Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System

K231081 · Dexcom, Inc. · QBJ · May 15, 2023 · Clinical Chemistry

Device Facts

• Record ID: K231081
• Device Name: Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System
• Applicant: Dexcom, Inc.
• Product Code: QBJ · Clinical Chemistry
• Decision Date: May 15, 2023
• Decision: SESE
• Submission Type: Special
• Regulation: 21 CFR 862.1355
• Device Class: Class 2
• Attributes: Therapeutic, Pediatric

Indications for Use

The Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System is a real time, continuous glucose monitoring device indicated for the management of diabetes in persons 2 years and older. The Dexcom G7 CGM System is intended to replace fingerstick BG testing for diabetes treatment decisions. Interpretation of the Dexcom G7 CGM System results should be based on the glucose trends and several sequential sensor readings over time. The Dexcom G7 CGM System also aids in the detection of episodes of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, facilitating both acute and long-term therapy adjustments. The Dexcom G7 CGM System is also intended to autonomously communicate with digitally connected devices, including automated insulin dosing (AID) systems. The Dexcom G7 CGM System can be used alone or in conjunction with these digitally connected medical devices for the purposes of managing diabetes.

Device Story

Dexcom G7 is a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for diabetes management. It consists of a glucose sensing subsystem (GSS) with a subcutaneous sensor, a mobile application (MAS), and a receiver (RVS). The sensor, a flexible wire inserted into subcutaneous tissue, converts glucose into electrical current via glucose oxidase reaction. A BLE transmitter samples this current, uses an onboard algorithm to calculate estimated glucose values and rates of change, and transmits data every 5 minutes to the MAS/RVS. Used in home settings by patients, the system alerts users to glucose levels outside target zones. It supports interoperability with other devices, including automated insulin dosing (AID) systems, and cloud-based data sharing via Partner Web APIs. The system replaces fingerstick testing for treatment decisions, allowing patients to make therapy adjustments based on glucose trends and sequential readings.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence based on design control activities, risk analysis, and verification/validation of physical modifications.

Technological Characteristics

Continuous glucose monitoring system; transmitter body; adhesive patch. Modifications limited to adhesive material and transmitter housing geometry. Fundamental sensing technology unchanged.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients requiring continuous glucose monitoring; specific population details not provided in this summary.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An integrated continuous glucose monitoring system (iCGM) is intended to automatically measure glucose in bodily fluids continuously or frequently for a specified period of time. iCGM systems are designed to reliably and securely transmit glucose measurement data to digitally connected devices, including automated insulin dosing systems, and are intended to be used alone or in conjunction with these digitally connected medical devices for the purpose of managing a disease or condition related to glycemic control.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Design verification and validation must include the following: (i) Robust clinical data demonstrating the accuracy of the device in the intended use population. (ii) The clinical data must include a comparison between iCGM values and blood glucose values in specimens collected in parallel that are measured on an FDA-accepted laboratory-based glucose measurement method that is precise and accurate, and that is traceable to a higher order ( *e.g.,* an internationally recognized reference material and/or method).(iii) The clinical data must be obtained from a clinical study designed to fully represent the performance of the device throughout the intended use population and throughout the measuring range of the device. (iv) Clinical study results must demonstrate consistent analytical and clinical performance throughout the sensor wear period. (v) Clinical study results in the adult population must meet the following performance requirements: (A) For all iCGM measurements less than 70 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL), the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±15 mg/dL of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 85 percent. (B) For all iCGM measurements from 70 mg/dL to 180 mg/dL, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±15 percent of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 70 percent. (C) For all iCGM measurements greater than 180 mg/dL, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±15 percent of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 80 percent. (D) For all iCGM measurements less than 70 mg/dL, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±40 mg/dL of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 98 percent. (E) For all iCGM measurements from 70 mg/dL to 180 mg/dL, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±40 percent of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 99 percent. (F) For all iCGM measurements greater than180 mg/dL, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±40 percent of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 99 percent. (G) Throughout the device measuring range, the percentage of iCGM measurements within ±20 percent of the corresponding blood glucose value must be calculated, and the lower one-sided 95 percent confidence bound must exceed 87 percent. (H) When iCGM values are less than 70 mg/dL, no corresponding blood glucose value shall read above 180 mg/dL. (I) When iCGM values are greater than 180 mg/dL, no corresponding blood glucose value shall read less than 70 mg/dL. (J) There shall be no more than 1 percent of iCGM measurements that indicate a positive glucose rate of change greater than 1 mg/dL per minute (/min) when the corresponding true negative glucose rate of change is less than −2 mg/dL/min as determined by the corresponding blood glucose measurements. (K) There shall be no more than 1 percent of iCGM measurements that indicate a negative glucose rate of change less than −1 mg/dL/min when the corresponding true positive glucose rate of change is greater than 2 mg/dL/min as determined by the corresponding blood glucose measurements. (vi) Data demonstrating similar accuracy and rate of change performance of the iCGM in the pediatric population as compared to that in the adult population, or alternatively a clinical and/or technical justification for why pediatric data are not needed, must be provided and determined by FDA to be acceptable and appropriate. (vii) Data must demonstrate that throughout the claimed sensor life, the device does not allow clinically significant gaps in sensor data availability that would prevent any digitally connected devices from achieving their intended use. (2) Design verification and validation must include a detailed strategy to ensure secure and reliable means of iCGM data transmission to provide real-time glucose readings at clinically meaningful time intervals to devices intended to receive the iCGM glucose data. (3) Design verification and validation must include adequate controls established during manufacturing and at product release to ensure the released product meets the performance specifications as defined in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section. (4) The device must demonstrate clinically acceptable performance in the presence of clinically relevant levels of potential interfering substances that are reasonably present in the intended use population, including but not limited to endogenous substances and metabolites, foods, dietary supplements, and medications. (5) The device must include appropriate measures to ensure that disposable sensors cannot be used beyond its claimed sensor wear period. (6) Design verification and validation must include results obtained through a usability study that demonstrates that the intended user can use the device safely and obtain the expected glucose measurement accuracy. (7) The labeling required under § 809.10(b) of this chapter must include a separate description of the following sensor performance data observed in the clinical study performed in conformance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section for each intended use population, in addition to separate sensor performance data for each different iCGM insertion or use sites ( *e.g.,* abdomen, arm, buttock):(i) A description of the accuracy in the following blood glucose concentration ranges: less than 54 mg/dL, 54 mg/dL to less than 70 mg/dL, 70 to 180 mg/dL, greater than 180 to 250 mg/dL, and greater than 250 mg/dL. (ii) A description of the accuracy of positive and negative rate of change data. (iii) A description of the frequency and duration of gaps in sensor data. (iv) A description of the true, false, missed, and correct alert rates and a description of the available glucose concentration alert settings, if applicable. (v) A description of the observed duration of iCGM life for the device.

Predicate Devices

• Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (K213919)

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}

FDA

U.S. FOOD & DRUG

ADMINISTRATION

# SPECIAL 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY

## I Background Information:

A 510(k) Number

K231081

B Applicant

Dexcom, Inc.

C Proprietary and Established Names

Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System

D Regulatory Information

| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| QBJ | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1355 - Integrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |

## II Review Summary:

This 510(k) submission contains information/data on modifications made to the submitter's own CLASS II device requiring 510(k). The following items are present and acceptable:

1. The name and 510(k) number of the SUBMITTER'S previously cleared device: Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (K213919).
2. Submitter's statement that the INDICATIONS FOR USE/INTENDED USE of the modified device as described in its labeling HAS NOT CHANGED along with the proposed labeling which includes instructions for use, package labeling, and, if available, advertisements or promotional materials (labeling changes are permitted as long as they do not affect the intended use).

Food and Drug Administration

10903 New Hampshire Avenue

Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

www.fda.gov

{1}

3. A description of the device **MODIFICATION(S)**, including clearly labeled diagrams, engineering drawings, photographs, user's and/or service manuals in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the **FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY** of the modified device has not changed. This change was for:

a. A modification to the adhesive patch that will be used to attach the transmitter to the user's body. The new adhesive patch has a different adhesive compared to the predicate device.

b. A modification to the design of the transmitter body to accommodate manufacturing process changes associated with the new adhesive patch material.

4. Comparison Information (i.e., similarities and differences) to the submitter's legally marketed predicate device including, labeling, intended use, and physical characteristics.

5. A Design Control Activities Summary which includes:

a) Identification of Risk Analysis method(s) used to assess the impact of the modification on the device and its components, and the results of the analysis.

b) Based on the Risk Analysis, an identification of the verification and/or validation activities required, including methods or tests used and acceptance criteria to be applied.

The labeling for this modified subject device has been reviewed to verify that the indication/intended use for the device is unaffected by the modification. In addition, the submitter's description of the particular modification(s) and the comparative information between the modified and unmodified devices demonstrate that the fundamental scientific technology has not changed. The submitter has provided the design control information as specified in The New 510(k) Paradigm and on this basis, I recommend the device be determined substantially equivalent to the previously cleared (or their preamendment) device.

K231081 - Page 2 of 2