K990410 · Quest Intl., Inc. · LSE · Oct 28, 1999 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K990410
Device Name
SERAQUEST EB VCA IGG
Applicant
Quest Intl., Inc.
Product Code
LSE · Microbiology
Decision Date
Oct 28, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3235
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The EB VCA IgG test is intended for the qualitive and semi-quantative detection of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen (VCA) in human serum by enzyme immunoassay, as an aid in differentiating active or recent Epstein-Barr virus infection from past infection. For manual use, or for use with the HyPrep System Plus. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
Device Story
SeraQuest EB VCA IgG is a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting IgG antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in human serum. Input: human serum sample; process: sample incubation in microwells coated with recombinant p18 antigen; immobilization of specific IgG antibodies; addition of enzyme-labeled goat anti-human IgG conjugate; addition of p-Nitrophenyl phosphate substrate; colorimetric reaction measured via spectrophotometry at 405 nm. Output: Index values representing antibody levels. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in differentiating active/recent Epstein-Barr virus infection from past infection, supporting patient management decisions.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study compared SeraQuest EB VCA IgG against Gull Laboratories' EBV IgG ELISA using 157 specimens. Results showed 130 positive, 9 negative, and 18 equivocal/discrepant results. Excluding equivocal results, relative sensitivity was 92.2% (95% CI: 87.8-96.6%) and relative specificity was 90.0% (95% CI: 71.4-100%). Overall agreement was 92.1% (95% CI: 87.7-96.4%).
Technological Characteristics
Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using plastic microwell solid phase. Antigen: recombinant p18. Conjugate: goat anti-human IgG labeled with alkaline phosphatase. Substrate: p-Nitrophenyl phosphate. Stop reagent: 0.5 M Trisodium phosphate. Readout: spectrophotometric at 405 nm. Manual or semi-automated (HyPrep System Plus) operation. Three 30-minute incubation periods at room temperature.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen (VCA) in human serum. Used as an aid in differentiating active or recent Epstein-Barr virus infection from past infection. For in vitro diagnostic use; manual or semi-automated (HyPrep System Plus) use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these viruses. Epstein-Barr viruses are thought to cause infectious mononucleosis and have been associated with Burkitt's lymphoma (a tumor of the jaw in African children and young adults) and postnasal carcinoma (cancer).
Predicate Devices
Gull Laboratories' EBV IgG ELISA test
Reference Devices
HyPrep System Plus
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
OCT 2 8 1999
APPENDIX 3.
Quest International, Inc., 1938 N.E. 148th Terrace, N. Miami, FL 33181 Page No. GAL
K990410
# 510(k) SUMMARY
| Applicant: | Quest International, Inc.<br>1938 N.E. 148th Terrace<br>North Miami, FL 33181 |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Registration No. | 1061839 |
| Contact Person: | Robert A. Cort, V.P., Quality Assurance |
| Telephone: | (305) 948-8788 |
| Telefax: | (305) 948-4876 |
| Manufacturing Site: | Same as above |
| Device: | SeraQuest® EB VCA IgG |
| Device Name: | Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents (21CFR § 866.3235) |
| Device Classification: | Class I (general controls) |
### ascription:
The SeraQuest EB VCA IgG test is a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which is performed in microwells, at room temperature, in three thity minute incubations. It has been developed in
IgG antibodies which are directed against Enotein Romains. It has been develope look to the superialism (in throe thirty minute incubations. It nas been developed to
The Calibrators in the SeraQuest EB VCA IgG test set have been assigned Index values based on an in-house standard. Test results are reported as Index values.
# Principle:
Diluted samples are incubated in wells coated with Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen. Antibodies directed against Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (if present) are immobilized in the wells. Residual sample is eliminated by washing and draining and online in the well. Hesidual human IgG) is added and including to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antibodies to
human IgG) is added and incubated. If IgG anibodies to Epstein-Barry present, the conjugate will be immobilized in the wells. Residual conjugate is eliminated by washing and draining, and the enzyme substrate is added and incubated. In the presence of the the substrate is converted to onlymo oubstrate is added and incubation. In the presence of the substrate
### Intended Use:
tended Use: The EB VCA IgG test is intended for the qualitive and semi-quantative detection of in of the collection of or rigated in ine qualified and semi-quantative defection of any
{1}------------------------------------------------
munoassay, as an aid in differentiating active or recent Epstein-Barr virus infection from past nfection. For manual use, or for use with the HyPrep System Plus. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
# Predicate Device:
The SeraQuest EB VCA IgG test is substantially equivalent in intended use and performance, to the Gull Laboratories' EBV IgG ELISA test, Gull Laboratories, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah.
# Summary of technological characteristics:
| Characteristic | SeraQuest EB VCA IgG | Gull Laboratories ' EBV IgG ELISA |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Description: | Enzyme Immunoassay | Enzyme Immunoassay |
| Intended Use: | The detection of IgG<br>antibodies against Epstein-<br>Barr virus capsid antigen<br>in human serum. | The detection of IgG<br>antibodies against Epstein-<br>Barr virus capsid antigen<br>in human serum. |
| Solid Phase: | Plastic Microwell | Plastic Microwell |
| ntigen : | Recombinant p18 | Purified gp 125 |
| Number of Incubation Periods: | Three | Three |
| Sample Dilution: | 1:50 | 1:21 |
| Sample Incubation<br>Duration: | 30 minutes | 30 minutes |
| Incubation Temperature: | Room temperature | 37 °C. |
| Ezyme-labeled Conjugate: | | |
| Antibody | Goat anti-human IgG | Goat anti-human IgG |
| Enzyme | Alkaline phosphatase | Alkaline phosphatase |
| Conjugate Volume: | 100 ul | 100 ul |
| Conjugate Incubation<br>Duration: | 30 minutes | 30 minutes |
| Substrate: | p-Nitrophenyl<br>phosphate | p-Nitrophenyl<br>phosphate |
{2}------------------------------------------------
| APPENDIX 3. | Quest International, Inc., 1938 N.E. 148th Terrace, N. Miami, FL 33181<br>Page No. 86 | |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| ubtrate Volume: | 100 μl | 100 μl |
| Substrate Incubation<br>Duration: | 30 minutes | 30 minutes |
| Stop Reagent: | 0.5 M Trisodium<br>phosphate | 1.5 N Sodium<br>hydroxide |
| Stop Reagent Volume: | 100 μl | 100 μl |
| Readout: | Spectrophotometric<br>405 nm | Spectrophotometric<br>405 nm |
Summary of Clinical Testing:
Of the 157 specimens tested, 130 were positive, and 9 were negative in both the SeraQuest and Of the 157 specimens tested, 130 were positive in of remains and the many of in Gull Laboratories tests (please see Table by the SeraQuest test, and 11 specimens which were was negative by the Gull test, was postive by the SeraQuest test. Six specimens gave equivocal results
positive by the Gull test, were negative by the SeraQuest test. Six spe positive by the Gulf test, were nogalive by the been see Table 1 below.
## TABLE 1.
.ESULTS OF SeraQuest EB VCA IgG ASSAYS, AND GULL VCA IgG ASSAYS, OF .ESULTS OF Seraudes EB VCA Titles TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN-HOUSE AT QUEST INTERNATIONAL, INC., MIAMI, FL.
| GULL<br>VCA<br>IgG | SeraQuest EB VCA IgG | | | | | |
|--------------------|----------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------------|------|--------------|
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | | % | 95 % CI |
| Positive | 130 | 2 | 11 | Relative sensitivity* | 92.2 | 87.8 to 96.6 |
| Equivocal | 2 | 1 | 0 | Relative specificity* | 90.0 | 71.4 to 100 |
| Negative | 1 | 1 | 9 | Overall agreement* | 92.1 | 87.7 to 96.4 |
* Excluding equivocal results.
V Calculated by the normal method.
Reference: Gardner, M.J. and Altman, D.G., Confidence Intervals Rather Than Hypothesis Testing. Brit. Med. J., 292: 746-750, 1986.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird symbol with three curved lines representing its wings or body. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the bird symbol.
OCT 2 8 1999
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Robert A. Cort Vice President, Quality Assurance Quest International, Inc. 1938 N.E. 148th Terrace North Miami, Florida 33181
Re: K990410 Trade Name: SeraQuest EB VCA IgG Regulatory Class: I Product Codc: LSE Dated: August 12, 1999 Received: September 8, 1999
Dear Mr. Cort:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment datc of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice rcquirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Eederal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Quest International, Inc., 1938 N.E. 148th Terrace, N. Miami, FL 33181 Page No. (UC
#### APPENDIX 6
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): ________
Device Name: SeraQuest EB VCA IgG
Indications For Use:
- 1. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
- 2. For the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen (VCA) in human serum by enzyme immunoassay.
- 3. For use as an aid in differentiating active or recent infection, from past infection.
- 4. For manual use, or for use with the HyPrep System Plus semi-automated fluid handler.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Woody Dubois
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K990410
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.