K961120 · Howmedica Leibinger, Inc. · HAW · May 10, 1996 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K961120
Device Name
MARKER SYSTEM FOR STEREOTAXIC NAVIGATION
Applicant
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Product Code
HAW · Neurology
Decision Date
May 10, 1996
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Marker System is intended for establishing fixed reference points in patients requiring stereotactic surgery. Examples of situations necessitating stereotaxy could include patients in need of biopsy, resection, lesion generation, implantation of radioisotopes, and small field external beam radiotherapy. The Marker System can be used as an accessory with all currently marketed Howmedica Leibinger® stereotactic systems and can also be used with frameless navigation systems from other manufacturers.
Device Story
The Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation provides a frameless alternative to traditional stereotactic frames. It consists of titanium bone screws secured into the patient's calvarium, which serve as anchors for base components holding imaging or optical markers. During imaging (CT, MRI, PET, angiography), markers containing contrast media (gold balls or liquid contrast) are attached to the base components to create reference points in 3D space. For surgery, imaging markers are replaced with black-anodized aluminum optical markers. These markers provide tactile or visual reference points for navigation systems (e.g., Zeiss MKM, Elektra Wand, Radionics OAS). The system is implanted by a neurosurgeon under local anesthesia and typically remains in place for 1-2 days, though it can be used for up to 30 days for fractionated radiotherapy. By eliminating the need for cumbersome, pin-fixed frames, the device improves patient comfort, increases surgical access to the skull base, and maintains registration accuracy for image-guided neurosurgical procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical assessment performed on 15 patients undergoing surgery with the Zeiss MKM navigation system following CT or MRI. Markers were placed under local anesthesia. No complications regarding screw placement, tissue condition, or infection were reported. Optical referencing accuracies ranged from 0.6 mm to 1.5 mm, comparing favorably to stereotactic frames. Non-clinical phantom testing at the University of Innsbruck evaluated registration accuracy, yielding mean correlation errors of 1.1 mm to 2.2 mm depending on the number of markers and imaging modality, with pooled mean error under 2 mm.
Technological Characteristics
System components include commercially pure titanium bone screws (9 mm or 18 mm length), polysulfone base components, and markers. Imaging markers contain gold balls (CT/angiography) or cavities for liquid contrast (MRI/PET). Optical markers are anodized aluminum alloy. The system is designed for manual implantation into the calvarium. It is compatible with stereotactic navigation systems and frames. Materials comply with FDA regulation 177.1655 for polysulfone. No electronic or software components are integral to the marker system itself; it functions as a passive reference tool for external navigation software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring stereotactic surgery, including biopsy, resection, lesion generation, radioisotope implantation, and small field external beam radiotherapy. Contraindicated in patients with bone or skin infections.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
K961120
MAY 10 1996
# SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
## 1.0 Administrative Information
### 1.1 Submitter
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
14540 Beltwood Pkwy. East
Dallas, TX 75244
1-800-962-6558
214-392-3636
### 1.2 Contacts
Andrew B. Rogers
Director--Product Development, Special Projects
Kristyn R. Waski
Product Engineer--Special Project
### 1.3 Date Prepared
March 18, 1996
## 2.0 Device Identification
### 2.1 Trade/Proprietary Name
Ost-Reg Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
### 2.2 Common Name
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
### 2.3 Classification
Stereotaxic Instrument
| Classification Number | Class | Regulation Number |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 84HAW | II | 882.4560 |
Page 38
{1}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
## 3.0 Predicate Device Identification
| | STP Complete Module Set | Wurzburg Titanium Bone Screws |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number | K892425 | K854886 |
| Classification Name | Stereotaxic Instrument | Bone Screw |
| Classification Number | 84HAW | 87HWC |
| Class | II | II |
| Regulation Number | 882.4560 | 888.3040 |
## 4.0 Product Description
### 4.1 Background
Stereotaxy refers to a group of neurosurgical procedures involving the establishment of a three-dimensional coordinate system where any anatomical point can be determined as a set of coordinates $(x,y,z)$. These procedures are used for resections, generating lesions, biopsy, implantation of radioisotopes, and small field external beam radiotherapy. Stereotactic systems all involve the same basic operating principle; by establishing known reference points and maintaining a fixed position between these points and the patient’s anatomy throughout imaging, surgery, and/or radiotherapy, minimally invasive procedures can be conducted. Reference points are created using fiducial markers visible both during imaging (CT, MRI, angiography, etc.) and surgery or radiotherapy. Stereotaxic localization uses these points to assemble images into three-dimensional space with known coordinates at every position, facilitating surgical or treatment planning.
Fiducial markers have traditionally been incorporated into a stereotactic frame fixed to the patient’s head with percutaneous pins before imaging and left in place for the duration of surgery or treatment. Several drawbacks are associated with this method. Patient comfort is compromised by the fixation pins and the resulting immobilization. The frames are often cumbersome for the physician to work around, limiting visibility and approach angles. Depending upon the material used, interactions between the frame and magnetic fields for imaging may occur, reducing system accuracy. Finally, access to the caudal two-thirds of the brain is limited with some stereotactic frames. As a result, skull base tumors often necessitate highly-invasive surgery and general
Page 30
{2}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
anesthetic. These factors have spurred interest in establishing stereotactic reference points without a frame.
## 4.2 Design
Rather than using fiducial markers external to the patient--consequently requiring the patient to be immobilized in a frame--the Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation creates reference points fixed to the patient's skull. The system uses bone screws, adapted from craniofacial fracture fixation, to secure three to five markers into the calvarium. Each assembly consists of a screw, base component, and marker ball or optical marker. Screws are made from commercially pure titanium, have threaded lengths of 6 mm, and come in two overall lengths--9 mm and 18 mm--to accommodate different soft tissue thicknesses. A polysulfone base component screws onto the head of each screw and holds a transparent marker ball of the same material or an aluminum alloy optical marker. The marker ball, containing the medium visible during imaging, is 5 mm in diameter and has an internal cavity 2 mm in diameter. For angiography or CT imaging, these markers contain a gold ball for contrast. Markers intended for MRI and PET use are hollow, allowing injection of appropriate contrast media such as gadolinium, copper sulfate, or $^{18}$F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose solutions¹. This cavity is accessed by a hole 0.6 mm in diameter descending from the top of the marker. Flat optical markers sit in the base component with the same profile as the marker balls. Fabricated from an aluminum alloy, they are anodized black and have a machined spot in the center where the true silver color of the alloy is visible; the position of this spot is identical to the center of the imaging marker ball. See Exhibit F for engineering drawings.
## 4.3 Biocompatibility
Marker System bone screws are made from commercially pure titanium, noted for its high biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, lack of toxicity, and minimal artifact in CT and MRI scans. Several of these features are due to the oxide layer spontaneously formed on the titanium surface from exposure to oxygen and strongly bonded to the underlying metal. Titanium also allows for excellent osseointegration, creating very stable screw fixation due to the lack of connective tissue between the screw and
¹ Mark Levivier, M.D., et. al., “Diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy guided by positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose,” *Journal of Neurosurgery*, 82(3): 445-452, March 1995.
Page 40
{3}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
bone². The base components and imaging markers are made from polysulfone complying with FDA regulation 177.1655. Other components supplied with the system--gold balls within CT/angiography imaging markers and aluminum alloy optical markers--are not implanted or skin-contacting. Additional material information can be found in Exhibit E.
## 4.4 Application
Each marker is placed by first making a small stab incision and then drilling a pilot hole for the bone screw with a twist drill. Skull thickness must be determined before drilling to prevent the pilot hole from extending into the dura. Proper screw length--9 mm or 18 mm--is selected based upon soft tissue thickness. The screw is advanced with a screwdriver, and the base component is fixed on the screw head. Depending upon imaging modality, the appropriate imaging marker is attached to the base component. In order to eliminate shift in marker position, care should be taken to completely seat the marker on the base component. At least 3 imaging markers are placed and will remain in position during scanning.
Angiography, CT, MRI, or PET image data can be transferred to navigation systems (e.g. Zeiss MKM System, Elektra Wand, Radionics OAS, etc.) for the surgical procedure. As with other neurosurgical procedures, the patient is first immobilized in a head rest such as a Mayfield to maintain constant patient position relative to the operating environment. For visual and wane registration systems, the imaging markers are removed and replaced with the optical (black-anodized alloy) markers to provide visual or tactile reference points identical to those provided by the imaging markers during scanning. Additionally, the optical markers have the option of being used with a stereotactic frame, requiring use of special adapters also provided with the system. The Marker System is typically implanted for 1-2 days, spanning imaging and treatment procedures, but can be left in place for up to 30 days for fractionated radiotherapy. Note that fractionated or intermittent procedures require re-registration of the Marker System using the same procedures and products previously indicated. The base components, marker balls, and optical markers are removable for fractionated radiotherapy, reducing the projection of the implant when the marker is not in use.
² Elof Eriksson, M.D., and Per-Ingvar Branemark, M.D., “Osseointegration from the Perspective of the Plastic Surgeon,” *Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery*, March 1994, 93(3): 628-629, March 1994.
Page 41
{4}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
The Marker System is compatible with the following stereotactic products:
Howmedica Leibinger® ZD Stereotactic Frame
Howmedica Leibinger® STP Stereotactic Planning Software
## 5.0 Intended Use
Draft labeling can be found in Exhibit A.
### 5.1 Indications
- The Marker System is intended for establishing fixed reference points in patients requiring stereotactic surgery. Examples of situations necessitating stereotaxy could include patients in need of biopsy, resection, lesion generation, implantation of radioisotopes, and small field external beam radiotherapy.
- The Marker System can be used as an accessory with all currently marketed Howmedica Leibinger® stereotactic systems and can also be used with frameless navigation systems from other manufacturers.
### 5.2 Contraindications
Cranial markers should not be used in the following situations:
- Bone infection
- Skin infection
### 5.3 Precautions
- Imaging and optical markers must be completely seated into the base components or frame adapters in order to reproduce exact positioning after removal and replacement.
- When filling hollow imaging markers with contrast medium, air bubbles must be avoided to optimize imaging accuracy.
- Markers should be placed in calvarial bone of thickness greater than the threaded length of the selected implant to prevent risk of implant protrusion into the dura.
Page 42
{5}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
- Markers placed for MRI imaging should be located near the target site to facilitate re-registration.
- Hollow imaging markers containing contrast medium should be removed from the base components after scanning to reduce the potential for contrast medium to be spilled.
- Contact between the imaging marker balls and surgical cloth during scanning should be prevented to reduce the risk of fluid absorption.
## 6.0 Non-Clinical Study
*Departments of Neurosurgery, Computerized Tomography, and Neurology
University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria*
A study was conducted at the University of Innsbruck (Innsbruck, Austria) to evaluate the image registration accuracy of the Marker System in CT and MRI use. 35 markers were placed into holes of known position on three platforms of a phantom assembly. The central cylinder of the phantom was filled with diluted contrast agent, and the test assembly was placed into a standard CT head coil along with a control assembly. Gold-filled imaging markers were used for CT scans, while the contrast agent used for MRI imaging was not reported. The marker images present on the monitor after scanning were registered by manually placing a cursor in the center of each visible marker dot. Note that this testing did not involve the use of an automatic detection algorithm for determining image center; this tool, commonly incorporated into imaging software, improves registration accuracy. 16 combinations of 4 markers and 16 combinations of 3 markers were tested for accuracy. The following results were obtained:
| Mean Correlation Error | CT | MRI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3 markers | 1.6 mm | 2.2 mm |
| 4 markers | 1.2 mm | 1.1 mm |
Considerably higher accuracies--0.6 mm to 0.8 mm--were obtained with only three markers when these markers were all on the same platform of the phantom. This indicates that magnetic field distortion--independent of the marker system used--reduces accuracy as distance increases between the plane defined by the markers and the feature to be registered. The pooled mean, combining 3-marker and 4-marker results from both imaging methods, was
Page 43
{6}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
under 2 mm. This agrees with clinically accepted accuracy levels for stereotaxic procedures. See Exhibit C for additional information.
## 7.0 Clinical Study
*Neurosurgery Department, Hopitaux des Armees, Paris, France*
The Marker System was assessed in 15 patients undergoing surgery with the Zeiss MKM navigation system after CT or MRI imaging. Number of markers placed and imaging modality is shown in the following table:
| # Markers | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| # Patients | 1 | 13 | 1 |
| Imaging Mode | CT | MR | CT+MR |
| # Patients | 1 | 13 | 1 |
All screws were placed one day pre-operatively under local anesthesia. Placement sites were determined by the neurosurgeon based upon the pre-planned surgical access route. In each case, all screws were placed close to the access site with the exception of a control placed at a distance to improve referencing precision.
No problems were encountered with screw placement, tissue condition, or infection. CT or MRI image clarity was not impaired by artifacts. Optical referencing accuracies ranged from 0.6 mm to 1.5 mm--this compares very favorably with accuracies attainable with stereotactic frames.
Page 44
{7}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
# 8.0 Substantial Equivalence
Components of the Marker System are substantially equivalent to the ZD stereotactic frame incorporated in the STP Complete Module Set for stereotaxy [510(k) K892425] and to Wurzburg titanium bone screws [510(k) K854886]. Both devices are listed as predicates because the Marker System merges the long history of bone screw use in the craniofacial area with stereotaxy to provide a frameless marker system with accuracy equivalent to stereotactic frames. Specific comparisons are made in the following table:
| Feature | Cranial Marker | ZD Stereotactic Frame (STP Complete Module Set) | Wurzburg Titanium Bone Screws |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number | n/a | K892425 | K854886 |
| Indication | establish a three-dimensional coordinate system for stereotactic surgery | establish a three-dimensional coordinate system for stereotactic surgery | bone fixation in craniofacial area |
| Stereotaxic Accuracy | 0.6-2.2 mm (see sections 3.0 and 4.0) | 1 mm | n/a |
| Marker Diameter | 2.0 mm | 1.6 mm for MRI
0.2 mm for CT | n/a |
| Material | titanium screws
Udel marker balls
contrast agent dependent upon imaging modality
-CT, angiography: gold ball
--MRI, PET: at discretion of physician | pins: titanium point, carbon fiber and plastic housing
contrast agent dependent upon imaging modality
--CT, angiography: stainless steel wire
--MRI, PET: at discretion of physician | titanium |
| Screw Diameter | 2.0 mm | n/a | 2.0 mm |
| Threaded Length | 4 or 5 mm | n/a | 3.5-13.5 mm |
| Thread Pitch | 1 mm | n/a | 1 mm |
Page 45
{8}
Howmedica Leibinger, Inc.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
510(k) Premarket Notification:
Marker System for Stereotaxic Navigation
## 9.0 Bibliography
Eriksson, Elof, M.D., and Branemark, Per-Ingvar, M.D. “Osseointegration for the perspective of the plastic surgeon.” *Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery*, 93(3): 626-637, March 1994.
Levivier, Marc, M.D., et. al. “Diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy guided by positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose.” *Journal of Neurosurgery*, 82(3): 445-452, March 1995.
Page 46
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.