The FARADRIVE Sheath is intended for percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and into the chambers of the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.
Device Story
Steerable sheath for percutaneous vascular and cardiac chamber access; includes handle with rotating actuator knob for single-plane unidirectional distal deflection and active straightening; features integral hemostasis valve, side flush line with three-way stopcock for aspiration/infusion/pressure monitoring, and distal vent holes; supplied with locking dilator. Used in electrophysiology labs by clinicians. Facilitates catheter/dilator manipulation while minimizing blood loss/air ingress. Benefits patient by providing stable, steerable access to cardiac chambers.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing and human factors summative validation study conducted under simulated-use conditions confirmed that users perform critical tasks safely and effectively.
Technological Characteristics
Steerable sheath with rotating actuator knob for unidirectional deflection. Includes hemostasis valve, side flush line, and distal vent holes. Supplied with locking dilator. Single-use, Ethylene Oxide sterilized. Identical to predicate device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and heart chambers, including left-sided access via interatrial septum.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A steerable catheter is a catheter used for diagnostic and monitoring purposes whose movements are directed by a steering control unit.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
July 24, 2026
Boston Scientific Corporation
Mariafernanda Marroquin
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
4100 Hamline Ave. N.
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112
Re: K262165
Trade/Device Name: FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath (M004PF21M402)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1280
Regulation Name: Steerable Catheter
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DRA
Dated: June 26, 2026
Received: June 26, 2026
Dear Mariafernanda Marroquin:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K262165 - Mariafernanda Marroquin
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn).
{2}
K262165 - Mariafernanda Marroquin
Page 3
Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for HETAL B. ODOBASIC -S
Aneesh Deoras
Assistant Director
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
Diagnostics, and Monitoring Devices
Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K262165 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The FARADRIVE Sheath is intended for percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and into the chambers of the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum. | | |
| Please select the types of uses. | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
| Please select the age group(s) for which the device(s) is to be used. | ☐ Neonates/Newborns (Birth to < 29 days old) ☐ Infants (29 days old to < 2 years old) ☐ Children (2 years old to < 12 years old) ☐ Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old) ☐ Adults (22 years old and greater) | ? |
{4}
Boston Scientific
510(k) Summary in Compliance with 21 CFR 807.92
Submitter Information:
Submitter Name: Boston Scientific Corporation
Submitter Address: 4100 Hamline Avenue North
St. Paul, Minnesota
55112-5798 USA
Contact: Mariafernanda Marroquin Gonzalez
Regulatory Affairs Specialist III
Phone: +506 8488-2687
Email: Mariafernanda.MarroquinGonzalez@bsci.com
Date Prepared: 26-June-2026
Device Information:
Generic Name: Steerable Sheath
Trade Name: FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath
Product Code: DRA (Catheter, Steerable).
Device Class: Class II
Review Panel: Cardiovascular (DRA)
Page 1 of 4
{5}
Classification Regulations: 21 CFR 870.1280
# Predicate Device Information:
# FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath
Manufacturer: Boston Scientific Corporation
510(k) #: K233248
FDA Clearance Date: December 11th, 2023,
Product Code: DRA
# Device Description:
The FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath is used to facilitate access to the vasculature and into the chambers of the heart. The handle is furnished with a rotating Actuator Knob that enables a single plane unidirectional deflection and has the ability to actively straighten the distal end of the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath curve when rotated.
The FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath includes an integral hemostasis valve to minimize blood loss or air ingress during catheter and dilator manipulation and a side flush line with three-way stopcock for blood aspiration, fluid infusion, blood sampling and pressure monitoring. The sheath also includes distal vent holes to facilitate aspiration and minimize cavitation. The supplied dilator is shaped to assist in facilitating vascular or chamber access when fully inserted into the sheath. The proximal end of the dilator includes a feature that will lock to the sheath hub when fully inserted.
# Indications for Use:
The FARADRIVE™ Sheath is intended for percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and into the chambers of the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.
# Substantial Equivalence & Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath subject device maintains the same intended use and indications for use as the predicate device (K233248). The subject and predicate devices are identical with respect to design, materials, fundamental scientific technology, principles of operation, environment of use, packaging configuration, and sterilization method. The only changes between the predicate and subject devices are limited to labeling updates to the Instructions for Use (IFU), including enhanced guidance on dilator insertion technique and the addition of a warning. These modifications do not alter the device's technological
Page 2 of 4
{6}
characteristics and do not raise new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. Verification and validation activities, including risk assessment and usability evaluation, support that the modified device remains substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
**Table 1 - COMPARISON OF THE SUBJECT FARADRIVE STEERABLE SHEATH VERSUS PREDICATE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE FARADRIVE STEERABLE SHEATH**
| Characteristic | Subject Device FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath (Boston Scientific Corporation) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Intended Use/ Indications for Use** | Identical | Both subject and predicate device are indicated for percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and into the chambers of the heart. |
| **Operating principles** | Identical | The operating principle for both subject and predicate device is to provide percutaneous introduction into the vasculature. |
| **Environment of use** | Identical | Both the predicate and subject devices are intended for use within electrophysiology labs. |
| **Materials** | Identical | Both the predicate and subject device contain the same materials. |
| **Technological characteristics (dimensions, design)** | Identical | Both the predicate and subject device share identical Technological characteristics. |
| **Labelling** | Similar | The subject device labelling has modifications to reflect the associated changes: • Clarifying Instructions For |
Page 3 of 4
{7}
| Characteristic | Subject Device FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath (Boston Scientific Corporation) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Use to ensure proper dilator insertion technique. |
| **Packaging configuration** | Identical | The predicate and subject device contain the same packaging configuration (tray, pouch, shelf carton and shipper box) |
| **Sterilization Method** | Identical | Both subject and predicate device are Single Use, Ethylene Oxide sterilized |
### Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Testing:
All previously completed non-clinical verification and validation testing—including bench performance, biocompatibility, sterilization, shelf life, and animal (design validation) studies—remain applicable, as the subject device maintains the same fundamental design, materials, and intended use as the predicate device.
A Human Factors summative (validation) study was conducted with representative users to evaluate impacted critical tasks under simulated-use conditions. Results demonstrate that users can perform these tasks safely and effectively and confirm that the FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath continues to meet user needs and intended use. No new safety or effectiveness concerns were identified, supporting substantial equivalence to the predicate device (K233248).
### Conclusion:
The subject and predicate devices share the same indications for use, intended use, and principles of operation. Labelling differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness. The results of verification and validation activities support substantial equivalence of the proposed FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath to the predicate device.
Page 4 of 4
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.