The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is indicated for use with compatible guide catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of microcatheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
Device Story
System comprises single-lumen, variable stiffness support and delivery catheters; hydrophilically coated; coil-reinforced. Used by physicians trained in neurovascular interventional techniques to facilitate microcatheter insertion/guidance into neurovascular blood vessels. Operates via manual navigation through vasculature. Output is physical access path for microcatheters. Benefits include improved deliverability and navigation within neurovascular anatomy.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing including biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), dimensional verification, tensile strength, kink/torsion resistance, burst testing, and simulated use in a neurovascular model.
Technological Characteristics
Single-lumen, variable stiffness, coil-reinforced catheters. Hydrophilic coating. Materials: polymers and metals. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (SAL 10^-6) per AAMI TIR28:2016. Standards: ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ISO 80369-7 (luer), ISO 10555-1 (leakage/burst), ASTM F756, F2382, F2888 (hemocompatibility).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring use of a microcatheter in the neurovascular system to facilitate insertion and guidance of microcatheters into selected blood vessels.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
Predicate Devices
Route 92 Medical Full Length 054 Access System (K231583)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
September 16, 2026
Route 92 Medical, Inc.
Denise Aycox
Regulatory Affairs Manager
155 Bovet Road, Suite 100
San Mateo, California 94402
Re: K260220
Trade/Device Name: Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250
Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QJP
Dated: July 14, 2026
Received: July 16, 2026
Dear Denise Aycox:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260220 - Denise Aycox
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K260220 - Denise Aycox
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
NAIRA MURADYAN -S
Naira Muradyan, PhD
Assistant Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
# Indications for Use
Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions.
K260220
?
Please provide the device trade name(s).
?
Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System
Please provide your Indications for Use below.
?
The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is indicated for use with compatible guide catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of microcatheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable).
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
?
{4}
510(k) Summary K260220
| Sponsor: | Route 92 Medical, Inc. 155 Bovet Road, Suite 100 San Mateo, CA 94402 |
| --- | --- |
| Contact: | Denise Aycox Regulatory Affairs Manager daycox@r92m.com Phone: 650-581-1179 |
| Date Prepared: | September 8, 2026 |
| Device Name: | Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System |
| Common Name: | Percutaneous Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature (Product Code QJP, 21 CFR 870.1250) |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Predicate Device: | Route 92 Medical Full Length 054 Access System – K231583 |
### Device Description
The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System includes a Support Catheter and a Delivery Catheter. The Support Catheter and Delivery Catheter are both single-lumen, variable stiffness catheters. Both catheters are hydrophilically coated. The devices are provided sterile and non-pyrogenic and are intended for single use only.
### Indications for Use
The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is indicated for use with compatible guide catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of microcatheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
### Comparison to the Predicate Device
The method of action, design, and materials of the Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System are equivalent or similar to the Predicate Device as shown in the following table.
1
{5}
| Attribute | Predicate Device Route 92 Medical Full Length 054 Access System (K231583) | Subject Device Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System (K260220) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The Route 92 Medical Full Length 054 Access System is indicated for use with compatible guide catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of microcatheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system. | The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is indicated for use with compatible guide catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of microcatheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system. |
| Device Description | Sterile, single-use, variable stiffness, coil-reinforced catheter | Same |
| Targeted population | Patients requiring use of a microcatheter in the neurovascular system | Same |
| User | Physicians trained in neurovascular interventional techniques | Same |
| Anatomical Sites | Neurovasculature only | Same |
| Materials | Polymers and metals commonly used in the manufacture of medical devices | Same |
| Sterilization | Ethylene oxide | Same |
| Shelf Life | 6 months | Same |
| **Support Catheter** | | |
| Inner Diameter | 0.054' | 0.046' |
| Outer Diameter | 0.066' | 0.058' |
| Length | 125 cm and 148 cm | 125 cm and 143 cm |
| **Delivery Catheter** | | |
| Inner Diameter | 0.015' | 0.016' |
| Outer Diameter | 0.048' | 0.040' |
| Length | 167 cm | 167 cm |
2
{6}
## Non-Clinical Testing
### Biocompatibility Testing
The Full Length 046 Access System is constructed using materials that are commonly used in the medical device industry. All patient contacting components have been evaluated for biocompatibility in accordance with ISO 10993-1 “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process.”
The Full Length 046 Access System is classified per ISO 10993-1 as an externally communicating device directly contacting circulating blood for a limited duration (≤ 24 hours). A summary of the biocompatibility testing conducted on the Full Length 046 Access System is provided below.
| Test | Method | Result |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity | ISO MEM Elution with L-929 Cells | The test article met the requirements of the test. |
| Sensitization | ISO Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization Test (Sodium Chloride USP Solution and Sesame Oil) | The test article was not considered a sensitizer. |
| Irritation | ISO Intracutaneous Reactivity (Sodium Chloride USP Solution and Sesame Oil) | Requirements of the ISO intracutaneous reactivity test were met for the test article. |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO Acute Systemic Injection (Sodium Chloride USP Solution and Sesame Oil) | Requirements of the ISO acute systemic injection test were met for the test article. |
| Material Mediated Pyrogenicity | USP Rabbit Pyrogen Study, Material Mediated (Sterile Non-Pyrogenic Saline) | The test article met the requirements for the absence of pyrogens. |
| Hemocompatibility - Hemolysis | ASTM F756 Hemolysis (Direct and Indirect (Extract)) | The test article is considered non-hemolytic. |
| Hemocompatibility - Partial Thromboplastin Time Assay | ASTM F2382 Partial Thromboplastin Time | The test article met the requirements of the test. |
| Hemocompatibility - Complement Activation Assay | SC5b-9 Complement Activation Assay | The concentration of SC5b-9 in the test article was lower than the concentration in the control article. The test article would not be expected to result in adverse effects in vivo. |
| Hemocompatibility - Platelet/Leukocyte Count | Platelet/Leukocyte Count Assay (ISO); ASTM F2888 | The test article met the requirements of the test. |
| Comparative Assessment of Geometry and Surface Characteristics | Comparative geometry and surface assessment using 40X magnification. | The subject device is comparable to the predicate device in terms of both macrogeometry and surface features. |
3
{7}
# Performance Testing
The successful completion of the performance testing listed in the following table demonstrates that the Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is suitable for its intended use.
| Test | Test Method | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Dimensional Verification | Device dimensions were measured to confirm conformance to the specifications. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Luer Integrity | Tested per ISO 80369-7. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength | The tensile strength of the catheter sections and bonds was tested. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Kink Resistance | Test specimen segments were formed into a defined bend diameter to evaluate kink resistance. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Torsion Resistance | The test specimens were rotated to evaluate integrity after rotation. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Tip Flexibility | Test specimens were tested for tip flexibility. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Air Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1, Annex D. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Liquid Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1, Annex C. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Static Burst | Tested per ISO 10555-1, Annex F. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Dynamic Burst | Mechanical integrity was maintained up to the specified pressures. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
4
{8}
| Test | Test Method | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Particulate Testing | The size and quantity of particulate matter generated during simulated use testing were determined. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Simulated Use Testing | Deliverability and compatibility with accessory devices were evaluated in a neurovascular model. | **PASS** All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria. |
| Delivery / Retrieval Force Testing | The forces to deliver and retrieve the subject device in an anatomical model were measured. | **PASS** |
| Radiopacity | The visibility of the radiopaque markers was evaluated under fluoroscopy and compared to the predicate. | **PASS** |
### Sterilization
The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is sterilized by ethylene oxide to sterility assurance level of 10⁻⁶. The device has been adopted into an existing validated cycle per AAMI TIR28:2016.
### Conclusions
The Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System has the same intended use, similar technological characteristics, and the same method of action as the predicate device. Differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness of the device. The successful completion of performance testing demonstrates that the Route 92 Medical Full Length 046 Access System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
---5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.