LoFric Elle Pro is intended for intermittent urinary catheterization
Device Story
LoFric Elle Pro is a sterile, single-use, intermittent urinary catheter for female patients. Device consists of a 10 cm catheter tube with a Nelaton (straight) tip, pre-lubricated with a hydrophilic coating (PVP) and activated by water-based wetting fluid contained within the primary packaging. The catheter features 12 drainage eyelets in a vertical spiral configuration to facilitate efficient urine flow. The device is intended for prescription use. The user performs catheterization to drain the bladder; the design minimizes preparation steps. The modification from the predicate involves increasing the number of drainage eyelets from two to twelve to improve drainage performance.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including catheter flow rate, strength, beam bending stiffness, and friction/coating appearance, all verified against ISO 20696:2018 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polyolefin based elastomer (POBE) catheter, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) coating, Polypropylene (PP) packaging. Energy: None (passive). Dimensions: 10 cm length, 10-14Fr diameters. Sterilization: E-beam (SAL 10^-6). Features: 12 drainage eyelets in vertical spiral configuration. Standards: ISO 20696:2018 (performance), ISO 10993-1:2018 (biocompatibility), ISO 11607 (packaging), ISO 11137 (sterilization).
Indications for Use
Indicated for intermittent urinary catheterization in female patients requiring bladder drainage.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A urological catheter and accessories is a flexible tubular device that is inserted through the urethra and used to pass fluids to or from the urinary tract. This generic type of device includes radiopaque urological catheters, ureteral catheters, urethral catheters, coudé catheters, balloon retention type catheters, straight catheters, upper urinary tract catheters, double lumen female urethrographic catheters, disposable ureteral catheters, male urethrographic catheters, and urological catheter accessories including ureteral catheter stylets, ureteral catheter adapters, ureteral catheter holders, ureteral catheter stylets, ureteral catheterization trays, and the gastro-urological irrigation tray (for urological use).
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
April 24, 2026
Wellspect AB
Emad Ramzi
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Manage
Amniogatan 1, P.O.Box 14 Se-431 51,
Mölndal
SWEDEN
Re: K260999
Trade/Device Name: LoFric Elle Pro
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5130
Regulation Name: Urological Catheter and accessories
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: EZD
Received: March 26, 2026
Dear Emad Ramzi:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260999 - Emad Ramzi
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K260999 - Emad Ramzi
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Negeen Haghighi -S
for
Jessica K. Nguyen, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3B: Division of Reproductive, Gynecology, and Urology Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This
textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K260999 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| LoFric Elle Pro | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| LoFric Elle Pro is intended for intermittent urinary catheterization | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as
applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K260999
Page 1 of 5
Special 510(k) SUMMARY for
LoFric Elle Pro
1. Submitter Information:
Wellspect AB
Aminogatan 1
P.O. Box 14
431 21 Mölndal
Contact Person: Emad Ramzi
Telephone Number: +46 31 376 32 41
Date Prepared: April 24, 2026
2. Device Name:
- Proprietary Name: LoFric Elle Pro
- Common Name: Intermittent urinary catheter
- Classification Name: Urological catheter and accessories
- Classification Number: 21 CFR 876.5130
- Device Class: Class II
- Product Code: EZD, Catheter Straight
3. Predicate Device:
| Type | Device Name | 510(k) | Company Name |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Predicate device | LoFric® Elle™ | K211212 | Wellspect HealthCare, a Dentsply Sirona company at the time of clearance |
4. Description of Device:
The subject device: LoFric® Elle™ Pro, is a range of sterile, single-use, urinary catheters designed as an intermittent pathway for drainage of the bladder. The catheter is pre-lubricated with a hydrophilic coating and immersed in water-based wetting fluid within its primary package. The primary package contains a sealed water container from which the wetting fluid migrates to the catheter tubing and activates the catheter surface. This results in minimal steps for preparation prior to use. LoFric® Elle™ Pro is available in a single length (10 cm) with a Nelaton (straight) tip and diameters of 10Fr, 12Fr, and 14Fr, to accommodate the individual anatomy of female users. The catheter features 12 drainage eyelets arranged in a vertical spiral configuration around the catheter tube, designed to promote efficient urine flow and reliable drainage performance.
{5}
K260999
Page 2 of 5
5. Indications for Use:
LoFric® Elle™ Pro is indicated for intermittent urinary catheterization.
6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The purpose of this Special 510(k) is to gain U.S. premarket clearance for the modification to the predicate device LoFric® Elle™ (K211212).
- The subject and predicate maintain the same indication for use.
- The subject and predicate maintain the same fundamental design, materials, hydrophilic coating, wetting fluid, packaging configuration, sterilization method, catheter dimensions, and user interface.
The key differences between the predicate device (K211212) and the subject device is:
- The Number of drainage eyelets. The predicate device includes two drainage eyelets, whereas the LoFric® Elle™ Pro incorporates twelve drainage eyelets arranged in a vertical spiral configuration around the catheter tube, with a harmonized eyelet size across all CH sizes.
An overview of the similarities and differences between the subject device and predicate devices are given in Table FS-1.
7. Non-Clinical Performance Data
Based on the modifications made to the device in this special 510(k), the following tests were impacted and repeated using the modified device. A summary of the following tests were submitted in this Special 510(k) to support the proposed change:
- Catheter Flow rate, verified by the test method in Annex E of ISO 20696:2018, Sterile urethral catheters for single use.
- Catheter Strength, verified by the test method in Annex A of ISO 20696, Sterile urethral catheters for single use.
- Catheter Beam Bending stiffness, verified by the internal method.
- Friction and coating appearance, verified by the internal method.
These test methods and protocols are identical to those used in the predicate submission (K211212) and were part of the information FDA evaluated during its review of that 510(k).
The testing below was leveraged from the predicate submission (K211212) and were not reviewed as part of this special 510(k):
a) Qualification of biological safety assessment according to ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process and FDA Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1".
b) Test methods for confirmation of sterile barrier systems and packaging validation testing following requirements in:
{6}
K260999
Page 3 of 5
- ISO 11607-1, Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices - Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems.
- ISO 11607-2, Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices - Part 2: Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly processes.
- ASTM D4169-16, Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems.
- ASTM D4332-14, Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers Packages or Packaging Components for Testing.
c) Sterilization validation was performed according to
- ISO 11137-1:2006/(R)2015, Sterilization of health care products – Radiation – Part 1: Requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
- ISO 11137-2:2013, Sterilization of health care products – Radiation – Part 2: Establishing the sterilization dose.
d) Shelf life and Performance bench testing was performed per applicable sections of ISO 20696:2018, Sterile urethral catheters for single use, and internal test methods to document the following properties of the catheters:
- Peak tensile force was verified by the test method in Annex H of ISO 20696.
- Kink stability was verified according to ISO 20696.
- Diameter sizes were verified by design according to ISO 20696.
- Water retention was verified by the internal method.
- Osmolality was verified by the internal method.
- Packaging sterile integrity was verified by the internal method.
- Flexural Strength was verified by the internal method.
- pH level was verified by the internal method.
8. Clinical Performance Data
No data from human clinical studies has been included to support the substantial equivalence of the subject LoFric® Elle™ Pro.
9. Conclusion
Based on the comparison of technological characteristics and the results of the non-clinical performance testing, the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device (K211212). The only modification, an increased number of drainage eyelets, was evaluated through nonclinical bench testing, which confirmed that the change does not adversely affect device safety and effectiveness. All other design features, materials, intended use, and performance characteristics remain unchanged from the predicate. Therefore, the LoFric® Elle™ Pro is as safe and effective as the predicate device and performs as intended when used for intermittent urinary catheterization.
{7}
K260999
Page 4 of 5
Table FS-1: Comparison of technological characteristics between subject and predicate devices
| Element | Subject Device
LoFric® Elle™ Pro | Predicate Device
LoFric® Elle™ | Differences between proposed device and predicate device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indication for Use | For intermittent urinary catheterization | For intermittent urinary catheterization | None |
| Product Code | EZD | EZD | None |
| Device for Prescription use | Yes | Yes | None |
| Anatomical site | Bladder through the Urethra | Bladder through the Urethra | None |
| Type/Sizes | Nelaton
CH.10, 12 & 14 | Nelaton
CH.10, 12 & 14 | None |
| Number of Drainage Eyelets | 12 | 2 | Proposed device incorporates twelve drainage eyelets arranged in a vertical spiral configuration around the catheter tube. |
| Tip Configuration | Straight (Nelaton) tip | Straight (Nelaton) tip | None |
| Catheter Material | Polyolefin based elastomer (POBE) | Polyolefin based elastomer (POBE) | None |
| Hydrophilic surface coating | Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) | Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) | None |
| Manufacturing method | Dip-coating technology with Ethanol coating solvent | Dip-coating technology with Ethanol coating solvent | None |
| Features | Single Use, pre-wet and ready to use | Single Use, pre-wet and ready to use | None |
| Wetting fluid | Sterile water with glycerol solution | Sterile water with glycerol solution | None |
| Connector | Color coded end-funnel | Color coded end-funnel | None |
{8}
K260999
Page 5 of 5
| Element | Subject Device
LoFric® Elle™ Pro | Predicate Device
LoFric® Elle™ | Differences between
proposed device and
predicate device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Packaging | A sealed lower and upper container
made by Polypropylene (PP) | A sealed lower and upper container
made by Polypropylene (PP) | None |
| Sterilization
method | e-beam | e-beam | None |
| Sterility assurance
level | 10^{-6} | 10^{-6} | None |
| Condition of
Use | Single Use | Single Use | None |
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.