TURBO TRACKER

K960806 · Target Therapeutics · DQO · May 2, 1996 · Cardiovascular

Device Facts

Record IDK960806
Device NameTURBO TRACKER
ApplicantTarget Therapeutics
Product CodeDQO · Cardiovascular
Decision DateMay 2, 1996
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 870.1200
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

TurboTRACKERs are intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents such as contrast media and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.

Device Story

Single lumen infusion catheter; aids physician access to distal vasculature; used with guiding catheter and steerable guidewire. Features graded shaft stiffness (flexible tip to semi-rigid proximal section) for tracking; Hydrolene™ hydrophilic coating reduces friction. Available in one or two tip marker versions. Operated by physicians in clinical settings to deliver diagnostic/therapeutic agents. Benefits include improved navigation through tortuous vasculature and facilitated delivery of interventional devices.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Tests included: tensile, tip flexibility, static pressure strength, hydrophilic coating durability, occlusion coil delivery force, flow rate, withdrawal force, tip buckling, coefficient of friction, minimum bend radius, and steam shaping shrinkage. Biocompatibility testing performed.

Technological Characteristics

Single lumen catheter; graded shaft stiffness; Hydrolene™ hydrophilic coating. Available in one or two tip marker configurations. Non-powered, manual device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients requiring delivery of diagnostic contrast media or therapeutic occlusion coils into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An intravascular diagnostic catheter is a device used to record intracardiac pressures, to sample blood, and to introduce substances into the heart and vessels. Included in this generic device are right-heart catheters, left-heart catheters, and angiographic catheters, among others.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} TARGET THERAPEUTICS K960806 # 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS MAY - 2 1996 This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92. ## CONTACT PERSON: Laraine Pangelina Manager, Regulatory Affairs Target Therapeutics, Inc. 47201 Lakeview Blvd. Fremont, CA 94538-6530 ## DEVICE NAME: TurboTRACKER; Class II ## DEVICE DESCRIPTION: TurboTRACKERs are single lumen devices designed to aid the physician in the access of distal vasculature when used with a guiding catheter and steerable guidewire. Graded shaft stiffness ranging from a highly flexible tip to a semi-rigid proximal section aids the physician in tracking over the selectively placed guidewire. TurboTRACKERs are externally coated with Hydrolene™, a hydrophilic surface that reduces friction during manipulation. TurboTRACKERs are available in one and two tip marker versions. ## INDICATIONS FOR USE: TurboTRACKERs are intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents such as contrast media and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature. ## PREDICATE DEVICE: Target Therapeutics’ Hydrophilic Tracker Infusion Catheter TurboTRACKER 510(k) {1} TurboTRACKER 510(k) # TESTING in SUPPORT of SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION: The results of bench testing (Tensile Test, Tip Flexibility Test, Static Pressure Strength Test, Post Steam Shaping Outer Diameter Hydrophilic Coating Durability Test, Forces Required to Deliver Occlusion Coils Test, Flow Rate Test, Forces Required to Withdraw the Catheter Through a Guiding Catheter Test, Tip Buckling Test, Coefficient of Friction Test - O.D., Minimum Bend Radius Test, and Steam Shaping Shrinkage Test) and biocompatibility testing support the substantial equivalence claims of the TurboTRACKER for its intended use in the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature. Results of these tests, in conjunction with the substantial equivalence claims as outlined in the premarket notification, effectively demonstrate the TurboTRACKER's substantial equivalence to the predicate device. # SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE CONCLUSIONS: Substantial equivalence is based on the fact that the TurboTRACKER has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as the predicate device. In instances where the technological characteristics are different, it has been demonstrated that there are no new questions raised regarding safety or efficacy of the TurboTRACKER. Therefore, it can be concluded that the TurboTRACKER is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. 12
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%