The Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Heads are single-use devices and may be used with all appropriately selected, legally marketed Osteonics Ti6Al4V femoral stems that incorporate a C-Taper trunnion. Additionally, the Osteonics® Alumina C-Taper Head is intended for use with any appropriately selected, legally marketed Osteonics polyethylene acetabular cup liner and associated metal shell, bipolar or Osteonics all-polyethylene acetabular cup.
Device Story
Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head is a ceramic femoral bearing component for hip arthroplasty. Device features spherical alumina ceramic head with smooth exterior and internal geometry for taper-lock assembly to Ti6Al4V alloy femoral stems with C-Taper trunnion. Available in 28mm and 32mm diameters with +0mm and +5mm neck extensions. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings for total or bipolar hip replacement. Provides articulating surface for hip joint; replaces damaged femoral head to restore joint function and reduce pain. Device is single-use and implanted via surgical procedure.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing and pre-clinical data incorporated by reference to prior submissions.
Technological Characteristics
Material: High-density, high-purity, fine-grain Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) ceramic per ASTM F-603. Design: Spherical femoral head with C-Taper internal bore for taper-lock connection to Ti6Al4V stems. Sizes: 28mm and 32mm diameters; +0mm and +5mm neck extensions. Sterilization: Standard methods.
Indications for Use
Indicated for bipolar hip replacement in patients with femoral head/neck fractures, non-unions, aseptic necrosis, or hip arthritis (osteo-, rheumatoid, post-traumatic) with minimal acetabular involvement. Also indicated for total hip replacement in patients with painful, disabling joint disease (degenerative, rheumatoid, post-traumatic arthritis, or late-stage avascular necrosis), revision of previous arthroplasty, or clinical management problems where alternative techniques are less likely to succeed. Includes cases requiring conservative acetabular procedures or salvage of failed total hip arthroplasty.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
Predicate Devices
Osteonics® Omnifit® Ceramic Morse Taper Head
Osteonics® Zirconia C-Taper Femoral Bearing Head
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
JUL - 9 1997
K971409
# 510(k) Premarket Notification Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Head
#### Submission Information
Name and Address of the Sponsor
| of the 510(k) Submission: | Osteonics Corporation<br>59 Route 17<br>Allendale, NJ 07401-1677 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Kate Sutton<br>Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Date of Summary Preparation: | April 15, 1997 |
| Device Identification | |
| Proprietary Name: | Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head |
| Common Name: | Ceramic Femoral Bearing |
Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis 21 CFR §888.3353
# Predicate Device Identification
The Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head is substantially equivalent to the following competitive and/or Osteonics devices, which have previously been determined substantially equivalent by FDA:
- Osteonics® Omnifit® Ceramic Morse Taper Head
Classification Name and Reference:
- Osteonics® Zirconia C-Taper Femoral Bearing Head
## Device Description
Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Heads are alumina ceramic femoral bearings that have been designed for assembly, through a taper lock mechanism, to Ti6A14V alloy stems with the Osteonics
{1}------------------------------------------------
C-Taper trunnion design. The Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Heads are available in 28mm diameter and 32mm diameter sizes, and in neck extensions of +0mm and +5mm.
The Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Heads are characterized by the following features:
- A basic spherical design. .
- . A smooth exterior finish.
- An interior geometry which accommodates any Osteonics stem with a C-Taper trunnion. .
These heads differ from the predicate Osteonics C-Taper Zirconia Ceramic Heads in that they feature alumina instead of zirconia ceramic; however both heads incorporate the identical C-Taper bore design. If the titanium adaptor sleeve of the Osteonics" Alumina Ceramic Bearing Head were excluded, the subject head would be identical in design and material to the predicate head.
## Intended Use:
The Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Heads are single-use devices and may be used with all appropriately selected, legally marketed Osteonics Ti6Al4V femoral stems that incorporate a C-Taper trunnion. Additionally, the Osteonics® Alumina C-Taper Head is intended for use with any appropriately selected, legally marketed Osteonics polyethylene acetabular cup liner and associated metal shell, bipolar or Osteonics all-polyethylene acetabular cup.
#### Indications:
For use as a Bipolar Hip Replacement:
The indications for the use of the Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Head, in keeping with those of other legally marketed Osteonics ceramic bearings, are as follows:
# For Use as a Bipolar Hip Replacement:
- . Femoral head/neck fractures or non-unions.
- Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head.
- Osteo-, rheumatoid, and post traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal acetabular . involvement or distortion.
Other Considerations:
- Pathological conditions or age considerations which indicate a more conservative . acetabular procedure and in avoidance of the use of bone cement in the acetabulum.
● Salvage of failed total hip arthroplasty.
# For Use as a Total Hip Replacement:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.
- . Revision of previous cup arthroplasty or other procedure.
- Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Statement of Technological Comparison:
The substantial equivalence of the Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Heads to the predicate devices identified above-in terms of intended use, materials, and design features-is based on the following.
#### Intended Uses:
The Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head, like the predicate Osteonics C-Taper Zirconia Ceramic Heads cited above, is intended for use with any appropriately selected, legally marketed Osteonics polyethylene acetabular cup liner or any Osteonics all-polyethylene acetabular cup.
## Materials:
The Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Head and the predicate Osteonics" Alumina Ceramic Bearing Head and Titanium Adaptor Sleeve Assembly cited above are manufactured from the same materials, exclusive of the titanium adaptor sleeve. Both devices are fabricated from high density, high purity, fine grain Aluminum Oxide (Al2O2) ceramic (ASTM F-603).
## Design:
।
The design of the Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head is consistent with that of the predicate Osteonics" Alumina Ceramic Bearing Head and Titanium Adaptor Sleeve Assembly and differs only in the following:
- The Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper does not have a titanium adaptor sleeve.
The design of the Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Head is consistent with that of the predicate Osteonics C-Taper Zirconia Ceramic Head and differs only in the following:
- The subject device is fabricated from alumina ceramic, whereas the predicate device is fabricated from zirconia ceramic.
None of these design or material differences raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
#### Summary
Based on the similarities presented above, the supporting testing summary, the pre-clinical data incorporated by reference to prior submissions, and the fact that the Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Heads employ standard sterilization and packaging methods, the substantial equivalence of the Osteonics Alumina C-Taper Heads to other legally marketed, class II, acetabeler Femoral head components is demonstrated.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or a bird in flight, composed of three stylized human profiles.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Kate Sutton Requlatory Affairs Specialist Osteonics Corporation 59 Route 17 Allendale, New Jersey 07401-1677
JUL - 9 1997
Re : K971409 Osteonics® Alumina C-Taper Head Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LZO Dated: April 15, 1997 Received: April 16, 1997
Dear Ms. Sutton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act and the following limitation that the package insert must reflect that the Osteonics® Alumina C-Taper Heads are to be used only with Ti6Al4V alloy hip stems with the C-Taper trunnion design.
The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Kate Sutton
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory In addition, FDA may publish further announcements action. concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal Laws or Regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification immediately. An FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 3 - Ms. Kate Sutton
information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".....
Sincerely yours,
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D.
Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Number (if known): K971409
#### Device Name: Osteonics" Alumina C-Taper Head
Indications For Use:
The indications for the use of these ceramic bearings, in keeping with those of other legally marketed Osteonics ceramic bearings, are as follows:
#### For Use as a Bipolar Hip Replacement:
- Femoral head/neck fractures or non-unions. .
- . Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head.
- . Osteo-, rheumatoid, and post traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal acetabular involvement or distortion.
Other Considerations:
- Pathological conditions or age considerations which indicate a more conservative ● acetabular procedure and in avoidance of the use of bone cement in the acetabulum.
- Salvage of failed total hip arthroplasty. .
#### For Use as a Total Hip Replacement:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, ● rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.
- Revision of previous cup arthroplasty or other procedure.
- Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques ● are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
| Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Division/Sign-Off) | | |
| Division of General Restorative Devices | | |
| 510(k) Number | K971409 | |
| Prescription Use <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> | OR | Over-The-Counter Use <span style="text-decoration: overline;">____</span> |
| (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | | (Optional Format 1-2-96) |
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.