K122462 · United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. · FDI · Sep 11, 2012 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K122462
Device Name
ROTH NET RETRIEVER
Applicant
United States Endoscopy Group, Inc.
Product Code
FDI · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Sep 11, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 876.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Roth Net® retriever product line is intended to be used to retrieve excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies and calculi during flexible and rigid endoscopy procedures.
Device Story
Roth Net retriever is an endoscopic accessory used by physicians during flexible or rigid endoscopy. Device consists of a proximal handle with a finger ring, a drive wire, a catheter sheath, and a distal fabric mesh basket (snare/net). Physician operates handle to deploy or retract the mesh basket through the endoscope's accessory channel. Once deployed, the net captures excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies, or calculi. The device facilitates secure retrieval of these items from the patient. Modifications include changes to snare shape (round to octagonal), wire type (braided to flat), mesh configuration, catheter material (TFE to PE), and dimensions to improve clinical ease of use, visibility, and manufacturing efficiency. Verification testing confirms the device maintains grasping ability, structural integrity, and compatibility with various endoscopes.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Verification activities included deployment/retraction force testing (≤ 3.25 lbs), simulated use testing for grasping ability, kink resistance testing, tensile strength testing (≥ 12 lbs), and biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-5, 10, and 11). All tests passed, confirming performance equivalent to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Endoscopic accessory; consists of a proximal handle, drive wire, catheter sheath, and fabric mesh basket. Materials include polyethylene (catheter) and flat/braided wire (snare). Dimensions vary to accommodate different endoscope channels. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Sterile and non-sterile versions available. Operation: Mechanical, manual actuation via handle.
Indications for Use
Indicated for retrieval of excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies, and calculi during flexible and rigid endoscopy procedures in patients requiring such interventions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endoscopic electrosurgical unit and accessories is a device used to perform electrosurgical procedures through an endoscope. This generic type of device includes the electrosurgical generator, patient plate, electric biopsy forceps, electrode, flexible snare, electrosurgical alarm system, electrosurgical power supply unit, electrical clamp, self-opening rigid snare, flexible suction coagulator electrode, patient return wristlet, contact jelly, adaptor to the cord for transurethral surgical instruments, the electric cord for transurethral surgical instruments, and the transurethral desiccator.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K122462
510(k) Premarket Notification: Special
Roth Net® retriever
| Special 510(k) Information | | SEP 11 2012 |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Device Name | The device trade name and common/classification name is: | |
| | Device Trade Name: Roth Net® retriever product line<br>Common/Classification Name: Endoscope and accessories<br>Classification Panel: Gastroenterology/Urology | |
| Address and<br>Registration # | Manufacturer: United States Endoscopy Group, Inc.<br>5976 Heisley Road<br>Mentor, Ohio 44060<br>Registration #: 1528319 | |
| Device Class | Endoscope accessories are classified with Endoscopes as Class II<br>devices under 21 CFR § 876.1500 (product code GCJ). No<br>performance standards have been established under Section 514 of<br>the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for endoscope<br>accessories. | |
| Predicate<br>Device Information | The predicate device is the US Endoscopy Polyp Snare Net (AKA,<br>the Roth Net® retriever), cleared under 510(k) K926104 on April 5,<br>1993. | |
| Labeling and<br>Intended Use | Since introduction of the Polyp Snare Net in 1993, the device<br>Instructions for Use (which now carries the Roth Net® brand name)<br>have been revised and Warning and Precaution statements were<br>added for clarity to ensure safe and effective use. Instructions for<br>Use can be found beginning on page 29.<br><br>Intended Use<br>The Roth Net® retriever product line is intended to be used to<br>retrieve excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies and calculi<br>during flexible and rigid endoscopy procedures. This is the same<br>intended use as specified in the device labeling and the cleared<br>510(k) under K926104, April 5, 1993. This intended use has not<br>changed, or in any way been affected, as a result of the warning<br>and precaution modifications. None of the modifications affected<br>the device's indications. | |
| | The Indications for Use Statement can be found on page 16. | |
: United States Endoscopy Group, Inc.
・ ·
{1}------------------------------------------------
## ted States Endoscopy Group, Inc.
### Device Description and Comparison of Legally Marketed Devices
### General Description
The Roth Net retriever product line is intended to be used to retrieve excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies and calculi during flexible and rigid endoscopy procedures. The device is marketed in both sterile and non-sterile versions.
The fundamental design and technology of the Roth Net® retriever are the same as the predicate Polyp Snare Net originally submitted under K926104 with the exception of the changes listed below. The device consists of a proximal handle with a finger ring that controls the deployment of the fabric mesh basket (a wire snare with a fabric net attached). The snare/net is connected to a drive wire, which is then connected to the handle. The drive wire is encompassed within a sheath that makes up the catheter.
Below is a representative drawing of the Roth Net® retriever.
Image /page/1/Figure/8 description: The image shows a medical device with multiple labeled parts. Part 1 is labeled as a snare/net that is deployed. Part 2 is labeled as a catheter, while parts 3 and 4 are other components of the device.
-
- 3. Finger ring
- 4. Handle
### Description of Modified Device
Subsequent to FDA's determination that the Polyp Snare Net was substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices under 510(k) K926104 on April 5, 1993, US Endoscopy implemented modifications to the device that are summarized below in Table 1. Each modification was reviewed and documented by US Endoscopy in accordance with Company procedures and processes regarding post-market product modifications and the guidance document, "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (K97-1).
The modified Roth Net retriever has the same intended use and same fundamental technological characteristics as the predicate Polyp Snare Net device. Each
{2}------------------------------------------------
・・・・・ United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. 510(k) Premarket Notification: Special Roth Net® retriever
modification was determined not to have a significant effect on the safety or effectiveness of the device, either individually and cumulatively. Determination that the modifications do not affect the performance characteristics of the device was accomplished through verification and validation testing, incorporating all device modifications made to date. This testing demonstrated that the modified device performs the same as the device cleared under K926104.
### Summary of Design Control Activities
The risk management activities used to assess the impact of the modifications were performed in accordance with US Endoscopy standard operating procedures and ISO 14971:2009. The test methods used are the same as those used to test the predicate device reviewed under K926104. A declaration of conformity to design controls is included on page 26. The design verification tests that were performed as a result of this risk analysis are listed in Table 1 below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
1 - - - - - - - - - - United States Endoscopy Group, I
510(k) Premarket Notification: Special
Roth Net® retriever
# ABLE 1 - Design Control Activities Summar
. .
| Device<br>Modification | Reason for<br>Modification<br>Changes for Clinical Ease of Use | Risk/ Hazard | Mitigation | Verification Activity | Acceptance Criteria | Verification<br>Results | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Change in snare<br>shape from<br>round to<br>octagonal and<br>change in snare<br>loop wire shape<br>(braided cable to<br>flat wire) | To better allow<br>the loop to<br>maintain its<br>shape; and allow<br>for greater<br>capacity. | Inability to grasp<br>objects; net will<br>not open fully | Verification<br>testing of the<br>deployment<br>and retraction<br>forces; test<br>device's ability<br>to grasp objects | Deployment and retraction<br>workability testing<br><br>Simulated use testing for grasping<br>ability | Force required to deploy and retract shall be ≤ 3.25<br>lbs.<br><br>Net can be fully retracted without any parts left<br>outside of the sheath.<br><br>Net can be fully deployed without exposing the<br>proximal end of the connector. | PASS | |
| Change in the<br>mesh size of the<br>net | To improve the<br>visibility when<br>capturing<br>multiple polyp<br>fragments. | Inability to grasp<br>objects; inability<br>to visualize net<br>once objects<br>grasped. | Verification of<br>device's ability<br>to grasp objects<br>and maintain<br>visibility. | Grasp testing using simulated<br>polyps and foreign bodies<br><br>Simulated use testing to verify<br>that there is no obstruction of<br>endoscopic visibility | Must maintain ability to grasp and retrieve simulated<br>polyps and foreign bodies<br><br>Net is capable of securing material that measures<br>2cm x 1.5cm x 2.5cm.<br><br>Visualization of pouch and its contents are not<br>obstructed | PASS | |
| Dimensional Changes<br>Increased length<br>and diameter of<br>device<br>sheath/catheter | Allow use of<br>subject-device<br>with various<br>endoscopes¹ | Inadequate fit to<br>the enteroscope<br>(length); catheter<br>collapse<br>(columnar<br>strength); non-<br>deployment of the<br>device.<br>Inability to push<br>device through<br>accessory channel<br>of the endoscope | Dimensional<br>and functional<br>testing; kink<br>resistance<br>testing.<br><br>Testing of<br>insertion and<br>retraction<br>forces;<br>resistance to<br>kinking | Dimensional Verification Testing<br><br>Kink testing.<br><br>Simulate use testing by inserting<br>the devices through an<br>enteroscope and grasping a<br>variety of items. | Length shall be 138.00 ± 2.5 inches (350.5 ± 6.35<br>cm)<br><br>Visible plastic deformation due to compression must<br>not occur in an insertion column length of 1.5 in (3.8<br>cm) through the accessory channel of the endoscope.<br><br>Device shall capture simulated food bolus, foreign<br>bodies or polyps while maintaining structural<br>integrity.<br><br>Insertion force of less than or equal to 2.5 lbs | PASS | |
| Device<br>Modification | Reason for<br>Modification | Risk/Hazard | Mitigation | Verification Activity | Acceptance Criteria | Verification<br>Results | |
| Dimensional Changes | Net size change<br>to largest size:<br>3 cm (l) x 4 cm (w) | To allow device<br>to be used with<br>endoscopes with<br>larger channels | Net fails to deploy<br>completely | Verification<br>testing of the<br>ability of net to<br>deploy | Simulated use testing to verify net<br>deployment and retraction force.<br><br>Verification of deployed net length<br>and width | Max deployment/retraction force shall be ≤<br>3.25lbs<br><br>The length of the fully deployed net shall be 2.59<br>- 3.29 inches (6.6 – 8.4 cm.)<br><br>The width of the fully deployed net shall be 1.41 –<br>2.10 inches (3.6 – 5.3 cm.) | PASS |
| | Changes for Increased Manufacturing Efficiency | | | | | | |
| | A chamfer melt<br>was added on<br>the inside of the<br>catheter | To maintain the<br>smooth transition<br>of the snare/net<br>into the catheter<br>when the<br>snare/net is<br>retracted | Difficulty in<br>deployment and/or<br>retraction | Verification<br>testing of the<br>force required<br>to deploy and<br>retract the net | Deployment and retraction force<br>testing | Max deployment force shall be ≤ 3.25lbs<br><br>Max retraction force shall be ≤ 3.25lbs | PASS |
| | Change in the<br>mesh<br>configuration to<br>add bidirectional<br>mesh | Increased<br>manufacturability | Inability to grasp<br>objects. | Verification<br>testing of the<br>device's ability<br>to continue to<br>grasp<br>simulated<br>polyps | Functional testing the net | Grasp the objects and held securely in the net.<br><br>Beads are captured and controlled. | PASS |
| | Change in the<br>length of the<br>wire loop ends<br>of the snare loop<br>assembly and a<br>change in the<br>flat wire bond to<br>the drive-wire<br>form | To facilitate the<br>change from a<br>crimp to a<br>resistance<br>welding<br>connection | Weld breaks | Tensile<br>strength testing | Test connection between drive cable<br>to wire form of the snare loop (30<br>devices) | Tensile pull must be ≥ 12 lbs | PASS |
| | | | | | | | |
| United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. Roth Net® retriever | | | | | | | |
| Device<br>Modification | Reason for<br>Modification | Risk/Hazard | Mitigation | Verification Activity | Acceptance Criteria | Verification Results | |
| <b>Changes for Increased Manufacturing Efficiency</b> | | | | | | | |
| Addition of a<br>mesh net tail on<br>the distal and<br>proximal sides<br>of the net | Eliminate the<br>need for thread<br>as an anchor to<br>prevent net<br>cinching | Net cinches up. | Verification<br>testing | Simulated use testing to verify<br>cinching does not occur | Nets shall not cinch.<br><br>Proximal and distal anchors shall remain intact. | PASS | |
| <b>Material Change</b> | | | | | | | |
| The catheter<br>material was<br>modified from<br>tetrafluoro-<br>ethylene (TFE)<br>to polyethylene<br>(PE) to reduce<br>cost without<br>reducing<br>performance | Cost Reduction | Loss of<br>biocompatibility | Verification<br>testing for<br>acute systemic<br>toxicity,<br>cytotoxicity<br>and irritation<br>and delayed<br>hypersensi-<br>tivity | Test in accordance with ISO 10993-<br>5, 10 and -11 | Material shall show no reactivity in test subjects | PASS | |
| <b>Appearance Change</b> | | | | | | | |
| Change handle<br>color from white<br>to silver | Add new color to<br>distinguish<br>between standard<br>and platinum<br>models | | | | | No risks were identified in relation to this modification. No performance data were required because a change in color of the handle does not affect<br>performance of the subject device. | |
Since intoduction of the Poly Snare Net in 1993, the variety of entosented considerably. Additional cathers lengths and diameters were
{4}------------------------------------------------
United States Endoscopy Group, Inc
510(k) Premarket Notification: Special
Roth Net® retriever
{5}------------------------------------------------
( _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
510(k) Premarket Notification: Special
Roth Net® retriever
. "
.
.
: :
.
.
24
:
·
{6}------------------------------------------------
United States Endoscopy Group, Inc.
510(k) Premarket Notification: Special Roth Net® retriever
### Substantial Equivalence Discussion
All currently marketed Roth Net® retriever devices share the same intended use and same fundamental technological characteristics as the US Endoscopy predicate Polyp Snare Net device cleared by the Agency under K926104. Verification and validation testing performed for each modification to the Roth Net® device demonstrates that these changes, both individually and cumulatively, do not have a significant effect on the safety or effectiveness of the device, do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than the predicate device and verify the Roth Net® device performs the same as the predicate device. Therefore, we conclude that the Roth Net® device is substantially equivalent to the predicate Polyp Snare Net device.
### 510(k) Summary /Statement
A 510(k) statement is included on page 17.
Truthful and Accurate Statement
A certification of the truthfulness and accuracy of this submission is provided on page 18.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with its wings spread, and the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circle around the eagle. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Mr. Craig Moore General Counsel United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. 5976 Heisley Road MENTOR OH 44060
SEP 11 2012
Re: K122462
Trade/Device Name: Roth Net® retriever product line Regulation Number: 21 CFR& 876.4300 Regulation Name: Endoscopic electrosurgical unit and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FDI, GCJ Dated: August 10, 2012 Received: August 13, 2012
Dear Mr. Moore:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{8}------------------------------------------------
Page 2-
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Sincerely yours,
Benjamin K-tixha
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIAL United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. 510(k) Premarket Notification: Special Roth Net" retriever
### INDICATIONS FOR USE
# 510(k) Number (if known): K122462
Device Name: Roth Net® retriever product line
Indications for Use:
The Roth Net® retriever product line is intended to be used to retrieve excised polyps, tissue samples, foreign bodies and calculi during flexible and rigid endoscopy procedures.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
# · Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use 1 (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
Herbert Leun
tive, Gastro-Renal, and
Page 1 of 1
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.