The SpineAssist™ System is indicated for precise positioning of surgical instruments or implants (pedicle screws, plates and etc.) during general spinal surgery. The SpineAssist™ System may be used in either open or percutaneous procedures.
Device Story
SpineAssist is a computer-controlled miniature image-guided surgery (IGS) system; platform for orthopedic procedures. Input: pre-operative fluoroscopic and CT images. Operation: software processes images via proprietary algorithms to create pre-operative plan; system exports coordinates to device; articulating arm and tool guide position according to plan. Bone attachment components (clamps, bridges, cervical kits) secure device to patient. Used in OR by surgeons to guide handheld surgical tools. Output: physical positioning of tool guide. Benefit: provides accuracy, precision, and accessibility for spinal instrumentation; enables minimally invasive approaches.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Stability and accuracy validated via cadaver studies simulating clinical procedures. Tests included software validation (IEC 60601-1-4), rigidity tests for cervical and bi-lateral bridges, and accuracy tests for cervical (C1-C6) and thoracic (T6-T12) regions.
Technological Characteristics
Stereotactic instrument; computer-controlled robotic arm. Materials: biocompatible (ISO 10993). Connectivity: workstation-based. Software: proprietary algorithms for image processing and coordinate export. Mounting: bone-attached via clamps/bridges (Hover-T, Bed Mount, Cervical Kit). Standards: IEC 60601-1-4 (software), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility).
Indications for Use
Indicated for precise positioning of surgical instruments or implants during general spinal surgery, including open or percutaneous procedures, across the vertebral column including cervical approaches.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY & EFFECTIVENESS SECTION 5 -
# SPINEASSIST™ SYSTEM
# 510(k) Number K_073467
MAY 2 3 2008
## Applicant's Name:
| Company name: | Mazor Surgical Technologies Ltd. |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Address: | 7 HaEshel Str. |
| | P.O.B. 3104 |
| | Southern Caesarea Industrial Park 38900 |
| | ISRAEL |
| Tel.: | +972-4-6270171 |
| Fax: | +972-4-6377234 |
| e-mail: | armin@mazorst.com |
# Contact Person:
| Official Correspondent: | Ahava Stein |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Company name: | A. Stein -- Regulatory Affairs Consulting |
| Address: | Beit Hapaamon (Suite 213)<br>20 Hata'as Str. (Box 124)<br>Kfar Saba 44425<br>ISRAEL |
| Tel: | + 972-9-7670002 |
| Fax: | +972-9-7668534 |
| e-mail: | asteinra@netvision.net.il |
# Name of the device:
SpineAssist™ System
# Trade or proprietary name, if applicable:
SpineAssist™ System
.. . . .
# Common or usual name:
Surgical Navigation System / Image Guided Surgery
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Establishment Registration No .:
3005075696
#### Classification Name:
Stereotactic Instrument
#### Classification:
FDA has classified Stereotactic devices as a Class II medical device, with product code HAW and 21 CFR classification code 882.4560. Review by the Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices.
#### Predicate Device:
The SpineAssist™ system is substantially equivalent to the original SpineAssist™ system (manufactured by Mazor Surgical Technologies Ltd., and the subject of 510(k) document no. K033413, K051676 and K063607) and the StealthStation System (manufactured by Medtronic and the subject of 510(k) document nos. K954276 to K050438). A comparison table and detailed discussion are presented in Section 12 of this application.
#### Device Description:
The SpineAssist™ system is a computer controlled miniature medical image-guided surgery (IGS) system, which serves as a technological platform for solutions that provide unprecedented levels of accuracy, precision and accessibility in performing orthopedic procedures. The SpineAssist™ is designed to assist surgeons in precisely guiding handheld surgical tools in line with a computerized, image-based pre-operative plan along given trajectories. The system's software processes fluoroscopic and CT images via proprietary algorithms and automatically exports the desired coordinates to the SpineAssist device, which positions its articulating arm and tool guide. Using a special bone attachment component (i.e., a clamp and bridge, the Hover-T / Bi-lateral Hover-T bridge, the Bed Mount Hover-T or the Cervical Kit) the SpineAssist device attaches to the bone in the area where the procedure is being performed and assists surgeons in precisely guiding handheld surgical tools according to the computerized, image-based, pre-operative plan.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The main components of the SpineAssist™ system include:
A. SpineAssist™ device
- B. Workstation
C. Accessories including the Clamp Kit for less invasive procedures, the MIS platforms: Hover-T, Bi-lateral Hover-T, Bed Mount Hover-T and the Cervical Kit, the last one intended for less invasive procedures.
The Spine Assist was previously cleared under K033413, K051676 and K063607. This 510(k) submission describes the addition of two accessories (Bilateral hover-T bridge and Bed Mount stabilization frame) that enable increased accessibility for the device over the entire range of the vertebral column, including cervical approaches; and the software changes that were introduced as improvements in user interface, as needed from the addition of the new approaches and in response to user's feedback.
#### Intended Use / Indication for Use:
The SpineAssist™ System is indicated for precise positioning of surgical instruments or implants during general spinal surgery. The SpineAssist™ System may be used in either open or percutaneous procedures.
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the predicate device:
The modified SpineAssist system is identical to the original SpineAssist system regarding all components, design, materials, basic scientific technology, etc. The only differences are that the "modified" device is intended also for cervical spinal surgery; more versatility is provided in minimally invasive spinal surgery, by allowing stabilization using a Bed Mount stabilizing frame (thus reducing the need to stabilize the device via more invasive pelvic screws) and the Bi-lateral Hover-T; and software changes providing more user interface features improving procedure workflow. To enable cervical approach, the SpineAssist includes some new accessories, including the Bilateral hover-T bridge and the Bed Mount stabilizing frame. The combination of these accessories allows extended trajectories and range of operation for the device, in three new mounting options: Bilateral Hover-T, Bed-Mount Hover-T, and Cervical Kit.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Non-Clinical Performance Data
The following performance tests were conducted on the SpineAssist™ system, in order to validate stability and accuracy of the device under the extended intended use, i.e. cervical and minimally invasive procedures using the new stabilizing platforms:
- 1. Software Validation (IEC 60601-1-4 & FDA Guidelines)
- 2. Bed Mount Hover-T Stability Test
- 3. Relative Movement of C2 Test
- 4. Cervical Bridge Rigidity Test
- 5. Bi-lateral Hover-T Rigidity Test
- 6. Cervical Accuracy C1-C6 Test
- 7. Bed Mount Hover-T Accuracy T6-T12
Stability and accuracy tests were performed on cadavers to simulate real clinical procedures.
### Clinical Performance Data
Not Applicable
#### Conclusions Drawn from Non-Clinical and Clinical Tests:
The performance tests demonstrate that SpineAssist system may be safely and effectively used in spinal surgical procedures requiring precise positioning of surgical instruments or implants during open or percutaneous spinal surgery. The software validation and accuracy performance tests demonstrate that the SpineAssist system meets its design and performance specifications and is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared SpineAssist system.
#### Substantial Equivalence:
In summary, the intended use of the modified SpineAssist™ system is substantially equivalent to a combination of the original SpineAssist™ system and the StealthStation device. Furthermore, the basic technological characteristics of the modified Spine Assist™ system are identical to the original Spine Assist™ system. The differences in the technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. Consequently, the SpineAssist™ system is substantially equivalent to the original SpineAssist™ system and the StealthStation device.
#### Performance Standards:
The SpineAssist™ system complies with the voluntary recognized standards:
- 1. Software Validation (IEC 60601-1-4 & FDA Guidelines)
- 2. Biocompatibility Testing (ISO 10993)
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with its wings spread, and the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES · USA" are arranged in a circle around the eagle. The eagle is black, and the text is also black. The logo is simple and recognizable.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Mazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd. % A. Stein Regulatory Affairs Consulting Ahava Stein 20 Hata'as St 44425 Kfar Saba Isrcal
MAY 2 3 2008
Re: K073467
Trade/Device Name: SpineAssist System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic instrument Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HAW Dated: May 15, 2008 Received: May 22, 2008
Dear Ahava Stein:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Ahava Stein
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050,
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510/k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (240) 276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at (240) 276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark M. Millerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
#### 510(k) Number (if known): K073467
Device Name: SpineAssist System
#### Intended Use Statement:
The SpineAssist™ System is indicated for precise positioning of surgical instruments or implants (pedicle screws, plates and etc.) during general spinal surgery. The SpineAssist™ System may be used in either open or percutaneous procedures.
Prescription Use ど (Per 21 C.F.R. 801 Subpart D) OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Optional Format Subpart C)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
**510(k) Number** K073467
Page 4-2
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.