K150804 · Medeia, Inc. · GZO · Oct 19, 2015 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K150804
Device Name
QBioScan
Applicant
Medeia, Inc.
Product Code
GZO · Neurology
Decision Date
Oct 19, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.1540
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
QBioScan is indicated for the measurement of galvanic skin response to aid in the assessment of the sudomotor function. The device is intended for use on the general adult population in medical clinics, healthcare practices and out-patient departments of hospitals.
Device Story
QBioScan measures galvanic skin response (GSR) to assess sudomotor function; used in medical clinics/hospitals by healthcare providers. Input: electrochemical reaction between surface electrodes (stainless steel plates) and chloride ions released by sweat glands under incremental low voltage (max 4V). Device transforms electrochemical signals into Bioelectrical Conductance (BEC) values (micro-Siemens). Output: quantitative BEC results for hands/feet and asymmetry values (percent difference between left/right sides) displayed on computer. Physician uses output as information for clinical decision-making; device does not provide direct diagnosis. Benefits: provides evidence of sweat gland dysfunction potentially undetectable in standard physiological exams.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing was performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing, and software verification and validation.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: AISI 304 stainless steel (hand/foot electrodes), stainless steel with Ag/AgCl layer (forehead electrode). Principle: electrochemical reaction measurement via variable amplitude low voltage/current excitation. Output: 4V max, continuous frequency. Connectivity: USB interface to computer. Software: moderate level of concern. Standards: IEC 60601-1, EN 60601-1-2. Form factor: custom electronics box with reusable electrodes.
Indications for Use
Indicated for measurement of galvanic skin response to aid in assessment of sudomotor function in general adult population.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A galvanic skin response measurement device is a device used to determine autonomic responses as psychological indicators by measuring the electrical resistance of the skin and the tissue path between two electrodes applied to the skin.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 882.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines representing hair or clothing.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
October 19, 2015
Medeia, Inc. % Daniel Lehtonen Regulatory Consultant Compliance and Regulatory Services LLC 3771 Southbrook Drive Dayton, Ohio 45430
Re: K150804
Trade/Device Name: QBioScan Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1540 Regulation Name: Galvanic skin response measurement device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GZO Dated: September 14, 2015 Received: September 16, 2015
Dear Mr. Lehtonen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Michael J. Hoffmann -S
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K150804
Device Name
QBioScan
Indications for Use (Describe)
QBioScan is indicated for the measurement of galvanic skin response to aid in the assessment of the sudomotor function.
The device is intended for use on the general adult population in medical clinics, healthcare practices and out-patient departments of hospitals.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <span> <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) SUMMARY
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the Requirements of Safe Medical Device systems Act 1990 and 21 CFR Sec. 807.92
510(k) Number:
#### a1 APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Date Prepared: March 16, 2015 Name: Medeia, Inc. Address: 80 S.W. 8th St. Suite 2000 Miami, FL 33130
| Contact Person: | Slav Danev |
|-----------------|----------------------|
| Phone Number: | +1 800 433 4609 |
| Fax Number: | +1 800 433 4609 |
| Email: | danev@medeia-inc.com |
#### NAME OF DEVICE: a2
| Trade Name: | QBioScanTM, model HW4 |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Galvanic Skin Measurement Device |
| Classification Name: | Galvanic Skin Measurement Device (21 CFR 882.1540 / GZC) |
#### a3 PREDICATE DEVICE:
| Device Name: | Sudoscan |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| K Numbers: | K100233 and K141872 |
| Manufacturer: | Impeto Medical<br>17, rue Campagne Première<br>75014 Paris - France |
The FDA database for recalls was searched during the writing of this 510(k) submission and no recalls for the predicate device or manufacturer were found.
#### DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE: a4
QBioScan™ is a galvanic skin response measurement device intended for the collection and display of galvanic skin response recorded by the device consists of the following components:
- . an off-the-shelf computer with proprietary device software pre-installed
- . a custom electronics box that houses the QBioScan circuitry
- a USB cable to connect the electronics box to the computer .
- reusable electrode lead cables .
- reusable hand and foot electrodes and optional disposable forehead electrodes .
- . an off-the-shelf printer (optional)
The device allows for a evaluation of sweat gland function based on a measuring method where patients are in contact with surface electrodes (reusable stainless-steel plates and optional disposable electrodes) and are exposed to an incremental low voltage (under the 60601-1 standard safety limits). The device tests the electrochemical reaction between electrodes and the chloride ion released by the stimulated sweat glands. This active test method provides information and evidence of a sweat gland dysfunction that might otherwise not be detectable in a physiological examination. The Bioelectrical Conductance (BEC, in micro-Siemens, uS) representing galvanic skin response for the hands and feet are expressed as quantitative results
{4}------------------------------------------------
along with an asymmetry value expressed as the percent difference between the BEC values of the right / left hands and the right / left feet.
The device does not provide any direct diagnosis rather the device provides information to the physician for inclusion in their decision making process.
#### STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE: a5
QBioScan is indicated for the measurement of galvanic skin response to aid in the assessment of the sudomotor function.
The device is intended for use on the general adult population in medical clinics, healthcare practices and out-patient departments of hospitals.
#### TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTIC COMPARISON: a6
Determination of the bioelectrical conductance value of the hands and feet via application of a variable amplitude low voltage, low current excitation is the technological principle of both the subject and predicate devices. The following table shows the similarities and differences between the devices. The differences have no material impact on the equivalence between the devices.
| | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Predicate Device |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | N/A | K100233 | K141872 |
| Device Name | QBioScan™ | SUDOSCAN | SUDOSCAN |
| Manufacturer | Medeia, Inc. | IMPETO Medical | IMPETO Medical |
| Classification Regulation | 882.1540, Class II | 882.1540, Class II | 882.1540, Class II |
| Product Code | GZO | GZO | GZO |
| Indication | QBioScan is indicated for<br>the measurement of<br>galvanic skin response to<br>aid in the assessment of<br>the sudomotor function.<br>The device is intended for<br>use on the general adult<br>population in medical<br>clinics, healthcare<br>practices and out-patient<br>departments of hospitals. | The SUDOSCAN system<br>is a medical device for the<br>measurement of galvanic<br>skin responses. | The SUDOSCAN system<br>is a medical device for the<br>measurement of galvanic<br>skin response to aid in the<br>assessment of sudomotor<br>function.<br>SUDOSCAN is indicated<br>for use in the general adult<br>population. |
| Operating Characteristics | • Measures difference in<br>skin conductance.<br>• Used to provide<br>feedback to physicians,<br>not to diagnose.<br>• Skin Contact Pads<br>measure skin<br>conductance. | • Measures difference in<br>skin conductance.<br>• Used to provide<br>feedback to physicians,<br>not to diagnose.<br>• Skin Contact Pads<br>measure skin<br>conductance. | • Measures difference in<br>skin conductance.<br>• Used to provide<br>feedback to physicians,<br>not to diagnose.<br>• Skin Contact Pads<br>measure skin<br>conductance. |
| Electrode Surface Area | Hand: 384 cm²<br>Foot: 384 cm²<br>Head: 7 cm² | Hand: 212 cm²<br>Foot: 269 cm²<br>Head: 7 cm² | Hand: 212 cm²<br>Foot: 269 cm²<br>Head: N/A |
| Electrode Placement<br>(Anatomic Sites) | Hands, Feet, Forehead | Hands, Feet, Forehead | Hands, Feet |
| Electrode Materials | Head Electrode:<br>• Stainless Steel with<br>Ag/AgCl layer (cleared<br>electrode)<br>Hand and Foot Electrode:<br>• AISI 304 Stainless Steel | Head Electrode:<br>• Nickel Silver Alloy<br>Hand and Foot Electrode:<br>• AISI 304 Stainless Steel | Hand and Foot Electrode:<br>• AISI 304 Stainless Steel |
| Skin Conductance<br>Measurement Range | 10 - 100 µS/cm² | 10 - 100 µS/cm² | 10 - 100 µS/cm² |
| | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Predicate Device |
| 510(k) Number | N/A | K100233 | K141872 |
| Skin Conductance Resolution | 1 nS/cm² | 1 nS/cm² | 1 nS/cm² |
| Acquisition Duration (total) | 120, 300 or 600 seconds | 120 seconds | 120 seconds |
| Electrical Output to the skin | 4 V max | 4 V max | 4 V max |
| Electrical Output Frequency | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous |
| Electrical Output Unit<br>Duration | 1 second | 1 second | 1 second |
| Power Density (at electrode) | 0.01 μΑ/mm² | 0.01 μΑ/mm² | 0.01 μΑ/mm² |
| User Display | Computer Display | VGA Color LCD | VGA Color LCD |
| User Control | Computer provided with<br>system | Touch screen | Touch screen |
| Audible Indicators | Internal Computer Speaker<br>and Optional Headphone | Internal Speaker and<br>Optional Headphone | Internal Speaker and<br>Optional Headphone |
| Output Report | • Subject details (patient<br>data)<br>• Indication for referral<br>[entered by examining<br>physician]<br>• Method<br>• Results<br>• Impressions [entered by<br>examining physician]<br>• Measured STC† values<br>of the test<br>• 4 average values of 12<br>STC measurements:<br>• Two STC for each<br>Hand:<br>Average value of a<br>minimum of 6 STC<br>measurements<br>• Two STC for each<br>Foot:<br>Average value of a<br>minimum of 6 STC<br>measurements<br>• Head:<br>Average value of a<br>minimum of 6 STC<br>measurements | • Subject details (patient<br>data)<br>• Indication for referral<br>[entered by examining<br>physician]<br>• Method<br>• Results<br>• Impressions [entered by<br>examining physician]<br>• Measured STC† values<br>of the test<br>• Two average values of<br>12 STC measurements:<br>• Hand:<br>Average value of 6<br>STC measurements<br>• Foot:<br>Average value of 6<br>STC measurements | • Subject details (patient<br>data)<br>• Indication for referral<br>[entered by examining<br>physician]<br>• Method<br>• Results<br>• Impressions [entered by<br>examining physician]<br>• Measured STC† values<br>of the test<br>• Two average values of<br>12 STC measurements:<br>• Hand:<br>Average value of 6<br>STC measurements<br>• Foot:<br>Average value of 6<br>STC measurements<br>• Head:<br>Average value of 6<br>STC measurements |
| Interface | USB from laptop | (USB) Internal | (USB) Internal |
| Power Source | 5 V provided by USB | 5 V provided by USB | 5 V provided by USB |
| Electrical Safety Standards | IEC 60601-1<br>EN 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1<br>EN 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1<br>EN 60601-1-2<br>ANSI/AAMI PC69 |
| Electrical Safety Classification | Class II<br>Type BF Applied Part | Class I<br>Type BF Applied Part | Class I<br>Type BF Applied Part |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Medeia, Inc.
「 STC- Standard Conductance; the terminology used to describe the ionic current measured by the predicate device electrodes
Based on comparisons of device technological characteristics, features, materials, intended use and performance the QBioScan™ has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the commercially available and legally marketed Sudoscan device.
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### b1 NON-CLINICAL TESTING:
The QBioScan™ device was subjected to the following non-clinical performance testing:
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Testing The device was submitted for testing and was found to be in compliance with the requirements of IEC 60601-1, 30 Edition and EN 60601-1-2, 30 Edition.
## Software Verification and Validation Testing
Software verification and validation testing were conducted following the FDA guidance document for software contained in medical devices. The software was considered to be a "moderate" level of concern since a failure or latent flaw could indirectly result in a minor injury to the patient through incorrect or delayed information or through action of the operator.
#### b2 CLINICAL TESTING:
No Clinical testing was necessary to determine substantial equivalence.
#### b3 CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM TESTING:
Based on information obtained on the predicate device with reference to the design specification, electrical safety / EMC testing and intended use, the QBioScan™ device was subjected to the same type of testing. The results support the conclusion that the QBioScan™ device is substantially equivalent to the Sudoscan device from Impeto Medical.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.