K133680 · Siesta Medical, Inc. · ORY · Mar 26, 2014 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K133680
Device Name
ENCORE SYSTEM
Applicant
Siesta Medical, Inc.
Product Code
ORY · Dental
Decision Date
Mar 26, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.5570
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K133680 · Mar 26, 2014
ENCORE SYSTEM
Siesta Medical, Inc.
Retrospective patient series; Peer-reviewed clinical literature
The sponsor provided a retrospective analysis of patients treated with the ENCORE System for OSA and a summary of 11 peer-reviewed studies to support the safety and effectiveness of the hyoid suspension procedure.
Retrospective analysis; Literature review; Obstructive sleep apnea; Hyoid suspension
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective analysis of patients treated for OSA; Retrospective patient series; Follow-up/Duration: Mean follow-up time 75 days
Patients treated for OSA using hyoid suspension with the Encore System
Not applicable for this study
AHI/RDI reduction, safety/complications
Peer-reviewed literature review; Literature review
The ENCORE System is intended to be used for anterior advancement of the tongue base. It is also suitable for performing hyoid suspension. It is indicated for the treatment of mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and /or snoring.
Device Story
ENCORE System facilitates anterior tongue base suspension and hyoid suspension to treat OSA and snoring; surgical procedure performed by clinicians. System components: integrated suture passer pre-loaded with #2-0 braided polyester suture; bone screws with inserters; suspension line lock tool; threading tool; various suspension lines (#2 monofilament polypropylene with radiopaque marker, #2 braided polyester, #2 braided polyester with radiopaque marker). Procedure involves passing suspension suture around hyoid bone or tongue base, anchoring to mandible bone via bone screws. Unlike predicate devices requiring knot-tying at midline, ENCORE attaches sutures directly to bone anchors. Device provides mechanical stabilization of airway soft tissue; reduces hypopharyngeal airway compromise; improves patient AHI/RDI metrics. Used in clinical settings; may be combined with other airway surgeries.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence includes a literature review of 11 studies (461 patients) and a retrospective analysis of a patient series. Retrospective series (n=not specified) showed successful hyoid suspension in all patients; mean age 58.3, mean BMI 27.9, baseline AHI/RDI 45.0. Results showed reduction in AHI/RDI from 52.8 to 11.8 (78% reduction, p<0.01) at mean 75-day follow-up. Complications were minimal; one reported wound seroma.
Technological Characteristics
Bone screw and suture-based suspension system. Materials: #2-0 braided polyester suture, #2 monofilament polypropylene, #2 braided polyester. Features radiopaque markers on specific lines. Mechanical fixation via bone screws and locking tool. No energy source. Sterile, single-use components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and/or snoring requiring anterior tongue base advancement or hyoid suspension.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea are devices that are worn during sleep to reduce the incidence of snoring and to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The devices are designed to increase the patency of the airway and to decrease air turbulence and airway obstruction. The classification includes palatal lifting devices, tongue retaining devices, and mandibular repositioning devices.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for these devices is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) for the Siesta Medical, Inc. ENCORE System March 26, 2014
## 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Number | K133680 | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Submitter Name and Address | | |
| Name | Siesta Medical, Inc. | |
| Contact | Michael Kolber | |
| | Vice President, Regulatory Affairs | |
| Address | 101 Church Street, Suite 3 | |
| | Los Gatos, CA 95030 | |
| Telephone | 408-505-6626 | |
| Fax | 408-399-7600 | |
| Date Prepared | March 26, 2014 | |
| General Device Information | | |
| Product Name | ENCORE™ System | |
| Common Name | Bone Screw System | |
| Classification | 21CFR872.5570<br>Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral<br>devices for snoring and obstructive sleep<br>apnea. | |
| Device Class | Class II | |
| Product Code | ORY | |
| Predicate Device | | |
| Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k) Number |
| Siesta Medical, Inc. | ENCORE Tongue<br>Suspension System | K121440 |
| Medtronic, Inc. | AIRvance System | K122391 |
| Device Description | | |
| The ENCORE System is designed for anterior tongue base suspension by fixation<br>of the soft tissue of the tongue base to the mandible bone and hyoid bone<br>suspension to the mandible bone using a bone screw and suspension lines. The<br>ENCORE System consists of 1) an integrated suture passer pre-loaded with size<br>#2-0 braided polyester suture, 2) two (2) bone screws and bone screw inserters, 3)<br>a suspension line lock tool, and 4) a threading tool. In addition, the following<br>suspension lines are provided depending on the model number: 1) a #2<br>monofilament polypropylene suspension line with a radiopaque marker, 2) a size<br>#2 braided polyester suspension line, and 3) a size #2 braided polyester<br>suspension line with a radiopaque marker. | | |
| Intended Use (Indications) | | |
| The ENCORE System is intended to be used for anterior advancement of the | | |
tongue base. It is also suitable for performing hyoid suspension. It is indicated for the treatment of mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and /or
{1}------------------------------------------------
snoring.
#### Comparison to the Predicate Device
The ENCORE System has a modified intended use compared to the predicate devices. The intended use has been modified to include a statement that it is also suitable for the performance of a hyoid suspension procedure.
With regard to the modified intended use, similar to the predicate device, a needle is used to pass a suspension suture around the hyoid bone and a bone screw is used to anchor the suture with the desired amount of tension. The difference between the predicate device and the ENCORE System relates to how the suspension sutures are fixed once the desired level of advancement is achieved. In the predicate device, the suspension sutures are provided pre-attached to the bone anchors, which requires the tails of the suspension sutures to be joined or fixed at the midline of the hyoid bone with a knot once they are passed around the hyoid bone. With the ENCORE System the suspension sutures are passed around the hyoid bone and then attached to the bone anchors without the need to tie a knot.
The fundamental scientific technology and technological characteristics of the ENCORE System are the same as the predicate devices including mechanism of action, packaging, biocompatibility, sterilization, and labeling. The ENCORE System contains the same materials and components as the predicate ENCORE System. Through bench performance and clinical testing it was demonstrated that the modified intended use do not adversely affect safety and effectiveness.
### Summary of Non-Clinical and Clinical Testing
The non-clinical test data provided in this submission demonstrated that the ENCORE System meets the performance specifications. The submission includes a Suspension Line Endurance Test and Bone Screw-to-Suspension Line Fixation Strength Test.
The non-clinical testing was performed to support a determination of substantial equivalence. The results of these tests provide reasonable assurance that the proposed device has been designed and tested to assure conformance to the requirements for its intended use. No new safety or performance issues were raised during the testing and, therefore, these devices may be considered substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
The clinical data provided in this submission includes a summary of eleven (11) clinical studies in 461 patients involving hyoid suspension published in the peerreview literature. There were few complications reports, with six studies reporting no significant intraoperative or post-operative complications.
This submission also includes an analysis of a series of patients treated for OSA
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siesta Medical. The word "Siesta" is in a large, bold font, with a curved line above it. Below "Siesta" is the word "Medical" in a smaller font. The logo is simple and clean, with a focus on the company name.
using hyoid suspension with the Encore System. This patient series included primarily males, with a mean age of 58.3 years, mean BM1 of 27.9 kg/m², and a baseline AHI/RDI of 45.0. Hyoid suspension was successful in all patients. One patient had a post-operative wound seroma that resolved. Mean follow-up time was 75 days, with a reduction in AHI/RDI from 52.8 to 11.8 (78%, p<0.01).
The literature review and patient series shows that this treatment is often used successfully to reduce hypopharyngeal airway compromise, and may be used in combination with other surgical procedures (i.e., tongue suspension) that address additional sites of obstruction in the airway.
The use of hyoid suspension is an effective method to treat hypopharyngeal-based obstructions and can be used in combination with other procedures to effectively treat obstructive sleep apnea with or without tongue suspension.
Conclusion: The Encore System is physically identical to the predicate device, justifying no new nonclinical testing. Based on a review of the peer-review literature and a retrospective analysis of patients treated using hyoid suspension, we conclude that the Encore System is as safe and effective and performs as well or better than the predicate device.
#### Statement of Equivalence
The ENCORE System has similar indications for use and the same technological characteristics as the predicate devices. Based on this and the data provided in this pre-market notification, the subject device and the predicate device have been shown to be substantially equivalent.
{3}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The logo features a stylized eagle with three curved lines representing its wings. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 26, 2014
Siesta Medical, Incorporated Mr. Michael Kolber Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 101 Church Street, Suite 3 Los Gatos, California 95030
Re: K133680
Trade/Device Name: ENCORE™ System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5570 Regulation Name: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and Intraoral Devices for Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ORY Dated: December 31, 2013 Received: January 2, 2014
Dear Mr. Kolber:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Mr. Kolber
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Mary S. Runner -S
Erin 1. Keith, M.S. Acting Division Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siesta Medical. The word "Siesta" is written in a bold, sans-serif font, with a curved line above it. Below "Siesta" is the word "Medical" in a smaller, sans-serif font. The logo is black and white.
510(k) for the Siesta Medical, Inc ENCORE System November 30, 2013
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): _____________
Device Name: Siesta Medical, Inc. ENCORE™ System
The ENCORE System is intended to be used for anterior advancement of the tongue base. It is also suitable for performing hyoid suspension. It is indicated for the treatment of mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and /or snoring.
Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Andrew 5:17 -04'00' 2014.03.26 08:5
Page 52
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.