REACH ANTIBACTERIAL TOOTHBRUSH

K971589 · Personal Products Co. · EFW · Jul 24, 1997 · Dental

Device Facts

Record IDK971589
Device NameREACH ANTIBACTERIAL TOOTHBRUSH
ApplicantPersonal Products Co.
Product CodeEFW · Dental
Decision DateJul 24, 1997
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 872.6855
Device ClassClass 1

Intended Use

Both the modified device and the predicate device are intended to be used to remove adherent plaque and food debris from the teeth to reduce tooth decay.

Device Story

Manual toothbrush consisting of shaft with synthetic bristles; incorporates antibacterial agent into handle plastic. Used by patients for oral hygiene to remove plaque and food debris. Antibacterial agent inhibits bacterial growth on handle surface; testing confirms no leaching of agent into toothpaste/water slurry or alcohol/water solution. Device provides mechanical cleaning action; antibacterial handle serves as adjunct feature. Benefits include reduction of plaque and debris accumulation on teeth.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing and pre-clinical studies only. Microbiology: Zone of Inhibition test showed antibacterial handle inhibited bacterial growth. Analytical: HPLC extraction study showed no detectable leaching of antibacterial agent (limit 1 ppm). Pre-clinical: Hamster cheek pouch study showed no significant irritation difference vs. non-antibacterial control. In vitro: USP Agar Diffusion cytotoxicity study showed no cell lysis or toxicity.

Technological Characteristics

Manual toothbrush; shaft with synthetic bristles. Antibacterial agent incorporated into handle plastic. Biocompatibility evaluated per USP guidelines. No electronic components or software.

Indications for Use

Indicated for removal of adherent plaque and food debris from teeth to reduce tooth decay in general population.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A manual toothbrush is a device composed of a shaft with either natural or synthetic bristles at one end intended to remove adherent plaque and food debris from the teeth to reduce tooth decay.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ JUL 2 4 1997 Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows a handwritten string of characters. The string appears to be a combination of letters and numbers. The string is "K971589". | Summary | Summarized below is the safety and effectiveness information compiled in support of claims of substantial equivalence (as defined in the FD&C Act). | |--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Submitter | Personal Products Company<br>199 Grandview Road<br>Skillman, New Jersey 08558 | | Contact Person | Ms. Lorna-Jane Bremer<br>Senior Regulatory Affairs Associate<br>Johnson & Johnson Consumer Franchises Worldwide<br>199 Grandview Road, Skillman, New Jersey 08858<br>Phone: 908-874-1700 Fax: 908-874-2751 | | Date of Submission | April 29, 1997 | | Device Trade Name | REACH® Antibacterial Toothbrush | | Device Common Name | Toothbrush | | Device Classification | Manual Toothbrush -- Class I Device<br>(Ref. 21 CFR § 872.6855) | | Predicate Device | Butler G.U.M. Antibacterial Toothbrush (John O. Butler), a Class I post-amendments 510(k) device (K950993). | | Intended Use | Both the modified device and the predicate device are intended to be used to remove adherent plaque and food debris from the teeth to reduce tooth decay. | | Technological Characteristics/ Description | Both the modified device and the predicate device are manual toothbrushes consisting of a shaft with synthetic bristles at one end. Antibacterial agents have been incorporated into the devices. | 510(k) Summary ! 【 ﻟﻤﻌﺪ ﺳ {1}------------------------------------------------ Johnson & Johnson Consumer Franchises Worldwide has conducted a Performance thorough program to evaluate the safety of the Modified Device. This Data program consisted of the following: ### Bench Testing ### 1. Microbiology Studv - Zone of Inhibition Test The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the "plastic" portion of the toothbrush both before and after simulated use. Toothbrushes with antibacterial "plastic" as well as toothbrushes without antibacterial "plastic" were exposed to several different strains of bacteria which may be found on toothbrushes after use. Results showed that the "plastic" portion of the toothbrush with antibacterial agent added was effective in inhibiting the growth of most of the bacteria tested. ## 2. Analytical Study - Extraction Study Using HPLC The purpose of this study was to determine whether any of the antibacterial agent contained in the toothbrush was able to leach out into a toothpaste/water slurry after 6-hours of simulated brushing and into an alcohol/water solution after soaking the toothbrush for 24 hours. HPLC results showed no detectable antibacterial agent in either the toothpaste/water slurry or the alcohol/water solution (limit of quantitation of antibacterial agent = 1 ppm). #### Pre-Clinical Testing #### 1. Mucous Membrane Irritation - Hamster Cheek The purpose of this study was to evaluate the irritation potential of the toothbrush with added antibacterial agent after it remained in contact with oral mucosal tissue in the hamster cheek pouch for one week. Results showed no significant difference in degree of irritation between toothbrushes with antibacterial agent and toothbrushes without antibacterial agent. ## 2. in vitro Cytotoxicity Study - USP Agar Diffusion The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of the toothbrush with antibacterial agent added using an in vitro mammalian cell culture test based on United States Pharmacopeia (USP) guidelines. Results showed no evidence of cell lysis or toxicity for either the toothbrushes with an added antibacterial agent or the toothbrushes without an added antibacterial agent. {2}------------------------------------------------ # Conclusions The modification to this device does not raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions. Accepted scientific methods were utilized to assess the effects of the modification. On this basis, we conclude that the data provided demonstrate that the Modified Device is safe for its intended use. Based on the 510(k) Substantial Equivalence Decision-Making Process review as shown and the testing information provided, we believe that the Modified Device is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device. {3}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with its wings spread. Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850 Ms. Lorna-Jane Bremer ·Senior Regulatory Affairs Associate Personal Products Company 199 Grandview Road Skillman, New Jersey 08558 JUL 2 4 1997 Re : K971589 Trade Name: Reach Antibacterial Toothbrush Regulatory Class: I Product Code: EFW Dated: April 29, 1997 Received: May 1, 1997 Dear Ms. Bremer: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in requlatory In addition, FDA may publish further announcements action. concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 {4}------------------------------------------------ Page 2 - Ms. Bremer through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling requlation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4618. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html". Sincerely yours, Timothy R. Walbert Timot Wy A. Ulatowski Director Division of Dental, Infection Control and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {5}------------------------------------------------ ## INDICATION FOR USE 510(k) Number (if known): K971589 Device Name: REACH® Antibacterial Toothbrush Indications For Use: REACH® Antibacterial Toothbrush is used to remove adherent plaque and food debris from teeth to reduce tooth decay. This device is made of a shaft (handle) with synthetic bristles attached at one end. An antibacterial agent has been added to the handle portion. The antibacterial activity is limited to the handle of the toothbrush. (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) (Division Sign-Off) Division of Dental, Info Courtence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) and General Hospital De 510(k) Number scription OR Over-The-Counter-Use (Per 21 CFR 801.1 (Optional Format 1-2-96) 000 00007
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%