K971627 · Rochester Medical Corp. · MJC · Jan 13, 1998 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K971627
Device Name
SILICONE ANTIBACTERIAL FOLEY CATHETER
Applicant
Rochester Medical Corp.
Product Code
MJC · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jan 13, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5130
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Silicone Antibacterial Foley catheter is intended for short term use to provide continuous urinary bladder drainage in adult males and females requiring catheterization for surgical procedures, monitoring urine output, management of incontinence, and voiding dysfunction. The catheter has been shown to provide a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of catheter acquired bacterial urinary tract infection during the first 5 days of catheterization. This device is not intended to be used as a treatment for active urinary tract infections.
Device Story
Standard Foley catheter; silicone elastomer construction; nitrofurazone-impregnated coating on external surface and inner lumen. Used for continuous urinary bladder drainage; inserted by clinicians in surgical or clinical settings. Retention balloon (5 or 10 cc) secured via Luer valve. Nitrofurazone coating provides antibacterial activity against specific uro-pathogens to reduce incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) during first 5 days of use. Clinical benefit: statistically significant reduction in bacterial CAUTI rates compared to conventional silicone catheters for short-term (≤5 days) catheterization.
Clinical Evidence
Single-site, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (n=344; mean age 56; 68% male). Compared nitrofurazone-coated catheter to conventional silicone catheter. Primary endpoint: incidence of CAUTI. Results: 3-fold reduction in bacterial CAUTI for patients catheterized ≤7 days (2.4% vs 6.9%). Statistically significant difference in survival curves for first 5 days (p=0.007). Hazard ratio trend reversed after day 5 (p=0.03). Bench testing confirmed compliance with ASTM 623-89 and successful elution profile.
Technological Characteristics
Silicone elastomer construction; nitrofurazone-impregnated coating. Available in 12, 18, 20 Fr sizes; 5 or 10 cc balloon capacity. 16-inch length. Complies with ASTM 623-89. Sterile, single-use. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult males and females requiring short-term continuous urinary bladder drainage for surgical procedures, urine output monitoring, incontinence management, or voiding dysfunction. Not indicated for treatment of active urinary tract infections.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A urological catheter and accessories is a flexible tubular device that is inserted through the urethra and used to pass fluids to or from the urinary tract. This generic type of device includes radiopaque urological catheters, ureteral catheters, urethral catheters, coudé catheters, balloon retention type catheters, straight catheters, upper urinary tract catheters, double lumen female urethrographic catheters, disposable ureteral catheters, male urethrographic catheters, and urological catheter accessories including ureteral catheter stylets, ureteral catheter adapters, ureteral catheter holders, ureteral catheter stylets, ureteral catheterization trays, and the gastro-urological irrigation tray (for urological use).
American Pharmascal Co. Antimicrobial Foley Catheter (K871429)
Rochester Medical All Silicone Foley Catheter (K896053)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K97162 1-12
# 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION
JAN 13 1998
Richard D. Fryar Submitter and Contact Person Rochester Medical Corporation
Classification Name: Urological catherer Name of the Device Common/Usual Name: Foley catheter Proprietary Name: Rochester Medical Corporation Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter
## Predicate Device
The predicate devices for purposes of substantial equivalence are the C.R. Bard Corp. Bardex® I.C. Foley Catheter (K910318), the American Pharmascal Co. Antimicrobial Foley Catheter (K871429) and the Rochester Medical All Silicone Foley Catheter (K896053).
#### Intended Use of the Device
The Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter is intended for short term use to provide continuous urinary bladder drainage in adult males and females requiring catheterization for surgical procedures, monitoring uring output, management of incontinence, and voiding dysfunction. The catheter has been shown to provide a statistically significant redution in the incidence of catheter acquired bacterial urinary tract infection during the first 5 days of catheterization. This device is not intended to be used as a treatment for active urinary tract infection.
#### Device Description
The catherer consists of a standard configuration Foley catheter with a drainage lumen that exits through two drainage eyes on the proximal end. A retention balloon is located near the proximal catheter tip. The retention balloon is filled thru a second lumen with a Luer valve that extends from a side arm on the distal end of the catherer to the balloon. The catherer is coated with nitrofurazone impregnated siliconc on the outside surface and inner lumen. It is available in 12, 18 and 20 Fr sizes. All French sizes are provided in a 16 inch length with a 5 or 10 cc size balloon.
## Technological Characteristics
The catheter described in the 510(k) has similar technological and performance characteristics to the predicate devices. The catheter is manufactured entirely from silicone elastomer. The predicate devices are manufactured from silicone elastomer or latex. The device is supplied in French sizes from 12 to 20 with 5 or 10 cc capacity balloons. The predicate devices are available in French sizes ranging from 8 to 30 French with 3, 5 10 and 30 cc balloons. All of the devices are supplied sterile for single use. The C.R. Bard Corp. Bardex® I.C. Foley Catheter and American Pharmaseal Co. Antimicrobial Foley Catheter provide antibacterial activity through the use of a silver or silver oxide coating or impregnation of the catheter
Rochester Medical Corporation Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter Section 510(k) Notification Summary of Safety and EMcacy Puge 1 of 2 Junuary 8, 1998
Image /page/0/Picture/18 description: The image shows a logo with the text "ISO 9001" in the center. The text is surrounded by a globe-like design with dashed lines. Below the text, the word "CERTIFIED" is written in a bold, curved font. The logo appears to be a certification mark, possibly indicating compliance with ISO 9001 standards.
Tel: (507) 533-9600
{1}------------------------------------------------
K971627 2 - 2
materials. The Rochester Medical Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter provides antibacterial activity by coating the catheter with nitrofurazone.
#### Testing and Test Results
Test results indicated that the Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter meets the requirements of ASTM 623-89 Standard Specification for Foley Catheters. Simulated use testing shows that the elution profile of the antibacterial agent from the catheter is reproducible and the agent is released at bacteriocidal levels. There has been no evidence that the catheter materials or performance are degraded with ageing. Samples of Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter passed Cytotoxicity, USP Systemic Toxicity, Subchronic Toxicity, Intracutancous Injection, Muscle Implant Study, Sensitization Study. Pyrogenicity and Hemolysis. Mutagenicity testing indicated some mutagenic changes.
#### In-vitro studies
In vitro studies have shown that nitrofurazone impregnated catherer segments have antibacterial activity against clinical isolates of uro-pathogens including Coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, Enterococcus spp., C. Minutissimum, E. Coli, Enterobacter spp., and Klebstella spp. Gram-negative bacilli including Serratia spp., Proteus spp., and Pseudomonas spp. were not inhibited by nitrofurazone impregnated catheter segments. Nitrofurazone is not effective against yeast and fungi.
#### Clinical studies
A single site randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the antibacterial properies of the Silicone Antibacterial Catheter (nitrofurazone impregnated) to a Conventional Silicone Catheter. During the eleven month trial, a total of 344 patients (68% men, 32% women) mecting the study evaluation criteria were enrolled (mean age = 56 years, range 18 to 91) and the incidence of catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) during catheterization was recorded.
For patients with catheters inserted for 7 days or less (91.9% of population, median = 3 days), the group receiving the Silicone Antibacterial Catherer had an approximate threefold reduction in the rate of bacterial CAUTI compared to the Conventional Silicone Catheter group (2.4% vs. 6.9% incidence). The difference in actuarial survival curves for time until the occurence of bacterial CAUTI between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.007, Kaplan-Mcicr survival, Breslow logrank statistic) for the first 5 days of use.
However, the trend in the hazard ratio over time to bacterial CAUTI between the antibacterial catheter and standard catherer was found to be statistically significantly increasing (P=0.03 Wald Chi Square Statistic) for the 7 days of use, resulting in the reversal of the hazard ratio in favor of the standard catheter from the 6th day.
Rochester Medical Corporation Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter Section 510(k) Notification Summary of Safety and Efficacy Page 2 of 2 January 8, 1998
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of an eagle with three lines representing its wings. The eagle is enclosed in a circle with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" surrounding the top half of the circle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
# JAN 1 3 1998
Re: K971627
Rochester Medical Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter Dated: December 5, 1997 Received: December 8, 1997 Regulatory class: II 21 CFR §876.5130/Product code: 78 MJC
Mr. Richard D. Fryar Vice President of Research and Development Rochester Medical Corporation One Rochester Medical Drive Stewartville, Minnesota 55976
Dear Mr. Fryar:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, subject to the general controls provisions of the general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. "
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Pederal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions; or _ other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, -permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (2) CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for question and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041-01-(301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely vours.
William Yu
Lillian Yiu, Ph.D.
Lillian Yin, Ph.D. Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if Known):
Silicone Antibacterial Foley Catheter Device Name: _ Rochester Medical Corporation
Indications for Use:
#### INTENDED USE
The Silicone Antibacterial Foley catheter is intended for short term use to provide continuous urinary bladder drainage in adult males and females requiring catheterization for surgical procedures, monitoring urine output, management of incontinence, and voiding dysfunction. The catheter has been shown to provide a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of catheter acquired bacterial urinary tract infection during the first 5 days of catheterization. This device is not intended to be used as a treatment for active urinary tract infections.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Robert D. Sattler
(Division Sign Off)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT,
and Radiological Devices
510(k) Number K971627
OR
Prescription Use _ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Over-The-Counter-Use
(Optional Formal 1-2-96)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.