Peri-Guard is intended for repair of pericardial structures and for use as a prosthesis for the surgical repair of soft tissue deficiencies which include: defects of the abdominal and thoracic wall, gastric binding, muscle flap reinforcement, and hernias (including diaphragmatic, femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy, scrotal, and umbilical hernias).
Device Story
Peri-Guard Repair Patch and Supple Peri-Guard Pericardium are biologic surgical meshes derived from bovine pericardium; cross-linked with glutaraldehyde; chemically sterilized using ethanol and propylene oxide. Subject devices undergo additional treatment with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75 minutes. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for pericardial closure and soft tissue reinforcement. Device acts as a structural prosthesis to support tissue repair. Safety and effectiveness established via comparative bench testing (shrink, suture, thickness, chemical residuals) and animal studies against non-NaOH treated controls, demonstrating no significant differences in biocompatibility or inflammatory response.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and animal studies only. Comparative testing between NaOH-treated and control samples evaluated shrink, suture, thickness, bioburden, sterility, pH, pyrogen, and chemical residuals. Results showed no significant differences. Animal testing confirmed no significant differences in biocompatibility or inflammation.
Technological Characteristics
Biologic tissue (bovine pericardium); cross-linked with glutaraldehyde; chemically sterilized with ethanol and propylene oxide; treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75 minutes at 20-25°C. Packaged in sterile, non-pyrogenic water containing propylene oxide.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring surgical repair of pericardial structures or soft tissue deficiencies, including abdominal/thoracic wall defects, gastric banding, muscle flap reinforcement, and various hernias (diaphragmatic, femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy, scrotal, umbilical).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
PAGE 1/4
K983162
,
## 510(K) SUMMARY
| Submitted by: | Synovis Surgical Innovations<br>2575 University Avenue West<br>St. Paul, MN 55114-1024<br>Tel: 651-796-7300<br>Fax: 651-642-9018 |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Fonda Burley<br>At address above |
| Device Trade Name: | Peri-Guard Repair Patch |
| Common Name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Mesh, Surgical<br>21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Product Code: | FTM , OXB |
| Predicate devices: | Peri-Guard K961811 and K842066<br>(Device acting as its own predicate) |
| Device Description: | Peri-Guard® Repair Patch (Peri-Guard) is a biologic tissue prepared<br>from bovine pericardium cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. The<br>pericardium is procured from cattle originating in the United States.<br>Peri-Guard is chemically sterilized using ethanol and propylene oxide.<br>Peri-Guard is treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide for 60-75<br>minutes at 20-25°C. |
| Statement of Intended use: | Peri-Guard is intended for repair of pericardial structures and for use<br>as a prosthesis for the surgical repair of soft tissue deficiencies which<br>include: defects of the abdominal and thoracic wall, gastric binding,<br>muscle flap reinforcement, and hernias (including diaphragmatic,<br>femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy, scrotal, and<br>umbilical hernias). |
| Technological Comparisons: | The subject device is technologically identical to the predicate device.<br>The only difference between these devices is that the subject device<br>is treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75<br>minutes at 20-25 °C. |
{1}------------------------------------------------
Technology/Device Testing:
Cross-linked pericardium was treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75 minutes at 20 -25 C, rinsed with deionized (DI) water and neutralized with citrate solution, followed by a final DI water rinse. Sodlum hydroxide treated and control (non-NaOHtreated) samples were subjected to shrink, suture, and thickness testing. Results showed no significant difference between the test and control samples. The test and control samples were subjected to bioburden, sterility, pH, pyrogen, and chemical residuals testing. Results showed no significant difference between the test and control samples. Samples of the NaOH-treated pericardium were also subjected to biocompatibility and animal testing. Results showed that the 1 M NaOH treatment did not produce significant differences in biocompatibility or inflammation when comparing the treated versus non-treated pericardium. Product subjected to 1 M NaOH treatment performs in a manner substantially equivalent to the product not treated with 1M NaOH, and that the exposure to sodium hydroxide poses no additional questions of safety or effectiveness.
{2}------------------------------------------------
K983162
Page 3/4
## 510(K) SUMMARY
| Submitted by: | Synovis Surgical Innovations<br>2575 University Avenue West<br>St. Paul, MN 55114-1024<br>Tel: 651-796-7300<br>Fax: 651-642-9018 |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Fonda Burley<br>At address above |
| Device Trade Name: | Supple Peri-Guard Pericardium |
| Common Name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Mesh, Surgical<br>21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Product Code: | FTM |
| Predicate devices: | Supple Peri-Guard K961810 and K921895<br>(Device acting as its own predicate) |
| Device Description: | Supple Peri-Guard® is prepared from bovine pericardium which is<br>cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. The pericardium is procured from<br>cattle originating in the United States. Supple Peri-Guard is chemically<br>sterilized using ethanol and propylene oxide. Supple Peri-Guard has<br>been treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide for 60-75 minutes at 20-<br>25°C.<br><br>Supple Peri-Guard is packaged in a container filled with sterile, non-<br>pyrogenic water containing propylene oxide. The contents of the<br>unopened, undamaged container are sterile. |
| Statement of Intended use: | For use as a prosthesis for pericardial closure and soft tissue<br>deficiencies which include: defects of the abdominal and thoracic<br>wall, gastric banding, muscle flap reinforcement, and hernias<br>(diaphragmatic, femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy,<br>scrotal and umbilical). |
| Technological Comparisons: | The subject device is technologically identical to the predicate device.<br>The only difference between these devices is that the subject device<br>is treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75<br>minutes at 20 -25 C. |
.
{3}------------------------------------------------
K983162
page 4/4
#### Technology/Device Testing:
Cross-linked pericardium was treated with 1 molar sodium hydroxide (1 M NaOH) for 60-75 minutes at 20 -25 C, rinsed with deionized (DI) water and neutralized with citrate solution, followed by a final DI water rinse. Sodium hydroxide treated and control (non-NaOHtreated) samples were subjected to shrink, suture, and thickness testing. Results showed no significant difference between the test and control samples. The test and control samples were subjected to bioburden, sterility, pH, pyrogen, and chemical residuals testing. Results showed no significant difference between the test and control samples. Samples of the NaOH-treated pericardium were also subjected to biocompatibility and animal testing. Results showed that the 1 M NaOH treatment did not produce significant differences in biocompatibility or inflammation when comparing the treated versus non-treated pericardium. Product subjected to 1 M NaOH treatment performs in a manner substantially equivalent to the product not treated with 1M NaOH, and that the exposure to sodium hydroxide poses no additional questions of safety or effectiveness.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an emblem depicting a stylized eagle with three lines forming its body and wings. The eagle is oriented towards the right.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Bio-Vascular, Incorporated % Ms. Dianna L. Geck Regulatory Affairs Associate 2575 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55114-1024
AUG 2 7 2012
Re: K983162 Trade/Device Name: Peri-Guard® Repair Patch Supple Peri-Guard® Pericardium Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FTM OxB Dated: September 9, 1998 Received: September 10, 1998
Dear Ms. Geck:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of October 9, 1998.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -Ms. Dianna L. Geck
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K983162
Device Name:
Peri-Guard Repair Patch
Indications For Use:
Peri-Guard is intended for repair of pericardial structures and for use as a prosthesis for the surgical repair of soft tissue deficiencies which include: defects of the abdominal and thoracic wall, gastric binding, muscle flap reinforcement, and hernias (including diaphragmatic, femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy, scrotal, and umbilical hernias).
× Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Daniel Krone for MM
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
Page 1 of _
510(k) Number K983162
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K983162
Device Name:
Supple Peri-Guard® Pericardium
Indications For Use:
For use as a prosthesis for pericardial closure and soft tissue deficiencies which include: defects of the abdominal and thoracic wall, gastric banding, muscle flap reinforcement, and hernias (diaphragmatic, femoral, incisional, inguinal, lumbar, paracolostomy, scrotal and umbilical).
Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Daniel Kracfer MM
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K983162
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.