← Product Code NIP · P160004

# GORE TIGRIS VASCULAR STENT (P160004)

_W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NIP · Jul 27, 2016 · Cardiovascular · APWD_

**Canonical URL:** https://fda.innolitics.com/device/P160004

## Device Facts

- **Applicant:** W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
- **Product Code:** NIP
- **Decision Date:** Jul 27, 2016
- **Decision:** APWD
- **Device Class:** Class 3
- **Review Panel:** Cardiovascular
- **Attributes:** Therapeutic

## Intended Use

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is intended to improve luminal diameter in patients with symptomatic de-novo or restenotic lesions or occlusions in the native superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery (PPA) with reference vessel diameters ranging from 4.0-6.5 mm and lesion lengths up to 240 mm.

## Device Story

Self-expanding nitinol stent with polymer secondary linkage and CBAS heparin surface; delivered via tri-axial catheter system. Physician gains guidewire access; performs pre-dilatation with PTA balloon; positions stent over guidewire; deploys via handle-actuated unpleating mechanism; seats stent with post-deployment balloon inflation. Used in clinic/OR by vascular specialists. Provides mechanical vessel support; heparin surface reduces thrombogenicity. Benefits include restored blood flow, improved luminal diameter, and symptom relief in PAD patients.

## Clinical Evidence

Prospective, multi-center, randomized (3:1) controlled trial (PCE 09-02) comparing TIGRIS (n=203) to Bard LifeStent (n=71). Primary safety: 30-day freedom from MAE (death, TVR, amputation); TIGRIS 99.5% vs Control 100% (p<0.001, non-inferior). Primary effectiveness: 12-month primary patency (PSVR ≤2.5); TIGRIS 57.1% vs Control 54.7% (p=0.002, non-inferior). No stent fractures reported for TIGRIS at 12 months vs 34.6% for Control.

## Technological Characteristics

Nitinol (NiTi) wire frame with polymer secondary linkage; CBAS Heparin Surface (covalently bonded porcine heparin). Self-expanding; 5-7 mm diameters; 30-100 mm lengths. Tri-axial catheter delivery system (6F compatible). Sterilized via ethylene oxide. MR Conditional (ASTM 2503). Complies with ASTM F2063-05 (nitinol) and ASTM F2129-08 (corrosion).

## Regulatory Identification

Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery -- a metal scaffold placed via a delivery catheter into the superficial femoral artery artery to maintain the lumen

## Reference Devices

- Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent

## Submission Summary (Full Text)

> This content was OCRed from public FDA records by [Innolitics](https://innolitics.com). If you use, quote, summarize, crawl, or train on this content, cite Innolitics at https://innolitics.com.
>
> Innolitics is a medical-device software consultancy. We help companies design, build, and clear FDA-regulated software and AI/ML devices, including [a PMA](https://innolitics.com/services/regulatory/), [a 510(k)](https://innolitics.com/services/510ks/), [a SaMD](https://innolitics.com/services/end-to-end-samd/), [an AI/ML medical device](https://innolitics.com/services/medical-imaging-ai-development/), or [an FDA regulatory strategy](https://innolitics.com/services/regulatory/).

{0}

# SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA (SSED)

## I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Device Generic Name: Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery

Device Trade Name: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent

Device Product Code: NIP

Applicant’s Name and Address: W.L. Gore &amp; Associates, Inc.
3250 West Kiltie Lane, P.O. Box 2400
Flagstaff, AZ 86005

Date(s) of Panel Recommendation: None

Premarket Approval Application (PMA) Number: P160004

Date of FDA Notice of Approval: July 27, 2016

Priority Review: No

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 1 of 43

{1}

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 2 of 43

## II. INDICATIONS FOR USE

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is intended to improve luminal diameter in patients with symptomatic de-novo or restenotic lesions or occlusions in the native superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery (PPA) with reference vessel diameters ranging from 4.0-6.5 mm and lesion lengths up to 240 mm.

## III. CONTRAINDICATIONS

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is contraindicated for non-compliant lesions where full expansion of an angioplasty balloon catheter was not achieved during pre-dilatation or where lesions cannot be dilated sufficiently to allow passage of the delivery system.

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is contraindicated in patients with contraindication to antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy.

Do not use the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent in patients with known hypersensitivity to heparin, including those patients who have had a previous incident of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II.

## IV. WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

The warnings and precautions can be found in the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent labeling.

## V. DEVICE DESCRIPTION

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent consists of an implantable self-expanding stent and a catheter delivery system (Figure 1 below). The catheter delivery system is used to intravascularly position the TIGRIS stent, constrained at a smaller introductory profile, at the target lesion and to release it into position.

{2}

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)
Figure 1: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent System (Stent and Catheter Delivery System)

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is offered in the device configurations shown in Table 1. All of the device configurations are compatible with 6 French introducer sheaths.

Table 1: Stent Configurations

|  Device Diameter | Device Length  |   |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  30 mm | 40 mm | 60 mm | 80 mm | 100 mm  |
|  5 mm | X | X | X | X | X  |
|  6 mm | X | X | X | X | X  |
|  7 mm | X | X | X | X | X  |

# A. Description of the Stent

The stent (Figure 2 below) is comprised of a sinusoidal wound, nitinol (NiTi) wire frame with a polymer secondary linkage. An immobilized heparin surface, the CBAS Heparin Surface, is applied to all surfaces of the stent.

![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)
Figure 2: Detail View of the TIGRIS Stent

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{3}

# B. Description of the Delivery Catheter

The catheter delivery system is comprised of a tri-axial catheter assembly that transmits deployment force from a proximal handle to the constrained stent at the distal end (Figure 3 below).

![img-2.jpeg](img-2.jpeg)
Figure 3: TIGRIS Delivery Catheter

A helically-pleated tube constrains the stent at the reduced profile at the distal end of the catheter. When deployment is actuated by turning the deployment wheel at the handle, the inner layer unpleats to progressively release the stent.

# C. CARMEDA BioActive Surface (CBAS) Heparin Surface

The CBAS Heparin Surface consists of heparin molecules that are covalently bonded to all stent surfaces by an "end-point attachment" method. USP heparin sodium API of porcine origin is used in the manufacture of the CBAS Heparin Surface. The heparin sodium API has been tested and certified to meet USP/EP requirements. The heparin sodium API is entirely of North American origin and is subsequently derivatized by a proprietary process established by Carmeda AB, Uplands Väsby, Sweden. Heparin bioactivity (ability to bind antithrombin III) is retained in the binding process due to the end-point covalent attachment that does not interfere with the heparin active site.

# D. Principle of Operation

For implantation, the physician gains guidewire access to the target location. The physician pre-dilates the target lesion by inflating a PTA balloon catheter and makes angiographic measurements to select the appropriate size endoprosthesis. The catheter-mounted stent is delivered to the target location over the guidewire and positioned at the target lesion. The stent is deployed from the delivery catheter. The physician seats the device against the vessel wall by inflating an angioplasty balloon within the stent. When fully deployed and seated, the stent supports the target vessel.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{4}

VI. ALTERNATIVE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Alternative procedures for treatment of symptomatic de novo or restenotic native lesions or occlusions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery include use of other commercially available stents (both bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents) and stent-grafts, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), medical management, exercise therapy, atherectomy, and bypass graft surgery. Each alternative has its own advantages and disadvantages. A patient should fully discuss these alternatives with a physician to select that method that best meets expectations and lifestyle.

VII. MARKETING HISTORY

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is currently available and marketed for vascular use in the European Union, where the CE mark was obtained in 2011. These countries include the following: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. There was a single recall of one lot (11 devices) in January 2015 due to possible separation of the distal catheter tip. Potential tip separation was due to a failure of a component in the bonding process equipment. The equipment was replaced and additional equipment monitoring has been added.

VIII. POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THE DEVICE ON HEALTH

Below is a list of the potential adverse effects (e.g., complications) associated with the use of the device.

Table 2: List of Procedure and Device Related Potential Adverse Effects

|  Procedure Related | Device Related  |
| --- | --- |
|  Access site infection | Allergic reaction  |
|  Entry site bleeding and / or hematoma | Hematoma  |
|  Hemorrhage | Stenosis  |
|  Nausea or vomiting | Restenosis  |
|  Vasospasm | Thrombosis or occlusion  |
|  Vessel thrombosis | Distal embolism  |
|  Occlusion | Vessel wall injury, including perforation, trauma, dissection, and rupture  |
|  Pseudoaneurysm, aneurysm, and trauma to the vessel wall (including rupture or dissection) | False aneurysm  |
|  Distal embolization | Infection  |
|  The need for urgent intervention or surgery | Inflammation  |
|  Arteriovenous fistula formation | Fever and / or pain in the absence of infection  |
|  Drug reactions | Deployment failure  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 5 of 43

{5}

|  Procedure Related | Device Related  |
| --- | --- |
|  Hypotension / hypertension | Migration  |
|  Transient or permanent contrast induced renal failure | Stent fracture  |
|  Renal toxicity | Target lesion revascularization  |
|  Sepsis | Device failure  |
|  Shock | A possible complication which may occur in conjunction with the use of any heparin-containing product: HIT type II  |
|  Radiation injury |   |
|  Fever |   |
|  Pain |   |
|  Arrhythmia |   |
|  Bradycardia |   |
|  Angina |   |
|  Myocardial infarction |   |
|  Stroke |   |
|  Leg pain or claudication |   |
|  Extremity ischemia or amputation |   |
|  Tissue ischemia or necrosis |   |
|  Cerebral vascular accident |   |
|  Malposition |   |
|  Malapposition |   |
|  Inflammation |   |
|  Death |   |

For the specific adverse events that occurred in the clinical studies, please see Section X below.

## IX. SUMMARY OF PRECLINICAL STUDIES

### A. Biocompatibility Studies

Biocompatibility testing was conducted on the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent in accordance with applicable Good Laboratory Practices (21 CRF §58) and ISO 10993-1: 2009, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Tests were conducted separately on product manufactured, packaged and sterilized using materials and procedures intended for the marketed product for the 1) TIGRIS catheter delivery system and 2) TIGRIS stent.

The TIGRIS catheter delivery system was classified as an externally communicating device in limited contact (&lt; 24 hrs) with circulating blood. The TIGRIS stent was classified as an implant device in permanent contact (&gt; 30 days) with blood. A summary of the biocompatibility testing conducted can be found in Table 3 below.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{6}

Table 3: Summary of GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent Biocompatibility Testing

|  Test Performed | Test Description | Stent | Delivery System | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Cytotoxicity | ISO MEM Elution Assay with L-929 Mouse Fibroblast Cells | X | X | Non-toxic  |
|  Sensitization | ISO Guinea Pig Maximization | X | X | Non-sensitizing  |
|  Irritation | ISO Intracutaneous Reactivity | X | X | Non-irritating  |
|  Pyrogenicity | Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity | X | X | Non-pyrogenic  |
|  Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO Systemic Toxicity Study | X | X | Non-toxic  |
|  Subchronic Toxicity | 14 Day Repeat Dose Intravascular and Intraperitoneal Toxicity Study | X | N/A | Non-toxic  |
|  Implantation | Intravascular Implantation Study – 4 Weeks | X^{a} | N/A | Non-toxic  |
|   |  Intravascular Implantation Study – 13 Weeks | X^{a} | N/A | Non-toxic  |
|  Hemocompatibility | ASTM Hemolysis Study (Direct and Indirect Contact) | X | X | Non-hemolytic  |
|   |  Complement Activation Assay (C3a and SC5b-9) | X | X | Not a complement activator  |
|   |  In Vivo Thrombogenicity Study | X^{a} | X^{b} | Non-thrombogenic  |
|  Genotoxicity | Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Assay | X | N/A | Non-mutagenic  |
|   |  Mouse Lymphoma Assay | X | N/A | Non-genotoxic  |
|   |  Mouse Micronucleus Assay | X | N/A | Non-genotoxic  |

a Evaluated as part of the animal studies outlined in Section C, below.
b Delivery system tested in the absence and presence of anticoagulation. In the absence of anticoagulation, significant thrombus was observed on the test and control articles. However, with anticoagulation, no thrombus was seen. The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is contraindicated in patients with contraindication to antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy.

Stent thrombogenicity was evaluated as part of other in vivo studies conducted to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the device in a vascular implant location, as described in Section C below. These additional animal studies demonstrated a lack of significant thrombus formation when stents were implanted in a clinically-relevant vascular implant location.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{7}

The omission of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity testing for the stent was supported by information regarding the starting materials, processing of the finished device compared to a marketed device, genotoxicity testing, the GLP animal study, and/or toxicity data from the literature.

The information provided demonstrates that the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is biocompatible.

## B. In vitro Engineering Testing

In vitro bench testing to support the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent was developed based on the device risk assessment and is consistent with FDA Non-Clinical Tests and Recommended Labeling of Intravascular Stents and Associated Delivery Systems, April 18, 2010 and its addendum, Select Updates for Non-Clinical Engineering Tests and Recommended Labeling for Intravascular Stents and Associated Delivery Systems, August 30, 2013.

The relevant in vitro tests outlined in the guidance document and included in support of the TIGRIS devices are summarized in Table 4 below. Unless otherwise specified, all test units were sterilized using a validated Ethylene Oxide sterilization process.

Table 4: Summary of in vitro Test Results

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Material Composition | Characterize the stent material composition to ensure it is acceptable for the intended use. | ASTM F2063-05 | The stent material conforms to implant material standards.  |
|  Shape Memory & Superelasticity | The stent must be in its austenitic phase at body temperature to behave superelastically. | A_{f} must be body temperature. | Each lot of nitinol wire used for the production of stents is tested for austenitic finish temperature (Af). The stent retains its specified size and shape by superelasticity.  |
|  Corrosion Resistance | The stent must resist corrosion following implantation. | The deployed stent must exhibit equivalent or superior breakdown potentials as compared to an appropriate reference device per ASTM F2129-08
The deployed stent must not exhibit evidence of corrosion after fatigue testing in an overlapped configuration (see below). | The stent exhibits acceptable corrosion resistance based on testing per ASTM F2129-08.
No wire discontinuities or fractures were observed on any of the devices.
No evidence of abrasion, corrosion, or other irregularities was observed on devices after fatigue testing (see below).  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 8 of 43

{8}

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria |   |   | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Nickel Elution | The stent must have acceptable levels of nickel elution. | The stent must not elute nickel beyond the acute and chronic tolerable intakes. |   |   | All stents meet the acceptance criteria for acute and chronic nickel elution.  |
|  Dimensional Verification (stent diameter) | The deployed stent outer diameter must be at least the maximum intended vessel diameter. | Stent Diameter (mm) | Intended Vessel Diameter (mm) | Min. Stent OD (mm) | All measurements pass the applicable requirement for stent outer diameter.  |
|   |   |  5 | 4.0-4.7 | 4.7  |   |
|   |   |  6 | 4.8-5.5 | 5.5  |   |
|   |   |  7 | 5.6-6.5 | 6.5  |   |
|   |   |  |   |   |   |
|  Dimensional Verification (stent length) | The stent must be within the dimensional specification when implanted. | Labeled Stent Length (cm) | Acceptable Deployed Length (cm) |   | All measurements passed the applicable requirement for deployed length.  |
|   |   |  3 | 2.8-3.2  |   |   |
|   |   |  4 | 3.8-4.2  |   |   |
|   |   |  6 | 5.7-6.3  |   |   |
|   |   |  8 | 7.6-8.4  |   |   |
|   |   |  10 | 9.5-10.5  |   |   |
|   |   |  |   |   |   |
|  Percent Surface Area of Stent | To determine the stent free surface area of the implanted stent. | Stents were characterized for information only. |   |   | The stent free surface area was calculated and ranges from 42% to 56% depending on device diameter and vessel oversizing.  |
|  Foreshortening | To determine the foreshortening of the stent from the catheter constrained diameter to the use diameter. | Stents were characterized for information only. See deployed length. |   |   | Foreshortening values range between -1.8% and 0.5% depending on labeled stent length (negative numbers indicate an increase in length post-deployment).  |
|  Stent Integrity | To verify the stent has no clinically significant defects or flaws after deployment. | The stent must have no completely severed linkages, no broken or bent struts, and no unacceptable contamination or delamination. |   |   | Stents meet the established acceptance criteria.  |
|  Coating Integrity | To characterize the CBAS heparin surface of the stent. | Stents were characterized for information only. |   |   | Based on the image analysis, the coating integrity of the CBAS Heparin Surface is maintained throughout aging, across device size configurations. There was no apparent gross heterogeneity in the presence or uniformity of the coating.  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{9}

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Radial Resistive Force | To measure the stent resistance to radial compression. | Stent resistance to circumferential compression must be ≥ 0.16kgf/cm2. | Stents meet the established acceptance criteria.  |
|  Chronic Outward Force | To characterize the stent outward force before expanding to nominal diameter. | Stents were characterized for information only. | Chronic outward forces ranged from 0.11kgf/cm2to 0.42kgf/cm2, depending on device diameter and vessel oversizing.  |
|  Material Mechanical Properties | Characterize the stent materials mechanical properties to ensure they are acceptable for the intended use. | ASTM F2063-05 | The stent material conforms to implant material standards ASTM F2063-05 for material properties.  |
|  Strain and Fatigue Analysis/Finite Element Analysis | To determine the location and magnitude of the maximum principal strains in the stents, under expected clinical use conditions, through the use of Finite Element Analysis (FEA). | Strains are calculated for: A) radial in-vivo pulsatile loading conditions when deployed in a host vessel at maximum and minimum product specification diameters, B) radial compressions due to catheter loading and C) multi-modal loading conditions when subjected to pulsatile loading conditions that are combined with bending, torsion and axial compression. | The location and magnitude of the maximum principle strains have been calculated and the strain states are below the endurance limit for the Nitinol material.  |
|  Accelerated Durability Testing | To evaluate the simulated 10 year durability of stents under expected clinical use conditions, including pulsatile and relative SFA physiological motions. | Acceptance criteria: The following acceptance criteria are used for the pulsatile fatigue test: • The stent must exhibit acceptable simulated 10 year fatigue durability. • There can be no damage that results in complete separation of the stent. | Stents meet the established acceptance criteria.  |
|  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatibility | To evaluate the MRI safety and compatibility of the stent. | The implant must not present additional risk to the patient when exposed to static magnetic field strengths of 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. | The stent does not pose additional risk to patients and may be labeled MR Conditional according to ASTM 2503.  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{10}

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Radiopacity | Determine the visibility of the stent and catheter delivery system under fluoroscopy. | The catheter delivery system must enable fluoroscopic visualization of the delivery catheter. The stent radiopacity must be characterized. | The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria. Stent radiopacity was characterized.  |
|  Crush Resistance | Demonstrate the ability of the stent to recover its desired size and shape after application and removal of external loads, deformations, or both. | The stent must recover its desired shape after application and removal of external loads, deformation, or both. | The stent fully recovers its diameter and length following deployment from the constrained profile and passed all acceptance criteria for accelerated durability testing.  |
|  Kink Resistance | To determine the radius of curvature at which the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent kinks. | Stents were characterized for information only. | Stents have kink radii below 0.2inches. All devices returned to original geometry after testing.  |
|  Dimensional Verification (Profile) | To verify the maximum diameter of the catheter delivery system and constrained stent and assure compatibility with recommended sheaths. | The catheter delivery system and constrained stent must be able to pass through a 6.4Fr profile block and through 6Fr introducer sheaths. The catheter delivery system must successfully withdraw through the introducer sheath following stent deployment. The catheter delivery system and constrained stent maximum diameter = 2.13mm (0.84") | The catheter delivery system and constrained stents meet the acceptance criteria.  |
|  Dimensional Verification (Working Length) | Delivery catheter working length enables treatment of the intended site. | The delivery catheter working length must be 118-125cm. | The delivery catheter meets the acceptance criteria for working length.  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{11}

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria |   | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Delivery, Deployment, and Retraction | To assess the ability of the catheter delivery system to deliver the stent to the intended location and deploy the stent. | The catheter delivery system must be able to reliably: • Access the target location. • Deploy the stent by withdrawing the tear tube. • Retract the intact catheter without dislodging the stent. The delivery system must deploy the stent with acceptable deployment accuracy and force (deployment force ≤3.3kgf). |   | The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria.  |
|  Delivery Catheter Bond Strengths | Evaluate the tensile strength of delivery catheter bonds. | The delivery catheter must maintain its function during access, deployment, and retraction. |   | Tensile strengths for all delivery catheter samples across all bond locations pass the applicable acceptance criteria  |
|   |   |  Bond | Bond Strength Accept. Criteria (kgf)  |   |
|   |   |  Tip bond | ≥0.51  |   |
|   |   |  Coupler bond | ≥1.02  |   |
|   |   |  Strain relief bond | ≥1.53  |   |
|   |   |  Thumbwheel linkage | ≥1.7  |   |
|   |   |  Hub bond | ≥0.51  |   |
|  Catheter Buckle Strength | Evaluate the force required to buckle the catheter | Buckle force must be >3.3kgf. |   | The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria for buckle force.  |
|  Catheter Delivery System Flexibility & Kink | To verify the catheter delivery system is able to reliably track through tortuous, clinically relevant anatomy and delivery the stent to its intended location. | The catheter delivery system must be able to reliably: • Access the target location. • Deploy the stent by withdrawing the tear tube. • Retract the intact catheter without dislodging the stent. The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria. |   | The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria.  |
|  Torqueability | Assess the catheter delivery system ability to maintain function while torqued. | Catheter delivery system shall maintain the ability to deploy with the handle rotated 360° during deployment. |   | The catheter delivery system meets the established acceptance criteria.  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{12}

|  Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Torque Strength | To evaluate the number of turns to failure for the catheter delivery system. | Catheter delivery systems were characterized for information only. | The catheter delivery system rotates an average of approximately 8 or 13 full turns prior to failure, depending on catheter working length.  |

# C. Animal Studies

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent was subjected to a series of three (acute, subacute and chronic) GLP animal studies. The in vivo animal studies demonstrated the safety and overall product performance of the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent in vivo in a total of 19 canine models and 6 porcine models. Table 5 summarizes the results of the GLP studies conducted on finished, sterile devices.

Table 5: Summary Results of the GLP Animal Studies

|  Study Type | Study Numbers Test or Control | Evaluations | Outcome  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  2003SC Chronic Safety Study in Canine Ilio- femoral Artery (30 and 90 days implantation) | 15 Canines were implanted with 5mm x 40mm or 6mm x40mm TIGRIS and 5mm x 50mm or 6mm x 50mm Control devices | Patency Histological Parameters | The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent demonstrated similar/superior results when compared to the Control device for patency, measured by percent diameter stenosis, at 90 ± 3 days. Histologically, injury and inflammation scores were similar between Test and Control devices.  |
|  2075SC Acute Safety/Deliverability Study in Canine Ilio-femoral Artery | 4 Canines were implanted with a total of 12 TIGRIS devices. Diameters were 5mm, 6mm, 7mm, or 8mm. Device lengths were 30mm and 100mm. | Device Deliverability Deployment Accuracy | All devices deployed as intended. All twelve devices were deployed and remained within 5mm of the target site.  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{13}

|  Study Type | Study Numbers Test or Control | Evaluations | Outcome  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  2110SC Chronic Safety Study in the Swine Ilio- femoral Artery (30 and 90 days implantation) | Six swine were implanted with a total of 12 TIGRIS Devices and 12 Control devices. Each study animal received two overlapping TIGRIS and two overlapping Control devices. Devices were 6mm or 7mm in diameter and 30mm in length. | Patency
Histological Parameters
Delivery and Deployment
Stent Integrity | The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent demonstrated similar results when compared to the Control device for patency, measured by percent diameter stenosis, at 90 ± 3 days.

Histologically, neointimal thickness and percent area stenosis scores were similar between Test and Control devices.

All TIGRIS devices received passing scores for delivery and deployment.

No fractures were detected in the test or control  |

## D. Sterilization, Packaging, and Shelf-Life

The GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent is sterilized by ethylene oxide. Validation of the sterilization method to ensure a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ has been conducted in accordance with ISO 11135-1:2007 Sterilization of health care products-Ethylene oxide-Part 1: Requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices.

Packaging qualification and device verification testing was performed on the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent at baseline and on aged product. The device is packaged in a backer card, sealed in a foil-tyvek primary pouch, and a poly-Tyvek secondary pouch. The packaged device is then placed in a carton.

A shelf life of 3 years has been established for the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent based on product and package shelf life testing.

## X. SUMMARY OF PRIMARY CLINICAL STUDY

The applicant conducted a prospective, multi-center, randomized control clinical study in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to establish a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for the use of the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent for in the treatment of de novo and restenotic atherosclerotic lesions, ≤24 cm in length, in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries (SFA/PPA) of patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The design and results of this investigational device exemption (IDE) study are summarized in Table 6.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 14 of 43

{14}

Table 6: Primary Clinical Study Synopsis

|  Title of study | Evaluation of the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries  |
| --- | --- |
|  Protocol number | PCE 09-02  |
|  Study sites | 33 study sites in the US and 3 study sites in the EU  |
|  Study objective | The primary objective of the randomized study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent in the treatment of de novo and restenotic atherosclerotic lesions, ≤24 cm in length, in the SFA/PPA of patients with symptomatic PAD.  |
|  Study design | Prospective, multi-center, randomized control clinical study comparing outcomes in subjects randomly assigned to treatment with the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent to those assigned to treatment with the control device, the Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (Control). Randomization was 3:1 (TIGRIS Vascular Stent:Control).  |
|  Number of subjects | Planned: 269 subjects meeting study eligibility criteria Enrolled: Total: 274 subjects TIGRIS Vascular Stent Group: 203 subjects Control Device Group: 71 subjects Analyzed: 274 subjects in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population 267 subjects in per-protocol (PP) analysis population  |
|  Follow-up evaluation intervals | 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months  |
|  Criteria for evaluation | Primary Safety Endpoint: A composite 30-day safety endpoint of freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE), defined as death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and amputation above the metatarsals in the treated leg (index limb amputation). Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Primary patency at 12 months after implantation, defined as uninterrupted patency without target lesion revascularization (TLR), including the proximal and distal margins, and no restenosis as documented by a peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≤2.5 by Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS).  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{15}

|  Results Summary | Safety Results: The safety of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent was found to be statistically non-inferior to that of the Control device, using a 12% margin, measured 30 days after implant (p<0.001). In the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group, 99.5% (187/188) of subjects were free from MAEs at 30 days, as compared to 100.0% (69/69) of subjects in the Control device group.

Effectiveness Results: The effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent was found to be statistically non-inferior to that of the Control device, using a 19% margin, measured 12 months after implant (p=0.002). In the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group, 57.1% (97/170) of subjects maintained primary patency at 12 months, whereas 54.7% (35/64) of subjects in the Control device group maintained primary patency at this time point.  |
| --- | --- |

A. Study Design

The PCE 09-02 clinical study was a prospective, unblinded, multi-center, randomized control study comparing outcomes in subjects randomly assigned to treatment with the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent to those assigned to treatment with the control device, the Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (Control), randomized at a 3:1 ratio (TIGRIS Vascular Stent:Control device). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent in the treatment of de novo and restenotic atherosclerotic lesions, ≤24 cm in length, in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries (SFA/PPA) of patients with symptomatic PAD.

A sample size of 269 subjects meeting study eligibility criteria was established to obtain 80% power to statistically demonstrate non-inferiority of the safety and effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent as compared to the Control device.

Two independent core laboratories were contracted to provide objective analysis of all study imaging (one core lab analyzed angiographic images, and another analyzed ultrasound and X-ray images). An independent DSMB composed of five members was established for this study to provide continuing review of study conduct with respect to subject safety and data integrity.

1. Clinical Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients eligible for inclusion in the study were required to possess all of the following characteristics:

1. Rutherford Class 2 - 4.
2. Abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI ≤0.9). If ABI was not measurable due to medial calcinosis, an abnormal toe brachial index (TBI ≤0.7) could be substituted.
3. At least 21 years of age.
4. Subject or legal representative willing to give written informed consent.
5. Reasonable expectation of survival of at least 12 months after the procedure.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 16 of 43

{16}

6. Male, infertile female, or female practicing an effective method of preventing pregnancy.

[NOTE: Women of childbearing potential were required to have a negative pregnancy test.]

7. Ability to participate in follow-up visits as required by the protocol.

8. Met angiographic inclusion criteria. Criteria used to establish that the patient was a candidate for treatment by stenting within the limits of this protocol were assessed angiographically at the time of stent implantation. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, patients were required to meet all of the following angiographic criteria:

8(a). One de novo or restenotic lesion of the SFA/PPA with a cumulative length visually estimated to be ≤24 cm, with one or more regions of focal luminal narrowing ≥50%. The lesion must have been located in the region beginning approximately 1 cm below the origin of the profunda femoris artery and ending approximately 1 cm above the intercondylar notch.

8(b). Arteries with reference vessel diameter of 4.0 – 6.5 mm within the SFA/PPA, estimated visually.

8(c). Angiographic evidence of at least one patent tibial artery (&lt;50% stenosis angiographically) from the origin to the ankle that did not require planned intervention at the time of procedure or within 12 months of enrollment.

8(d). Guidewire had successfully traversed the lesion to be treated and was within the true lumen of the distal vessel.

8(e). Lesion had been pre-dilated before stent deployment as required in study protocol Section 4.3.4.

## Exclusion Criteria

Patients were not considered eligible for inclusion in the study if they possessed any of the following characteristics:

1. Prior enrollment in this study.
2. Vascular access/catheterization in the target leg within 30 days of study enrollment.

[NOTE: Diagnostic catheterizations done for the purposes of planning and scheduling the interventional procedure were allowed.]

3. Prior treatment of the SFA/PPA in the target leg with stenting or bypass.
4. Flow-limiting aortoiliac disease.

[NOTE: Patients receiving successful treatment of iliac disease during the same procedure could be enrolled in the study if all other inclusion/exclusion criteria had been met.]

5. Additional ipsilateral femoropopliteal or tibial disease, outside of the lesion to be stented, requiring intervention.
6. Arterial aneurysm in the target leg.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 17 of 43

{17}

7. Co-morbid conditions which would have precluded compliance with study protocol.
8. Obstructive or occlusive non-atherosclerotic disease.
9. Creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dl.
10. Amputation above the metatarsals, resulting from vascular disease, in the target leg.
11. Septicemia or uncontrolled infection.
12. Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, including allergy to heparin, or history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), or a positive PF4 antibody assay.
13. Abnormal platelet levels, i.e., platelet count at Baseline less than 80,000/μL.
14. History of coagulopathy.
15. Participation in any other clinical research study that might confound the endpoints of this study.
16. Any other factor identified by the Investigator that would disqualify the prospective subject from participation in the study.

## 2. Follow-up Schedule

After the index procedure, enrolled subjects were to return to the enrolling site at five specified intervals for follow-up evaluation: one month (30 ± 7 days), six months (182 ± 30 days), 12 months (365 ± 45 days), 24 months (730 ± 45 days), and 36 months (1095 ± 45 days). The schedule of evaluations to be completed at each study interval is presented in Table 7.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 18 of 43

{18}

Table 7: Evaluations to be Completed at Each Study Interval

|  Study Interval | Evaluations to be Completed  |
| --- | --- |
|  Baseline | ·Demographics ·Medical history ·Physical exam ·CBC, platelets, and creatinine ·Rutherford classification ·Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) or Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) ·Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires (EQ-5D, PAQ) ·Medications  |
|  Index Procedure / Discharge | ·Angiography / vessel and lesion characteristics ·Procedure and device information ·Adverse events ·X-ray for fracture analysis ·Medications  |
|  Follow-Up Visits | 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up evaluations: ·Physical exam ·Adverse events ·Rutherford classification ·ABI or TBI (whichever was collected at baseline) ·QOL questionnaires ·Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) ·Medications Additional 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up evaluation: ·X-ray  |
|  Unscheduled Visits (as available and applicable) | ·Physical exam ·Adverse events ·Rutherford classification ·ABI or TBI (whichever was collected at baseline) ·QOL questionnaires ·Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) ·Medications ·X-ray  |
|  Study Completion / Discontinuation | ·Reason for discontinuation ·Adverse events  |

# 3. Clinical Endpoints

# Primary Endpoints

The primary safety endpoint in this study was freedom from MAE observed within 30 days of stent implant, with MAE defined as death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and amputation above the metatarsals in the treated leg (index limb amputation). Analysis of the primary safety endpoint tested the hypothesis that the safety of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent is statistically non-inferior to the Control device, using a  $12\%$  margin, measured 30 days after implant.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{19}

The primary effectiveness endpoint in this study was primary patency at 12 months after implantation, with primary patency defined as uninterrupted patency without target lesion revascularization (TLR), including the proximal and distal margins, and no restenosis as documented by a peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≤2.5 by Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS). Analysis of the primary effectiveness endpoint tested the hypothesis that the effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent is statistically non-inferior to the Control device, using a 19% margin, measured 12 months after implant.

## Secondary Endpoints

Secondary endpoints were established to describe functional outcomes of therapy with the TIGRIS Vascular Stent. The study utilized the following secondary endpoints:

1. Freedom from MAE, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
2. Procedural Success: Successful device implantation with a residual stenosis &lt;30% without acute (within 48 hours) serious adverse events (AEs) defined as: death, stroke, myocardial infarction, emergent surgical revascularization, significant distal embolization in the treated leg, or thrombosis of the target vessel occurring after or not successfully treated during the implant procedure.
3. Device Success: Successful delivery of stent to the intended site and successful stent deployment.
4. Freedom from TVR, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
5. Freedom from TLR, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
6. Rutherford improvement: Improvement in Rutherford Classification (from baseline value) by ≥1 class. Any subjects not receiving a Rutherford Classification for the corresponding month visit were not to be used in calculating this statistic.
7. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI): Descriptive statistics measured at pre-procedure and each follow-up visit. Any subjects not having an ABI measured for a specific visit were not to be used in calculating this statistic at that interval.
8. Quality of Life - Descriptive statistics on change in overall Quality of Life (EQ-5D) and disease-specific Quality of Life (Peripheral Artery Questionnaire [PAQ]) between Baseline and each follow-up visit. Subjects not completing either an EQ-5D or a PAQ for a specific visit were not to be used in calculating this statistic at that interval.
9. Primary patency, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
10. Assisted primary patency, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
11. Secondary patency, estimated through time-to-event analysis.
12. Freedom from stent fracture. All subjects for which fracture is not evaluable at the corresponding time point were not to be used in calculating this statistic.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 20 of 43

{20}

# B. Accountability of PMA Cohort

Between May 2012 and June 2014, a total of 274 subjects were enrolled in the study at 33 study sites in the US and 3 study sites in the EU. The study was designed to enroll 269 subjects meeting all eligibility criteria. Cases of eligibility violations were reviewed and adjudicated by the independent DSMB. Based on this review, and with the approval of the FDA, the enrollment limit was increased by five subjects during the enrollment period to compensate for ineligible subjects that had been enrolled. Of the 274 subjects ultimately enrolled, 267 were determined by the DSMB to have met essential eligibility requirements. The remaining seven subjects were deemed by the DSMB to have had eligibility violations that could affect the evaluation of primary endpoints, and were excluded from the per-protocol (PP) population. All endpoint data reported here are based on the PP population of 267 subjects, unless the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of 274 subjects is specified.

The clinical study report included in the PMA reflects complete follow-up data through at least the 12-month visit for all available subjects. The PCE 09-02 study remains ongoing until all study subjects have completed 36 months of follow-up or have been withdrawn.

Of the 267 subjects determined to meet essential eligibility requirements for inclusion in the study, 25 (9.4%) were withdrawn prior to reaching 365 days after the index procedure. Similar withdrawal percentages were observed between the TIGRIS Vascular Stent and Control device groups at each follow-up interval (Table 8).

Table 8: Withdraw Status

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | Total  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects^{1,2} | 197 | 70 | 267  |
|  Subjects Withdrawn prior to 30 Days | 2 (1.0%) [197] | 0 (0.0%) [ 70] | 2 (0.7%) [267]  |
|  Subjects Withdrawn prior to 6 Months | 10 (5.1%) [197] | 1 (1.4%) [ 70] | 11 (4.1%) [267]  |
|  Subjects Withdrawn prior to 12 Months | 19 (9.6%) [197] | 6 (8.6%) [ 70] | 25 (9.4%) [267]  |

1 Numbers indicate subjects withdrawn prior to the exact time point.
2 Brackets contain subject number eligible for visit according to their study time.

Fourteen deaths had occurred in the study at the time of data lock. Twelve of the deaths occurred in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group (5.9% of all subjects enrolled in this group), and two occurred in the Control device group (2.8% of all subjects enrolled in this group). No deaths in either group were determined by the DSMB to have a relationship to the study device or procedure. Reported causes of death (by MedDRA Preferred Term code) included myocardial infarction (two cases), ischaemic cardiomyopathy, cardiac failure (acute), cardiac failure (chronic), renal cancer, cardiac arrest (three cases), ventricular fibrillation, septic shock, coronary artery disease, peripheral ischaemia, and cerebrovascular accident.

Of the available subjects that had not withdrawn from the study prior to their 12-month follow-up visit window, 90.8% attended the 12-month follow-up visit. Follow-up visit attendance through 12 months is presented in Table 9.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 21 of 43

{21}

Table 9: Subject Follow-up Visit Attendance

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | Total  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects1,2,3 | 197 | 70 | 267  |
|  Attended 30-Day Follow-Up Visit | 183 (93.8%) [195] | 70 (100.0%) [70] | 253 (95.5%) [265]  |
|  Attended 6 Month Follow-Up Visit | 175 (92.1%) [190] | 64 (92.8%) [69] | 239 (92.3%) [259]  |
|  Attended 12 Month Follow-Up Visit | 167 (91.8%) [182] | 59 (88.1%) [67] | 226 (90.8%) [249]  |

1Numbers indicate subjects whom attended corresponding follow-up visit.
${}^{2}\left( \% \right)$  indicate the percentage of eligible subjects who attended the corresponding follow-up visit.
3Brackets contain number of subjects eligible for the corresponding follow-up visit.

# C. Study Population Demographics and Baseline Parameters

The study was conducted in the US and EU. Subject demographics, including a poolability analysis for gender and age by location, are shown in Table 10 below (ethnicity and race data were not collected in the EU). Subject medical history, including key clinical characteristics at the time of the index procedure, is presented in Table 11. Target vessel and lesion characteristics are provided in Table 12.

Table 10: Demographics

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-value  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Gender1 | 197 | 70 | 0.878  |
|  Female | 56 (28.4%) | 21 (30.0%) |   |
|  Male | 141 (71.6%) | 49 (70.0%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Age at Procedure (years)2 | 195 | 70 | 0.385  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 66.8 (9.30) | 67.9 (8.87) |   |
|  Median | 67 | 69 |   |
|  Min-Max | 45 - 88 | 47 - 86 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Ethnicity1,3 | 142 | 54 | 1.000  |
|  Hispanic or Latino | 2 (1.4%) | 1 (1.9%) |   |
|  Not Hispanic or Latino | 140 (98.6%) | 53 (98.1%) |   |
|  Unknown | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Race1,3 | 142 | 54 | 0.010  |
|  American Indian or Alaskan Native | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  Asian | 4 (2.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  Black | 18 (12.7%) | 2 (3.7%) |   |
|  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  White | 116 (81.7%) | 52 (96.3%) |   |
|  Other Race | 2 (1.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{22}

Table 2: Subject Medical History and Baseline Characteristics

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-value  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Smoking History1 | 197 | 70 | 0.460  |
|  Never Smoked | 17 (8.6%) | 10 (14.3%) |   |
|  Current Smoker | 76 (38.6%) | 23 (32.9%) |   |
|  Former Smoker | 104 (52.8%) | 37 (52.9%) |   |
|  Quit ≤ 1 year ago2 | 18 (17.3%) | 5 (13.5%) |   |
|  Quit ≤ 5 years ago2 | 14 (13.5%) | 8 (21.6%) |   |
|  Quit > 5 years ago2 | 72 (69.2%) | 24 (64.9%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Diabetes Mellitus1 | 197 | 70 | 0.777  |
|  Yes | 79 (40.1%) | 30 (42.9%) |   |
|  No | 118 (59.9%) | 40 (57.1%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Hypertension1 | 197 | 70 | 0.122  |
|  Yes | 171 (86.8%) | 55 (78.6%) |   |
|  No | 26 (13.2%) | 15 (21.4%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Hyperlipidemia1 | 197 | 70 | 0.881  |
|  Yes | 137 (69.5%) | 48 (68.6%) |   |
|  No | 60 (30.5%) | 22 (31.4%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Coronary Artery Disease1 | 197 | 70 | 0.580  |
|  Yes | 98 (49.7%) | 32 (45.7%) |   |
|  No | 99 (50.3%) | 38 (54.3%) |   |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{23}

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-value  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Myocardial Infarction (MI)1 | 197 | 70 | 0.581  |
|  Yes | 36 (18.3%) | 10 (14.3%) |   |
|  No | 161 (81.7%) | 60 (85.7%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  BMI3 | 197 | 70 | 0.626  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 28.0 (5.0) | 28.4 (6.0) |   |
|  Median | 27.5 | 28.8 |   |
|  Min-Max | 16.2 - 47.5 | 15.5 - 46.9 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Baseline Rutherford Category1 | 197 | 70 | 0.772  |
|  Category 2 | 62 (31.5%) | 22 (31.4%) |   |
|  Category 3 | 125 (63.5%) | 43 (61.4%) |   |
|  Category 4 | 10 (5.1%) | 5 (7.1%) |   |

1 P-value obtained with the Fisher's Exact Test.
2 Percent measured out of former smokers.
3 P-value obtained with the t-test.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{24}

Table 3: Target Lesion and Vessel Characteristics

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-Value  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Final Lesion Length (mm)^{1} | 197 | 70 | 0.075  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 107.0 (69.5) | 124.6 (73.4) |   |
|  Median | 90 | 120 |   |
|  Min-Max | 5 - 260 | 10 - 240 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Lesion Type^{1} | 197 | 70 | 0.483  |
|  Occlusion | 83 (42.1%) | 26 (37.1%) |   |
|  Stenosis | 114 (57.9%) | 44 (62.9%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  If Stenosis, Maximum Percent^{2} | 114 | 44 | 0.143  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 74.4 (9.27) | 72.0 (8.57) |   |
|  Median | 75.0 | 73.8 |   |
|  Min-Max | 51.0 - 91.7 | 52.8 - 86.6 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Lesion Calcification^{1} | 189 | 66 | 0.442  |
|  None | 95 (50.3%) | 28 (42.4%) |   |
|  Mild | 4 (2.1%) | 0 (0.0%) |   |
|  Moderate | 48 (25.4%) | 21 (31.8%) |   |
|  Severe | 42 (22.2%) | 17 (25.8%) |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Reference Diameter Proximal to Lesion (mm)^{1} | 196 | 70 | 0.698  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 5.4 (0.65) | 5.5 (0.65) |   |
|  Median | 5.5 | 5.5 |   |
|  Min-Max | 4.0 - 6.5 | 4.0 - 6.5 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Reference Diameter Distal to Lesion (mm)^{1} | 196 | 70 | 0.671  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 5.4 (0.69) | 5.4 (0.62) |   |
|  Median | 5.5 | 5.5 |   |
|  Min-Max | 4.0 - 6.5 | 4.0 - 6.5 |   |
|  |   |   |   |
|  Tibial Runoff Vessels^{1} | 187 | 69 | 0.156  |
|  1 | 21 (11.2%) | 11 (15.9%) |   |
|  2 | 106 (56.7%) | 30 (43.5%) |   |
|  3 | 60 (32.1%) | 28 (40.6%) |   |

1 P-value obtained with the t-test.
2 P-value obtained with the Fisher's Exact Test.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{25}

D. Safety and Effectiveness Results

1. Safety Results

Primary Safety Endpoint

The primary safety endpoint of the PCE 09-02 study, freedom from MAE observed within 30 days of stent implant was met. The safety of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent was found to be statistically non-inferior to that of the Control device, using a 12% margin, measured 30 days after implant (p&lt;0.001; Table 13). Table 13 represents the primary safety endpoint analysis for the PP population; analyses of ITT and As-treated (AT) populations demonstrated similar results for this endpoint.

MAEs were defined in this study as death, TVR, and index limb amputation. One MAE was reported within the first 30 days after the index procedure. This MAE, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group, consisted of a TVR performed on the day of the procedure to treat a procedural complication. After deployment of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent, occlusion of the popliteal artery was noted above the knee but distal to the margins of the deployed TIGRIS Vascular Stent. A guidewire was passed through the occlusion to restore flow, and a prophylactic balloon angioplasty was performed in the peroneal and distal popliteal arteries.

Table 13: Freedom from Major Adverse Events at 30 Days

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-value*  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Freedom from MAE | N=188 | N=69 | < 0.001  |
|  Yes | 187 (99.5%) | 69 (100.0%) |   |
|  95% Confidence Interval** | [97.1%, 100.0%] | [94.8%, 100.0%] |   |

*The non-inferiority test with a 12% margin is performed using a one-sided z-test with a pooled variance estimate.
**Confidence interval calculated using binomial exact test.

Secondary Safety Endpoint

Freedom from MAE through 12 months after implant, estimated through time-to-event analysis, is presented in Table 14.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 26 of 43

{26}

Table 14: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Freedom from MAE

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 69 | 4 (4) | 1 (2) | 94.1% | (85.1%, 97.8%)  |
|  [184-365] | 64 | 9 (13) | 15 (17) | 80.1% | (68.0%, 87.9%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 1 (1) | 6 (6) | 99.5% | (96.5%, 99.9%)  |
|  [1-30] | 190 | 0 (1) | 3 (9) | 99.5% | (96.5%, 99.9%)  |
|  [31-183] | 187 | 13 (14) | 5 (14) | 92.4% | (87.5%, 95.4%)  |
|  [184-365] | 169 | 36 (50) | 22 (36) | 72.3% | (65.1%, 78.2%)  |

# Device- or procedure-related Serious Adverse Events

Listings of all reported device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) as classified via MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC), High Level Term (HLT), and Preferred Term (PT) for each follow-up interval are provided in Tables 15 and 16. The percentage of subjects experiencing a device- or procedure-related SAE was similarly low for both treatment groups at each interval, ranging from a low of  $1.4\%$  (TIGRIS Vascular Stent group at procedure day, and Control device group at 30-day interval) to a high of  $5.9\%$  (Control device group at 1-year interval) through one year.

The MedDRA SOCs corresponding to the device- or procedure-related SAE category were "General disorders and administration site conditions," (21 total events) "Injury, poisoning and procedural complications," (six total events) and "Vascular disorders" (four total events) (Tables 15 and 16).

The MedDRA PTs corresponding to this AE category included the following:

- Vessel puncture site haematoma (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group),
- Vessel puncture site haemorrhage (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group),
Device breakage (one event, in the Control device group),
- Vascular stent restenosis (17 events, with 11 in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group and six in the Control device group),
- Vascular pseudoaneurysm (five total events, with four in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group and one in the Control device group),
- Procedural complication (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group),
- Vessel perforation (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group),

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{27}

- Arteriovenous fistula (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group),
- Device occlusion (one event, in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group), and
- Intermittent claudication (two total events, with one in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group and one in the Control device group).

The frequency and types of the reported device- or procedure-related SAEs in the study are in alignment with what might be expected in the studied patient population and therapeutic area.

Table 15: Summary of All Serious Device and Procedure Related Adverse Events by Early Follow-up Interval (ITT Population) $^{3,4,5}$

|   |   |   | Follow-up Interval  |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   | Procedure Day |   | 30 Days1 |   | 6 Months  |   |
|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
|  Number of Subjects2 Available | N = 203 | N = 71 | N = 203 | N = 71 | N = 199 | N = 70  |
|  Number experiencing any event(s) | 5 (2.5%) [5] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 4 (2.0%) [4] | 2 (2.9%) [2]  |
|  General disorders and administration site conditions | 2 (1.0%) [2] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 2 (2.9%) [2]  |
|  Administration site reactions NEC | 2 (1.0%) [2] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vessel puncture site haematoma | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vessel puncture site haemorrhage | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Device physical property and chemical issues | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Device breakage | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular complications associated with device | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 2 (2.9%) [2]  |
|  Vascular stent restenosis | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 2 (2.9%) [2]  |
|  Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Cardiac and vascular procedural complications | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular pseudoaneurysm | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (1.4%) [1] | 3 (1.5%) [3] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Non-site specific procedural complications | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Procedural complication | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular disorders | 2 (1.0%) [2] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular injuries NEC | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vessel perforation | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular malformations and acquired anomalies | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Arteriovenous fistula | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{28}

This time interval includes Day 0 such that all adverse events counted in the Procedure Day column are also counted 30 Days.
Subject counts at the top of each column are the number of subjects within the study at the beginning of that interval and are the denominator used in calculating percentages in that column.
3Time intervals for estimates: Procedure Day (0 Days), 30 Days (Procedure - 30 Days) and 6 Months (31 - 182 Days).
4Entries Represent MedDRA System Organ Class, High Level Term and Preferred Term and are identified by font style and increasing level of indentation.
Cells are formatted to display: number of subjects experiencing the event (percentage of subjects experiencing the event) [number of events experienced].

Table 16: Summary of All Serious Device and Procedure Related Adverse Events by Late Follow-up Interval (ITT Population) $^{2,3,4}$

|   | Follow-up Interval  |   |   |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   | 1 Year |   | 2 Years |   | 3 Years  |   |
|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
|  Number of Subjects1 Available | N = 188 | N = 68 | N = 123 | N = 39 | N = 22 | N = 9  |
|  Number experiencing any event(s) | 6 (3.2%) [6] | 4 (5.9%) [4] | 4 (3.3%) [4] | 1 (2.6%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  General disorders and administration site conditions | 5 (2.7%) [5] | 3 (4.4%) [3] | 4 (3.3%) [4] | 1 (2.6%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Device malfunction events NEC | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (0.8%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Device occlusion | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 1 (0.8%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular complications associated with device | 5 (2.7%) [5] | 3 (4.4%) [3] | 3 (2.4%) [3] | 1 (2.6%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular stent restenosis | 5 (2.7%) [5] | 3 (4.4%) [3] | 3 (2.4%) [3] | 1 (2.6%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Vascular disorders | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 1 (1.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Peripheral vasoconstriction, necrosis and vascular insufficiency | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 1 (1.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |
|  Intermittent claudication | 1 (0.5%) [1] | 1 (1.5%) [1] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0] | 0 (0.0%) [0]  |

Subject counts at the top of each column are the number of subjects within the study at the beginning of that interval and are the denominator used in calculating percentages in that column.
2Time intervals for estimates: 1 Year (213 - 410 Days), 2 Years (411 - 775 Days) and 3 Years (776 - 1140 Days).
3Entries Represent MedDRA System Organ Class, High Level Term and Preferred Term and are identified by font style and increasing level of indentation
4Cells are formatted to display: number of subjects experiencing the event (percentage of subjects experiencing the event) [number of events experienced].

# 2. Effectiveness Results

Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

The primary effectiveness endpoint of the PCE 09-02 study, primary patency assessed at 12 months after implant, was met. The effectiveness of the TIGRIS Vascular Stent was found to be statistically non-inferior to that of the Control device, using a  $19\%$  margin, measured 12 months after implant  $(p = 0.002$ ; Table 17). Table 17 represents the primary effectiveness endpoint analysis for the PP population; analyses of ITT and AT populations demonstrated similar results for this endpoint.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{29}

Table 17: Primary Patency at 12 Months

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT | P-value*  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Patent at 12 Months | N=170 | N=64 | 0.002  |
|  Yes | 97 (57.1%) | 35 (54.7%) |   |
|  95% Confidence Interval** | [49.3%, 64.6%] | [41.8%, 67.2%] |   |

*The non-inferiority test with a 19% margin is performed using a one-sided z-test with a pooled variance estimate.
**Confidence interval calculated using binomial exact test.

Secondary Effectiveness Endpoints

# Procedural Success

A large majority of index procedures in both treatment groups were successful in treating the target lesion with no acute, unresolved SAEs. A total of three subjects did not meet the study definition of procedural success, i.e., successful device implantation with a residual stenosis  $&lt; 30\%$  without acute (within 48 hours) serious adverse events (AEs) defined as: death, stroke, myocardial infarction, emergent surgical revascularization, significant distal embolization in the treated leg, or thrombosis of the target vessel occurring after or not successfully treated during the implant procedure (Table 18).

Table 18: Procedural Success

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  Procedural Success | 197 | 70  |
|  Yes | 196 (99.5%) | 68 (97.1%)  |
|  No | 1 (0.5%) | 2 (2.9%)  |

# Device Success

One subject in the PP group did not have a device implanted successfully (Table 19). During the applicant's review of the procedural records in this case, the implanting Investigator noted that this subject had unusually challenging anatomy. All stents were withdrawn, undeployed, from the subject with no clinical sequelae. The implanting Investigator elected to discontinue the procedure without deploying a stent or continuing the procedure with a non-study stent, and the subject was successfully treated using balloon angioplasty only.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{30}

Table 19: Device Success

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  Device Success | 197 | 70  |
|  Yes | 196 (99.5%) | 70 (100.0%)  |
|  No | 1 (0.5%) | 0 (0.0%)  |

# Freedom from TVR

Freedom from TVR was comparable between treatment groups. Time-to-event analysis of freedom from TVR through 12 months is presented in Table 20.

Table 20: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Freedom From TVR

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 69 | 4 (4) | 1 (2) | 94.1% | (85.1%, 97.8%)  |
|  [184-365] | 64 | 8 (12) | 16 (18) | 81.9% | (70.3%, 89.3%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 1 (1) | 6 (6) | 99.5% | (96.5%, 99.9%)  |
|  [1-30] | 190 | 0 (1) | 3 (9) | 99.5% | (96.5%, 99.9%)  |
|  [31-183] | 187 | 10 (11) | 8 (17) | 94.0% | (89.4%, 96.6%)  |
|  [184-365] | 169 | 35 (46) | 23 (40) | 74.1% | (66.9%, 79.9%)  |

# Freedom from TLR

Freedom from TLR was comparable between treatment groups. Time-to-event analysis of freedom from TLR through 12 months is presented in Table 21.

Table 21: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Freedom From TLR

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 69 | 4 (4) | 1 (2) | 94.1% | (85.1%, 97.8%)  |
|  [184-365] | 64 | 8 (12) | 16 (18) | 81.9% | (70.3%, 89.3%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 0 (0) | 6 (6) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 191 | 0 (0) | 3 (9) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 188 | 9 (9) | 8 (17) | 95.0% | (90.7%, 97.4%)  |
|  [184-365] | 171 | 33 (42) | 23 (40) | 76.3% | (69.3%, 81.9%)  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{31}

# Rutherford Improvement

The TIGRIS Vascular Stent group exhibited a comparable frequency of improvement in Rutherford category, as well as mean change in Rutherford category, to the Control device group at each follow-up interval. Improvement was seen in more than 87% of subjects at all intervals (Table 22).

Table 22: Rutherford Improvement¹,²

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  30 Days | 182 | 69  |
|  Rutherford Improved | 171 (94.0%) | 66 (95.7%)  |
|  Rutherford Not Improved | 11 (6.0%) | 3 (4.3%)  |
|  |   |   |
|  6-Months | 175 | 64  |
|  Rutherford Improved | 155 (88.6%) | 59 (92.2%)  |
|  Rutherford Not Improved | 20 (11.4%) | 5 (7.8%)  |
|  |   |   |
|  12-Months | 165 | 58  |
|  Rutherford Improved | 145 (87.9%) | 52 (89.7%)  |
|  Rutherford Not Improved | 20 (12.1%) | 6 (10.3%)  |

¹Rutherford Improved requires at least 1 class of improvement in Rutherford Classification versus baseline; otherwise they are counted as Rutherford Not Improved.
²Subjects without Rutherford measured at corresponding visit omitted.

# Ankle-Brachial Index

Table 23 presents the mean, median, and min-max change in ABI from the pre-procedure baseline value at each follow-up interval. Higher numbers in Table 23 represent a more favorable clinical outcome, with positive numbers indicating improvement from subjects' pre-procedure condition. The mean change from the baseline value is positive at each interval for both treatment groups, and similar between groups.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 32 of 43

{32}

Table 23: Change in ABI

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  30-Days | 178 | 70  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 0.310 (0.1897) | 0.332 (0.1902)  |
|  Median | 0.280 | 0.350  |
|  Min-Max | -0.130 - 1.000 | -0.050 - 0.820  |
|  |   |   |
|  6-Month | 172 | 61  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 0.241 (0.2364) | 0.232 (0.2399)  |
|  Median | 0.210 | 0.210  |
|  Min-Max | -0.410 - 0.900 | -0.260 - 1.000  |
|  |   |   |
|  12-Month | 160 | 57  |
|  Mean (Std Dev) | 0.249 (0.2269) | 0.314 (0.2107)  |
|  Median | 0.215 | 0.270  |
|  Min-Max | -0.350 - 1.200 | 0.000 - 1.000  |

## Quality of Life

This endpoint was established in order to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) improvement brought about by improvement of symptoms following treatment with the TIGRIS Vascular Stent as compared to the Control device. The QOL questionnaire results obtained at each visit following the index procedure were compared with those obtained pre-procedure.

In this study, the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) and EQ-5D Questionnaire were used. For both questionnaires, higher scores reflect a better quality of life. Scores for both treatment arms showed a trend of consistent post-procedure improvement as compared to baseline, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at any interval.

## Primary Patency

Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency are presented in Table 24. Estimates of primary patency (survival probability) are similar between the two treatment groups through 12 months.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{33}

Table 24: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Primary Patency

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 1 (1) | 3 (3) | 98.6% | (90.2%, 99.8%)  |
|  [31-183] | 66 | 8 (9) | 3 (6) | 86.2% | (75.2%, 92.6%)  |
|  [184-365] | 55 | 14 (23) | 10 (16) | 63.7% | (50.5%, 74.3%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 0 (0) | 11 (11) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 186 | 0 (0) | 2 (13) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 184 | 23 (23) | 8 (21) | 87.0% | (81.1%, 91.2%)  |
|  [184-365] | 153 | 45 (68) | 30 (51) | 60.2% | (52.4%, 67.1%)  |

# Assisted Primary Patency

Kaplan-Meier estimates of assisted primary patency are presented in Table 25. Estimates of assisted primary patency (survival probability) are similar between the two treatment groups through 12 months.

Table 25: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Assisted Primary Patency

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 0 (0) | 3 (3) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 67 | 0 (0) | 6 (9) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [184-365] | 61 | 4 (4) | 12 (21) | 93.4% | (83.3%, 97.5%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 0 (0) | 9 (9) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 188 | 0 (0) | 2 (11) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 186 | 3 (3) | 12 (23) | 98.3% | (94.9%, 99.5%)  |
|  [184-365] | 171 | 8 (11) | 46 (69) | 93.3% | (88.3%, 96.3%)  |

# Secondary Patency

Kaplan-Meier estimates of secondary patency are presented in Table 26. Estimates of secondary patency (survival probability) are similar between the two treatment groups through 12 months.

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{34}

Table 26: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Secondary Patency

|  Time Post Treatment (days) | # at Risk Interval Start | Events Number (Cumulative) | Censored Number (Cumulative) | Survival Probability | 95% C.I.  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Treatment Group: Bard LifeStent Vascular Stent (N=70)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 70 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 70 | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 69 | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [184-365] | 68 | 1 (1) | 18 (20) | 98.3% | (88.4%, 99.8%)  |
|  Treatment Group: GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent (N=197)  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  0 | 197 | 0 (0) | 6 (6) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [1-30] | 191 | 0 (0) | 3 (9) | 100.0% | (100.0%, 100.0%)  |
|  [31-183] | 188 | 1 (1) | 9 (18) | 99.5% | (96.2%, 99.9%)  |
|  [184-365] | 178 | 1 (2) | 29 (47) | 98.9% | (95.5%, 99.7%)  |

# Freedom from Stent Fracture

The presence/absence of stent fracture was evaluated by the core lab using X-ray imaging analysis. No fractures were identified in the TIGRIS Vascular Stent group at the 12- month interval. In the Control device group, 18 subjects  $(34.6\%)$  with stent fractures were identified at 12 months (Table 27). Over  $88\%$  of the 19 Control devices observed to have fractured were classified by the core lab as either type III (a complete transverse fracture), type IV (two transverse fractures bounding a displaced section of the stent), or type V (spiral dissection of the stent) (Table 28).

Table 27: Stent Fractures (Reported by Subject)

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  12-Month | 158 | 52  |
|  Fracture | 0 (0.0%) | 18 (34.6%)  |
|  No Fracture | 158 (100.0%) | 34 (65.4%)  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{35}

Table 28: Fracture Grades (Reported by Device)

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Devices Analyzed at 12-Months | 270 | 70  |
|  Number of Fractures | 0 (0.0%) | 19 (27.1%)  |
|  |   |   |
|  Fracture Grades |  |   |
|  Grade 1: Single strut fracture only | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.4%)  |
|  Grade 2: Multiple single strut fractures that occur at different sites | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.4%)  |
|  Grade 3: Multiple strut fractures resulting in complete transection of the stent, without displacement of the stent segment | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (10.0%)  |
|  Grade 4: Multiple strut fractures resulting in displacement of segment(s) of the stent | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (7.1%)  |
|  Grade 5: Spiral dissection of the stent | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (7.1%)  |

## 3. Subgroup Analyses

Primary Endpoints Stratified by Lesion Length

Both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoints were re-estimated and stratified by lesion lengths, including 95% confidence intervals around the estimates (Table 29).

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 36 of 43

{36}

Table 29: Primary Endpoints Stratified by Lesion Length

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  Primary Patency at 12 months^{1} |  |   |
|  |   |   |
|  ≤ 16 cm | 134 | 43  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 82 (61.2%) | 27 (62.8%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [52.4%, 69.5%] | [46.7%, 77.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  > 16 cm | 36 | 21  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 15 (41.7%) | 8 (38.1%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [25.5%, 59.2%] | [18.1%, 61.6%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  (16 cm - 20 cm) | 17 | 7  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 7 (41.2%) | 0 (0.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [18.4%, 67.1%] | [59.0%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  > 20 cm | 19 | 14  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 8 (42.1%) | 8 (57.1%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [20.3%, 66.5%] | [28.9%, 82.3%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Freedom from MAEs at 30 days^{1} |  |   |
|  |   |   |
|  ≤ 16 cm | 146 | 47  |
|  Free from MAE | 145 (99.3%) | 47 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [96.2%,100.0%] | [92.5%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  16 cm - 20 cm | 20 | 8  |
|  Free from MAE | 20 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [83.2%,100.0%] | [63.1%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  > 20 cm | 22 | 14  |
|  Free from MAE | 22 (100.0%) | 14 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [84.6%,100.0%] | [76.8%,100.0%]  |

¹Confidence intervals calculated using binomial exact test.

## Primary Endpoints Stratified by Gender and Race

Both primary endpoints were re-estimated, stratified by gender and race separately, including 95% confidence intervals around the estimates.

For the primary effectiveness endpoint, the primary patency at 12 months was similar between treatment groups in males and females. Although males were observed to have a slightly higher primary patency than females, there was a substantial degree of overlap in the confidence intervals between the genders for both groups (Table 30). Primary patency at 12 months was similar between treatment groups for White

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 37 of 43

{37}

subjects, but it is difficult to compare treatment groups for non-White subjects due to the low number of subjects identified as non-White in the Control device group. This low number reflects the exclusion of subjects enrolled in the EU, where race data was not collected (Table 30).

Table 30: Primary Patency at 12 Months by Gender and Race

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  Primary Patency at 12 Months by Gender^{2} |  |   |
|  Females | 47 | 19  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 25 (53.2%) | 9 (47.4%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [38.1%, 67.9%] | [24.5%, 71.1%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Males | 123 | 45  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 72 (58.5%) | 26 (57.8%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [49.3%, 67.4%] | [42.2%, 72.3%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Primary Patency at 12 Months by Race^{1,2} |  |   |
|  White | 100 | 49  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 56 (56.0%) | 26 (53.1%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [45.7%, 65.9%] | [38.3%, 67.5%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Non-white | 21 | 1  |
|  Patent at 12 Months | 9 (42.9%) | 0 (0.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [21.8%, 66.0%] | [2.5%,100.0%]  |

¹Subjects from Europe are omitted, as race data was not collected at EU study sites.
²Confidence intervals calculated using binomial exact test.

For the primary safety endpoint, the 30-day freedom from MAE percentage was similar between treatment groups with respect to both gender and race, with only one subject (a White female) experiencing an MAE within 30 days of the index procedure (Table 31).

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Page 38 of 43

{38}

Table 31: Freedom from Major Adverse Events at 30 Days by Gender and Race

|   | TIGRIS | LIFESTENT  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Number of Subjects | 197 | 70  |
|  |   |   |
|  Freedom from MAEs at 30 days by Gender2 |  |   |
|  Females | 54 | 21  |
|  Free from MAE | 53 (98.1%) | 21 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [90.1%,100.0%] | [83.9%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Males | 134 | 48  |
|  Free from MAE | 134 (100.0%) | 48 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [97.3%,100.0%] | [92.6%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Freedom from MAEs at 30 days by Race1,2 |  |   |
|  White | 112 | 51  |
|  Free from MAE | 111 (99.1%) | 51 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [95.1%,100.0%] | [93.0%,100.0%]  |
|  |   |   |
|  Non-white | 25 | 2  |
|  Free from MAE | 25 (100.0%) | 2 (100.0%)  |
|  95% C. I. | [86.3%,100.0%] | [15.8%,100.0%]  |

Subjects from Europe are omitted, as race data was not collected at EU study sites.
2Confidence intervals calculated using binomial exact test.

# Additional Efficacy Analyses Stratified by Lesion Length

Additional efficacy analyses are summarized in Tables 32-34 below. All analyses by lesion length are Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses using site-reported lesion lengths, and include day 360 and day 720 performance estimates. Subjects are considered to have known status if they either lost patency prior to day 720 or had a follow-up visit with the required testing performed at or after the start of the two-year window (730-45 days). For example, there were  $63.7\%$  (170/267) of subjects who met these conditions for primary patency at the time of the data lock.

Table 32: Primary Patency by Lesion Length

|  Time Point | Day 360 |   |   | Day 720  |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Lesion Lengths | 0-16cm | 17-24cm | All | 0-16cm | 17-24cm | All  |
|  GORE TIGRIS Device | 68.3% | 43.6% | 63.0% | 59.9% | 34.9% | 54.9%  |
|  Control Device | 74.6% | 52.4% | 67.4% | 57.4% | 23.3% | 45.5%  |

PMA P160004: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

{39}

Table 33: Freedom from TLR by Lesion Length

|  Time Point | Day 360 |   |   | Day 720  |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Lesion Lengths | 0-16cm | 17-24cm | All | 0-16cm | 17-24cm | All  |
|  GORE TIGRIS Device | 82.1% | 57.9% | 76.9% | 73.6% | 51.5% | 68.8%  |…

---

**Source:** [https://fda.innolitics.com/device/P160004](https://fda.innolitics.com/device/P160004)

**Published by [Innolitics](https://innolitics.com)** — a medical-device software consultancy. We help companies design, build, and clear FDA-regulated software and AI/ML devices. If you're preparing [a PMA](https://innolitics.com/services/regulatory/), [a 510(k)](https://innolitics.com/services/510ks/), [a SaMD](https://innolitics.com/services/end-to-end-samd/), [an AI/ML medical device](https://innolitics.com/services/medical-imaging-ai-development/), or [an FDA regulatory strategy](https://innolitics.com/services/regulatory/), [get in touch](https://innolitics.com/contact).

**Cite:** Innolitics at https://innolitics.com