K051321 · Metrika, Inc. · LCP · Jun 13, 2005 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K051321
Device Name
INVIEW
Applicant
Metrika, Inc.
Product Code
LCP · Hematology
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2005
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7470
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The InView™ multi-use test provides quantitative measurement of the percent of glycated hemoglobin (%HbA1c, %A1C) levels in whole blood samples. The test is for home use and professional use for monitoring glycemic control in people with diabetes.
Device Story
Modified blood glucose/A1C monitor; enables multiple A1C determinations from single monitor; utilizes single-use reagent strip cartridges. Device modification maintains fundamental scientific technology of previously cleared predicate. Intended for clinical use to monitor A1C levels.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; device is a modification of a previously cleared predicate (K033847).
Technological Characteristics
Monitor modified for multiple A1C determinations; utilizes single-use reagent strip cartridges. Fundamental scientific technology unchanged from predicate.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of %HbA1c in whole blood to monitor glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Suitable for both home and professional use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
K033847 — A1CNOW FOR HOME AND PROFESSIONAL USE · Metrika, Inc. · Dec 23, 2003
K020234 — A1CNOW FOR RX HOME USE · Metrika, Inc. · Feb 15, 2002
K091400 — MODIFICATION TO AVIE A1C TEST SYSTEM · Mec Dynamics Corp · Jun 11, 2009
K011933 — GLYCOSAL II HBA 1C TEST · Provalis Diagnostics , Ltd. · Nov 2, 2001
K020235 — A1CNOW FOR PROFESSIONAL USE · Metrika, Inc. · Feb 15, 2002
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
SPECIAL 510(k): Device Modification
ODE Review Memorandum
To: THE FILE
RE: DOCUMENT NUMBER K051321
This 510(k) submission contains information/data on modifications made to the SUBMITTER'S own Class II, Class III or Class I devices requiring 510(k). The following items are present and acceptable (delete/add items as necessary):
1. The name and 510(k) number of the SUBMITTER'S previously cleared device- K033847 (For a preamendments device, a statement to this effect has been provided.)
2. Submitter's statement that the INDICATION/INTENDED USE of the modified device as described in its labeling HAS NOT CHANGED along with the proposed labeling which includes instructions for use, package labeling, and, if available, advertisements or promotional materials.
3. A description of the device MODIFICATION(S), including clearly labeled diagrams, engineering drawings, photographs, user's and/or service manuals in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY of the modified device has not changed.
This change was for change in the monitor to allow multiple A1C determinations from one monitor and use of single-use reagent strip cartridges.
4. Comparison Information (similarities and differences) to applicant's legally marketed predicate device including, labeling, intended use, physical characteristics, and device performance.
5. A Design Control Activities Summary which includes:
a) Identification of Risk Analysis method(s) used to assess the impact of the modification on the device and its components, and the results of the analysis
b) Based on the Risk Analysis, an identification of the verification and/or validation activities required, including methods or tests used and acceptance criteria to be applied
c) A declaration of conformity with design controls. The declaration of conformity should include:
i) A statement signed by the individual responsible, that, as required by the risk analysis, all verification and validation activities were performed by the designated individual(s) and the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met, and
ii) A statement signed by the individual responsible, that the manufacturing facility is in conformance with design control procedure requirements as specified in 21 CFR 820.30 and the records are available for review.
6. A Truthful and Accurate Statement, a 510(k) Summary or Statement and the Indications for Use Enclosure (and Class III Summary for Class III devices).
The labeling for this modified subject device has been reviewed to verify that the indication/intended use for the device is unaffected by the modification. In addition, the submitter's description of the particular modification(s) and the comparative information between the modified and unmodified devices demonstrate that the fundamental scientific technology has not changed. The submitter has provided the design control information as specified in The New 510(k) Paradigm and on this basis, I recommend the device be determined substantially equivalent to the previously cleared (or their preamendment) device.
Panel 1
/
Sort by
Ready
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.