The intended use of these sterile single use devices is as accessories to medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizers in respiratory therapy or for tracheal irrigation or lavage. These devices are not for parenteral use nor for preparations intended for parenteral use. The use of these devices requires physician order (prescription). Sale of the device is restricted by or on the order of a physician.
Device Story
Single-use, sterile, pyrogen-free, preservative-free Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP; supplied in color-coded, embossed polyethylene unit-dose containers (3mL or 5mL). Manufactured via aseptic blow-fill-seal technology using dark-side/white-side machine systems. Used in clinical or respiratory therapy settings as an accessory for medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizers or for tracheal irrigation/lavage. Operated by healthcare professionals. Provides sterile water for inhalation therapy; supports respiratory treatment protocols. Benefits patient by providing sterile, unit-dose delivery of water for nebulization or irrigation, minimizing contamination risk.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through bench testing, including in vitro analytical methods for water purity, fill uniformity, sterility, and container integrity, alongside compliance with USP monograph criteria for Sterile Water for Inhalation.
Technological Characteristics
Polyethylene resin containers meeting direct food/drug contact criteria. Aseptic blow-fill-seal manufacturing technology (dark-side/white-side system). Single-use, unit-dose form factor. Sterile, pyrogen-free, preservative-free. Complies with USP monograph specifications.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as an accessory to medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizers in respiratory therapy or for tracheal irrigation or lavage. Not for parenteral use. Requires prescription.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nebulizer is a device intended to spray liquids in aerosol form into gases that are delivered directly to the patient for breathing. Heated, ultrasonic, gas, venturi, and refillable nebulizers are included in this generic type of device.
Predicate Devices
Prefilled Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP (K871618)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Michel
| | | 510(k) Notification | June, 1997 |
|-------------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| | | Section 2: 510(k) Summary | |
| | | SUMMARY CONTENTS | |
| AUG 28 1997 | | Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP | |
| | 1. | Applicants Name<br>Address<br>Contact Person<br>Date of Submission | |
| | 2. | Device Name and Classification | |
| | 3. | The Predicate Devices to which Equivalence is Claimed | |
| | 4. | Description of the Device | |
| | 5. | Intended Use | |
| | 6. | Technological Characteristics of the Device and the Predicate Device | |
| | 7. | Non-Clinical and Clinical Testing | |
- 8. Summary Conclusion
This 510(k) Premarket Notification summary information following is provided with respect to requests for information on this submission under Freedom of Information. Copy of this summary, which excludes Confidential Information, will be made available on request as required under Freedom of Information.
{1}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Notification
June, 1997
## Section 2: 510(k) Summary
- 1. Applicant Name & Address:
Holopack International, LP Carolina Research Park 1 Technology Circle Columbia, SC 29203
Contact Persons:
Walter Zahn President Phone: 803-806-3300 Fax: 803-806-3301
Marianna Cronrath Regulatory Agent Phone: 732-888-6278 Fax: 732-888-2917
This 510(k) premarket notification summary was prepared June, 1997 in conjunction with the notification.
- 2. Device Name and Classification:
- . Trade Name of Devices:
- 2.1 Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP
- . Common Name of the Devices:
- 2.2 Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP
- . Classification: Class II, Anesthesiology 514 Compliance: Standard
- 2.3 Class Code: 73 CCQ 73 BTT Accessory to medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizer
Class Code: 73 CAF Nebulizer accessory
{2}------------------------------------------------
Holopack
510(k) Notification
Section 2: 510(k) Summary
- 3. The Predicate Devices to which Equivalence is Claimed
There are several comparable devices manufactured prior to 1976 and/or those to which Substantial Equivalence is claimed.
- K871618 Prefilled Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP Automatic Liquid Packaging, Inc. 2200 W. Lake Shore Drive Woodstock, IL 60096
- K870332 Travenol Laboratories ( pre-1976) Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. (pre-1976) Respiratory Therapy Vials
- K881184 Sterile Water for Inhalation Delmed-Intertech
Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP Dey Laboratories, Inc. Concord, CA 94518
- 4. Description of the Devices
The single-use devices are color-coded unit blow-fill-sealed containers with liquid contents as labeled for inhalation therapy. The devices contain no preservative. They are sterile and pyrogen-free.
| CONTENTS | VOLUME | CONTAINER |
|-----------------------------------|----------|-----------------------|
| Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP | 3mL fill | Blue / Embossed label |
| Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP | 5mL fill | Blue / Embossed label |
{3}------------------------------------------------
**Holopack**
Section 2: 510(k) Summary
### ട. Intended Use
The intended use of these sterile devices is as accessories to medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizers in respiratory therapy or for tracheal irrigation or lavage.
The intended use indication is identical to those devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed. The use of these devices as accessories for inhalation therapy is well-established.
### 5.1 Limitations
These devices are not for parenteral use nor for preparations intended for parenteral use. The use of these devices requires prescription.
### Technological Characteristics of the Device and the Predicate Devices ട.
The subject unit dose devices of this premarket notification are formed of polyethylene resins meeting the direct food and drug contact criteria. The formed units meet the criteria for direct food and drug contact as prefilled unit containers. The water raw material source is Water for Injection, USP produced at Holopack.
The single-use containers are embossed with identifying product text and level markings.
The finished device product configuration characteristics of these inhalation devices are similar to those of the predicate devices.
The technological improvements relate to the method of manufacture of the devices which are the subject of this premarket notification. The blow-fill-seal systems used by Holopack International, LP in the production of these devices for inhalation therapy utilize dark-side/white-side machine technology. The blow-fill-seal systems on which the devices are manufactured represent technological advances in this type of production and in the control of the manufacturing environment. The devices are manufactured under conditions of current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP).
Performance characteristics of the devices that are the subject of this notification are identical or better than the predicate devices.
Proprietary details of the aseptic manufacturing environment and blow-fill-seal technology are referenced under confidentiality.
{4}------------------------------------------------
| ---<br>International L.A.<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 510/k) Notification | - COO-<br> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| <br>AND AND AND CONSULTION OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAIM OF CLAI | -----------<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | LINE MELECT CONN. L<br> |
Section 2: 510(k) Summary
# Non-Clinical and Clinical Testing
The component materials of the accessory device container have been substantiated to each meet criteria for direct food and drug contact or additive respectively. The formulation components of the filled device solution have been substantiated to each meet their respective USP monograph criteria. Each of the finished devices undergoes testing to meet the stated USP monograph and container criteria.
Clinical testing is not necessary to show substantial equivalence for either safety or efficacy of intended use to the predicate devices as there are several various in vitro analytical methods (water purity, fill uniformity; sterility; container integrity) and physical-chemical characteristics (water properties; unit configuration) available which demonstrate this equivalence.
### 8. Summary Conclusions
The subject devices:
7.
Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP
as manufactured by Holopack International, LP of Columbia, SC claim substantial equivalence, with the same intended use, to several devices which were manufactured prior to 1976 or which have received market clearance through established equivalence.
These devices are designed to meet the current USP specifications. The device containers have embossed unit identification and shelf carton labeling so that label requirements are met.
Analytical testing to the stated specifications demonstrates that these devices will have comparable safety and efficacy in use.
The devices, as manufactured by Holopack, are produced using dark-side/white-side blow-fill-seal technology on rommeLag® machines specifically designed for aseptic filling operations. These manufacturing systems represent a technological advance for the production of these types of devices. The details of the aseptic manufacturing processes and environment are referenced under confidentiality.
••
{5}------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20856
AUG 28
Mr. Walter Zahn Holopack International, LP Carolina Research Park 1 Technology Circle Columbia, South Carolina 29203
K972467 Re: Prefilled Units containing Sterile for Inhalation, USP Requlatory Class: II (two) Product Code: 73 CAF Dated: June 30, 1997 Received: July 1, 1997
Dear Mr. Zahn:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Requlation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Druq Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Walter Zahn
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callahan
Thomas J . Callahan, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
lolopack
510(k) Notification-
June, 1997
## STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE
AUG 28 1997
Devices:
Sterile Water for Inhalation, USP
### Intended Use
The intended use of these sterile single use devices is as accessories to medicinal non-ventilatory nebulizers in respiratory therapy or for tracheal irrigation or lavage.
The intended use indication is identical to those devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed. The use of these devices for inhalation therapy is well-established.
## Limitations
These devices are not for parenteral use nor for preparations intended for parenteral use.
The use of these devices requires physician order (prescription). Sale of the device is restricted by or on the order of a physician.
Prescription Device
Ath. A. Ciarlush.
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices K972467 510(k) Number
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.