The performance of the Granada Medium was evaluated at four hospitals using routine clinical vaginal/rectal swab specimens to determine sensitivity and specificity compared to a reference method.
Antepartum women (vaginal/rectal swabs); Sample Size: 771 valid samples; Number of Sites: 4
LIM Broth enrichment followed by subculture to blood agar (reference method)
Sensitivity and specificity of Granada Medium for GBS detection
Indications for Use
Granada Medium is a selective and differential agar which is intended for the qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) from LIM Broth enrichment cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women following 18-24 hours of incubation. Recovery of orange colored colonies on Granada Medium is a positive result for presence of β-hemolytic GBS. Results can be interpreted after 18-24 hours of anaerobic incubation. Due to the properties of Granada Medium, white colonies recovered on Granada Medium must undergo additional testing to confirm absence of GBS. Subculture of GBS colonies must be performed for conducting susceptibility testing as recommended for penicillin- allergic women. A lack of growth or the absence of orange colonies on Granada Medium does not preclude the presence of GBS. Granada Medium is not intended to diagnose infection, or to guide or monitor treatment for infections.
Device Story
Granada Medium is a selective/differential agar for qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS). Input: LIM Broth enrichment cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women. Principle: Utilizes Granada reaction; contains starch, peptone, serum, and folate pathway inhibitors; beta-hemolytic GBS produces light-to-dark orange pigmented colonies via direct genetic linkage between pigment and hemolysin production. Operation: Manual, visual inspection of agar plates after 18-24 hours of anaerobic incubation at 35°C. Used in clinical laboratories by healthcare practitioners. Output: Presence/absence of orange colonies. Clinical utility: Aids in identifying GBS colonization; white colonies require additional testing to confirm absence of GBS; subculture required for susceptibility testing. Benefits: Facilitates screening for GBS colonization to support prevention of perinatal GBS disease.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 771 protocol-compliant vaginal/rectal swabs from pregnant women across four sites. Granada Medium performance was compared to a Reference Culture Method (LIM Broth subcultured to 5% sheep blood agar with biochemical confirmation). For total GBS detection (hemolytic and non-hemolytic), Granada Medium (with biochemical testing of white colonies) showed 99.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 96.6-99.9%) and 98.4% specificity (95% CI: 97.0-99.1%). For β-hemolytic GBS detection via color development alone, sensitivity was 98.1% (95% CI: 94.5-99.3%) and specificity was 97.9% (95% CI: 96.4-98.8%).
Technological Characteristics
Selective and differential agar medium. Contains starch, peptone, serum, and folate pathway inhibitors. Principle: Pigment detection of beta-hemolytic GBS (Granada reaction). Form factor: Agar plate. Connectivity: None (standalone). Sterilization: Not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) from LIM Broth enrichment cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs in antepartum women. Not intended to diagnose infection or guide/monitor treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A selective culture medium is a device that consists primarily of liquid or solid biological materials intended for medical purposes to cultivate and identify certain pathogenic microorganisms. The device contains one or more components that suppress the growth of certain microorganisms while either promoting or not affecting the growth of other microorganisms. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms and also provides epidemiological information on these diseases.
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K173903
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for Granada Medium for the qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS)
C. Measurand:
Group B Streptococcus (GBS)
D. Type of Test:
Detection of GBS using a selective and differential chromogenic medium
E. Applicant:
Hardy Diagnostics
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Granada Medium
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.2360
2. Classification:
Class I (non-exempt)
3. Product code:
PQZ
4. Panel:
Microbiology (83)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Granada Medium is a selective and differential agar which is intended for the qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) from LIM Broth enrichment cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women following 18-24 hours of incubation.
Recovery of orange colored colonies on Granada Medium is a positive result for presence of β-hemolytic GBS. Results can be interpreted after 18-24 hours of anaerobic incubation. Due to the properties of Granada Medium, white colonies recovered on Granada Medium must undergo additional testing to confirm absence of GBS. Subculture of GBS colonies must be performed for conducting susceptibility testing as recommended for penicillin- allergic women. A lack of growth or the absence of orange colonies on Granada Medium does not preclude the presence of GBS. Granada Medium is not intended to diagnose infection, or to guide or monitor treatment for infections.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as the Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription Use only
White colonies on Granada Medium after 18-24 hours incubation are considered presumptive negative for GBS and must be confirmed by additional testing to rule-out presence of weakly β-hemolytic or non-hemolytic GBS.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not Applicable
I. Device Description:
Granada Medium is a selective and differential medium used for the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae (S. agalactiae, GBS) colonization in pregnant women by testing LIM Broth enriched cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs. Color development (light orange to dark orange color) is a unique characteristic of β-hemolytic GBS strains resulting from colored pigment production in the presence of substrates such as starch, peptone, serum, and folate pathway inhibitors. Non-hemolytic GBS cannot be detected by color production, but can be recovered from Granada Medium by evaluating white colonies growing on the medium. Growth of microorganisms belonging to other species is either inhibited, or if there is growth, the colonies do not produce the expected color reaction.
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
chromID Strepto B Agar
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K163042
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Granada Medium (K173903) | chromID Strepto B Agar (K163042) |
| Intended Use | Granada Medium is a selective and differential agar which is intended for the qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) from LIM Broth enrichment cultures of vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women following 18-24 hours of incubation.
Recovery of orange colored colonies on Granada Medium is a positive result for presence of β-hemolytic GBS. Results can be interpreted after 18-24 hours of anaerobic incubation. Due to the properties of Granada Medium, white colonies recovered on Granada Medium must undergo additional testing to confirm absence of GBS. Subculture of GBS colonies must be performed for conducting susceptibility testing as recommended for penicillin-allergic women. A lack of growth or the absence of orange colonies on Granada Medium does not preclude the presence of GBS. Granada Medium is not intended to diagnose infection, or to guide or monitor treatment for infections. | chromID Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic medium that is intended to aid in the qualitative determination of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women. This medium supports the growth of, but does not differentiate between, hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS strains. The test is performed on 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs obtained from pregnant women. chromID Strepto B agar results can be interpreted after 24 hours incubation with confirmation of characteristic GBS colonies from the media. chromID Strepto B agar is not intended to diagnose infection nor to guide or monitor treatment for infections.
chromID Strepto B agar does not provide susceptibility results. Subculture to non-selective media should be performed as needed for susceptibility testing. chromID Strepto B agar is intended for use by laboratory health practitioners in a clinical laboratory. |
| Specimen Type | 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs | 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Granada Medium (K173903) | chromID Strepto B Agar (K163042) |
| Interpretation | Manual/visual, subculture colonies for susceptibility | Manual/visual, subculture colonies for susceptibility |
| Culture Media Type | Selective and differential media | Selective and differential media |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Granada Medium (K173903) | chromID Strepto B Agar (K163042) |
| Interpretation | Orange colonies representative of β-hemolytic GBS. Subculture white colonies to rule-out weakly β-hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS. | Growth/color development (pale pink to red colonies) does not distinguish between hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS. |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Not Applicable
# L. Test Principle:
Granada Medium is a selective, differential medium for the detection of GBS. The ability to detect $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS is based on the presence of selective agents that suppress growth of organisms other than GBS, and the presence of components necessary for pigment production (color development) that allow the detection of $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS. Granada Medium also supports the growth of non-hemolytic GBS, which are identified by additional testing of white colonies growing on the culture medium. After vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women are enriched in LIM Broth, an aliquot of culture is inoculated directly onto Granada Medium and incubated anaerobically at $35^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 18-24 hours. Plates are examined after incubation for the development of light orange to dark orange colored colonies. Plates with no growth, or where testing of white colonies ruled-out the presence of GBS, are considered negative.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility was demonstrated at three sites using an 11-member panel, which included 5 hemolytic GBS strains, 1 non-hemolytic GBS strain, and 5 non-GBS strains (as the negative controls). At each site, panel members were tested in duplicate on Granada Medium each day for five days—GBS strains (near $10^{3}$ CFU/ml) and non-targets strains ( $10^{7}$ CFU/ml) resulting in 660 total test results.
{4}
Plates were observed for growth and color development after 24 hours at 35°C. The study was conducted with at least one operator and two readers per site who were blinded to study results. All GBS strains produced the expected results with Granada Medium at 24 hours. Isolates were also plated onto Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood to ensure viability and purity of cultures.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Quality Control (QC) Testing
QC testing was performed to examine growth and color development with Granada Medium. Three QC organisms were tested at each study site with Granada Medium for each day of testing. QC testing results provided expected reactions across each testing site (Table 1). The submitted QC data are acceptable.
Table 1. QC Data Summary
| QC Strain | Time of Incubation | Expected Results after 18-24 hrs at 35°C | QC Results (all sites) Observed/Expected |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386 | 18-24 hrs | Growth, orange colonies | 100/100 |
| Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615 | 18-24 hrs | Growth, white to off-white colonies | 100/100 |
| Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 | 18-24 hrs | Partial to complete inhibition; no color change | 100/100 |
d. Detection limit:
Recovery Study
A Recovery Study was performed with two GBS strains (ATCC 12386 and ATCC 12403). After preparing a dilution series per strain in LIM broth, Granada Medium plates were inoculated and incubated anaerobically between 18-24 hours at 35°C before evaluating color development. The lowest dilution at which the strain grew with the expected color reaction on Granada Medium was determined to be the LoD. The LoD concentration for the two GBS strains was confirmed by testing Granada Medium with five replicate dilutions with both strains. The LoD was reported as 10² CFU/ml.
Recovery on Granada Medium Upon Subculture from LIM Broth Enrichment
{5}
To evaluate the performance of Granada Medium after an overnight enrichment in LIM Broth, LIM Broth was spiked with two $\beta$ -hemolytic ATCC strains of Group B Streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386 and Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12403) prepared in GBS-negative vaginal/rectal specimen matrix at 10-fold decreasing concentrations. After overnight enrichment, the LIM Broth culture was subcultured to Granada Medium and evaluated for color reaction. The lowest GBS concentration (previously spiked in LIM Broth and incubated overnight) yielding expected results on Granada Medium was then confirmed with five replicate dilutions of the lowest concentration. Following overnight enrichment in LIM Broth, Granada Medium was able to recover both GBS strains originally spiked at approximately 4.5 CFU (1 - 9 CFU). Blood agar plates were used to determine the concentrations of organisms present in each dilution.
# Analytical Reactivity
A study was conducted to demonstrate the sensitivity of Granada Medium in detecting various GBS strains at a concentration of $10^{2}$ CFU/ml. A $100\mu \mathrm{l}$ aliquot of bacterial suspension prepared in saline was plated onto Granada Medium. The study included 54 ATCC reference and clinical GBS strains representing seven of the nine different serotypes; forty-eight strains were hemolytic and six were non-hemolytic. Plates were read at 24 hours of incubation for colony counts and orange color development (indicative of $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS). The inclusivity panel and the observed colony color on Granada Medium are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. GBS Panel for Inclusivity Testing
| Strain | Source | Hemolysis | Serotype1 | Observed Colony Color on Granada Medium |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BAA-611 | ATCC | β | V | Orange |
| 12403 | ATCC | β | III | Orange |
| 12386 | ATCC | β | II | Orange |
| 8017 | NCTC | β | III | Orange |
| 1 | Clinical | β | V | Orange |
| 2 | Clinical | β | II | Orange |
| KPWP | Clinical | β | III | Light Orange |
| P003-001 | Clinical | β | Ia | Light Orange |
| 7 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| 10 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| 11 | Clinical | β | V | Orange |
| 13 | Clinical | β | VI | Orange |
| 3 | Clinical | β | II | Orange |
| 4 | Clinical | β | VI | Orange |
| QOVHI | Clinical | β | Ia | Light Orange |
| 27 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| 28 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
{6}
| 14 | Clinical | β | IV | Orange |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| 18 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| 19 | Clinical | β | 1b | Light Orange |
| 24 | Clinical | β | II | Orange |
| 26 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| 29 | Clinical | β | II | Orange |
| 30 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS2 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| MS3 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS4 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS5 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS6 | Clinical | β | V | Orange |
| MS7 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS8 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS9 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS10 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS11 | Clinical | β | NT1 | Orange |
| MS12 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| French | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS13 | Clinical | β | NT | Orange |
| MS14 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS15 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS17 | Clinical | β | 1a | Orange |
| MS18 | ATCC | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS19 | ATCC | β | NT | Light Orange |
| MS26 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| MS27 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| MS28 | Clinical | β | III | Orange |
| MS29 | Clinical | β | II | Orange |
| MS30 | Clinical | β | 1b | Orange |
| 13813 | ATCC | Non-hemolytic | II | White |
| 701348 | NCIMB | Non-hemolytic | II | White |
| MS20 | Clinical | Non-hemolytic | III | White |
| MS21 | Clinical | Non-hemolytic | III | White |
| MS22 | Clinical | Non-hemolytic | III | White |
| MS23 | Clinical | Non-hemolytic | NT | White |
$^{1}\mathrm{NT} =$ Non-Typable against the nine known serotypes.
On Granada Medium, all 48 $\beta$ -hemolytic strains produced the expected orange color, and all six non-hemolytic GBS strains showed a negative color reaction. Results also
{7}
demonstrated that Granada Medium was able to grow all non-hemolytic GBS strains tested at the LoD $(10^{2}\mathrm{CFU / ml})$
# Incubation Study
An Incubation Study was conducted to determine the effect of various incubation times on the performance of Granada Medium when tested with ten GBS strains (hemolytic and non-hemolytic) at $10^{2}\mathrm{CFU / ml}$ . A $100\mu \mathrm{l}$ aliquot of bacterial suspension prepared in saline was plated onto Granada Medium. The recovery of organisms and development of characteristic color on Granada plates were evaluated every 2 hours from 18-48 hours. At the earliest time point (18 hours), all $\beta$ -hemolytic organisms produced an orange color reaction. The one non-hemolytic strain tested showed white colonies at each incubation time from 18-48 hours. The earliest incubation time for positive detection of GBS by color development was set at 18 hours. The incubation range for Granada medium was reported as 18-24 hours.
# e. Analytical specificity:
# Cross-Reactivity Study
In order to evaluate the performance of Granada Medium with microorganisms potentially encountered in vaginal/rectal swabs or related to GBS, a Cross-Reactivity Study was completed with 69 non-target organisms (gram negative bacteria, gram positive bacteria, and yeast). Using a $10\mu \mathrm{l}$ loop, non-target organisms were streaked onto Granada Medium from a $10^{8}$ CFU/ml suspension of cells. Results showed that all 69 organisms from the cross-reactivity panel produced a negative result with Granada Medium (no growth or non-orange colonies). A total of 35 organisms $(50.7\%)$ were recovered on Granada Medium after 24 hours incubation. The cross-reactivity panel is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. List of non-target organisms tested in Analytical Specificity Study
| Organism | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Enterococcus faecium | Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
| Aeromonas hydrophila | Enterococcus flavescens | Pseudomonas fluorescens |
| Bacillus cereus | Enterococcus saccharolyticus | Salmonella enterica (typhii) |
| Bacillus subtilis | Escherichia coli | Salmonella enterica arizonae |
| Bacteroides fragilis | Gardnerella vaginalis | Serratia marcescens |
| Bifidobacterium breve | Geotrichum candidum | Shigella boydii |
| Campylobacter jejuni | Klebsiella oxytoca | Shigella flexneri |
| Candida albicans | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Shigella sonnei |
| Candida glabrata | Lactobacillus acidophilus | Staphylococcus aureus |
| Candida parapsilosis | Lactobacillus gasseri | Staphylococcus epidermidis |
| Candida tropicalis | Lactobacillus leichmannii | Staphylococcus saprophyticus |
| Citrobacter freundii | Lactococcus lactis | Stenotroph. maltophilia |
| Clostridium difficile | Legionella pneumophila | Streptococcus anginosus |
| Clostridium novyi | Listeria monocytogenes | Streptococcus bovis |
{8}
9
| Organism | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Clostridium perfringens | Moraxella cartarrhalis | Streptococcus dysgalactiae |
| Clostridium sporogenes | Morganella morganii | Streptococcus mitis |
| Enterobacter aerogenes | Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Streptococcus mutans |
| Enterobacter cloacae | Pediococcus acidilacti | Streptococcus pneumoniae |
| Enterococcus casseliflavus | Pediococcus damnosus | Streptococcus pyogenes |
| Enterococcus cecorum | Peptostreptococcus anaerobius | Streptococcus salivarius |
| Enterococcus dispar | Plesiomonas shigelloides | Streptococcus uberis |
| Enterococcus durans | Proteus mirabilis | Vibrio parahaemolyticus |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Providencia alcalifaciens | Yersinia enterocolitica |
## Cross-Reactivity from LIM Broth Enrichment
In a separate study, eighty-four organisms that are phylogenetically-related to Group B Streptococci or potentially encountered in a vaginal-rectal swab were tested on Granada Medium following overnight enrichment in LIM Broth. $1.5 \times 10^{6}$ CFU of each organism was inoculated into a LIM Broth tube. After 24 hours incubation, each LIM Broth culture tube was subcultured to a Granada Medium plate using a $10 \mu \mathrm{l}$ loop and evaluated for growth and color reaction after 24 hours of anaerobic incubation. All organisms tested were considered to produce no cross reaction. Organisms tested either produced a negative color reaction (39/84, $46.4\%$) or were not recovered (45/84, $53.6\%$) on Granada Medium after LIM Broth enrichment.
## Interference Study
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of potentially interfering substances commonly found in vaginal/rectal swab specimens on the detection of six hemolytic GBS strains. Twenty-one substances (Table 4) were tested at physiologically or biologically relevant concentrations and mixed with bacterial suspensions in GBS-negative specimen matrix. A $30~\mu \mathrm{l}$ aliquot of GBS suspension (9-90 CFU) was inoculated into LIM Broth and incubated at $35^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. After overnight incubation, a $10~\mu \mathrm{l}$ aliquot of LIM Broth culture was inoculated onto Granada Medium. Growth and development of color were evaluated after 18 hours and 24 hours incubation on Granada Medium. No interference on Granada Medium was observed for any substance (at the highest clinically relevant concentration) when GBS was prepared in negative specimen matrix and enriched in LIM Broth in the presence of potentially interfering substances.
Table 4. List of Potential Interfering Substances
| Category | Substance/Active Ingredient or Supplier | Concentration in Sample Matrix |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Exogenous Substances | | |
| Anti-diarrheal Medication | Pepto-Bismol (Bismuth subsalicylate solution) | 1% v/v |
| | Imodium A-D (Loperamide HCl) | 2% w/v |
| Body Oil | Neutrogena Body Oil | 2% v/v |
| Body Powder | Gold Bond Body Powder | 1% w/v |
{9}
| Contraceptive Gel | Options Gynol II (Nonoxynol-9) | 0.59% w/v |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Enema Solution | Physiological saline | 0.25% v/v |
| Lubricating Gel | K-Y Jelly | 0.57% w/v |
| Oral Laxative | Milk of Magnesia | 1.78% v/v |
| | Dulcolax (Sodium picosulfate solution) | 1% w/v |
| Polysorbate 80 | Tween 80 | 10% v/v |
| Rectal Laxative | Fleet Glycerin Suppositories | 10% v/v |
| Topical Hemorrhoid Ointment | Preparation-H | 0.26% w/v |
| Vaginal Anti-Itch Medication | Vagisil Cream | 0.41% w/v |
| Vaginal Anti-Fungal Medication | Monistat (Miconazole nitrate) | 0.29% w/v |
| | Lotrimin (Clotrimazole) | 0.29% w/v |
| Endogenous Substances | | |
| Human Amniotic Fluid | LEE Biosolutions | 2% v/v |
| Human Feces | Central Coast Pathology | 2% v/v |
| Human Meconium | LEE Biosolutions | 2% v/v |
| Human Urine | Central Coast Pathology | 2% v/v |
| Human Whole Blood | In-house | 2% v/v |
| Mucin | Sigma, M2378 | 0.05% w/v |
## Microbial Interference Study
A Microbial Interference Study was conducted to demonstrate that high levels of non-target organism would not suppress color development and recovery of GBS (Streptococcus agalactiae, ATCC 12386 and Streptococcus agalactiae, ATCC 12403). Organisms that were recovered from Granada Medium in the Cross-Reactivity Studies were tested in the Microbial Interference Study. Non-target organisms at a concentration of $3 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/ml were mixed 1:1 with $1.5 \times 10^{4}$ CFU/ml of target organism and streaked for isolation onto Granada Medium with a $10~\mu \mathrm{l}$ loop. If the target organism was not recovered, the concentration of the non-target organism was lowered 10-fold until the target organism was recovered. A total of 51 non-target organism strains were included in the study.
At 24 hours, both GBS strains gave expected results (orange colonies of the appropriate size) in the presence of 42 non-target organisms in the Microbial Interference Study. However, GBS in the presence of the following 10 non-target organisms produced unexpected results: Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 51299), Enterococcus avium (ATCC 14025), Enterococcus gallinarium (ATCC 49573), Enterococcus saccharolyticus (ATCC 43076), Lactococcus lactis (ATCC 19435), Morganella morganii (ATCC 25830), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 43071), Serratia marcescens (ATCC 13880), and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (ATCC 17802). In the presence of $1.5 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/ml of Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), both strains of GBS were not recovered on Granada Medium; however, when Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) was reduced to $1.5 \times 10^{7}$ CFU/ml, GBS strain ATCC 12403 was recovered (a further reduction to $1.5 \times 10^{6}$ CFU/ml allowed for the recovery of GBS strain ATCC 12386). For the remaining (9) non-target strains producing unexpected results in the
{10}
Microbial Interference Study, it was observed that the colony size of one or both GBS was affected when the non-target organism was tested at $1.5 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/ml. When these non-target organisms were inoculated onto Granada Medium at $1.5 \times 10^{7}$ CFU/ml in the presence of GBS, it was reported that GBS colony size was larger and more clearly visible in the mixed culture. Also, in the presence of $1.5 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/ml *Vibrio parahaemolyticus*, GBS colonies appeared as light orange colonies. The expected color (dark orange) was observed when the *Vibrio parahaemolyticus* concentration was reduced to $1.5 \times 10^{7}$ CFU/ml. Inhibition of growth and changes in colony size/color with these specific non-target organisms are noted as Limitations in the product labeling.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable—Compared to Standard Reference Method
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Granada Medium was evaluated at four clinical sites. A total of 884 vaginal/rectal swabs from pregnant women were prospectively collected and inoculated per protocol into LIM broth, followed by subculture onto Granada Medium. Due to protocol deviations (enrollment criteria not met), 108 specimens were excluded from the study, leaving 776 swab specimens for evaluating GBS detection by Granada Medium. An additional 5 samples were excluded due to improper storage (time of set-up) as specified by the clinical study protocol. In total, 771 protocol compliant specimens were included in the final performance calculations.
To evaluate performance of Granada Medium, LIM Broth enriched cultures (vaginal/rectal swabs inoculated and incubated in LIM Broth overnight) were subcultured onto Granada Medium plates and streaked for isolation. Granada plates were incubated under anaerobic atmosphere for 18-24 hours at $35 - 37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. For the Reference Culture Method, vaginal/rectal specimens were tested by inoculating LIM Broth with $30~\mu \mathrm{l}$ of specimen from the transport swab system and incubating for 24 hours at $35 - 37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. LIM Broth cultures were subcultured to Tryptic Soy Agar with $5\%$ Sheep Blood, and all colonies with characteristic appearance suggestive of GBS
11
{11}
were screened to confirm the presence of GBS (both hemolytic and non-hemolytic strains) using established laboratory methods: gram stain, catalase, latex agglutination.
Results of Granada Medium from 18-24 hours incubation were compared to the Reference Culture Method. Growth and color development on Granada Medium were observed after 18-24 hours. Growth of orange colonies was representative of a positive result for the presence of GBS. White colonies growing on the media were subject to biochemical testing to identify non-hemolytic GBS. Tables 5-7 below show the clinical performance data for Granada Medium vs the Reference Culture Method (all sites). Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of Granada Medium was calculated based on color development and the recovery of GBS from the medium and compared to the recovery of $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS and total GBS strains by the Reference Culture Method.
All isolates with discrepant results were frozen in CryoSavers with Brucella Broth and returned to Hardy Diagnostics for testing. The identity of each isolate was confirmed (β-hemolytic GBS, non-hemolytic GBS, or non-GBS isolate). Once the identity was confirmed, positive organisms (β-hemolytic GBS or non-hemolytic GBS) were tested in donated GBS negative-vaginal/rectal matrix for their recovery from the LIM Broth Culture Reference Method and color development on Granada Medium.
Table 5. Comparison between Granada Medium+ Biochemical Testing (Recovery of all GBS) vs Reference Culture Method (all GBS)
| Granada Medium (18-24 hrs) | Reference Culture Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 162 | 10 | 172 |
| Negative | 1 | 598 | 599 |
| Total | 163 | 608 | 771 |
| Sensitivity: 99.4% (161/163), 95% CI (96.6%-99.9%)Specificity: 98.4% (598/608), 95% CI (97.0%-99.1%) | | | |
Table 6. Comparison between Granada Medium (orange color) vs Reference Culture Method (all GBS)
| Granada Medium (18-24 hrs) | Reference Culture Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 154 | 121 | 166 |
| Negative | 92 | 596 | 605 |
| Total | 163 | 608 | 771 |
| Sensitivity: 94.5% (154/163), 95% CI (89.8%-97.1%)Specificity: 98.0% (596/608), 95% CI (96.6%-98.9%) | | | |
There were 12 False Positives observed after 18 to 24 hours of incubation. All isolates were retested and confirmed by the discrepant analysis protocol above. Ten isolates recovered from Granada Medium were confirmed to be $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS. Two isolates were recorded as pale orange on Granada Medium by the clinical site, but were not identified as GBS. During discrepant analysis, both isolates were confirmed to be Streptococcus salivarius subsp. salivarius. Upon
{12}
additional analysis, one Streptococcus salivarius subs. salivarius isolate exhibited yellow colonies on Granada Medium and the other isolate grew as pale orange colonies on Granada Medium.
2There were 9 False Negatives observed after 18 to 24 hours of incubation. All isolates were retested and confirmed by the discrepant analysis protocol above. Of these nine GBS isolates recovered by the Reference Method, three were $\beta$ -hemolytic and six were non-hemolytic. For the $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS isolates identified by the Reference Method and evaluated by discordant analysis, all three isolates grew as orange colonies on Granada Medium, where originally the colony color was observed as white at the clinical site. Samples where the six non-hemolytic Group B Streptococci were identified by the Reference Method showed white colonies on Granada Medium as expected (no discordant analysis was performed for these isolates).
Table 7. Comparison between Granada Medium (orange color) vs Reference Culture Method (only $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS) $^1$
| Granada Medium (18-24 hrs) | Reference Culture Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 153 | 13 | 166 |
| Negative | 3 | 602 | 605 |
| Total | 156 | 615 | 771 |
| Sensitivity: 98.1% (153/156), 95% CI (94.5-99.3%)Specificity: 97.9% (602/615), 95% CI (96.4-98.8%) | | | |
Considering that non-hemolytic GBS cannot be detected by the medium's color change and require additional identification, there were six specimens that were found to contain non-hemolytic GBS strains upon subculture and identification by the Reference Method. If these specimens are included as negatives, then the overall sensitivity and specificity values observed when comparing the recovery of $\beta$ -hemolytic GBS by the LIM Reference Method to the Granada Medium color development can also be evaluated.
b. Clinical specificity:
See above
c Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The overall prevalence of GBS (both hemolytic and non-hemolytic strains) by the Reference Culture Method was $21.1\%$ (163/771).
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
{13}
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
14
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.