K984069 · Les Laboratorires Brothier, S.A. · EMX · Jan 25, 1999 · Ear, Nose, Throat
Device Facts
Record ID
K984069
Device Name
ENTAXIS NASAL PACKING
Applicant
Les Laboratorires Brothier, S.A.
Product Code
EMX · Ear, Nose, Throat
Decision Date
Jan 25, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 874.4100
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packings are intended for nasal epistaxis and as post operative nasal packings.
Device Story
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing is a sterile, hemostatic, 12-inch (30cm) rope composed of 100% pure calcium alginate fibers. Used in clinical settings by ENT surgeons for nasal epistaxis and post-operative sinus surgery packing. The device acts as a hemostatic agent to control bleeding; it is highly conformable and can be used dry or moistened with saline. When moistened, it demonstrates improved release from the wound bed compared to traditional packings. The device is intended to facilitate hemostasis, reduce patient pain upon removal, and support healing of the nasal mucosa.
Clinical Evidence
Multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study (n=50 patients, 100 nasal cavities) compared ENTaxis to Merocel in bilateral sinus surgery. Patients served as their own controls. Results: ENTaxis showed significantly less bleeding (p=0.016) and significantly less pain on removal (p=0.0001) on Day 2. A trend toward improved healing was observed at Day 9. Preclinical evidence included in vitro and in vivo (pig) hemostatic efficacy studies, confirming hemostatic potency equal to or greater than oxidized cellulose.
Technological Characteristics
100% pure calcium alginate fibers; 12-inch (30cm) rope form factor; hemostatic via calcium alginate properties; sterile; non-pyrogenic; biocompatible per USP and British Standard 5736-Part 4; non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non-irritating.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring management of nasal epistaxis or post-operative nasal packing following ENT sinus surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An epistaxis balloon is a device consisting of an inflatable balloon intended to control internal nasal bleeding by exerting pressure against the sphenopalatine artery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo with the text "LES LABORATOIRES BROTHIER S.A." The logo is a stylized "b" in black. Above the text, the date "JAN 25 1999" is printed in a simple, sans-serif font.
K984069
# 510(k) SUMMARY
## ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing (77 EMX)
- SUBMITTER'S NAME 1.
- CONTACT PERSON AT LABORATOIRES BROTHIER 2.
- DATE THAT 510(k) SUMMARY WAS PREPARED 3.
- NAME OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE (Classification / Common / Proprietary) 4.
- LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICES TO WHICH SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE IS CLAIMED ട.
- DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE 6.
- INTENDED USE OF THE DEVICE 7.
- TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBJECT AND PREDICATE DEVICES 8.
- SUMMARY OF PRECLINICAL SAFETY STUDIES AND CONCLUSIONS FROM PRECLINICAL 9. SAFETY STUDIES
- SUMMARY OF PRECLINICAL PERFORMANCE STUDIES 10.
- CLINICAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY STUDY 11.
| <b>1. SUBMITTER'S NAME</b> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| LABORATOIRES BROTHIER S.A.<br>41 rue de Neuilly<br>92000 Paris-Nanterre<br>FRANCE |
| Tel: 011-33-1-47 24 27 34<br>Fax: 011-33-1 47 25 51 58 |
| 2. | U.S. REGULATORY CONTACT PERSON FOR<br>LABORATOIRES BROTHIER S.A. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Evan Dick, Ph.D.<br>E.G. Dick & Associates<br>7527 Westmoreland Avenue<br>St. Louis, MO 63105 |
| | Tel: (314) 721-0112<br>Fax: (314) 721-7591 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
## DATE THAT 510(k) SUMMARY WAS PREPARED
November 13, 1998
| 4. NAME OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE | |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification name | Balloon, epistaxis (nasal)<br>(Ear, Nose & Throat 77 EMX) |
| Common / usual name | Nasal Packing |
| Proprietary name | ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing |
LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICES TO WHICH SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE IS CLAIMED
Algoderm Alginate Wound Dressing (Laboratoires Brothier, K905314) Algosteril Alginate Dressing (Laboratoires Brothier, K922540) Nu Gauze Plain Packing Strip (Johnson & Johnson, K821150) Curity Petrolatum Gauze (Kendall, K973511) Merocel Nasal Packing (Merocel, K920394)
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packings are highly conformable, sterile, hemostatic packings designed for managing bleeding in the nasal cavity and as post operative packings. ENTaxis™ nasal packings are 12" (30cm, 2g) "ropes" that are 100% composed of pure calcium alginate fibers.
{2}------------------------------------------------
INTENDED USE OF THE DEVICE
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packings are intended for nasal epistaxis and as post operative nasal packings.
#### TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBJECT AND PREDICATE DEVICES
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packings are highly conformable, sterile, hemostatic packings. The packings are 12" (30cm) long, 2 gm "ropes", similar in dimensions to predicate gauze strip packings such as Nu Gauze Plain Packing Strip (K821150) and Curity Petrolatum Gauze (K973511). ENTaxis and these predicate devices are composed of chemically similar natural fibers.
ENTaxis™ nasal packings are physically and chemically identical to Laboratoires Brothier calcium alginate wound dressing products that have been in U.S. interstate commerce since 1990 and that were reviewed under:
- Algoderm Alginate Wound Dressing (Laboratoires Brothier, K905314), and
- · Algosteril Alginate Dressing (Laboratoires Brothier, K922540).
ENTaxis™ nasal packings and the identified predicate devices all act to help control nasal bleeding.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### SUMMARY OF PRECLINICAL SAFETY STUDIES AND CONCLUSIONS FROM PRECLINICAL SAFETY STUDIES ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing has been evaluated (under the brand name ENTaxis or Algosteril) though in vitro tests and animal safety studies. All of these results are consistent in indicating that this product is safe for use as a nasal packing. Preclinical safety tests and the conclusions drawn for the test articles: · Cytotoxicity: USP Elution Method > product met the requirements of the USP. · Cytotoxicity: USP Agar Diffusion Test ▷ product met the requirements of the USP. · Cytotoxicity: Hemolysis Test ▷ product was found to be nonhemolytic. · Sensitization: Beuhler Method ▷ product was found to be a non-sensitizer. · Sensitization: Magnusson and Kligman Method ▷ product was found to be a non-sensitizer. · Primary Skin Irritation (24 Hour) ▷ product was found to be neither a dermal irritant nor a dermal corrosive. · Primary Skin Irritation (5 Day) ▷ product passed the skin irritation test in the rabbit. · Intranasal Irritation (3 Day Repeated Dose) ▷ product was found to be a non-irritant to the nasal mucosa and to produce no microscopic changes in the nasal tissues of rats. · Eye Irritation (3 Day Repeated Dose) ▷ product was found to be a non-irritant in rabbit eyes. · Intracutaneous Reactivity ▷ product complies with British Standard 5736-Part 4. · Acute Systemic Toxicity > product passed i.v. and i.p. systemic injection tests in mice. · Repeated Dose Systemic Toxicity (7 Days) ▷ product was found to be non-toxic in mice with daily systemic dosing for seven days. · Microbiology: Effect On TSS-Associated Staphylococcus aureus > product did not enhance the growth of TSS-associated S. aureus. · Rabbit Pyrogen Test ▷ product was found to be nonpyrogenic.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## SUMMARY OF PRECLINICAL PERFORMANCE STUDIES The hemostatic efficay of Algosteril / ENTaxis (different brand names for an identical product) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. · IN VITRO ASSESSMENT OF HEMOSTATIC EFFICACY Hemostatic Capacity Study of Algosteril Compared to Three Reference Test Articles. Biomatech S.A. Study No. 288E702. February 19, 1998. ▷ Algosteril / ENTaxis is hemostatic. · Hemostatic effects, in vitro, are equal to or greater than those of oxidized cellulose. · IN VIVO ASSESSMENT OF HEMOSTATIC EFFICACY Short-Term Study In Pigs of A Calcium Alginate (Algosteril): Assessment of Primary Hemostatic Efficacy. Biomatech S.A. Study No. 288E701 November 7, 1997. ▷ Product is hemostatic on actively bleeding surgical wounds. ▷ Hemostatic potency (both dry and wet) was equal to or greater than the hemostatic potency of oxidized cellulose. ▷ The hemostatic potency of Algosteril/ENTaxis calcium alginate is greater when moistened with saline than when dry & Algosteril / ENTaxis, when moistened with saline, releases more easily from a wound bed than either oxidized cellulose or
dry calcium alginate.
{5}------------------------------------------------
### 11. CLINICAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY STUDY
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing has been clinically evaluated as a hemostatic, post operative nasal packing in ENT sinus surgery. Results indicate that this product is safe and effective for this use.
R. Peynegre, P. Bonfils, L. Castillo, et al. 1998. Clinical Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Two Nasal Packings, a Calcium Alginate (ENTaxis™) and Polyvinyl Acetal (Merocel™) in Bilateral ENT Surgery.
A multi-center, randomized, and controlled clinical study compared the efficacy and safety of two different types of post-operative packings in sinus surgery. The test products were ENTaxis (Algosteril) and Merocel. Clinical endpoints were epistaxis (degree of bleeding), pain on removal, and qualityof-healing.
Fifty (50) patients (100 nasal cavities) were enrolled in five ENT surgery departments. Every patient served as their own control by being treated with both test products. Clinical assessments were made during surgery (Day 1), on Day 2 (epistaxis and pain on removal), and on Day 9 (quality-ofhealing).
Upon removal of the sinus packings on Day 2, ENTaxis was associated with both significantly less bleeding than Merocel (p=0.016) and significantly less pain on removal (p=0.0001).
Inspection of nasal mucosas eight days post-operatively revealed a trend towards more complete healing with ENTaxis (10 patients) compared to Merocel (5 patients).
Overall, compared to Merocel, ENTaxis was associated with statistically significant reductions in bleeding and pain on removal, as well as a trend towards improved overall healing.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the top half of the circle. In the center of the seal is a stylized image of what appears to be an eagle or bird-like figure.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JAN 25 1999
Les Laboratories Brothier, S.A. C/O E.G. Dick & Associates Evan Dick, Ph.D. President 7527 Westmorland Ave. St. Louis, MO 63105
Re:
K984069 ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing Dated: November 16, 1998 Received: November 16, 1998 Regulatory class: I 21 CFR 874.4100/Procode: 77 EMX
Dear Mr. Dick:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Capt. Daniel G. Schultz, M.D. Acting Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
## INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number:
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing Device Name:
Indications For Use:
ENTaxis™ Nasal Packing is intended for
- Epistaxis
- · Post operative nasal packing
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) (Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT, and Radiological D 510(k) Number OR
V Prescription Use_ (per 21 CFR 801.109) Over-The-Counter Use_
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.