The NeuroMate Stereotactic System is intended to be used in a stereotactic neurosurgical operating room for the spatial positioning and orientation of an instrument holder or tool guide to be used by the surgeon to manually guide standard neurosurgical instruments.
Device Story
NeuroMate is a computer-controlled, 5-axis electro-mechanical multijointed arm used in neurosurgical operating rooms. It receives stereotactic planning data (target coordinates/trajectories) from external imaging software (CT, MR, DSA, PET, SPECT) via RS-232 interface. The system translates Cartesian coordinates into joint space to position and orient an instrument holder proximal to the patient's head. The surgeon retains control over entry points and trajectories. The device provides stable, accurate mechanical guidance for manual surgical instruments, reducing human error. It operates via a distributed controller (axis controllers, main controller, supervisor module) and 24V DC motors. The system is used with a stereotactic head ring. Benefits include improved access to surgical sites, enhanced trajectory planning, and high spatial accuracy, potentially reducing procedure time and increasing precision compared to manual frame-based methods.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical testing conducted at Grenoble University Hospital (Sept 1995–Apr 1996) on 45 patients (mean age 42, range 6-75) undergoing biopsy, cysternostomy, tumoral cyst, Parkinson's, and epilepsy procedures. Primary endpoint: successful positioning of instrument holder at required stereotactic coordinates. Results: 100% success rate in achieving requested positioning (75% direct, 25% after minor X-ray guided readjustment). Simulation capabilities improved positioning accuracy, with 97% of cases within 2mm of optimal target when using treatment simulation versus 65% without. No adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
5-axis electro-mechanical multijointed arm; 24V DC motors; RS-232 interface for external PC/workstation connectivity. Distributed controller architecture (axis controllers, main controller, supervisor module). Operates on 110V/220V via double-insulated transformer. Spatial accuracy: 0.73 mm; angular accuracy: 0.14°; repeatability: 0.136 mm. Sterile draping required. Software performs coordinate transformations (Cartesian to joint space) and motion control.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing stereotactic neurosurgical procedures, including biopsy, cysternostomy, tumoral cyst treatment, Parkinson's disease management, and electro-encephalogram stimulation for epilepsy. Applicable to patients aged 6-75 years.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}
K963256
MAY 9, 1997
9. **SMDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness - 510(k) Summary**
A. **Sponsor Information**
Innovative Medical Machines International, Inc.
70 Walnut Street
Wellesley, MA 02181
Telephone: 617 239 8108
Contact Person: Dr. Jean-Luc Boulnois
President
B. **Device Identification**
Common/Usual Name: Stereotactic Instrument
Proprietary Name: NeuroMate Stereotactic System
C. **Identification of Predicate Device(s)**
The NeuroMate Stereotactic System is substantially equivalent to the following previously cleared and currently marketed devices:
- BRW Stereotactic System (Radionics; K811452)
- COMPASS Stereotactic System (Stereotactic Medical Systems; K871046)
D. **Device Description**
The NeuroMate Stereotactic System is a computer controlled image-guided electro-mechanical multijointed arm. NeuroMate is intended to be used in a stereotactic neurosurgical operating room for the spatial positioning and orientation of an instrument holder or tool guide to be used by the surgeon to manually guide standard neurosurgical instruments (Figure 1).
NeuroMate assists the surgeon in its operating tasks by providing a stable, accurate, and reproducible mechanical guidance for surgical instruments, while not directly entering in contact with the patient's head. The instrument holder's stereotactic spatial positioning and orientation are determined by the neurosurgeon using an "external" (i.e., not provided by IMMI Inc.) imaging software for stereotactic planning and specific to the intended clinical application.
The NeuroMate Stereotactic System acts like a motorized stereotactic frame driven by the external imaging software supported by a PC or a computer workstation providing visualization of anatomical structures and brain targets specific for the intended application (e.g., 3-D image databases from CT, MR, DSA, PET, SPECT).
Following a carefully prepared stereotactic treatment plan, at the neurosurgeon request, the NeuroMate Stereotactic System slowly moves and subsequently rigidly maintains an instrument holder proximal to the patient's head: NeuroMate automatically and accurately insure the correct stereotactic angular and spatial positioning of surgical instruments, thereby reducing potential human errors. During most of the duration of a neurosurgical procedure, NeuroMate is motionless and the instrument holder rigidly holds the surgical instrument chosen by the neurosurgeon prior to initiating stereotactic surgery. Only when changing spatial position and/or orientation does NeuroMate actually move. Finally, NeuroMate must be used in conjunction with a stereotactic head ring.
000046
{1}
J3

Joint Axis
Figure 1: NeuroMate Stereotactic System Geometry
000047
{2}
The treatment strategy, including the choice of the entry point on the patient's head and the associated rectilinear route to reach a pre-selected brain target, are entirely left under the neurosurgeon's control. NeuroMate enables the surgeon to spatially position a surgical instrument along a virtually infinite number of angular orientations centered onto a pre-selected brain target point.
The device operates from a 110V supply, with all of its structure grounded; the device is equipped with a double-insulation 110V/220V transformer. Its main components are:
- electronic and PC circuit boards powered by switching power supplies;
- an electromechanical 5-axis multijointed arm displaced by 24V DC motors;
- a RS-232 computer interface enabling communications with external computers or workstations which operate the external imaging software driving the NeuroMate Stereotactic System.
The NeuroMate Stereotactic System's controller has been specifically developed for surgical applications. It includes several functions at the mechanical and software levels, which, in case of dysfunction, guarantee the patient safety and the medical staff safety.
NeuroMate Stereotactic System's controller is a "distributed controller" comprising the following elements:
- an axis controller for each joint;
- a main controller module coordinating NeuroMate's motion; it performs the necessary transformations between the Cartesian space and joint space;
- a field bus linking the main controller to the axis controllers;
- a supervisor module performing all functions related to user interface, and generating the motion orders for the NeuroMate Stereotactic System to navigate in Cartesian space.
## E. Performance Data
Overall performances of the NeuroMate Stereotactic System were assessed as a result of different testing sequences designed to:
- verify the device's technical and functional characteristics,
- verify the operation of the device's safety systems, and
- measure the accuracy and repeatability performances in spatial positioning and orientation of the multi-jointed arm carrying a specific payload.
The results of these measurements are well within the performance specifications of the device and provide a clear indication of the relatively high spatial accuracy of the NeuroMate Stereotactic System.
- Accuracy may be defined as the success of the device in reaching a known location in space: the measured positioning accuracy was 0.73 mm, and the measured angular accuracy was 0.14°
- Repeatability is the ability of the device to return to the same position in space repeatedly: the measured repeatability was 0.136 mm.
## F. Clinical Testing
Between Sept. 1995 and Apr. 1996, the NeuroMate Stereotactic System was tested at the Neurosurgery Department of Grenoble University Hospital in France. The objectives of the clinical testing were to establish that the NeuroMate Stereotactic System could
000048
{3}
position an instrument in any required stereotactic spatial position corresponding to predetermined entry and a target points, as determined by the neurosurgeon.
A cohort of 45 patients (16 females; 29 males) with a mean age of 42 years (range 6-75) underwent various stereotactic procedures with the assistance of NeuroMate. The procedures were as follows: biopsy (11 cases), cysternostomy (4 cases), tumoral cyst (1 case), Parkinson (17 cases), electro-encephalogram stimulation for the treatment of acute epilepsy (12 cases).
The stereotactic approaches used included single oblique, double oblique, frontal, lateral, and parietal trajectories corresponding to standard accesses around the patient's head. In all cases, NeuroMate performed as intended and successfully positioned the instrument holder at the required stereotactic spatial and angular position.
As a result of these clinical tests, the benefits of using the NeuroMate Stereotactic System for the positioning of an instrument holder can be summarized as follows:
- NeuroMate can access any part of the patient's head for single or multiple trajectories without the mechanical limitations encountered in the use of frames;
- the choice of optimal trajectories adapted to anatomical, functional, and surgical considerations is facilitated by the accessibility provided by NeuroMate;
- NeuroMate was successful in directly positioning its instrument holder at the appropriate stereotactic location in 75% of the cases; following readjustment judged clinically necessary by X-ray control in-situ, the requested positioning was achieved in every case (100%);
- NeuroMate's simulation capabilities, particularly when bi-planar X-rays are available in the Operating Room, can significantly enhance the clinical effectiveness of the instrument holder positioning: deviations between requested positioning and clinically optimal positioning were < 2mm in 65% of the cases without simulation, and increased to 97% with treatment simulation;
- NeuroMate positioning readjustment immediately prior to surgical treatment could be easily performed and was judged clinically satisfactory in 94% of cases at the first request, and in all cases at the second request.
## G. Substantial Equivalence
The IMMI's NEUROMATE Stereotactic System is substantially equivalent to the BRW Stereotactic System (Radionics; K811452) and the Compass Stereotactic System (Stereotactic Medical Systems; K871046) in terms of its performance data and intended uses. A direct comparison of significant performance data for these predicate devices and for the NeuroMate Stereotactic System is summarized in Table A. A direct comparison of the intended uses is summarized in Table B.
The technical characteristics of the NeuroMate Stereotactic System are equivalent to those of the BRW and Compass Stereotactic Systems. Differences that exist between these devices, relating to technical specifications, materials, physical appearance, and control systems, do not affect the relative safety and effectiveness of NeuroMate.
The NeuroMate Stereotactic System, the BRW Stereotactic System and the Compass Stereotactic System are intended for the stereotactic spatial positioning and orientation of an instrument or tool guide to be used by a surgeon to manually guide standard neurosurgical instruments.
000049
{4}
| Manufacturer | RADIONICS | Stereotactic Medical Systems, Inc. | IMMI, Inc. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| Model | BRW CT Stereotactic System | COMPASS Stereotactic Positioning System | NEUROMATE Stereotactic System |
| K-Number | K811452 | K871046 | |
| Class | II | II | |
| | | | |
| Head Ring Assembly | Yes (BRW-HR) | Yes | Yes: from other existing manufacturers |
| Localizer Ring | Yes (BRW-LR) | Yes | No: use other existing manufacturer localizers for images |
| Rigid connection to table | Yes (Mayfield Assembly) | Yes (Stereotactic Headframe) | Yes: with mechanical frame |
| Arc System | Yes (BRW-AS: based on AP, LAT, and VERT coordinates converted into angular coordinates) | Yes (3-D slide & arc quadrant) | Multi-jointed electro-mechanical arm; rigid spatial position locking |
| Instrument Holder | Yes (set on Arc System: BRW-AS) | Yes (set on Arc Carrier) | Yes: mounted on 5^{th} joint; rigid instrument holding |
| Calibration | Yes | Yes | Yes: register on head ring |
| Phantom assembly for calibration | Yes (BRW-PB) | Yes | No |
| Isocentric target position | Yes | Yes | Yes: Isocentric stereotactic targeting |
| Trajectory through 2 points | Yes (set up from computer solution providing BRW-AS stereotactic settings) | Yes (set up from computer solution providing precise stereotactic headframe settings) | Yes: different types of possible motions |
Table A. Performance Data: Stereotactic Systems
059650
{5}
| Manufacturer | RADIONICS | Stereotactic Medical Systems, Inc. | IMMI, Inc. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| Model | BRW CT Stereotactic System | COMPASS Stereotactic Positioning System | NEUROMATE Stereotactic System |
| K-Number | K811452 | K871046 | |
| Class | II | II | |
| | | | |
| Location accuracy: Position: Angle: Repeatability: | Position: 1.5 mm Angle: 0.5° | Position: 0.7 mm | Position: < 0.75 mm Angular: < 0.14° Repeatability: < 0.15 mm |
| Computer and Software | Yes: Calculate target coordinates relative to Head Ring from image data; calculate arc angles for desired probe trajectory | Yes: Computer Assisted Stereotaxy; calculate headframe settings from image data for desired trajectory | Yes: Computer Assisted Stereotaxy; calculate trajectory and instrument orientation from image data |
| Motorized Motion | No | Yes: Motorized motion of the headframe along X,Y,Z through 3 stepper motor slides | Yes: Motorized motion of the instrument holder through electro mechanical, 5 axis, multi-jointed arm |
Table A (Continued). Performance Data: Stereotactic Systems
000051
{6}
| Manufacturer | RADIONICS | Stereotactic Medical Systems, Inc. | IMMI, Inc. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| Model | BRW CT Stereotactic System | COMPASS Stereotactic Positioning System | NEUROMATE Stereotactic System |
| K-Number | K811452 | K871046 | |
| Class | II | II | |
| | | | |
| Accessibility | From any suitable direction (rotatable head posts on Head Ring) | From any suitable direction | From any suitable direction: displace multi-jointed arm around patient's head avoiding pre-programmed forbidden volumes |
| Multiple targets | Yes: through one burr hole | Unknown | Yes: through one burr hole |
| Range of target access | | | |
| Conventional stereotaxy access | Yes | Yes | Yes: universal approach any trajectory |
| Transnasal pituitary access | Yes | Unknown | Yes |
| Posterior fossa access | Yes (cervical approaches by lowered/tilted Head Ring) | Unknown | Yes |
| Full lateral access | Yes | Yes: lateral access | Yes: universal approach |
| | | | |
| Sterile draping | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Table B. Intended Uses: Stereotactic Systems
000052
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.