K043193 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · FAD · Dec 7, 2004 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K043193
Device Name
BARD INLAYOPTIMA URETERAL STENT WITH SUTURE
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
FAD · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Dec 7, 2004
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 876.4620
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Bard® InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent is indicated to relieve obstruction in a variety of benign, malignant and post-traumatic conditions in the ureter. These conditions include stones and/or stone fragments or other ureteral obstructions such as those associated with ureteral stricture, malignancy of abdominal organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or ureteral trauma, or in association with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The stent may be placed using endoscopic surgical techniques or percutaneously using standard radiographic technique. It is recommended that the indwelling time not exceed 365 days. The stent is not intended as a permanent indwelling device.
Device Story
Bard® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stent is a coated, double-pigtail ureteral stent designed to relieve ureteral obstructions. It includes a monofilament suture loop to facilitate removal. The device is placed by physicians using endoscopic or percutaneous radiographic techniques. It functions as a passive drainage conduit to bypass obstructions. The stent is supplied with a push catheter with a radiopaque tip and a pigtail straightener. In vitro testing indicates reduced accumulation of urine calcium salts compared to controls. The device is intended for temporary use, not exceeding 365 days.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. In vitro testing demonstrated reduced accumulation of urine calcium salts compared to a control. No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Stent material: Polycarbonate-based polyurethane. Coating: Hydrophobic polymer. Suture: USP Medical Grade black nylon monofilament (3-0). Push catheter: High Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Radiopaque marker band included. Sizes: 4.7 Fr, 6 Fr, 7 Fr, 8 Fr. Pigtail geometry: 360° curvature + 45° overlap. Sterilization: Sterile. Standards: FDA draft 'Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Ureteral Stents' (1993) and draft ASTM F.04.70.01 (1997).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring relief of ureteral obstruction due to benign, malignant, or post-traumatic conditions, including stones, stone fragments, ureteral stricture, abdominal malignancy, retroperitoneal fibrosis, ureteral trauma, or in association with ESWL. Not for permanent use; indwelling time limit 365 days.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A ureteral stent is a tube-like implanted device that is inserted into the ureter to provide ureteral rigidity and allow the passage of urine. The device may have finger-like protrusions or hooked ends to keep the tube in place. It is used in the treatment of ureteral injuries and ureteral obstruction.
Predicate Devices
Bard® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stent with Suture (K022447)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEC - 7 2004
K043193
Page 1 of 3
## 510 (k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990.
- A. Submitter's Information:
| Submitter's Name: | C. R. Bard, Inc., Urological Division |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 8195 Industrial Blvd.<br>Covington, Georgia 30014 |
| Contact Person: | Frances E. Harrison, RAC |
| Contact Person's Phone: | (770) 784-6257 |
| Contact Person's Fax: | (770) 784-6419 |
| Date of Preparation: | November 24, 2004 |
- B Device Name:
| Trade Name: | Bard® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stent with Suture |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Common / Usual Name: | Bard Ureteral Stent |
| Classification Name: | Ureteral Stent |
- C. Predicate Device Name:
| Trade Name: | Bard ® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stent with Suture |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------|
| | #K022447 |
- D. Device Description: The Bard® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stent and Multi-Length Ureteral Stent is a coated, double pigtail ureteral stent with a monofilament suture loop attached to aid in stent removal. The stent is available in two forms: a single size or a customizable multi-length size. The following items are included with each stent:
- 1 Ureteral Stent with Suture
- 1 Push Catheter with Radiopaque Tip
- ー Pigtail Straightener
- Guidewire* (Optional) 1
- *Note: a 4.7 Fr stent is compatible with a .035" guidewire and a 6.7 and 8 Fr stents are compatible with a .038" guidewire.
In vitro testing conducted on the Bard® InLayOptima™ Ureteral Stents and Multi-Length Ureteral Stents indicate reduced accumulation of urine calcium salts as assayed by calcium when compared to a control. Correlation of in vitro data to clinical outcome has not been established.
Choong, SKS, Wood. S, Whitfield, HN. "A model to quantify encrustation on ureteric stents, urethral catheters, and polymers intended for urological use," BJU International (2000), 86, 414-421.
- E. Intended Use: The Bard® InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent is indicated to relieve obstruction in a variety of benign, malignant and post-traumatic conditions in the ureter. These conditions include stones and/or stone fragments or other ureteral obstructions such as those associated with ureteral stricture, malignancy of abdominal organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or ureteral trauma, or in association with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The stent may be placed using endoscopic surgical techniques or percutaneously using standard radiographic technique. It is recommended that the indwelling time not exceed 365 days. The stent is not intended as a permanent indwelling device.
{1}------------------------------------------------
K043193
Page 2 of 3
- F. Technological Characteristics Summary:
The table below provides a tabulated comparison summary of the technological characteristics of
the Bard* InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent with Suture versus the predicate device
| Product<br>Characteristics | Bard® Inlay Optima ™ Ureteral Stent<br>with Suture<br>(this 510(k)) | Bard® Inlay Optima™ Ureteral Stent<br>with Suture<br>(Predicate device - #K022447) | Difference |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Stent | | | |
| Indications or<br>Intended Use | The Bard® Inlay Optima ™ Ureteral Stent<br>is indicated to relieve obstruction in a<br>variety of benign, malignant and post-<br>traumatic conditions in the ureter. These<br>conditions include stones and/or stone<br>fragments or other ureteral obstructions<br>such as those associated with ureteral<br>stricture, malignancy of abdominal<br>organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or<br>ureteral trauma, or in association with<br>Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy<br>(ESWL). The stent may be placed using<br>endoscopic surgical techniques or<br>percutaneously using standard<br>radiographic technique. It is<br>recommended that the indwelling time<br>not exceed 365 days. The stent is not<br>intended as a permanent indwelling<br>device. | The Bard® Inlay Optima ™ Ureteral Stent<br>is indicated to relieve obstruction in a<br>variety of benign, malignant and post-<br>traumatic conditions in the ureter. These<br>conditions include stones and/or stone<br>fragments or other ureteral obstructions<br>such as those associated with ureteral<br>stricture, malignancy of abdominal<br>organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or<br>ureteral trauma, or in association with<br>Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy<br>(ESWL). The stent may be placed using<br>endoscopic surgical techniques or<br>percutaneously using standard<br>radiographic technique. It is<br>recommended that the indwelling time<br>not exceed 365 days. The stent is not<br>intended as a permanent indwelling<br>device. | None |
| Disposable | Yes | Yes | None |
| Sterile | Yes | Yes | None |
| Stent Base Material | Polycarbonate-based Polyurethane* | Polyether-based Polyurethane | Material<br>change |
| X-Ray Opaque | Yes | Yes | None |
| Coating | | | |
| Double Pigtail | Hydrophobic polymer | Hydrophobic polymer | None |
| Multilength | Hydrophobic polymer | Hydrophobic polymer | None |
| Models and Sizes | | | |
| Fr. Sizes Available | 4.7 Fr., 6 Fr., 7 Fr., and 8 Fr. | 4.7 Fr., 6 Fr., 7 Fr., and 8 Fr. | None |
| Double Pigtail<br>Lengths | 14. 20-30 cm | 14. 20-30 cm | None |
| Multilength Lengths | 23-32cm (one overall adjustable length) | 23-32cm (one overall adjustable length) | None |
| Pigtail Geometry | | | |
| Double Pigtail | 360° curvature + 45° overlap (both ends) | 360° curvature + 45° overlap (both ends) | None |
| Multilength | 2 ½ Turns | 2 ½ Turns | None |
| Suture Loop | Yes - USP Medical Grade black nylon<br>monofilament: 3-0 | Yes - USP Medical Grade black<br>monofilament; 3-0 | None |
| Guidewire Interface | 4.7 Fr. = 0.035" diameter<br>6. 7. 8 Fr. = 0.038" diameter | 4.7 Fr. = 0.035" diameter<br>6. 7. 8 Fr. = 0.038" diameter | None |
| Accessories | | | |
| Stent Clamp | No | No | Clamp<br>Removed |
| Push Catheter | | | |
| Color | Orange | Orange | None |
| Material | High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) | High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) | None |
| Guidewire Interface | 4.7 Fr. = 0.035" diameter<br>6. 7. 8 Fr. = 0.038" diameter | 4.7 Fr. = 0.035" diameter<br>6. 7. 8 Fr. = 0.038" diameter | None |
| Radiopacity | Radiopaque marker band near distal end | Radiopaque marker band near distal end | None |
## Comparison Summary of Technological Characteristics
. New feature(s) or change this 510(k)
{2}------------------------------------------------
X043193
Page 3 of 3
The Bard" InlayOpima" Ureteral Stent with Suture referenced in this submission is held to
the same design, manufacture, and performance specifications as those stents current manufactured by Bard. Performance and functional testing standards are based on the FDA draft "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Ureteral Stents" dated February 10, 1993 and the draft ASTM F.04.70.01, "Standard Test Method for Ureteral Stents" dated July 9, 1997.
{3}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol featuring three abstract human figures or forms, often interpreted as representing people or the provision of services.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
DEC - 7 2004
Frances E. Harrison, RAC Director, Regulatory Affairs C. R. Bard, Inc. 8195 Industrial Blvd. COVINGTON GA 30014
Re: K043193
Trade/Device Name: Bard® InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent with Suture Regulation Number: 21 CFR §876.4620 Regulation Name: Ureteral stent Regulatory Class: II Product Code: 78 FAD Dated: November 10, 2004 Received: November 18, 2004
Dear Ms. Harrison:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced we have reviewed your becalled by equivalent (for the indications for use stated in above and nave determined the als at redicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to the enclosure) to regary manusical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been May 20, 1770, the clademisine acto of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the do not require approval of a promance approvisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act device, subject to the general connois prove, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket If your device is classified (600 above).
Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your Apploval), It they of sabject to antiFederal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA acvice can be round in the cements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that Ficast be advised mar PDT o isoual your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any FDA liade a actemination adaministered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Federal statues and regulations administer to registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling ACL STEQuirements, metading but noing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) (21 CFR Part 801); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{4}------------------------------------------------
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) I mis lotter notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally promation notificate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please 11 you atter of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter:
| 21 CFR 876.xxxx | (Gastroenterology/Renal/Urology) | 240-276-0115 |
|-----------------|----------------------------------|--------------|
| 21 CFR 884.xxxx | (Obstetrics/Gynecology) | 240-276-0115 |
| 21 CFR 892.xxxx | (Radiology) | 240-276-0120 |
| Other | | 240-276-0100 |
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Nancy C. brogdon
Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): _K043193
Device Name: Bard® InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent
Indications for Use:
The Bard® InlayOptima™ Ureteral Stent is indicated to relieve obstruction in a variety of benign, malignant and post-traumatic conditions in the ureter. These conditions include stones and/or stone fragments or other ureteral obstructions such as those associated with ureteral stricture, malignancy of abdominal organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or ureteral trauma, or in association with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The stent may be placed using endoscopic surgical techniques or percutaneously using standard radiographic technique. It is recommended that the indwelling time not exceed 365 days. The stent is not intended as a permanent indwelling device.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
CONCURRENCE OF CDRH, OFFICE OF DEVICE EVALUATION (ODE)
Prescription Use 1 (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1/2/96)
Daniel A. Suggars
(Division Sign-Of Division of Reproductive, Abdominal. and Radiological Devic 510(k) Number
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.