This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only.
Device Story
Steerable peripheral guidewire; Ni-Ti alloy tapered core wire; hydrophilic coating; used to direct catheters in peripheral vasculature; operated by clinicians during diagnostic/interventional procedures; provides mechanical guidance for catheter placement; benefits patient by facilitating access to target anatomical sites.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing following FDA guidance for peripheral guidewires. Tests included tensile strength, torque strength, torqueability, tip flexibility, coating adhesion, catheter compatibility, dimensional verification, kink resistance, and radiopacity. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993 (cytotoxicity, sensitization, reactivity, pyrogenicity, systemic toxicity, hemolysis, PTT, platelet-leukocyte, and complement activation).
Technological Characteristics
Ni-Ti alloy tapered core wire; hydrophilic coating; polyurethane/tungsten distal coating; 0.035-inch diameter; lengths 1500-3000mm; sterile (Ethylene Oxide, SAL 10^-6); non-coil design; biocompatibility per ISO 10993; performance testing per FDA guidance for peripheral guidewires.
Indications for Use
Indicated for directing catheters to desired anatomical locations in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
September 3, 2026
Filmecc Co., Ltd.
% Meagan Fagan
Principal Consultant
Cardiomed Device Consultants
3618 Braverton St.
Edgewater, Maryland 21037
Re: K261281
Trade/Device Name: CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 Peripheral Guide Wire
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330
Regulation Name: Catheter Guide Wire
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DQX
Dated: August 4, 2026
Received: August 4, 2026
Dear Meagan Fagan:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261281 - Meagan Fagan
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K261281 - Meagan Fagan
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JENNY R.
KATSNELSON -S
Digitally signed by JENNY R. KATSNELSON -S
Date: 2026.09.03 23:16:49 -04'00'
for Lydia Glaw
Assistant Director
DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices
OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2023
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K261281
Device Name
CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 Peripheral Guide Wire
Indications for Use (Describe)
This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
K261281^{}[] Page 1 of 5

## 510(k) Summary [as required per 21 CFR 807.92]
510(k) K261281
| **Date Prepared** | April 17, 2026 |
| --- | --- |
| **Applicant:** | Filmecc Co., Ltd. 3-99 Akatsuki-cho Seto-shi, Aichi 489-0071 Japan TEL: +81-561-48-8601; FAX: +81-561-48-8607 |
| **Contact Person:** | Meagan Fagan CardioMed Device Consultants, LLC 3168 Braverton Street Edgewater, Maryland 21037 (919) 995-8949 mfagan@cardiomedllc.com |
| **Trade Name:** | CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 Peripheral Guide Wire |
| **Common Name:** | Peripheral Guide Wire |
| **Device Classification:** | Class II per 21 CFR 870.1330 |
| **Classification Name:** | Catheter, Guide, Wire |
| **Product Code:** | DQX – Catheter Guide Wire |
| **Predicate Device:** | CROSSLEAD Peripheral Guide Wire (K213315) |
| **Reference Devices:** | Terumo Radifocus Guidewire (K863138/K152740) VASSALLO GT Crossing 14 (K232574) |
### Indication For Use/Intended Use:
*This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only.*
### Description:
The CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 are steerable guidewires designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. The guidewires have a maximum diameter of 0.035 inches
{5}
K261281
Page 2 of 5
(0.89mm) and are available in lengths of 1500mm, 1800mm, 2600mm and 3000mm. The guide wire is constructed from a Ni-Ti alloy tapered core wire. A hydrophilic coating is applied to the full length of the guidewire. An underlying urethane coating is applied to the distal portion of the guide wire.
### Comparison with Predicate Device
A side-by-side comparison of key characteristics and a discussion of the similarities/differences between the subject device and the predicate devices is provided below.
A claim of substantial equivalence is supported by the following:
- The same indication for use and intended use
- The same operating principle
- The same/similar basic design feature
- Same/similar materials of construction
Comparison of the subject device and the predicate devices show that the technological characteristics, such as components, design, sterilization method, and operating principle are similar and/or identical to the currently marketed predicate device
{6}
K261281^{}[] Page 3 of 5
**Table 1. Comparison of Subject and Predicate Devices**
| Device Name | Subject Devices | | Predicate Device | Reference Devices | | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | CROSSLEAD Standard 035 | CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 | CROSSLEAD Peripheral Guide Wire | Terumo Radifocus Guide Wire | VASSALLO GT 14 Crossing | |
| **Applicant** | Filmecc Co., Ltd. | | ASAHI INTECC CO., LTD. | TERUMO Co., Ltd. | Filmecc Co., Ltd. | |
| **510(k) Number** | Current Application | Current Application | K213315 | K863138/K152740 | K232574 | |
| **Indication for Use** | This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only | This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only | This product is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location in the peripheral vasculature during diagnostic or interventional procedures | The Glidewire is designed to direct a catheter to the desired anatomical location during diagnostic or interventional procedures. | This product is intended to facilitate the placement and exchange of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during intravascular procedures. This device is intended for peripheral vascular use only | Same as Predicate Device |
| **Overall length** | 1500mm, 1800 mm, 2600 mm, 3000mm | 1500mm, 1800 mm, 2600 mm, 3000mm | 2000mm,3000mm | 300-3000mm | 1900mm, 3000mm | Similar to Predicate and Reference Devices |
| **Tip shape** | Straight Angled (45°) | Straight Angled (45°) | Straight Angled (65°) | Straight Angled (45°) | Straight | Same as Predicate and Reference device |
| **Outer OD** | 0.89mm (0.035') No Coil | 0.89mm (0.035') No Coil | 0.89mm (0.035') | 0.45mm-1.32mm (0.018'-0.052') No Coil | 0.36mm (0.014') | Same as Predicate Device |
| **Outer Coil** | No | No | Yes - SUS | No | Yes – Platinum-Nickel | Same as Reference device |
| **Inner Coil** | No | No | Yes - SUS | No | No | Same as Reference devices |
| **Tapered Core Wire** | Nickel-Titanium alloy | Nickel-Titanium alloy | Nickel-Titanium alloy | Nickel-Titanium alloy | Stainless Steel | Same as Predicate and Reference device |
| **Under Coating (non blood contact)** | Silane | Silane | Nitrocellulose Polycarbonate Urethane | Unknown | N/A | Determine equivalence by conducting a biological evaluation using the final product. |
{7}
K261281
Page 4 of 5
| Device Name | Subject Devices | | Predicate Device | Reference Devices | | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | CROSSLEAD Standard 035 | CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 | CROSSLEAD Peripheral Guide Wire | Terumo Radifocus Guide Wire | VASSALLO GT 14 Crossing | |
| **First Coating** | Polyurethane containing Tungsten (Tungsten/ Polyurethane) | Polyurethane containing Tungsten (Tungsten/ Polyurethane) | Polyurethane elastomer | Polyurethane containing Tungsten (Tungsten/ Polyurethane) | Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) | Same as Reference Device |
| **Second Coating** | Polyvinyl pyrrolidone Nitrocellulose Polycarbonate Urethane | Polyvinyl pyrrolidone Nitrocellulose Polycarbonate Urethane | <Distal>Hydrophilic <Proximal> Hydrophobic | Hydrophilic polymer (Half-ester methyl vinyl ether-maleic anhydride copolymer) | Polyvinyl pyrrolidone Nitrocellulose Polycarbonate Urethane | Same as Reference Device |
| **Packaging Configuration** | Wire in holder tube, sealed in bag | Wire in holder tube, sealed in bag | Wire in holder tube, sealed in bag | Individual package Unit box Shipping carton | Wire in holder tube, sealed in bag | Same as Predicate and Reference device |
| **Accessories** | — | — | Shaping needle | Guide wire inserter | Torque device | Subject has no accessories |
| **Use with Optional Extension Wire** | — | — | Yes, 190cm length device | — | Yes, 190cm length device | Subject is not used with extension wires connected |
| **Sterilization** | Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Same as Predicate and Reference devices |
| **Shelf Life** | 0.5 years | 0.5 years | 3 years | 24 months | 3 years | Different; testing to be performed to support future extension of shelf life |
### Non-Clinical Testing/Performance Data
The substantial equivalence of the CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 was evaluated in bench testing that followed the recommendations outlined in FDA's Guidance Document, "Coronary, Peripheral, and Neurovascular Guidewires – Performance Tests and Recommended Labeling, published October 10, 2019.
- Tensile Strength
- Torque Strength
- Torqueability
- Tip Flexibility
- Coating Adhesion/Integrity
- Catheter Compatibility
- Dimensional Verification
- Kink Resistance
- Visual Inspection
- Corrosion
- Radiopacity
{8}
K261281^{}[] Page 5 of 5
The in vitro bench tests demonstrated that the CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 met all acceptance criteria and performed similarly to the predicate device. Performance data demonstrate that the subject device functions as intended and that it is similar to the predicate device.
## Biocompatibility
The CROSSLEAD Standard 035 and CROSSLEAD Stiff 035 were tested in accordance with ISO 10993 and found to be biocompatibility. The test performed are summarized in the table below.
**Table 2. Biocompatibility Summary Table**
| Endpoint/Test Method/Relevant Standard | Acceptance Criteria | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity; MEM Elution ISO 10993-5 | Biological response <2 (mild) | Pass |
| Sensitization; Kligman Maximization ISO 10993-10 | Overall pattern, intensity, duration, character of reactions compared to control conditions | Pass |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity; Intracutaneous Injection in Rabbit ISO 10993-23 | Difference between test extract mean score and corresponding control mean score ≤ 1 | Pass |
| Material Mediated Pyrogenicity; Rabbit Injection ISO 10993-11 | No single animal shows a body temperature rise of ≥ 0.5°C | Pass |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity; Mouse Injection ISO 10993-11 | None of the animals treated with the test article show a significantly greater biological reactivity than the animals treated with the control device | Pass |
| Hemolysis (Indirect and Direct Contact) ISO 10993-4, ASTM F756 | ≤ 2 % hemolytic | Pass |
| Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT Measurement) ISO 10993-4, ASTM F2382 | Test article does not have a statistically lower clotting time when compared to the negative control | Pass |
| Platelet-Leukocyte Testing (PLC) ISO 10993-4, ASTM F2888 | Test article platelet mean percentage value is 80 to 120% of the vehicle control and the test article platelet mean percentage value is at least 30% above the positive control | Pass |
| Complement Activation SC5b-9; blood ISO 10993-4 | Comparison to the negative controls | Pass |
## Conclusion
The subject device has the same indication for use/intended use as compared to the predicate device, in addition to having similar technological characteristics and incorporating similar materials of construction as the predicate device. The subject device is comparable to the predicate based on the indication for use, materials, technology, performance and/or design.
The results from the non-clinical testing performed confirm that the subject device performs as intended, in alignment with its indication for use. Any differences between the subject and predicate device do not raise new questions compared to the predicate. These results, along with the comparison of technological characteristics, demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.