumatoid and/or<br>osteoarthritis of the hand as: |
| | ● An adjunctive therapy in reducing the level of<br>pain and stiffness associated with pain from<br>rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. |
| | ● As an adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the<br>hand to reduce the level of pain and stiffness<br>and to improve the function of the hand. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Clinical Study Results and Summary:
The study was designed as a prospective, multi center, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the BioniCare Hand System in the treatment of Osteoarthritis of the hand. Patients were entered from the investigating physicians practice, without advertising, if they were 18 years or older, had osteoarthritis of the hand that was symptomatic for at least 3 months with a pain score of at least 3 out of 10 on a VAS scale despite stable NSAIDs and/or analgesics for at least a month prior to study entry. Eighty two patients were enrolled, 66 females and 16 males, with a mean age of 64 and a range of 45 to 89 years. When both hands were effected the more symptomatic hand was designated the index hand to be treated. The primary outcome measure was osteoarthritis pain in the last 48 hours. Additional efficacy outcomes were pain in the study thumb in the last 48 hours, patient global assessment and the physicians global assessment. Efficacy assessment of function included the validated DASH functional assessment questionnaire and the traditional measures of strength, pinch force and grip strength as measured by a JAMAR Hand Assessment Kit which includes a squeeze (grip) dynamometer and a pinch dynamometer. Efficacy was expressed for each variable as the effect size. Effect sizes are generally recognized to be small if they are from 0.2-0.49, moderate from 0.5 to 0.99 and large if they are 1.0 or greater.
In the intent-to-treat statistical analysis, after 8 weeks of treatment, the effect size for OA pain in the study hand in the past 48 hours was 1.3, for OA pain in the study thumb for the past 48 hours was 0.8, for patient global assessment was 1.2, and for physician global assessment was 1.1. Functional outcome was moderately improved by the DASH Score with an effect size of 0.5. Smaller but still significant effect sizes were seen for the additional functional outcomes of pinch force, effect size 0.4 and grip strength with an effect size of 0.3. A limitation of this trial is that it was an open label study which includes the likelihood of bias caused by placebo effect. This was partially compensated by maintaining patients on stable NSAIDs and/or analgesics for the month prior to and for the entire study. This makes it more difficult to show efficacy as the benefit must be in addition to that of NSAIDs and/or analgesics. For example meta-analytic studies have shown an effect size for acetaminophen of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.41) and an effect size for NSAIDs of 0.32 (0.24-0.39). It should be noted that these effect sizes were in comparison to placebo. However, it should also be noted that all of the trials required discontinuation of previous pharmacotherapy for 3 to 14 days prior to study entry. The majority of trials additionally required a pre-defined flare of symptoms when NSAID treatment was discontinued in the pretreatment washout. This pretreatment washout and flair requirement makes it easier to demonstrate effectiveness by any treatment. This was evidenced by the mete-analysis as when they removed the studies which excluded nonresponders to NSAID treatment the effect size for pain decreased to 0.23 (0.15-0.31). Thus, even the effect size for pinch force and grip strength (0.4 and 0.3 respectively) are respectable, particularly since multiple studies have demonstrated that surgery of the hand can improve pain but does not increase strength as measured by pinch force and grip strength.
Open label clinical data was used to support the Substantial Equivalence of the BIO-2000 to the predicate. VQ OrthoCare conducted randomized clinical trials to support
{5}------------------------------------------------
clearance of the BioniCare BIO-1000 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the hand and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Given that the pathophysiological process of osteoarthritis of the knee is similar to the degenerative process that would occur in the hand, data was leveraged from the randomized controlled clinical trial of the knee. The device was previously cleared for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the hand which is a more destructive process (worst case scenario) when compared to OA of the hand. Hence, the clinical data presented in support of the BioniCare BIO-2000 was found to be adequate to support Substantial Equivalence of this device to the predicate.
### Substantial Equivalence
The device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices because all changes made are categorized as changes to Performance Specifications, Ergonomics of User Interface and/or Firmware as the following tables demonstrate.
| 510(k) Number | K052625 | K142236 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | BIO-1000 | BIO-2000 |
| Manufacturer | BioniCare | VQ OrthoCare |
| Power Source | One 9V battery | One 3.7V battery |
| No. of Output Modes | 1 | 1 |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Synchronous | Yes | N/A |
| Reciprocal | No | N/A |
| Computerized | No | Yes |
| Software Provided | N/A | Yes - Embedded Firmware |
| Constant Current | No | No |
| Constant Voltage | Yes | Yes |
| Channel Isolation as per AAMI NS4<br>3.2.3.2 | No | N/A |
| Line Current Isolation | N/A | N/A |
| Automatic Overload Trip | No | No |
| Automatic No-Load Trip | Yes | Yes |
| Patient Override Control | No | No |
| Max Leakage Current | N/A | N/A |
| Indicator Display | | |
| Unit Functioning | Yes | Yes |
| Low Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Other | LCD panel displays all parameter settings. | LCD panel displays all parameter settings. |
| Standards - AAMI NS4 | Yes - applicable parts | Yes - applicable parts |
BIO-2000/BIO-1000 Equivalency Table
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Timer Settings | No | No |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Automatic Shut Off | N/A | N/A |
| Frequency | 100 Hz. | 100 Hz. |
| Waveform | Monophasic spike shaped pulse | Monophasic spike shaped pulse |
| Voltage Output | 0-12 Volts | 0-12 Volts (0 - 15V mfr override option) |
| Voltage Pulse Width (% of peak) | 1.8mS @ 10%; 0.64mS @ 50% | 1.8mS @ 10%; 0.64mS @ 50% |
| Current Output Range (500 Ohms) | 0 - 24mA peak | 0 - 24mA peak (30mA option) |
| Peak Charge (500 Ohm) | 20uC | 20uC (25uC optional) |
| Average Power (500 Ohm) | .092W | .092W (0.115W optional) |
| Minimum Electrode Size | >30cm2 | >30cm2 |
| Peak Current Density | < 0.667uC/cm2 | < 0.667uC/cm2 (< 0.833uC/cm2 optional) |
| Below AAMI NS4 Safe current limit (20uC + (0.8)(35t)uC | Yes (limit is 50.8uC) | Yes (limit is 50.8uC) |
| Less than AAMI safe average power (0.25W/ cm2) | Yes: 0.003W/ cm2 | Yes: 0.003W/ cm2 (0.0036W/ cm2 optional) |
| Area of stimulation | hand | hand |
| Weight (with batteries) in grams | 136 | 72 |
| Dimensions (mm) | 63.9 X 96.4 X 36.9 | 54.0 X 90.5 X 14.7 |
| Construction | Molded ABS/PC housing | Molded ABS/PC housing |
## Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
The device and accessories were tested thoroughly using standard test equipment and methods and in accordance with company SOP's. All testing verified conformance to specifications as provided in 510(k). The device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. The following table contains a list of some of the non-clinical testing performed.
| Test or Standard | Name | Purpose |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| IEC 60601-1:1998<br>+A1:1991 +A2:1995 | Medical electrical equipment — Part 1:<br>General requirements for safety and<br>Essential Performance | Safety and Essential<br>Performance |
| IEC 60601-1-2:2001 | Medical electrical equipment. General<br>requirements for safety. Collateral | Electromagnetic<br>Compatibility |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| +A1:2004 | standard. Electromagnetic<br>compatibility. Requirements and tests. | |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| IEC 60601-2-10:1987<br>1.0b<br>+A1:2001 | Medical electrical equipment. Part 2:<br>Particular requirements for the safety<br>of nerve and muscle stimulators | Safety and Essential<br>Performance |
| IEC 60601-1-11:2010 | Medical electrical equipment. Part 1-<br>11: General requirements for basic<br>safety and essential performance –<br>Collateral Standard: Requirements for<br>medical electrical equipment and<br>medical electrical systems used in the<br>home healthcare environment | Safety and Essential<br>Performance |
| P10-04-22R | Design Hardware Verification Report | Bench Verification and<br>Functional Testing for<br>substantial equivalence and<br>or verification of<br>performance enhancement |
| P10-04-20R | Design Validation Report | Voice of the Customer |
### Summary
The BioniCare Hand System stimulator generates a waveform with proven benefit that is substantially equivalent to the waveform provided by the predicate devices. This waveform used has been demonstrated in predicated devices to be effective as an adjunctive therapy in Osteoarthritis to reduce the level of pain and stiffness. The BioniCare Hand System delivers this same waveform in an effective manner to the hand.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.