EsophaCap Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device (changed from Cell-Mata)
Applicant
Capnostics, LLC
Product Code
EOX · Ear, Nose, Throat
Decision Date
May 4, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 874.4710
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The gathering and recovery of cells and cellular material from the mucosa in the esophagus for cytological and histological analyses.
Device Story
EsophaCap is a non-endoscopic, single-use device for esophageal cell sampling. It consists of an open-cell polyether polyurethane foam sphere attached to a radiopaque polyester tether, encapsulated in a dissolvable hypromellose (HPMC) capsule. The patient swallows the capsule; upon dissolution in the stomach, the foam sphere expands. A clinician then withdraws the sphere through the esophagus; the expanded foam acts as a 'bottle brush' to collect mucosal cells. The retrieved foam sphere containing the cellular sample is then sent for cytological and histological analysis. The device provides a minimally invasive alternative to traditional endoscopy for obtaining esophageal tissue samples, potentially benefiting patients by simplifying the collection process for diagnostic evaluation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included dissolution testing, tether/stylus tensile testing, tether/stylus length testing, and biocompatibility testing. No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: polyether polyurethane foam sphere, polyester tether, hypromellose (HPMC) capsule. Principle: mechanical cell collection via expanded foam sphere. Form factor: swallowable capsule (20-35mm sphere). Non-sterile. Single-use. No energy source. No software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the gathering and recovery of esophageal mucosal cells and cellular material for cytological and histological analysis in patients requiring esophageal sampling.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An esophagoscope (flexible or rigid) and accessories is a tubular endoscopic device with any of a group of accessory devices which attach to the esophagoscope and is intended to examine or treat esophageal malfunction symptoms, esophageal or mediastinal disease, or to remove foreign bodies from the esophagus. When inserted, the device extends from the area of the hypopharynx to the stomach. It is typically used with a fiberoptic light source and carrier to provide illumination. The device is made of materials such as stainless steel or flexible plastic. This generic type of device includes the flexible foreign body claw, flexible biopsy forceps, rigid biopsy curette, flexible biopsy forceps and flexible biopsy curette, but excludes the fiberoptic light source and carrier.
Predicate Devices
Cell-Mate™ Mass Cytology -Cellular Retrieval System (K934193)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left and features a stylized human figure. The FDA logo is on the right and includes the FDA acronym in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
May 4, 2021
CapNostics, LLC Martin von Dyck President & CEO 9724 Colts Neck Lane Concord, NC 28027
Re: K203450
Trade/Device Name: EsophaCap Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device (changed from Cell-Mata) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.4710 Regulation Name: Esophagoscope (flexible or rigid) and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EOX Dated: November 13, 2020 Received: November 23, 2020
Dear Martin von Dyck:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls' provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K203450
#### Device Name
EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device
Indications for Use (Describe)
The gathering and recovery of cells and cellular material from the mucosa in the esophagus for cytological and histological analyses.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(K) Summary
| General Information:<br>Date of Submission: | November 13, 2020 |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter / Owner of the 510(K): | CapNostics, LLC.<br>9724 Colts Neck Lane<br>Concord, NC 28027 USA |
| Contact Person: | Martin von Dyck<br>President & CEO<br>Phone: (610) 442-1363<br>E-mail: mvondyck@capnostics.com |
## Trade/Proprietary Name of Device:
| Trade Name: | EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Mass cytology cellular retrieval device |
| Classification Name: | Esophagoscope (Flexible or Rigid) |
| Regulation Number: | 21CFR 874.4710 |
| Product Code: | EOX |
| Device Panel: | Ear, Nose and Throat Devices |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
## Legally Marketed Predicate Devices for Claimed Equivalency:
- K934193: Cell-Mate™ Mass Cytology -Cellular Retrieval System a)
- b) K142695, K152794 and K181020: Cytosponge™ Cell Collection Device Note: The CytoSponge device in the original 510(k) submission (K142695) used the Cell-Mate (K934193) as the predicate device.
## Device Description:
The EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device is a non-sterile, non-endoscopic, singleuse Esophageal cell sampling device. The EsophaCap® is composed of an open-cell polyether polyurethane foam sphere attached to a polyester tether cap. The open-cell foam sphere ranging in diameter sizes from 20 mm to 35mm is compressed and encapsulated within a vegetable (hypromellose (HPMC)) capsule. When swallowed the EsophaCap® capsule dissolves releasing the foam sphere. The foam sphere expands to form a cytology and cellular retrieval device that allows a circumferential "bottle brush" collection using the expanded "open cell" foam sphere. The radiopaque polyester tether/stylus is used to slowly withdraw the foam sphere through the esophagus and then to subsequently retrieve the foam sphere with the cellular sample.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use:
The gathering and recovery of cells and cellular material from the mucosa in the esophagus for cytological and histological analyses.
# Technological Characteristics of the Subject Device Compared to the Predicate Devices:
The EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate Cell-Mate™ Mass Cytology Cellular Retrieval System cleared under K934193. The substantial equivalence is in terms of intended use/indications of use, target patient population, anatomical locations, method of operation, operating instructions, and single use.
The technological differences are that this subject device is:
- a. non-sterile, while the predicate device is provided sterile;
- b. there is a change in the dissolvable capsule material from animal based gelatin to a vegetable capsule;
- shelf-life (for the 10 pore per inch foam sphere); ﻥ
- d. an additional foam porosity has been added;
- an additional smaller foam sphere diameter; e.
- f. a smaller capsule has been added;
- the tether cap location has been moved g.
- the tether/stylus was shortened; h.
- i. the labeling/IFU have been updated to reflect the preceding changes.
The EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device is also substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Cytosponge™ Cell Collection Device cleared under K142695, K152794, and K181020. The substantial equivalence is in terms of intended use/indications of use, anatomical locations, method of operation, operating instructions, single use, non-sterile, foam porosity, and vegetable capsule.
## Testing Performance Data:
The EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device performance testing consisted of bench testing, biocompatibility testing and user input. The bench testing included: dissolution testing, and tether /stylus tensile testing, and tether/stylus length test.
## Conclusion:
CapNostics LLC, considers the EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicates: Cell-Mate™ Mass Cytology Cellular Retrieval System (K934193) and Cytosponge™ Cell Collection Device ( K142695, K152794, and K181020). Based upon the results of performance testing the design modifications to the EsophaCap® Swallowable Cellular Retrieval Device raises no new safety and effectiveness questions.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.