K964507 · Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. · MKZ · Jun 13, 1997 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K964507
Device Name
ROCHE COBAS AMPLICOR CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS TEST
Applicant
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Product Code
MKZ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jun 13, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3120
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Test is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer. The test utilizes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) nucleic acid amplification technique and nucleic acid hybridization for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid DNA in endocervical, urethral (male), and urine (male) samples.
Device Story
Automated in vitro diagnostic test for Chlamydia trachomatis detection; utilizes PCR amplification and nucleic acid hybridization. Input: endocervical swabs, male urethral swabs, male urine. Operation: automated pipetting, thermal cycling, hybridization, and detection on COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer. Detection uses magnetic microparticles as solid support; biotinylated primers (CP24/CP27) target CT DNA; biotinylated amplicon hybridizes to CP35 probe. Detection reaction measures chromophore absorbance at 660 nm via horseradish peroxidase oxidation of TMB. Used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Output: qualitative result based on optical density. Benefits: provides automated, high-throughput screening for Chlamydia infection, replacing manual microwell plate methods.
Clinical Evidence
Comparative clinical performance evaluated using 639 clinical specimens (266 endocervical swabs, 93 male urethral swabs, 280 male urine). Results demonstrated equivalence between the COBAS AMPLICOR and the predicate AMPLICOR microwell plate test. Analytical sensitivity is 1 Inclusion Forming Unit (IFU) for all 15 Chlamydia serovars. Analytical specificity tested against 105 bacteria, yeasts, and viruses with no cross-reactivity. Reproducibility confirmed via multi-operator, multi-analyzer study over three days with 100% correct results for spiked samples.
Technological Characteristics
Automated nucleic acid amplification and detection system. Uses magnetic microparticles as solid support for DNA probes. Detection via horseradish peroxidase-mediated oxidation of TMB, measured at 660 nm. Employs PCR amplification with biotinylated primers (CP24, CP27). Automated thermal cycling, pipetting, and washing. System is networked/automated analyzer-based. Reagents include denaturation solution, substrate A/B, and wash concentrate.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid DNA in endocervical swabs, male urethral swabs, and male urine samples using PCR and nucleic acid hybridization on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Chlamydia serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to chlamydia in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of chlamydia antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify chlamydia directly from clinical specimens or cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Chlamydia and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Chlamydia are the causative agents of psittacosis (a form of pneumonia), lymphogranuloma venereum (a venereal disease), and trachoma (a chronic disease of the eye and eyelid).
Predicate Devices
AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Microwell Plate Test (K922906/C)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
K964507
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Somerville, New Jersey 08876
COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia Trachomatis Test 510(k) Summary
510(k) Summary
JUN 13 1997
Roche COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis Test
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
1080 U.S. Highway 202
Somerville, New Jersey 08876-1760
(908) 253-7200
## Intended Use:
The COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Test is a qualitative *in vitro* diagnostic test for the detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis* in clinical specimens on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer. The test utilizes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) nucleic acid amplification technique and nucleic acid hybridization for the detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis* plasmid DNA in endocervical, urethral (male), and urine (male) samples.
## Description of the Device:
The Roche COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis test performed on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer is an automated modification of the Roche AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Microwell Plate Test performed using the Perkin Elmer 9600 thermal cycler and a conventional photometric microwell plate reader (K922906/C). The AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis Test was previously shown to be substantially equivalent to tissue culture with immunofluorescent staining for the detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis* in urogenital swab and male urine samples. The AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test has been modified to allow the automation of the amplification and detection test procedure using the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer. Specimen collection, transport and processing and target amplification with the COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test are identical to the AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test. COBAS AMPLICOR and microwell AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test detection reagents incorporate identical probes using the appropriate solid support. The clinical and non-clinical performance of the COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test is substantially equivalent to the AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test.
## Similarities and Differences to Predicate Device:
The COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test is similar in design, reagent composition, function and intended use to the commercial microwell plate format AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test (K922906/C). The COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test uses without modification the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test STD Swab Specimen Collection and Transport Kit, the AMPLICOR STD Swab and the Urine Specimen Preparation Kits for specimen collection, specimen preparation and PCR amplification (see Table 1). The COBAS AMPLICOR Detection Kit reagents are similar in function and formulation to those in the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Detection Test. The solid support for the DNA detection probe has been changed from a polystyrene microwell plate to magnetic microparticles to permit automation of the detection reaction on the COBAS AMPLICOR.
## Similarities
- AMPLICOR STD Specimen Collection and Transport Kit (P/N 83075) for the collection and transport of male and female swab specimens.
- AMPLICOR STD Specimen Preparation Kits (P/N 83002 and 83006) for the processing of swab and urine specimens.
- AMPLICOR CT Amplification Kit (P/N 83008).
- Identical biotinylated primers (CP24 and CP27) for defining the CT DNA target sequence for amplification.
f\reg\regdocs\ctdocs\ctcobas\fdaresp\ctresp.new\26
Page 036
{1}
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Somerville, New Jersey 08876
COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia Trachomatis Test
510(k) Summary
- Hybridization of biotinylated amplicon generated in the PCR reaction to the same CP35 CT-specific DNA probe
- Identical Detection Reagent formulations (Denaturation Solution, Substrate A, Substrate B and 10-X Wash Concentrate)
- Identical detection reactions based on the measurement chromophore absorbance following oxidation of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethybenzidine by horseradish peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide.
## Differences
- Automated pipetting of amplified samples and reagent, washing, thermal cycling, hybridization and detection steps of the test procedure.
- The avidin-HRP Conjugate Buffer in the COBAS AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test contains bovine serum albumin compared to bovine gamma globulin in the AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* MWP Test.
- Change of solid support from polystyrene microwell plate to magnetic microparticles,
- Slightly modified thermal cycle profile for the COBAS AMPLICOR to give equivalent performance to the Perkin Elmer 9600 thermal cycler.
- No Stop Reagent is required with the COBAS AMPLICOR assay. Since the automated analyzer precisely times each step of the hybridization and detection procedures, it is not necessary to add Stop Reagent at the conclusion of the substrate incubation step. Accordingly, the optical density of the oxidation products from the detection reaction is measured at 660 nm in the COBAS AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test as compared to 450 nm in the AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* MWP Test system since the Stop Reagent modifies the oxidation state of the TMB reaction product, from the detection reaction, shifting the absorbance maximum of the chromophore from 660 nm to 450 nm.
## Non-Clinical Performance:
The analytical sensitivity (limit of detection) of the COBAS AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test is 1 Inclusion Forming Unit for all 15 Chlamydia serovars (A, B, Ba, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L1, L2, L3). The analytical specificity for the AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test was evaluated using 105 bacteria, yeasts and viruses. No organism gave a result greater than 0.016 A₆₆₀. These results are consistent with those observed for the AMPLICOR *Chlamydia Trachomatis* Test.
The reproducibility of the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer was determined in a multi-operator analysis of swab samples spiked with *Chlamydia trachomatis* organism at four levels, AMPLICOR *C. trachomatis* positive and negative kit controls, and six patient samples spanning the reportable range for the assay (24 samples per test run; two complete A-tube rings). Samples were analyzed by independent operators for three days using three different analyzers. The test results for all samples (STM specimens spiked at 50, 10, 1 and 0 IFU/PCR, positive and negative kit controls, and the patient specimens) were 100% correct. The reproducibility of the assay was calculated from the absorbance values obtained from the replicates of the spiked STM specimens and the Kit Controls. The complete results of the Analysis of Variance calculations for these data are provided in Table 2.
## Clinical Performance:
The comparative clinical performance between the COBAS AMPLICOR *Chlamydia trachomatis* Test and the AMPLICOR *Chlamydia Trachomatis* Test was determined using 639 clinical specimens (266 endocervical swabs, 93 male urethral swabs, and 280 male urine specimens). Equivalent results were obtained for specimens tested by the two test procedures.
March 31, 1997
f\reg\regdocs\ctdocs\ctcobas\fdaresp\ctresp.new\27
Page 037
{2}
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Somerville, New Jersey 08876
COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia Trachomatis Test
510(k) Summary
# TABLE 1
## COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis Test Reproducibility
### Analysis of Variance - Statistical Summary
| PRECISION
MEASUREMENT | TEST SAMPLE | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | C. trachomatis Spiked STM (IFU/PCR Test) | | | | Kit Controls | |
| | 0 | 1 | 10 | 50 | Negative | Positive |
| Total Replicates | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Mean Absorbance | 0.004 | 3.856 | 3.685 | 3.639 | 0.004 | 3.831 |
| Minimum | 0.000 | 3.646 | 3.220 | 3.220 | 0.000 | 3.279 |
| Maximum | 0.017 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 0.011 | 4.000 |
| Between Day Variance | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0040 | 0.0037 | 0.0000 | 0.0022 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0013 | 0.0000 | 0.0632 | 0.0610 | 0.0000 | 0.0468 |
| CV (%) | 32.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Between Operator Variance | 0.0000 | 0.0145 | 0.0271 | 0.0230 | 0.0000 | 0.0587 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0029 | 0.1206 | 0.1647 | 0.1517 | 0.0027 | 0.2422 |
| CV (%) | 72.4 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 69.7 | 6.3 |
| Within Operator Variance | 0.0000 | 0.0059 | 0.0162 | 0.0125 | 0.0000 | 0.0109 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0035 | 0.0767 | 0.1274 | 0.1118 | 0.0026 | 0.1045 |
| CV (%) | 87.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 67.4 | 2.7 |
| Total Variance | 0.0000 | 0.0204 | 0.0474 | 0.0392 | 0.0000 | 0.0718 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0047 | 0.1429 | 0.2176 | 0.1980 | 0.0037 | 0.2679 |
| CV (%) | 117.6 | 3.7 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 97.0 | 7.0 |
# TABLE 2
## Comparative Clinical Performance
### COBAS AMPLICOR vs AMPLICOR Chlamydia Trachomatis Test
| | Culture Positive | | Culture Negative | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | AMPLICOR Positive | | |
| | AMPLICOR
Positive | AMPLICOR
Negative | MOMP
Positive | MOMP
Negative | AMPLICOR
Negative |
| FEMALE SWABS | | | | | |
| COBAS Positive | 19 | 1 | 13 | 2* | 0 |
| COBAS Negative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 229 |
| MALE SWABS | | | | | |
| COBAS Positive | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1** |
| COBAS Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 |
| MALE URINE | | | | | |
| COBAS Positive | 32 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 2 |
| COBAS Negative | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 202 |
* inconclusive results by MOMP alternative primer pair testing
** COBAS negative on repeat testing
f\reg\regdocs\ctdocs\ctcobas\fdaresp\ctresp.new\28
Page 038
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville MD 20850
JUN 13 1997
Alex Wesolowski
Director, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
1080 U.S. Highway 202
Branchburg, NJ 08876-1760
Re: K964507
Trade Name: Roche Cobas Amplicor™ Chlamydia Trachomatis Test
Regulatory Class: I
Product Code: MKZ
Dated: November 7, 1996
Received: November 8, 1996
Dear Mr. Wesolowski:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A.
Director
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known) _______________
Device Name: COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia Trachomatis Test
Indications for Use:
The COBAS AMPLICOR™ Chlamydia trachomatis Test is a qualitative *in vitro* diagnostic test for the detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis* in clinical specimens on the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer. The test utilizes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) nucleic acid amplification technique and nucleic acid hybridization for the detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis* plasmid DNA in endocervical, male urethral, and male urine samples.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use ☑ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Optional Format 1-2-96)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K 96 4507
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.