XRT-7.0

K964583 · Elscint, Inc. · JAK · Jan 17, 1997 · Radiology

Device Facts

Record IDK964583
Device NameXRT-7.0
ApplicantElscint, Inc.
Product CodeJAK · Radiology
Decision DateJan 17, 1997
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 892.1750
Device ClassClass 2

Device Story

XRT-7.0 option for CT Twin flash scanners; adds X-ray tube with 7.0 MHU anode heat capacity. Increases convenience by reducing tube cooling delays. Operated by radiology staff in clinical CT imaging environments. Output is X-ray radiation for diagnostic imaging, consistent with predicate CT scanner functionality.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data; bench testing only. Safety and effectiveness established via mechanical and electrical similarity to predicate.

Technological Characteristics

X-ray tube with 7.0 MHU anode heat capacity. Integrates with existing CT-Twin flash hardware and software drivers.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} JAN 17 1997 K964583 # Summary of Safety and Effectiveness ## 1. Device Name XRT-7.0 option for CT scanners. ## 2. Submitter Elscint Inc., 505 Main Str. Hackensack, NJ 07601. ## 3. New Features Description XRT-7.0 option was added to CT Twin flash. The option adds an X-ray tube with 7.0 MHU anode heat capacity to the options list. ## 4. Predicate Device CT-Twin flash submitted in “HRSW Option for CT-Twin Flash”, K945512. ## 5. Safety The safety of the device is equivalent to the safety of the predicate device, CT Twin flash. The 7.0 MHU tube option is mechanically and electrically very similar to the previous X-ray tubes and the software driver is the same. ## 6. Effectiveness The effectiveness of the device was not significantly changed in respect to the predicate device, CT Twin flash: The increased heat capacity is more convenient to use due to shorter delays for tube cooling. ## 7. Substantial Equivalency Statement Based on the above considerations, it is Elscint’s opinion that CT scanners with the added XRT-7.0 option is substantially equivalent in safety and effectiveness to its predicate device, CT-Twin flash submitted in “HRSW Option for CT-Twin Flash”, K945512.
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%