Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
K260002 · Scientia Vascular, Inc. · NRY · Jul 16, 2026 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K260002
Device Name
Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
Applicant
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Product Code
NRY · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Jul 16, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Socrates System with the Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter is intended for use in revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Device Story
Socrates Aspiration System is a neurovascular intervention tool; comprises Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter and Aspiration Tubing. Catheter is single-lumen, variable-stiffness, advanced over steerable guidewire to target thrombus. System connects to external vacuum pump via tubing to apply suction; facilitates thrombus aspiration/removal from intracranial vessels. Used in clinical settings by physicians; guided by fluoroscopy via radiopaque tip marker. Hydrophilic coating reduces friction during navigation through tortuous neurovasculature. Output is mechanical removal of occlusive thrombus; restores blood flow in acute ischemic stroke patients. Benefits include rapid revascularization, potentially improving clinical outcomes for stroke patients.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical performance data including biocompatibility, functional bench testing (tensile, kink, flow rate, fatigue, lubricity, particulate characterization), and a comparative GLP porcine animal study (n=6) evaluating clot aspiration and vascular injury at 3-day and 30-day time points.
Indicated for revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (internal carotid, middle cerebral M1/M2, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Candidates include patients ineligible for or who failed intravenous thrombolytic drug therapy. Socrates Aspiration Tubing is indicated to connect the catheter to a compatible suction pump.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
Predicate Devices
Penumbra System ACE 68 Reperfusion Catheter (K161640)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
July 16, 2026
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Thomas Lippert
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
2460 South 3270 West
West Valley City, Utah 84119
Re: K260002
Trade/Device Name: Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250
Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: NRY
Dated: June 17, 2026
Received: June 17, 2026
Dear Thomas Lippert:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260002 - Thomas Lippert
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K260002 - Thomas Lippert
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
NAIRA MURADYAN -S
Naira Muradyan, PhD
Assistant Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K260002
Device Name
Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
Indications for Use (Describe)
Socrates Aspiration Catheters
As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Catheters with a compatible suction pump are indicated for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic drug therapy or who failed thrombolytic drug therapy are candidates for treatment.
Socrates Aspiration Tubing
As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Tubing is indicated to connect the Socrates Aspiration Catheters to a compatible suction pump.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)

SCIENTIA
510(K) SUMMARY
K260002
(Per 21 CFR 807.92)
SCIENTIA VASCULAR, INC
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
Submitter Name and Address
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
2460 South 3270 West
West Valley City, UT 84119
Contact Person
Thomas Lippert
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Phone: 1 (888) 385-9016
Email: regulatory@scientiavascular.com
Date Prepared
17 June 2026
SUBJECT DEVICE
Trade Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name:
Regulation:
Product Code:
Review Panel:
Device Class:
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
Catheter, Thrombus Retriever
Percutaneous Catheter
21 CFR 870.1250
NRY
Neurology
Class II
PREDICATE DEVICE
Trade Name: Penumbra System ACE 68 Reperfusion Catheter
Predicate 510(k) Number: K161640
REFERENCE DEVICE
Trade Name: AXS Vecta Aspiration System
Reference Device 510(k) Number: K191768
Pg. 1
{5}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
# DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Scientia Vascular Socrates Aspiration System is composed of three components: the Socrates 38 and 70 Aspiration Catheters, designed to aid in accessing vasculature, and the Socrates Aspiration Tubing, designed to connect the aspiration catheter to a compatible suction pump and control flow between them. When used with a compatible vacuum pump, these components facilitate the aspiration and removal of thrombus from the neurovasculature. All components are supplied sterile for single use only.
The Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter, a component in the Socrates Aspiration System, is a single lumen, variable stiffness catheter designed to be advanced over a steerable guidewire. The catheter shaft design includes nitinol, polymers of varying durometer, and an internal lubricious liner. To reduce friction during manipulation, a hydrophilic coating is applied to the distal exterior section of the catheter shaft. A single radiopaque tip marker provides visualization under fluoroscopy. The proximal end of the catheter includes a clear hub with Luer lock and a stainless-steel strain relief. The catheter is supplied sterile, for single use only and is packaged with a rotating hemostasis valve (RHV) and three peel-away introducers.
The Socrates Aspiration Tubing is designed to connect the Socrates 38 or Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter to a compatible vacuum pump and control flow between them. The aspiration tubing consists of tubing attached to a suction connector on one end and a male Luer lock on the other with an intermediate on/off fluid flow control device and is supplied sterile and for single use only.
# INTENDED USE
The Socrates System with the Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter is intended for use in revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
# INDICATIONS FOR USE
# Socrates Aspiration Catheters
As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Catheters with a compatible suction pump are indicated for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic drug therapy or who failed thrombolytic drug therapy are candidates for treatment.
# Socrates® Aspiration Tubing
As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Tubing is indicated to connect the Socrates Aspiration Catheters to a compatible suction pump.
# COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The technological characteristics of the Socrates Aspiration System Socrates™ 70 Aspiration Catheter are compared to those of the predicate device, Penumbra System ACE 68 Reperfusion Catheter below. Differences are indicated in **bold**.
| Characteristic | Subject Device Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter) | Predicate Device Penumbra System ACE 68 Reperfusion Catheter (K161640) | Reference Device AXS Vecta Aspiration System (K191768) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Catheters **with a** | As part of the **Penumbra** System, the **Reperfusion** Catheters **and Separators** are | The AXS Vecta Aspiration Catheter, as part of the AXS Vecta Aspiration System, is |
Pg. 2
{6}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
| | **compatible suction pump** are indicated for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. **Patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic drug therapy or who failed thrombolytic drug therapy are candidates for treatment.** As part of the Socrates Aspiration System, the Socrates Aspiration Tubing is indicated to connect the Socrates Aspiration Catheters to a compatible suction pump. | indicated for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral – M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. As part of the **Penumbra** System, the **Penumbra Sterile** Aspiration Tubing is indicated to connect the **Penumbra Reperfusion** Catheters to the **Penumbra Pump MAX**. **The Penumbra Pump MAX is indicated as a vacuum source for Penumbra Aspiration Systems.** | indicated in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral – M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who failed IV t-PA therapy are candidates for treatment. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | Revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke. | Revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke. | Revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke. |
| Catheter Materials | Hub **Polycarbonate** Strain Relief Stainless Steel Catheter Shaft PEBAX, **Polyurethane**, Nitinol, and PTFE Radiopaque Marker **Tantalum** | Hub Grilamid Strain Relief Stainless Steel, **[hub sleeve] Grilamid** Catheter Shaft PTFE, **Stainless Steel**, Nitinol, **Vestamid**, Pebax, **Tecoflex**, **Pellathane**, Radiopaque Marker Platinum/ Iridium | Hub **Nylon** Strain Relief **Polyolefin** Catheter Shaft Polymer, Stainless Steel/Nitinol Radiopaque Marker Platinum/Iridium Colorants Not Publicly Available |
Pg. 3
{7}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
| | ColorantsClear/Natural | ColorantsClear/Natural or Purple colorants, PET yellow, black inkID Band Polyolefin | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Catheter Dimensions | Outer DiameterProximal: 0.085”Distal: 0.085”Inner DiameterProximal: 0.070”Distal: 0.070”Effective Lengths115cm, 132cm, 138cmHydrophilic Coating Length90cm | Outer Diameter:Proximal: 0.084”Distal: 0.084”Inner DiameterProximal: 0.068”Distal: 0.068”Effective Lengths115cm, 120cm, 125cm, 127cm, 132cmHydrophilic Coating Length30cm | Outer Diameter:Proximal: 0.087”Distal: 0.083”Inner DiameterProximal: 0.074”Distal: 0.074”Effective Lengths115cm, 125cm, 132cmHydrophilic Coating length25cm |
| Coating | Hydrophilic | Hydrophilic | Hydrophilic |
| Tip Shape | Straight | Straight | Straight |
| Radiopaque Markers | 1 distally located radiopaque marker | 1 distally located radiopaque marker | 1 distally located radiopaque marker |
| Condition Supplied | Sterile, single use | Sterile, single use | Sterile, single use |
| Sterilization Method | Ethylene oxide (EO) | EO | EO |
| Packaged Accessories | Rotating hemostasis valve (RHV), three (3) peel-away introducers | RHV, peelable sheath, shaping mandrel | RHV, two (2) peel-away introducers |
When compared with the predicate device, the subject Socrates™ 70 Aspiration Catheter has the technological characteristic differences shown in the table above. These differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness for the subject device.
### NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA
The following non-clinical performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- Biocompatibility
• Functional Testing
- Animal Study
• Sterilization, Shelf Life, and Residuals
#### Biocompatibility
The following biocompatibility evaluations were performed in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
| Test | Test Summary | Conclusion of Testing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution) | Cell culture was observed for cytotoxic reactivity. | Non-cytotoxic |
Pg. 4
{8}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
| Sensitization | The study animals with subject device were observed for dermal sensitization. | No sensitization reaction. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | The study animals with subject device were observed for dermal reaction. | No significant dermal reactions at the injected site. |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | The study animals with the subject device were observed for abnormal clinical signs indicative of toxicity during the 72-hour test period. | No signs of toxicity. |
| Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity | The study animals were observed for individual temperature rise. | Non-pyrogenic |
| Hemolysis (Direct Contact and Extract Method Testing) | The difference between the hemolytic indexes of the subject device and the negative control was evaluated. | Non-hemolytic |
| Complement Activation of SC5b-9 | Comparison of the subject device SC5b-9 value to the predicate device for all exposure times was performed. | The two samples are considered similar. |
| Thrombogenicity | Hemocompatibility: In Vitro Blood Loop Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) Platelet and Leukocyte Count (PLC) Comparative Surface Assessment | Considered similar to the predicate. |
## Functional Testing
The following functional tests were conducted in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tensile and Elongation | Reference ISO-10555-1:2013. Peak tensile force and elongation measured by displacement at break. | Pass |
| Tip Stiffness | The cantilever bending stiffness of the catheter tip was measured. | Pass |
| Kink Radius | Minimum kink radius was measured by wrapping the catheter around mandrels of varying size. | Pass |
| Liquid Leak and Static Burst | Per ISO-10555-1:2013. | Pass |
| Positive Flow Rate | Reference ISO-10555-1:2013. Dynamic flow rate was characterized. Dynamic leak and burst were evaluated. | Pass |
| Compatibility with Agents | Compatibility was evaluated by functionally testing catheters following exposure to contrast media and saline. | Pass |
| Torque Turns to Failure | Torque turns to failure were evaluated in an anatomical model. | Pass |
| Visual and Dimensional Inspections | Test per ISO-10555-1:2013. Dimensional inspection per engineering drawings. | Pass |
| Flexural Fatigue | The catheter was flexed for multiple cycles and inspected for damage. | Pass |
| Air Ingress | Tested for air ingress through catheter hub per ISO-10555-1:2013. | Pass |
| Negative Collapse | Negative collapse measures catheter lumen integrity while the catheter is subjected to a worst-case vacuum pressure. | Pass |
| Hub Luer Design Verification | Test per ISO-80369-7. | Pass |
| Usability and Radiopacity Validation | Physicians evaluated various performance characteristics of the subject and predicate catheters, including radiopacity, in a human cadaver. | Pass |
| Coating Lubricity, Durability, and Integrity | Frictional force of the coated catheter portion was determined after simulated use in a tortuous path model. Hydrophilic coating of the catheter was inspected before and after simulated use in a tortuous path model with interfacing ancillary devices. | Pass |
Pg. 5
{9}
Scientia Vascular, Inc.
Traditional 510(k)
Socrates® Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter)
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Corrosion Resistance | Per ISO-10555-1:2013 | Pass |
| Particulate Characterization | Particulates of various size ranges were counted after simulated use in a tortuous path model with comparison to the predicate. | Pass |
| Model and Product Compatibility Testing | Catheters were advanced through a representative neurovascular anatomical model with the use of interfacing ancillary devices and compared with the predicate device. | Pass |
| Delivery and Retrieval Testing | Measured the forces required to deliver and retrieve the catheter in a tortuous pathway with ancillary devices. | Pass |
| Suction Flow Rate | Measured the suction flow rate at maximum pressure while the catheter is connected to the aspiration tubing. | Pass |
### Animal Study
The safety and effectiveness of the Socrates Aspiration System (including the Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter) was evaluated in a comparative porcine study conducted under Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) against a cleared control system. Both the subject and control systems were evaluated at subacute (3 day) and chronic (30 day) time points, with three animals evaluated at each time point. Assessments included aspiration of experimental soft clots from the left or right ascending pharyngeal arteries, firm clots from the left or right renal arteries, and application of maximum vacuum with the device in a wedged position against the vessel wall in the left or right lingual artery.
Modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) scores were assigned after clot aspiration.
Following treatment, in-life monitoring, necropsy, angiography, histopathological and downstream organ assessments were conducted. Clot aspiration and wedge assessment results were comparable between the test and control systems. Angiographic and histological evaluations concluded the systems were comparable at all time points. There were no significant gross or histological findings suggestive of significant vascular injury (lesions, dissection, perforation, infarction, etc.) in the test or control treated vessels at either time point. Additionally, there were no gross or histological findings in nontarget organs which were attributable to the test or control articles at either time point. Therefore, the study endpoints support equivalent safety and performance of the Socrates Aspiration System when compared with the reference device.
### Sterilization, Shelf-Life, and Residuals
Additionally, the subject device and its packaging were evaluated for the proposed shelf-life, packaging integrity and sterilization including ethylene oxide (EO), ethylene chlorohydrin (ECH) residuals, and bacterial endotoxin levels. The subject device met the predetermined acceptance criteria.
### CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA
The non-clinical performance data presented were determined to be sufficient to support the substantial equivalence of the Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter) to the predicate. Therefore, no clinical study was conducted.
### CONCLUSION
The subject device, Socrates Aspiration System (Socrates 70 Aspiration Catheter), has the same intended use and similar indications for use as the predicate device. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness and have been evaluated through non-clinical performance testing. The resulting data demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Pg. 6
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.