e.p.t.® Pregnancy Test is an over-the-counter urine hCG test which is intended for the detection of pregnancy. The test is indicated for use from first day of missed period and detection of pregnancy. The test is indication for ass in associed period.
Device Story
e.p.t.® Pregnancy Test is an over-the-counter lateral flow immunoassay for qualitative detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine. Device is intended for home use by consumers to detect pregnancy starting from the first day of a missed period. User applies urine sample to test device; presence of hCG is indicated by visual color change on test strip. Results provide early pregnancy detection to assist in clinical decision-making regarding prenatal care. No complex instrumentation or remote processing required.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunoassay for qualitative hCG detection. Form factor is a handheld test device for urine analysis. Standalone device; no software, connectivity, or energy source required.
Indications for Use
Indicated for detection of pregnancy in women starting from the first day of a missed period. Intended for over-the-counter use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine. A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
Related Devices
K033658 — E.P.T. PREGNANCY TEST · Unipath , Ltd. · Jan 16, 2004
K032939 — EPT CERTAINTY PREGNANCY TEST · Unipath , Ltd. · Oct 20, 2003
K023699 — CLEARBLUE EASY EARLY RESULT PREGNANCY TEST · Unipath , Ltd. · Nov 27, 2002
K053452 — PURE-AID PREGNANCY TEST · Bio Focus Co., Lt. · May 25, 2006
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
SPECIAL 510(k): Device Modification
ODE Review Memorandum (Decision Making Document is Attached)
To: THE FILE
RE: DOCUMENT NUMBER K040329
This 510(k) submission contains information/data on modifications made to the SUBMITTER'S own Class II device requiring 510(k). The following items are present and acceptable:
1. The name and 510(k) number of the SUBMITTER'S previously cleared device.
2. Submitter's statement that the INDICATION/INTENDED USE of the modified device as described in its labeling HAS NOT CHANGED along with the proposed labeling which includes instructions for use, package labeling, and, if available, advertisements or promotional materials (labeling changes are permitted as long as they do not affect the intended use).
3. A description of the device MODIFICATIONS, including clearly labeled diagrams, photographs, user's and/or service manuals in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY of the modified device has not changed.
This change was to revise the presentation of the positive and negative result and corresponding labeling.
4. Comparison Information (similarities and differences) to applicant's legally marketed predicate device including, labeling, intended use, physical characteristics, reagents and materials used to manufacture the test's functional components, and performance specifications.
5. A Design Control Activities Summary which includes:
a) Identification of Risk Analysis method used to assess the impact of the modification on the device and its components, and the results of the analysis
b) Based on the Risk Analysis, an identification of the verification and/or validation activities required, including methods or tests used and acceptance criteria to be applied
c) A declaration of conformity with design controls. The declaration of conformity should include:
i) A statement signed by the individual responsible, that, as required by the risk analysis, all verification and validation activities were performed by the designated individual(s) and the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met, and
ii) A statement signed by the individual responsible, that the manufacturing facility is in conformance with design control procedure requirements as specified in 21 CFR 820.30 and the records are available for review.
6. A Truthful and Accurate Statement, a 510(k) Statement and the Indications for Use Enclosure.
The labeling for this modified subject device has been reviewed to verify that the indication/intended use for the device is unaffected by the modification. In addition, the submitter's description of the particular modifications and the comparative information between the modified and unmodified devices demonstrate that the fundamental scientific technology has not changed. The submitter has provided the design control information as specified in The New 510(k) Paradigm and on this basis, I recommend the device be determined substantially equivalent to the previously cleared device.
Panel 1
/
Ready
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.