BODYLOC WHOLE BODY STEREOTACTIC LOCALIZER SYSTEM FOR RADIOTHERAPY
K991336 · Medical Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp.(Midco) · IYE · Jul 12, 1999 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K991336
Device Name
BODYLOC WHOLE BODY STEREOTACTIC LOCALIZER SYSTEM FOR RADIOTHERAPY
Applicant
Medical Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp.(Midco)
Product Code
IYE · Radiology
Decision Date
Jul 12, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The BodyLoc™ Whole Body Stereotactic Localizer System For Radiotherapy, as submitted under the above referenced 510(k) number, is indicated for use as a precision patient immobilization and positioning system for the purpose of performing diagnostic localization and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy/ radiosurgery treatment. It is substantially equivalent to similar devices which are used to position the body during stereotactic radiotherapy of various body lesions. The decision and conditions under which the system is to be used is made by the patient's managing physician(s).
Device Story
BodyLoc is a stereotactic frame and immobilization system for radiotherapy. It uses integrated fiducial markers and a coordinate reference system to localize targets during CT or MR imaging. Patient immobilization is achieved via vacuum or foam molds (posterior) and thermoplastic molds (anterior/ventral). The system includes software for calculating stereotactic coordinates from scanner images on a PC. Clinicians use the frame's coordinate indicators and a moveable arc localizer to align targets. The device is used in clinical settings by radiotherapy staff to ensure reproducible patient positioning. By providing stable, accurate immobilization and precise coordinate mapping, the device facilitates targeted radiation delivery, potentially improving treatment accuracy and sparing healthy tissue.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via Monte Carlo simulations, test calculations, and measurements of multiple targets using various axial scan slice thicknesses. Accuracy of the fiducial localization system was verified against quality assurance reference markers and scanner screen measurement methods. Radiation attenuation of the polycarbonate frame material was tested using various MeV LINACs. Results showed an overall accuracy range (transversal plane mean 0.5095 ± 0.1058 mm; longitudinal plane range 0.41-2.10 mm) substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Polycarbonate frame construction (attenuation 0.029 cm⁻¹). Features integrated stereotactic fiducial markers and quality assurance reference markers. Immobilization via vacuum/foam molds and thermoplastic body molds. Compatible with CT and MR imaging. Software-based coordinate calculation on IBM-compatible PC (Windows 95).
Indications for Use
Indicated for precision patient immobilization and positioning for diagnostic localization and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery of head, neck, thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal lesions. Used under the direction of a managing physician.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation. The logo features a stylized "M" with a person climbing on it, along with the text "INCO" to the right of the M. Below the logo, the full name of the company, "Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation," is written in a smaller font.
K991336
## 510(k) Summary
As required by section 807.92(c)
Trade Name:
#### BodyLoc™ Whole Body Stereotactic Localizer System For Radiotherapy
Common Name: Body Stereotactic Frame and Immobilizer Classification Name: X-ray Radiation Therapy System (accessory) Reference: Per 21 CFR Section 892.550 Proposed Regulatory Class: II
Submitter: MIDCO® 5995 Mira Mesa Blvd., Suite B San Diego, CA 92121 TEL. (619) 558-5880 FAX. (619) 558-5883 Contact: Tyrone L. Hardy, M.D. Date of Preparation: April 13, 1999
000392
{1}------------------------------------------------
## ldentification of Predicate Devices
a) Elekta Instrument AB
18140 Smokesignal Drive San Diego, CA 92127 Product Name: Stereotactic Body Frame 510(k) Number: K960338
b) Elekta Instrument AB St. Larsgatan 8 Linkoping, SW S-582 24 Product Name: Accessories to the Stereotactic Body Frame 510(k) Number: K970291
c) Howmedica Inc. (Leibinger) 359 Veteran Blvd. Rutherford, NH 07070-2584 Product Name: Extracranial Radiotherapy System 510(k) Number: K982463
#### Device Description
The BodyLoc" is a body stereotactic localizer system which utilizes a coordinate reference system that can be used to reproducibly localize targets during diagnostic and treatment procedures. Stereotactic localization fiducials are positioned in the sides and base of the BodyLoc™ and the localization system is continuous from the head to mid-thigh regions. The BodyLoc" is supplied with
a software program for calculation of BodyLoc" stereotactic coordinates from scanner images. Software is functional on IBM or IBM-compatible PC computers with Microsoft® Windows 95. Targets within the system can be aligned by use of the coordinate indicators on the sides of the frame and the moveable arc localizer. Immobilization is achieved by the use of a vacuum mold system or polyurethane foam mold for posterior (the part of the body nearest the frame base) areas and a thermoplastic body mold to cover large body surfaces in the ventral or anterior plane. The BodyLoc™ has quality assurance markers in its base which are used to aid in system set-up and in verifying the accuracy of the coordinate alignment and target calculations.
## Intended Use
The BodyLoc™ is a body stereotactic frame device designed for stereotactic diagnostic localization and stereotactic radiotherapy of localized targets.
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Summary of Substantial Equivalence
MIDCO®'s body localizer (the BodyLoc™) is substantially equivalent in function, use, and performance to the stereotactic body frame predicate devices manufactured by Elekta Instruments AB and Howmedica (Leibinger). The dimensions of the BodyLoc™ are similar and it can be used with CT and MR imaging systems. The differences in the design of the BodyLoc " to predicate devices include the following:
- Body localization with an uninterrupted fiducial indicator and coordinate a) localization system that extends continuously from the head to the pelvis/mid-thigh; and means for both,
- Anterior and posterior immobilization over wide body areas for reliable b) repositioning and immobilization.
#### Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of the BodyLoc™ in comparison to predicate and legally marketed devices is provided in the following table entitled "Substantially Equivalent Devices Comparison Table".
# Summary of Performance Data and Conclusions
MIDCO® developed tests to evaluate the functionality of its BodyLoc System as a stereotactic localization device. Since the BodyLoc" is a stereotactic immobilization system with an internal imaging fiducial localization system, it was necessary to test the accuracy of the fiducial system. Additional tests were developed to test the axial imaging localization algorithm used with the fiducial system. Tests were also developed to evaluate the fiducial localization system in relation to quality assurance reference markers embedded in the base of the localizer at known stereotactic frame z-axis levels. The imaging fiducial localization algorithm was then tested against a scanner screen measurement method. The latter screen coordinate measurement method can also be used as an additional target quality assurance method.
A series of Monte Carlo tests and test calculations and measurements of multiple targets throughout the BodyLoc" using various axial scan slice thicknesses resulted in an overall accuracy range substantially equivalent to that of predicate devices. The material used to manufacture the frame was evaluated under normal use, and the frame material was evaluated for radiation attenuation when irradiated with different MeV LINACs. These studies also demonstrated that the BodyLoc™ was safe and accurate in positioning a patient in relation to the coordinate reference system.
{3}------------------------------------------------
| SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT DEVICES COMPARISON TABLE | | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Features | Stereotactic Body Frame®<br>(Elekta)<br>K960338,K970291 | Extracranial Radiotherapy<br>System (Howmedica/Fischer)<br>K982463 | TM<br>BodyLoc<br>(MIDCO®) |
| 1.<br>Anterior body form<br>(immobilization) | No | No | Yes |
| 2.<br>Posterior body form<br>(immobilization) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3.<br>Dimensions | 1000cm L x 50cm W x 20cm H | 2000cm L x 50cm W x 18cm H | 1125cm L x 55cm W x 19cm H |
| 4.<br>Construction<br>Material/Attenuation<br>Coefficient (cm") | Laminate of wood and plastic<br>0.0467 cm™ | Carbon fiber composite<br>Approximately 0.5 cm7 | Polycarbonate<br>0.029 cm™ |
| 5.<br>Method of suppressing<br>diaphragmatic movements | Breastplate | Breastplate | Thermoplastic mold over chest and<br>abdomen |
| દ.<br>Stereotactic fiducial<br>markers built into frame | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 7.<br>Fixation | Vacuum pillow | Skeletal and/or Vacuum pillow | Vacuum pillow or foam mold and<br>Thermoplastic Mold |
| 8.<br>Imaging studies | CT scan before each treatment<br>Also MR | Single CT scan before treatment<br>Also MR | CT and/or MR scan before each<br>treatment |
| Treatment modality<br>9. | Photon linear accelerator | Photon linear accelerator | Photon linear accelerator |
| 10. Radiation delivery | Usually 8-10 noncoplanar fixed<br>beams | Usually 4-6 noncoplanar fixed beams | Usually 4-10 noncoplanar fixed beams |
| 11. CT Localization error in the<br>transversal plane.<br>(x-axis, y-axis) | Mean 3.1 mm | Mean 0.98 + 0.22 mm | Mean 0.5095 + 0.1058 mm |
| 12. CT localization error in the<br>longitudinal plane (z-axis) | Range, 2-7 mm | Range, 0.9-3.5 mm | Range, 0.41-2.10 mm |
| 13. LINAC Set-up Error | Approximately 10 mm | Approximately 2.5 mm | Approximately 3.0 mm |
| 14. Proposed clinical<br>applications | Intraabdominal, intrathoracic<br>therapeutic targets | Spinal, paraspinal and other<br>extracranial therapeutic targets | Head, neck, thoracic, pelvis, abdominal<br>therapeutic targets |
| 15. Immobilization | Non-Invasive | Invasive/Non-Invasive | Non-Invasive |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human figures in profile, with flowing lines representing movement or connection.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUL 1.2 1999
Tyrone L. Hardy Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corp. 5995 Mira Mesa Blvd, Suite B San Diego, California Suite B
RE:
K991336 BodyLoc Whole Body Stereotactic Localizer System for Radiotherapy Dated: April 15, 1999 Received: April 19, 1999 Regulatory Class: II 21 CFR 892.5050/Procode: 90 IYE
Dear Mr. Hardy:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been redassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class III (Special Controls) or dass III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Dan Setiz
APT Daniel G. Schultz. M.D. Acting Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal. Ear. Nose and Throat. and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Statement of Indications For Use
510(k) Number: _ K 99/336
Device name: BodyLoc"* Whole Body Stereotactic Localizer System For Radiotherapy
Indications For Use:
This is to certify that the BodyLoc™™ Whole Body Stereotactic Localizer System For Radiotherapy, as submitted under the above referenced 510(k) number, is indicated for use as a precision patient immobilization and positioning system for the purpose of performing diagnostic localization and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy/ radiosurgery treatment. It is substantially equivalent to similar devices which are used to position the body during stereotactic radiotherapy of various body lesions. The decision and conditions under which the system is to be used is made by the patient's managing physician(s).
This form submitted by:
MIDCO® 5995 Mira Mesa Blvd., Suite B San Diego, CA 92121 TEL. (619) 558-5880 FAX. (619) 558-5883
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Over-The-Counter-Use
Colin m. Pillard
OR
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological D 510(k) Number
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.