The CraniUS Plate is indicated for use to fill a bony void or defect areas in a cranial skeleton.
Device Story
CraniUS Plate is a patient-specific, non-load bearing cranial implant machined from PEEK. It is designed to fill bony voids or defects in the cranial skeleton. The device is provided non-sterile and is intended for surgical implantation by a physician. It may include surgeon-requested features such as perfusion/suture holes, temporal cut-backs, and an opening to accommodate an implantable reservoir (reservoir not included). The implant is secured to the patient's bone using FDA-cleared cranial fixation hardware. The device is MR Safe. It serves as a structural filler to restore cranial integrity.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including biocompatibility, sterilization validation, bacterial endotoxin testing, and mechanical performance verification compared to the predicate device.
Indicated for patients requiring reconstruction of bony voids or defects in the cranial skeleton.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A preformed alterable cranioplasty plate is a device that is implanted into a patient to repair a skull defect. It is constructed of a material, e.g., tantalum, that can be altered or reshaped at the time of surgery without changing the chemical behavior of the material.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
July 29, 2026
CraniUS, LLC
Oxana Pantchenko
Regulatory Consultant
1700 Union Ave., Suite A1
Baltimore, Maryland 21211
Re: K261058
Trade/Device Name: CraniUS Plate
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5320
Regulation Name: Preformed Alterable Cranioplasty Plate
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: GWO
Dated: July 2, 2026
Received: July 2, 2026
Dear Oxana Pantchenko:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261058 - Oxana Pantchenko
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JULIA E. SLOCOMB -S
Digitally signed by JULIA E. SLOCOMB -S
Date: 2026.07.29 16:59:00 -04'00'
{2}
K261058 - Oxana Pantchenko
Page 3
for Jaime Raben, Ph.D.
Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K261058
Device Name
CraniUS Plate
Indications for Use (Describe)
The CraniUS Plate is indicated for use to fill a bony void or defect areas in a cranial skeleton.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
# 510(k) Summary
Date Prepared: July 28, 2026
## Manufacturer and 510(k) Owner
CraniUS, LLC
1700 Union Avenue, Suite A1
Baltimore, MD 21211
Official Contact: Bejan Darbandi, VP, Systems Engineering
## Representative/Consultant
Oxana S. Pantchenko Ph.D.
(650)269-4915
Oxana@MedicalDeviceConsulting.US
## Device Information
Name: CraniUS Plate
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5320 - Preformed alterable cranioplasty plate
Class: II
Product Code: GWO – Plate, Cranioplasty, Preformed, Alterable
Medical Specialty: Neurology
## Predicate/Device Identification
K182711 Customized Craniofacial Implant (CCI), Customized Skull Implant (CSI), Kelyniam Global Inc.
## Device Description
The CraniUS Plate is indicated for use to fill a bony void or defect areas in a patient's specific cranial skeleton. The implant is attached to the bone using FDA cleared cranial fixation screws and plates. The device is machined from Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) material. The CraniUS Plate may contain convenience features requested by surgeons: perfusion / suture holes, cut-backs, through-holes, and/or an opening for an implantable reservoir. Implantable reservoirs are not included. The device is provided non-sterile. The CraniUS Plate is a prescription-only device.
## Indications for Use
The CraniUS Plate is indicated for use to fill a bony void or defect areas in a cranial skeleton.
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The CraniUS Plate has similar indications for use, technology, and material compared to the predicate device: K182711 Kelyniam Global Inc., Customized Skull Implant (CSI). More specifically, both implants are indicated to fill a bony void or defect area in a patient's specific cranial skeleton. Both implants are made from the same material and are contract manufactured by Kelyniam Global, Inc. Both devices are provided clean but not sterile. CraniUS Plate's implant size range and thickness are identical to the predicate device. CSI implants may have the following features: perfusion holes, integrated fixation system, temporal cutback, and multi-part implant. With the exclusion of the integrated fixation system and multi-part implant, the CraniUS Plate could have the same set of features, as well as an additional opening feature for an implantable reservoir. The feature consists of a central burr hole and a circular pattern of suture holes. Each hole has similar characteristics as those cleared in K182711. This feature will be offered as an additional customization option to be added to the implant per surgeon's request. While minor dimensional differences are present between the two devices, they do not alter the indications for use of the subject device. Minor dimensional differences along with successfully performed mechanical testing do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device, nor do they raise any new or novel safety or effectiveness questions from those raised by the predicate device.
{5}
Please see the device comparison table for additional details.
| | Subject Device | Predicate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Name | The CraniUS Plate | Customized Craniofacial Implant (CCI) and Customized Skull Implant (CSI) |
| 510(k) clearance | - | K182711 |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 882.5320 | 21 CFR 882.5320 |
| Product Class | II | II |
| Product Code | GWO | GWO |
| Indications for Use | The CraniUS Plate is indicated for use to fill a bony void or defect areas in a cranial skeleton. | The Customized Craniofacial Implant (CCI) and Customized Skull Implant (CSI) is intended to fill a bony void or defect area in a patient's specific cranial and craniofacial skeleton (orbital rim, zygoma, & adjacent bone). |
| Material | Evonik Vestakeep i4 | Invibio Inc. PEEK-Optima LT-1 and Evonik Vestakeep i4 |
| Technical Specification | Customized skull implant | Plate - Custom sized to each patient using CT scan data |
| Sterilization | Provided non-sterile | Provided non-sterile |
| Features | Perfusion/suture holes, temporal cutback, openings for an implantable reservoir. | Perfusion holes, integrated fixation system, temporal cutback, multi-part implant. |
### Summary of Non-Clinical Testing:
#### Biocompatibility Testing:
The CraniUS Plate is categorized as a long term (> 30 days) implant in direct contact with tissue/ bone, neural tissue and CSF. The following biocompatibility endpoints were assessed on the final, finished, sterilized device and it was determined that no additional testing was needed: cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation or intracutaneous reactivity, acute systemic toxicity, material-mediated pyrogenicity, subchronic systemic toxicity, chronic systemic toxicity, hemocompatibility (indirect hemolysis test), genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, implantation, and carcinogenicity.
#### Cleaning and Sterilization Testing:
Sterilization validation test was assessed on the final, finished, sterilized device and it was concluded that the subject device had no impact on the predicate sterilization validation.
The Bacterial Endotoxins Test was successfully completed. This testing was conducted in accordance with the following regulatory documents: ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019, ISO 11737-3:2023, USP <161>, USP <85>, EP 2.6.14, and JP 4.01.
#### Mechanical Testing:
There is no industry accepted standard governing mechanical testing for non-load bearing implantable cranioplasty plates. A mechanical testing verification protocol was developed where the performance characteristics were compared to those of the predicate device. All mechanical testing was conducted at a 3 \( ^{rd} \) party accredited testing laboratory.
#### MR Safety:
The CraniUS Plate is electrically nonconductive or a nonmagnetic item and poses no known hazards in all MR environments. The CraniUS Plate implants are MR Safe.
{6}
# **Summary of Clinical Testing:**
Clinical testing was determined not applicable for the CraniUS Plate.
# **Conclusion**
The subject device utilizes the same intended use, same material composition, and similar technological characteristics as the predicate device such that the CraniUS Plate does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate device. The non-clinical laboratory data indicate that the subject device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device and support a finding of substantial equivalence.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.