BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content and is adjusted to the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is available as either a dehydrated culture medium, which is prepared as a broth prior to use, or as a ready-to-use broth. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth, not cation-adjusted, is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens as long as the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations are adjusted as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth is available as a dehydrated culture medium which is prepared as a broth prior to use.
Device Story
Culture media for in vitro diagnostic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST); supports growth of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Media contains beef extract, acid hydrolysate of casein, and starch; formulated with low thymine/thymidine content. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth is cation-adjusted (Ca2+, Mg2+) per CLSI standards; BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth requires user adjustment. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians; manual broth dilution method involves serial antimicrobial dilutions inoculated with standardized bacterial suspension (0.5 McFarland). Growth assessed via visual turbidity observation; lowest concentration inhibiting visible growth identified as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Aids clinicians in selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy for patients.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Reproducibility study performed using five CLSI-recommended QC strains (E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 29213, E. faecalis ATCC 29212, S. aureus ATCC 43300). Testing conducted in triplicate over three days using two media lots (54 data points per combination). Results compared against CLSI M100 expected ranges; 100% of results were within range for all tested antimicrobial/organism combinations.
Technological Characteristics
Nutritionally supportive culture media; contains beef extract, acid hydrolysate of casein, and starch. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) includes Ca2+ and Mg2+ per CLSI M07 specifications. Available as dehydrated powder (reconstituted/autoclaved) or ready-to-use liquid. Manual, non-automated, non-software-based diagnostic test.
Indications for Use
Indicated for manual, quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Used with pure culture isolates.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A culture medium for antimicrobial susceptibility tests is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of any medium capable of supporting the growth of many of the bacterial pathogens that are subject to antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The medium should be free of components known to be antagonistic to the common agents for which susceptibility tests are performed in the treatment of disease.
Predicate Devices
Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood (K963036)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
[LOGO]
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
### 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
### I Background Information:
### A 510(k) Number
K262163
### B Applicant
Becton Dickinson and Company
### C Proprietary and Established Names
BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted); BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth
### D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JTZ | Class II | 21 CFR 866.1700 – Culture Medium for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test | MI - Microbiology |
### II Submission/Device Overview:
### A Purpose for Submission:
Obtain substantial equivalence for the following media formulations for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST):
1. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and
2. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth
### B Measurand:
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test
### C Type of Test:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
Culture Medium for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (Broth)
### III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
#### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
#### B Indication(s) for Use:
##### **BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted):**
BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content and is adjusted to the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is available as either a dehydrated culture medium, which is prepared as a broth prior to use, or as a ready-to-use broth.
##### **BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth:**
BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth, not cation-adjusted, is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens as long as the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations are adjusted as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth is available as a dehydrated culture medium which is prepared as a broth prior to use.
#### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
#### D Special Instrument Requirements:
Not applicable
### IV Device/System Characteristics:
#### A Device Description:
BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth are *in vitro* diagnostic culture media intended for use in manual, quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of rapidly growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. The media are used in broth dilution methods for determination
K262163 - Page 2 of 8
{2}
of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents. This media is intended for use with pure culture isolates.
BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is available as a readymade liquid medium and as a dehydrated culture medium; BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth is available as a dehydrated culture medium. The readymade format requires no preparation, while the dehydrated media are required to be reconstituted and autoclaved prior to use.
# **B Principle of Operation:**
Mueller Hinton Broth is a nutritionally supportive medium designed for the growth of rapidly growing aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria and for use in broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The medium contains beef extract and an acid hydrolysate of casein that provides essential nutrients required for bacterial growth. Starch acts as a protective colloid against toxic substances that may be present in the medium.
The media are formulated to have low thymine and thymidine content to minimize interference with the activity of certain antimicrobial agents and to support reliable MIC determinations. For BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted), calcium and magnesium ion concentrations are adjusted to provide the amounts recommended by CLSI M07 to ensure appropriate antimicrobial activity, particularly for agents affected by divalent cation concentrations. The pH of the prepared medium is adjusted in accordance with CLSI specifications.
In broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing, antimicrobial agents are prepared in serial dilutions using Mueller Hinton Broth and inoculated with a standardized bacterial suspension. Following incubation at appropriate temperature, bacterial growth is assessed by visual observation of turbidity. The lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent that inhibits visible growth is determined as the minimum inhibitory concentration for the organism/agent combination.
# **V Substantial Equivalence Information:**
# **A Predicate Device Name(s):**
Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood
# **B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):**
K963036
# **C Comparison with Predicate(s):**
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | **K262163** **(Proposed Devices)** | **K963036** **(Predicate)** |
| --- | --- | --- |
K262163 - Page 3 of 8
{3}
| Device Trade Name | BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) | BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth | Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content and is adjusted to the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) is available as either a dehydrated culture medium, which is prepared as a broth prior to use, or as a ready-to-use broth. | BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth, not cation-adjusted, is intended for use in manual, quantitative procedures for susceptibility testing of rapidly-growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens as long as the calcium and magnesium ion concentrations are adjusted as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). It is formulated to have a low thymine and thymidine content. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth functions as an aid to diagnosis using pure culture isolates. BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth is available as a dehydrated culture medium which is prepared as a broth prior to use. | Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood (MHLHB) is intended for use in broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with 11 antimicrobial agents; i.e., cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin, according to the protocol described in the Approved Standard M7-A3, "Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically - Third Edition", dated 12/93, published by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). |
| Medium | Broth | | Same |
| Inoculum | Pure culture colonies in a suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland | | Same |
| Result Interpretation | Determination of MIC by visual observation of turbidity | | Same |
| Result Type | Quantitative | | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | | |
| Formulation | 3.0 g beef extract, 17.5 g acid hydrolysate of casein, and 1.5 g starch, Ca^{2+} and Mg^{2+} adjusted to CLSI recommendations | 2.0 g beef extract powder, 17.5 g acid digest of casein, and 1.5 g soluble starch | 3.0 g beef extract, 17.5 g acid hydrolysate of casein, 1.5 g starch, and 30 mL Lysed Horse Blood, Ca^{2+} and Mg^{2+} adjusted to CLSI recommendations |
| Supply Form and Preparation | Ready-to-use broth: No additional preparation required prior to use OR Dehydrated Culture media: | Reconstituted, autoclaved, and cation adjusted prior to use | No additional preparation required prior to use |
K262163 - Page 4 of 8
{4}
| | Reconstituted and autoclaved prior to use | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test organisms | Rapidly growing aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria | | Streptococcus pneumoniae |
## VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CLSI M100-Ed35. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (January 2025).
- CLSI M07-Ed12. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically (March 2024).
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
#### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The performance of BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth was evaluated in a reproducibility study using five (5) CLSI-recommended quality control (QC) strains (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300). Testing was performed in triplicate on three separate days using two media lots for a total of 54 datapoints per antimicrobial/organism combination. BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth were prepared, tested, and QC results were read and interpreted per CLSI M07 guidelines. Antimicrobial/organism combinations were included that evaluate media parameters, including cation concentrations. Colony counts were performed each day of testing to ensure the inoculum of each QC strain was prepared equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard.
Results were compared to the CLSI expected QC ranges listed in CLSI M100 and the percentage of results in range was calculated to determine the reproducibility by operator, media lot, and QC strain. The overall reproducibility was acceptable at 100% for BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth (Table 1).
Table 1. Reproducibility Results for BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth
| Antimicrobial | Broth Dilution Range Tested (μg/mL) | CLSI QC Range (μg/mL) | BD BBL Mueller Hinton II (Cation-Adjusted) Results In Range (%) | BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth Results In Range (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| E. coli ATCC 25922 | | | | |
| Ampicillin | 0.5-32 | 2-8 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Cefotaxime | 0.0075-0.5 | 0.03-0.12 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Tigecycline | 0.0075-1 | 0.03-0.25 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 | | | | |
K262163 - Page 5 of 8
{5}
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.03-4 | 0.12-1 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gentamicin | 0.125-8 | 0.5-2 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Imipenem | 0.25-16 | 1-4 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 0.25/4-32/4 | 1/4-8/4 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| S. aureus ATCC 29213 | | | | |
| Clindamycin | 0.015-1 | 0.06-0.25 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Erythromycin | 0.06-4 | 0.25-1 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Oxacillin | 0.03-2 | 0.12-0.5 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Tetracycline | 0.03-4 | 0.12-1 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Vancomycin | 0.125-8 | 0.5-2 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| E. faecalis ATCC 29212 | | | | |
| Ampicillin | 0.125-8 | 0.5-2 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 0.125/2.375-2/38 | ≤0.5/9.5 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| Vancomycin | 0.25-16 | 1-4 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
| S. aureus ATCC 43300 | | | | |
| Oxacillin | 1-16 | ≥4 | 54/54 (100%) | 54/54 (100%) |
2. Linearity:
Not applicable
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Not applicable
4. Detection Limit and Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Five (5) CLSI-recommended quality control strains, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300, were included in the reproducibility study. Antimicrobials representing major drug classes relevant to each quality control strain were tested. The results of the study for each organism-antimicrobial combination were within acceptable range 100% of the time.
6. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
### B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
K262163 - Page 6 of 8
{6}
Device performance was evaluated in a reproducibility study described above.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable
# C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
3. Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
4. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
# D Expected Values/Reference Range:
The CLSI-recommended quality control ranges for the antimicrobials and strains used in the reproducibility testing of BD BBL Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) and BD Difco Mueller Hinton Broth are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. CLSI Expected QC Ranges for Evaluated Antimicrobials and Strains
| QC Strain | Antimicrobial | CLSI QC Range (μg/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| *E. coli* ATCC 25922 | Ampicillin | 2-8 |
| | Cefotaxime | 0.03-0.12 |
| | Tigecycline | 0.03-0.25 |
| *P. aeruginosa* ATCC 27853 | Ciprofloxacin | 0.12-1 |
| | Gentamicin | 0.5-2 |
| | Imipenem | 1-4 |
| | Piperacillin-tazobactam | 1/4-8-4 |
| *S. aureus* ATCC 29213 | Clindamycin | 0.06-0.25 |
| | Erythromycin | 0.25-1 |
| | Oxacillin | 0.12-0.5 |
| | Tetracycline | 0.12-1 |
| | Vancomycin | 0.5-2 |
| | Ampicillin | 0.5-2 |
K262163 - Page 7 of 8
{7}
| E. faecalis ATCC 29212 | Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | ≤0.5/9.5 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Vancomycin | 1-4 |
| S. aureus ATCC 43300 | Oxacillin | ≥4 |
### VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
### IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K262163 - Page 8 of 8
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Report an issue or suggest a feature
Spot a broken citation, a wrong extraction, a missing document, or something you wish this app did? Tell us — no account needed.
or drag and drop files here
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.