IMMULITE EPO is a solid-phase, two-site enzyme chemiluminescent sequential immunometric assay for use with the IMMULITE Automated Analyzer and designed for the quantitative measurement of erythropoietin (EPO) in serum or heparinized plasma. It is intended strictly for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid the diagnosis of anemias and polycythemias.
Device Story
IMMULITE EPO is an in vitro diagnostic reagent system used with the IMMULITE Automated Immunoassay Analyzer. It measures erythropoietin (EPO) levels in serum or heparinized plasma samples. The device utilizes a solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay. Patient samples and ligand-labeled monoclonal anti-EPO antibodies are incubated with a polystyrene bead coated with anti-ligand; subsequently, an alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-EPO antibody is added. A chemiluminescent substrate (phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane) is introduced; hydrolysis by alkaline phosphatase produces light proportional to EPO concentration. The analyzer measures photon output to quantify EPO. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel to assist physicians in diagnosing anemias and polycythemias by evaluating EPO levels relative to patient hematocrit and clinical condition. Results aid in differentiating primary from secondary anemias and polycythemias, supporting clinical management of conditions like chronic renal disease or polycythemia vera.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study performed on 130 endogenous serum samples with EPO concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 200 mU/mL. Comparison between IMMULITE EPO and the predicate radioimmunoassay (INCSTAR) yielded a linear regression of y = 0.846x + 3.818 mU/mL with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.978. Mean values were 40.96 mU/mL for IMMULITE and 43.90 mU/mL for INCSTAR.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay. Solid phase consists of a polystyrene bead coated with anti-ligand. Detection uses alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-EPO antibody and a phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane chemiluminescent substrate. Operates on the IMMULITE Automated Immunoassay Analyzer. Quantitative measurement based on photon emission proportional to EPO concentration.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of erythropoietin (EPO) in serum or heparinized plasma as an aid in the diagnosis of anemias and polycythemias in patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A erythropoietin assay is a device that measures the concentration of erythropoietin (an enzyme that regulates the production of red blood cells) in serum or urine. This assay provides diagnostic information for the evaluation of erythrocytosis (increased total red cell mass) and anemia.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special control for this device is FDA's “Document for Special Controls for Erythropoietin Assay Premarket Notification (510(k)s).”
{0}------------------------------------------------
JUL 12 1999
### 510(k) Summary
This summary of safety and effectiveness information has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Diagnostic Products Corporation Name: 5700 West 96th Street Address: Los Angeles, CA 90045
Telephone Number: Facsimile Number:
Contact Person:
Date of Preparation:
Device Name Trade: Common:
Catalog Number:
Classification:
CLIA Complexity Category:
Manufacturer:
Establishment Registration Number:
Substantially Equivalent Predicate Device:
Description of the Device:
(310) 645-8200 (310) 645-9999
Edward M. Levine, Ph.D. Director of Clinical Affairs
June 7, 1999
IMMULITE® EPO Reagent system for the determination of EPO in serum and heparinized plasma
LKEPZ (50 tests), LKEP1 (100 tests)
Class III device (pre-amendment) 21CFR 864.7250
Moderate, based on previous classification of analogous tests
Diagnostic Products Corporation 5700 West 96th Street Los Angeles, CA 90045-5597
DPC's Registration Number is 2017183
Incstar's EPO-Trac 1251 RIA (K902639)
IMMULITE® EPO is a solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent sequential enzyme immunometric assay for use with the IMMULITE® Automated Immunoassay Analyzer
{1}------------------------------------------------
Intended Use of the Device:
IMMULITE® EPO is a solid-phase, two-site enzyme chemiluminescent sequential immunometric assay for use with the IMMULITE Automated Analyzer and designed for the quantitative measurement of erythropoietin (EPO) in serum or heparinized plasma. It is intended strictly for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid the diagnosis of anemias and polycythemias.
#### Summary and Explanation of the Test:
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone consisting of 165 amino acids, with four complex carbohydrate chains attached to the peptide at four linkage sites. It has a molecular weight of 36,000 daltons, 40% of this attributed to the carbohydrate chains. EPO is the primary regulator of erythropoiesis, stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of erythroid precursor cells in bone marrow. In mammals, the fetal liver produces nearly all of the hormone; in adults, hepatic production drops to under 10% and renal secretion accounts for over 90%. The production site is believed to be the proximal renal tubular cells or the peritubular capillary endothelial cells of the renal cortex and outer medulla. The clearance of circulating EPO has not been fully explained, but it is accomplished, in small part, by urinary excretion, and possibly also by hepatic elimination and by uptake into target cells in bone marrow.
EPO adjusts red blood cell production to meet the tissue oxygen demand. It exerts its effect in a complex feedback system, in which renal secretion of the hormone is controlled by an oxygen sensor in the kidney that responds to the partial pressure of oxygen in blood. Under conditions of increased peripheral oxygen, EPO levels diminish. This is seen after correction of hypoxia in healthy subjects (as in descent from a high elevation) and after hypertransfusion.
Anemias may be divided into two categories with respect to EPO levels in blood: those that are primary to EPO levels and those that are secondary. Primary anemias are characterized by an increase of EPO in the blood to attempt to restore red blood cell production levels to normal. Examples of anemias in which EPO levels are elevated include iron deficiency anemia, reduction of blood flow to the kidney (as in blood loss) and hemoglobinopathies with increased affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen. The EPO production rate is seen to increase exponentially with the decrease in available oxygen and with falling hematocrit in nonrenal anemias, in the latter, EPO levels 1,000 times normal have been reported.
Anemia can be secondary to inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, neoplasm, and chronic renal disease. The "secondary anemias" may, however, be at least partly attributable to underproduction of EPO.
{2}------------------------------------------------
A failure to produce sufficient EPO accounts for the moderate to severe anemias observed in end-stage renal disease. Decreased EPO production is attributed to destruction of renal production sites; the renal oxygen sensor may also be affected. Levels of the hormone slightly exceed the reference range at most, and are inadequate to counter the blood loss due to dialysis, shortened red blood cell life, iron and folate deficiency, impaired iron transfer to erythroid progenitor cells and other challenges faced by such patients. Anephric patients demonstrate especially low EPO levels. A few patients with chronic kidney failure, however, exhibit normal hematocrits or less serious anemia, and elevated EPO. Some of these patients have cystic kidneys or viral hepatitis; in the latter, increased EPO may have resulted from enhanced hepatic production.
Overproduction of red blood cells is called polycythemia. Polycythemias may also be divided into two categories depending on whether the condition is primary or secondary to EPO levels. In polycythemia vera, EPO levels are diminished and erythropoiesis is primary to and independent of stimulation by EPO. Variation in EPO values can be as much as tenfold for different patients with the same hematocrit.
Certain conditions may be characterized by the loss of feedback control of oxygen concentration over EPO production, causing an increase in EPO levels. These include renal cell carcinomas, in which 2% of patients demonstrate erythrocytosis, and some benign renal lesions, such as single or multiple renal cysts, renal artery stenosis and microvascular abnormalities. In addition, approximately 10% of renal transplant patients develop erythrocytosis, sometimes from autologous diseased kidney.
Secondary polycythemia is characterized by elevated EPO levels which lead to increased red blood cell mass. This condition may result from a variety of factors, including defective hemoglobin, smoking, pulmonary fibrosis, cardiac disease, tumors, and kidney stones.
When assaying EPO for the differential diagnosis of polycythemias, the possible overlap of values for secondary erythrocytosis or for polycythemia vera with those in the reference range must be considered.
### Technological Comparison to Predicate:
IMMULITE EPO is a solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent enzymelabeled immunometric assay. The solid phase, a polystyrene bead enclosed within an IMMULITE Test Unit, is coated with an anti-ligand specific for EPO.
The patient sample and a ligand-labeled monoclonal anti-EPO antibody are simultaneously introduced into the Test Unit and incubated for approximately 30 minutes at 37 ℃ with intermittent agitation. During this time, EPO in the sample binds to the anti-ligand on the solid phase.
{3}------------------------------------------------
An alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-EPO antibody is introduced, and the Test Unit is incubated for another 30-minute cycle. The unbound enzyme conjugate is removed by a centrifugal wash. Substrate is then added and the Test Unit is incubated for a further 10 minutes.
The chemiluminescent substrate, a phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane, undergoes hydrolysis in the presence of alkaline phosphatase to yield an unstable intermediate. The continuous production of this intermediate results in the sustained emission of light, thus improving precision by providing a window for multiple readings. The bound complex and thus also the photon output, as measured by the luminometer - is proportional to the concentration of EPO in the sample.
The Incstar's EPO-Trac 1251 RIA procedure is a competitive binding, disequilibrium radioimmunoassay which utilizes recombinant human erythropoietin for both tracer and standards. Samples are incubated with the EPO-Trac primary goat antibody (goat anti-EPO) and allowed to react for 2 hours before EPO-Trac tracer labeled with iodine-125 is added Following an overnight incubation, the donkey anti-goat precipitating complex (DAG-PPT) secondary antibody is added to the specific assay test tubes (TABLE 1) The DAG-PPT is a donkey anti-goat serum that is pre-precipitated with a normal goat serum and a surfactant. The DAG-PPT is incubated with standards or samples, primary antibody and tracer, for thirty minutes before the test tubes are centrifuged to separate the bound from the unbound tracer. The unbound tracer is removed by decanting the supernatant from each test tube. The bound tracer in the remaining DAG-PPT complex pellets is counted in a gamma counter for I minute. The 122T counts are inversely proportional to the amount of EPO present in each sample.
### Method Comparison:
The IMMULITE EPO procedure was compared to a radioimmunoassay (INCSTAR) on 130 endogenous serum samples, with EPO concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 200 mU/mL. Linear regression analysis yielded the following statistics.
(IMMULITE) = 0.846 (INCSTAR) + 3.818 mU/mL r = 0.978
40.96 mU/mL (IMMULITE) Means:
43.90 mU/mL (INCSTAR)
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Conclusion:
The data presented in this summary of safety and effectiveness is the data that the Food The Gata prescitied in this summal y or surely and equivales of the equivalence for IMMULITE® EPO.
Edward h. Lewis
Edward M. Levine, Ph.D. Director of Clinical Affairs
6/7/95
Date
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The seal features a stylized caduceus-like symbol, with three abstract human figures forming a wing-like shape. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
JUL 1.2 1999
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Edward M. Levine, Ph.D. Director of Clinical Affairs Diagnostic Products Corporation 5700 West 96th Street Los Angeles, California 90045-5597
Re: K983203
Trade Name: DPC's IMMULITE® EPO Test Kit Regulatory Class: III Product Code: GGT Dated: March 19, 1999 Received: March 22, 1999
## Dear Dr. Levine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Putman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D, M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): Device Name: IMMULITE® EPO
Kq83203
Indications For Use:
IMMULITE EPO is a solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay for use with the IMMULITE Automated Analyzer and designed for the quantitative measurement of erythropoietin (EPO) in serum or heparinized plasma. It is intended strictly for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid in the diagnosis of anemias and polycythemias.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Division Sign-Off vision of Clinical Laboratory Devi 1983223 510(k) Numb
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-
96)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.