DB-Cranial is a calcium phosphate bone void filler indicated for the repair or filling of neurosurgical burr holes or other cranial bone defects and craniotomy cuts with a surface area no larger than 25 cm2. DB-Cranial may be used in the restoration or augmentation of bony contours of the cranial bone skeleton.
Device Story
DB-Cranial is a moldable, biocompatible calcium phosphate bone void filler kit; consists of alpha-tricalcium phosphate powder and sodium silicate-sodium phosphate mixing solution. Components mixed prior to implantation; applied by surgeons to repair/fill cranial defects or burr holes. Material sets in situ to form hydroxyapatite; provides structural restoration of cranial bone contours. Device is sterile, single-use; supplied in 3 cc, 5 cc, and 10 cc volumes. Benefits include stable, biocompatible material for cranial reconstruction with minimal risk of thermal necrosis during curing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated via bench testing only, including mechanical, chemical, and physical performance comparisons against the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Calcium phosphate bone void filler; alpha-tricalcium phosphate powder and sodium silicate-sodium phosphate liquid. Sterilized via gamma radiation (ISO 11137-2:2013, VDMax25). Sets to hydroxyapatite. Shelf life 30 months. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for repair or filling of neurosurgical burr holes, cranial bone defects, and craniotomy cuts (surface area ≤ 25 cm2) and restoration/augmentation of cranial bone contours.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Methyl methacrylate for cranioplasty (skull repair) is a self-curing acrylic that a surgeon uses to repair a skull defect in a patient. At the time of surgery, the surgeon initiates polymerization of the material and forms it into a plate or other appropriate shape to repair the defect.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA text logo on the right. The FDA text logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size.
June 20, 2019
Dimensional Bioceramics, LLC % Patsy Trisler Regulatory Consultant Trisler Consulting 5600 Wisconsin Ave. #509 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
Re: K182742
Trade/Device Name: DB-Cranial Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5300 Regulation Name: Methyl Methacrylate for Cranioplasty Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GXP Dated: May 20, 2019 Received: May 21, 2019
Dear Patsy Trisler:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Matthew Krueger Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K182742
Device Name DB-Cranial
Indications for Use (Describe)
DB-Cranial is a calcium phosphate bone void filler indicated for the repair or filling of neurosurgical burr holes or other cranial bone defects and craniotomy cuts with a surface area no larger than 25 cm2. DB-Cranial may be used in the restoration or augmentation of bony contours of the cranial bone skeleton.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary DB-Cranial
| I. SUBMITTER | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter Name: | Dimensional Bioceramics, LLC |
| Submitter Address: | 250 Natural Bridges Drive<br>Santa Cruz, CA 95050 |
| Contact Person:<br>Telephone #: | Duran N. Yetkinler, M.D., Ph.D.<br>408-757-6603 |
| Date Prepared: | May 6, 2019 |
| II. DEVICE | |
| Device Trade Name: | DB-Cranial |
| Common or Usual Name: | Hydroxyapatite Cement |
| Regulatory Name(s): | Methyl Methacrylate For Cranioplasty |
| Classification #: | 21 CFR 882.5300 |
| Product Code: | GXP |
| III. PREDICATE DEVICE(s) | K162864, OsteoVation® Impact<br>SkeletalKinetics , LLC |
| IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION | |
| Device Identification,<br>Characteristics,<br>Sterilization and Shelf life | DB-Cranial Bone Void Filler is a moldable and<br>biocompatible calcium phosphate bone void filler.<br>DB-Cranial kit is comprised of two components: a<br>calcium-phosphate powder and a mixing solution<br>in premeasured quantities, which will be mixed<br>together prior to implantation. |
| | The 3 cc, 5 cc, and 10 cc DB-Cranial Bone Void Filler<br>kits are provided sterile to SAL of 10-6 and are for<br>single use only. |
| | The sterilization method is gamma radiation.<br>Sterilization validation is based on ISO 11137-<br>2:2013 (VDMax25). |
| | DB-Cranial Bone Void Filler will be labeled with a<br>shelf life of 30 months. |
| V. INDICATIONS FOR USE | DB-Cranial is a calcium phosphate bone void filler<br>indicated for repair or filling of neurosurgical burr<br>holes, other cranial bone defects and craniotomy<br>cuts with a surface area of no larger than 25cm².<br>DB-Cranial may be used in the restoration or<br>augmentation of bony contours of the cranial bone<br>skeleton. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| VI. SUMMARY OF TESTING [PERFORMANCE DATA] | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Performance Bench Testing | | |
| TEST | Test Method Summary | Results |
| Working Time<br>In-Vitro | Ensures sufficient manipulation<br>time is provided while also<br>ensuring cement setting-times<br>are met in the operative theater.<br>Mixing, mold-ability, and setting<br>strengths were measured | Both subject and predicate device<br>reached sufficient indentation<br>loads to ensure targeted working<br>time and setting strength |
| Setting Time | Setting tests determined strength<br>(Mean $\geq$ 450N and $\geq$ 700N) at<br>specified time points post<br>sterilization and post mixing. | Subject and predicate devices<br>achieved similar setting strengths<br>at all time points. Strength values<br>of these two setting cements are<br>substantially equivalent. |
| Ca to P Ratio | This test determines CA/P ratios<br>via ICP-MS. | Both samples have a Ca/P ratio of<br>1.5. This test confirms both subject<br>and predicate are composed of<br>identical amounts of calcium and<br>phosphate salts. |
| Kit Components | Kit ingredients are compared to<br>determine substantial<br>equivalence. | Both subject and predicate device<br>consist of alpha-tricalcium<br>phosphate (Powder) and sodium<br>silicate-sodium phosphate solution<br>(Liquid). |
| Heavy Metal<br>Analysis | Samples are analyzed for trace<br>heavy metal content using ICP-<br>MS. | Trace metal limits were below<br>allowable limits in both subject<br>and predicate. |
| pH Profile | Examines effects of the device on<br>pH surrounding the implanted<br>device. pH is measured in<br>physiologic buffer solutions<br>surrounding curing cements. | All pH readings remained within<br>normal physiological range for<br>both predicate and subject devices. |
| FTIR Analysis | This test identifies the chemical<br>composition of subject and<br>predicate device following curing<br>in simulated physiologic<br>conditions for 24 hours then dry<br>cured at 37°C for 72 hours. | Both subject and predicate device<br>both show the formation of<br>hydroxyapatite. Subject and<br>predicate device are substantially<br>equivalent with regards to FTIR<br>chemical analysis. |
| Crystallographic<br>Analysis | XRD analysis is performed with<br>samples set in simulated<br>physiologic conditions for 2<br>hours, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days.<br>Samples are evaluated using<br>powder x-ray diffraction and<br>compared against known<br>mineralogic standards. | Both subject and predicate device<br>are confirmed identical via<br>crystallographic analysis. The<br>same crystalline structure over<br>several different clinically relevant<br>time points is formed in both<br>materials. |
| Temperature<br>Profile | Device samples are tested in<br>simulated physiologic solutions to<br>measure temperature of curing<br>cement. Temperatures above, at,<br>and below the level of the sample<br>are measured at 2 minute<br>intervals over 20 minutes. | Both subject and predicate device<br>set in an isothermic manner as<br>designed. This demonstrates a<br>minimal risk of thermal necrosis of<br>tissue surrounding the<br>implantation site. In this respect,<br>both subject and predicate device<br>are substantially equivalent. |
| Solubility and<br>Dissolution | Test samples are cured and<br>incubated at simulated<br>physiological conditions for 4<br>days; fluid is extracted and tested<br>for Ca2+ concentration via ICP-<br>AES. This experiment evaluates<br>solubility and dissolution. | Both subject and predicate device<br>have substantially equivalent<br>solubility and dissolution. |
| Tensile Testing | Test samples were mixed and<br>cured for 24 hours at simulated<br>temperature and pH. Tensile<br>testing was performed using a<br>mechanical tester and load at<br>sample breakage was recorded<br>and compared. | Subject and predicate device<br>demonstrated identical tensile<br>strength at 24 hours and are<br>substantially equivalent in terms<br>of tensile strength. |
| Dimensional<br>Stability | Dimensional stability is measured<br>to establish that the bone void<br>fillers maintain shape and do not<br>dissolve in an untimely manner. | Subject and predicate are<br>dimensionally stable materials<br>with no discernable differences in<br>form. |
| Physical Form | Test samples were imaged by<br>SEM to determine<br>microstructural similarities and<br>differences. | Both subject and predicate device<br>demonstrated hydroxyapatite<br>crystal formation. Subject and<br>predicate device set to form<br>hydroxyapatite in an identical<br>manner. |
| Biocompatibility<br>Testing: | No biocompatibility studies were needed to demonstrate substantial<br>equivalence. | |
| Animal Testing: | No animal studies were needed to demonstrate substantial equivalence. | |
| Clinical Testing: | This product type does not require clinical testing. | |
| VII. COMPARISON OF<br>TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS<br>WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE | DB-Cranial intended use and critical specifications are substantially equivalent to the predicate device, OsteoVation Impact® (K162864), as shown by the comparative testing.<br><br>There are no notable differences in comparison to the predicate device, therefore no new questions related to safety and effectiveness were raised. | |
| VII. CONCLUSIONS | Based on the comparison provided and the data submitted in the 510(k), it can be concluded the DB- Cranial is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, OsteoVation Impact® (K162864). | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.