K983864 · Mennen Medical, Inc. · CCK · Oct 8, 1999 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K983864
Device Name
ETCO2 VITAL SIGNS MODULE
Applicant
Mennen Medical, Inc.
Product Code
CCK · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Oct 8, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.1400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The ENVOY Monitor is a physiological patient monitor intended to be used for monitoring vital signs of critically ill adult and pediatric patients in the hospital environment, such as: ECG/Heart Rate, Invasive Blood Pressure, Respiration, Temperature, Noninvasive Blood Pressure, Pulse Oximetry and EtCO2. The ENVOY may be used to monitor a wide range of patient conditions in many different clinical specialties within the hospital. The device is intended for use by qualified health care providers, who will determine when use of the device is indicated, based upon their professional assessment of the patient's medical condition.
Device Story
ENVOY EtCO2 is a hospital-based module for monitoring physiological vital signs; acquires EtCO2 data from patient; displays waveforms, numeric values, and alarm status on ENVOY display unit. Uses Pryon technology for processing and alarm determination. Operated by qualified healthcare providers in clinical settings; interaction via front panel controls and quick-knob menu system. Output assists clinicians in assessing patient condition and managing respiratory status. Benefits include continuous monitoring of EtCO2, respiration rate, inCO2, and apnea detection to support clinical decision-making for critically ill patients.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation studies compared ENVOY performance against Mennen Medical design standards and voluntary industrial standards (IEC 601-1 series, EN1441, AAMI/ANSI). Simulated inputs and defined gas concentrations of CO2 were used to verify system accuracy, alarm functionality, and software performance. No clinical data presented.
Technological Characteristics
Module-based patient monitor; utilizes Pryon Duet board for EtCO2 processing. Standards: IEC 601-1, IEC 601-1-1, IEC 601-1-2, IEC 601-1-4, EN1441, AAMI/ANSI. Interface: front panel controls with quick-knob and menu-driven display. Not MRI compatible.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring vital signs (ECG/HR, IBP, Respiration, Temp, NIBP, SpO2, EtCO2) in critically ill adult and pediatric patients within hospital environments. Not MRI compatible.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A carbon dioxide gas analyzer is a device intended to measure the concentration of carbon dioxide in a gas mixture to aid in determining the patient's ventilatory, circulatory, and metabolic status. The device may use techniques such as chemical titration, absorption of infrared radiation, gas chromatography, or mass spectrometry.
{0}------------------------------------------------
OCT 8 1099
| | MENNEN MEDICAL LTD.<br>Kiryat Weizmann Science Park<br>P.O.B. 102<br>Rehovot 76100 Israel<br>Tel: 972-8-938-3030<br>Fax: 972-8-940-6519 |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: | 30 August 1999 |
| To: | Food and Drug Administration<br>Center for Devices and Radiological Health Document Control Center (HFZ-401)<br>9200 Corporate Boulevard<br>Rockville MD 20850 |
| Attn.: | Document Control Clerk |
| From: | Kenneth Raichman<br>Director of Regulatory Affairs |
| Topic: | 510(k) Summary<br>ENVOY Patient Monitor - EtCO2 module<br>Safety and Effectiveness |
| Product Name | |
| Proprietary: | ENVOY EtCO2 Module |
| Common: | End-Tidal Physiological Patient Monitor |
| Establishment Registration Number and Address | |
| Registration Number | 9611022 |
| | Mennen Medical LTD.<br>Ken Raichman, Director of Regulatory Affairs<br>Kiryat Weizmann Science Park<br>Rehovot 76100 Israel<br>Tel: 972-8-938-3030 |
| Classification (Section 513) | |
| Classification: | Class III |
| Product Code | DSI III |
| Panel: | Anesthesiology and Respiratory/Cardiology |
| Performance Standards | |
| None promulgated | |
| Voluntary Standards | IEC 601-1, IEC 601-1-1, IEC 601-1-2, IEC 601-1-4, EN1441, AAMI/ANSI Standards |
| Predicate Devices | |
| | MENNEN MEDICAL MERCURY (K940081)<br>PRYON SC300 (CAP 400 AT - K935272) |
| Date Prepared: | 30 October 1998 |
| Date Revised: | 29 August 1999 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary, ENVOY EtCO2 Safety & Effectiveness
## Device Description
ENVOY EtCO2 is a hospital based module, for monitoring EtCO2 physiological patient vital signs.
ENVOY vital signs EtCO2 module acquires vital signs data from the patient, and displays the patients waveform and alarms indication on the ENVOY display unit. This information is displayed simultaneously on the ENVOY Display Unit.
All processing and alarm determination for EtCO2 is made using Pryon technology based on currently marketed Pryon monitoring devices.
Information from each vital sign is presented in a separate portion of the display. Each vital sign is labeled for identification and numeric value. Displayed Vital sign information can include: Primary Vital Sign Name, Waveform, Vital Sign Numeric Value, Alarm Status Message.
Selection of the EtCO2 functions is accomplished by interaction with front panel controls on the main processor unit. A quick-knob control allows direct interaction with displayed menus for direct parameter selection and setup. Where manual entry of alphanumeric information is required, a menu keyboard menu is display.
### Indications for Use:
Mennen Medical is extending the current Indications for Use statement for the Envoy to include EtCO2 monitoring.
#### Substantial Equivalency Information:
Mennen Medical submits that the ENVOY EtCO2 is substantially equivalent to the EtCO2 of the MENNEN MEDICAL MERCURY (K940081) and the Pryon CAP 400 AT - K935272. The following tables summarize data on the Mennen Medical ENVOY employing the Pryon Duet board, and the Mennen Medical MERCURY.
| Displayed<br>Parameter Message | Alarm Indication | Mennen Medical<br>ENVOY<br>Patient Monitor | Mennen Medical<br>MERCURY<br>Patient Monitor |
|--------------------------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| etCO2 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Respiration Rate | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| inCO2 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Apnea Information | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| EtCO2 Alarm Limits | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Display Units | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Display Labels | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sweep Speed | N/A | Yes | Yes |
| Grid | N/A | Yes | Yes |
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Marketing History
EtCO2 has a well known marketing history.
#### Summary of Validation
Device validation studies were performed to verify that conditions detected by the "bedside device" were completely and accurately reported and displayed on the ENVOY.
#### Validation:
ENVOY EtCO2 was tested against Mennen Medical's Design Specifications, in accordance with the procedures identified in Part 3, with results as presented in Part 5.
Simulated inputs were used to test the vital signs monitored by the ENVOY. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the ENVOY against voluntary industrial standards where appropriate, and Mennen Medical design standards where appropriate, or where industrial standards did not exist.
Software validation was tested against Mennen Medical's test plan protocol as presented in Part 5. Simulated conditions were evaluated against defined gas concentrations of CO2.
#### Conclusions Drawn from Validation Studies:
The results of the validation studies indicate that ENVOY EtCO2 is safe, effective and poses no new risks when compared against the Mennen Medical Design Standards, and equipment already in clinical use.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Software Validation
Software validation verified the functionality of the Mennen Medical ENVOY EtCO2 from a "black box" approach. Validation was performed by a persons other than those involved in the design of the system. This independent audit confirmed that the system software met the specified requirements.
Software Validation Plan:
The software validation plan tested the following areas:
Verified that the system performed according to specified requirements.
Verified the system by exercising user input and assuring correct output.
Checked for hidden functionality.
Verified that the system recovers from errors.
The SOFTWARE VALIDATION PLAN was reviewed and approved by Mennen Medical's Engineering and Quality Assurance Departments, insuring that the tests were both valid and thorough.
The SOFTWARE VALIDATION PLAN was executed and the results were analyzed by the Quality Assurance and Engineering Departments. The results met expectations and the software was approved for release, pending clearance of the 510(k) process.
MENNEN MEDICAL LTD.
Kenneth Raichman, Director of Regulatory Affairs
Enclosures.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo features a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle's head and neck, depicted with three parallel lines forming the shape.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
OCT 8 1999
Mr. Asher Kassel Mennen Medical Ltd. Kiryat Weizmann Science Park P.O. Box 102, Rehovot 76100 ISRAEL
Re: . K983864 ETCO2 Module of Envoy Patient Monitor Regulatory Class: II (two) Product Code: 73 CCK and 74 MHX Dated: August 16, 1999 Received: Auqust 18, 1999
Dear Mr. Kassel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in requlatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Asher Kassel
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling requlation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callahan
Thomas J. C allahan, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known)
983864
Device Name
ENVOY PATIENT MONITOR
Indications for Use:
The ENVOY Monitor is a physiological patient monitor intended to be used for monitoring vital signs of critically ill adult and pediatric patients in the hospital environment, such as: ECG/Heart Rate, Invasive Blood Pressure, Respiration, Temperature, Noninvasive Blood Pressure, Pulse Oximetry and EtCO2. The ENVOY may be used to monitor a wide range of patient conditions in many different clinical specialties within the hospital. The device is intended for use by qualified health care providers, who will determine when use of the device is indicated, based upon their professional assessment of the patient's medical condition.
MRI Compatibility Statement:
The ENVOY is not compatible for use in MRI magnetic field.
# (DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
or
Over-The-Counter Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional Form 1-2-96)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular, Respi
and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K983864
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.