Cytrans™ Elashield is intended for the following uses as a space-making barrier: - Guided bone regeneration in oral surgery - Alveolar ridge augmentation - Guided tissue regeneration in periodontal defects - Extraction socket site preservation - Sinus lifts - Immediate implant placement at time of extraction or delayed placement - Treatment of associated cystic defect - The containment of bone grafting materials
Device Story
Cytrans™ Elashield is a resorbable, bilayer barrier membrane composed of L-lactide-ε-caprolactone copolymer (P(LA/CL)). It features a dense layer to prevent soft tissue invasion and a porous layer for flexibility. Used in oral surgery by clinicians to cover bone defects, it acts as a space-making barrier to promote bone regeneration and contain bone grafting materials. The device is resorbed in the body via hydrolysis. It is provided in various sheet sizes and sterilized via gamma irradiation. Clinical benefit includes effective bone regeneration in periodontal and maxillofacial defects.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing (ISO 22803-based) and a prospective animal study using a beagle dog mandibular defect model. Study compared new bone volume and residual material area at 4, 12, and 26 weeks post-implantation. Results showed no significant difference in bone volume between Cytrans™ Elashield and the predicate device.
Indicated for patients requiring guided bone or tissue regeneration in oral surgery, including alveolar ridge augmentation, extraction socket preservation, sinus lifts, implant placement, and treatment of cystic defects.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Bone grafting material is a material such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, polylactic and polyglycolic acids, or collagen, that is intended to fill, augment, or reconstruct periodontal or bony defects of the oral and maxillofacial region.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for bone grafting materials that do not contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. The special control is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Bone Grafting Material Devices.” (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) Class III (premarket approval) for bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. Bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic, such as biological response modifiers, require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}

July 6, 2026
GC America, Inc.
Futoshi Fusejima
Director of Product Engineering and Regulatory Affairs
3737 W 127th St.
Alsip, Illinois 60803
Re: K253317
Trade/Device Name: Cytrans™ Elashield
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3930
Regulation Name: Bone Grafting Material
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: LYC
Dated: June 5, 2026
Received: June 5, 2026
Dear Futoshi Fusejima:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253317 - Futoshi Fusejima
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}
K253317 - Futoshi Fusejima
Page 3
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Sherrill Lathrop Blitzer
for Andrew Steen
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and
ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia,
Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K253317
Device Name
Cytrans™ Elashield
Indications for Use (Describe)
Cytrans™ Elashield is intended for the following uses as a space-making barrier:
- Guided bone regeneration in oral surgery
- Alveolar ridge augmentation
- Guided tissue regeneration in periodontal defects
- Extraction socket site preservation
- Sinus lifts
- Immediate implant placement at time of extraction or delayed placement
- Treatment of associated cystic defect
- The containment of bone grafting materials
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
{4}
# 510(k) Summary
K253317
# 1. Submitter Information:
GC America Inc.
3737 W. 127th Street
Alsip, IL 60803
Contact Person:
Futoshi Fusejima.
Phone:
(708) 926-3050
Alternate Contact:
John Oberholtzer
Phone:
(708) 926-3246
Fax:
(708) 925-0373
Date Prepared:
June 30, 2026
# 2. Device Name:
Proprietary Name:
Cytrans™ Elashield
Common Name:
Resorbable barrier membrane
Classification Name:
Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic
Device Classification:
Class II, 872.3930
Product Code:
LYC
# 3. Predicate Devices:
| Product | Applicant | 510(k) No. | Code No | Predicate | Decision Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CytoFlex® Resorb | UNICARE BIO-MEDICAL, INC. | K090083 | LYC | Primary | 03/23/2009 |
| Geistlich Bio-Gide® | Geistlich Pharma AG | K212463 | NPL | Secondary | 04/05/2022 |
# 4. Description of Device:
Cytrans™ Elashield consists of a single composition of P (LA/CL) (L-lactide-ε-caprolactone copolymer), a bioresorbable polymer, and has a white membrane structure with a thickness of about 200 μm. It acts as a barrier to prevent the invasion of soft tissue into the bone defect by covering the affected bone defect, thus promoting bone regeneration in the defect area. It has a two-layer structure, one is a dense layer (solid layer) to prevent the invasion of soft tissues, and the other is a porous layer, which provides flexible operability. It is resorbed into the body via hydrolysis. It is a gamma-ray sterilized material.
# 5. Indications for Use:
Cytrans™ Elashield is intended for the following uses as a space-making barrier:
- Guided bone regeneration in oral surgery
- Alveolar ridge augmentation
- Guided tissue regeneration in periodontal defects
- Extraction socket site preservation
- Sinus lifts
- Immediate implant placement at time of extraction or delayed placement
- Treatment of associated cystic defect
- The containment of bone grafting materials
# 6. Comparison of Technology
GC AMERICA INC.
3737 West 127th Street • Alsip, IL 60803 • TEL: 800.323.3366 • FAX: 708.897.4062
www.gcamerica.com
p. 1
{5}
The applicant device and the predicate devices are substantially equivalent in the following points.
- Bioresorbable barrier membrane applied for GBR or GTR
- Indication for use
- Provided in clinically relevant sizes for intra-oral surgical procedures
- Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶.
- Performance evaluation *in vivo*
- Degradation by hydrolysis
The applicant device is different from the predicate devices in the following points.
- The applicant device and the primary predicate device are equivalent in that they are made of polylactic acid-based bioresorbable synthetic polymer, but the detailed composition of the polymers used is different. The reference device differs from the applicant device in that it is made of animal-derived collagen. The applicant device and the reference device are equivalent in that they have a two-layer structure with an intended porous layer and a dense layer, while the primary predicate device has not two-layer structure but just porous.
- The measured tensile strength itself as a physical property of the applicant device and the primary predicate device is equivalent but the breaking distance of the applicant device is greater than that of the both predicate devices. It is concluded that this is due to flexible and rubber-like properties of the applicant device and that there is no problem in clinical use when combined with the performance evaluation *in vivo*.
Based on similarities in intended use, mode of action, chemical composition, and performance testing, Cytrans™ Elashield is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
p. 2
{6}
Substantial equivalence to the comparative device
| | Applicant device | Primary device | Secondary predicate device | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trade name | Cytrans™ Elashield | CytoFlex® Resorb K090083 | Geistlich Bio-Gide® K212463 | |
| Manufacturer | GC Corporation | UNICARE BIOMEDICAL, INC. | Geistlich Pharma AG | |
| Product category | LYC, NPL Bone Grafting Material, Syntheti Class II | LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic Class II | NPL Barrier, Animal Source, Intraoral Class II | Applicant device and primary device are the same. Reference device is different in that the raw material is of animal origin. |
| Indications for use | Cytrans™ Elashield is intended for the following uses as a space-making barrier: • Guided bone regeneration in oral surgery • Alveolar ridge augmentation • Guided tissue regeneration in periodontal defects • Extraction socket site preservation • Sinus lifts • Immediate implant placement at time of extraction or delayed placement • Treatment of associated cystic defect • The containment of bone grafting materials | CytoFlex® Resorb membranes are intended for use as a space-making barrier in the treatment of periodontal defects and maxillofacial guided tissue regeneration procedures, including preservation and regeneration of alveolar bone height and volume, ridge and extraction site augmentation, sinus lifts, and treatment of associated cystic defects. It is also intended for use as a grafting material containment matrix. | Geistlich Bio-Gide® is intended for the following uses: • augmentation around implants placed in immediate extraction sockets; • augmentation around implants placed in delayed extraction sockets; • localized ridge augmentation for later implantation; • alveolar ridge reconstruction for prosthetic treatment; • filling of bone defects after root resection, cystectomy, removal of retained teeth; • guided bone regeneration in dehiscence defects; and • guided tissue regeneration procedures in periodontal defects. | Although verbiage describing is different, indications for use are substantially equivalent between applicant device, primary device and reference device. All devices are applied for GBR or GTR. |
| Classification of material | Resorbable P(LA/CL) Bilayer membrane | PLA/PGA Membrane | Bilayer collagen membrane | All devices are substantially equivalent in the following respects. • Barrier membrane for bone regeneration • Bioresorbable Applicant device and primary device are the same as made of a bioresorbable synthetic polymer. Applicant device and reference device are the same in terms of having a two-layer structure with an intended porous layer and a dense layer. |
| Delivery form | Sheet | Sheet | Sheet | No difference between the applicant, the primary, and the reference device. |
p. 3
{7}
| | Applicant device | Primary device | Secondary predicate device | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Size | · 15 mm × 25 mm · 25 mm × 25 mm · 30 mm × 40 mm | · 15mmx12mm · 17mmx17mm · 25mmx17mm · 30mmx24mm · 40mmx30mm · 25mmx20mm | Geistlich Bio-Gide® is provided in the following sizes: · 13 x 25 mm · 25 x 25 mm · 30 x 40 mm · 40 x 50 mm · 16 x 22 mm as part of the Combi-Kit Collagen | All devices are substantially equivalent |
| Thickness | 200 μm | 300 μm | 400 μm | Applicant device is thinner than primary predicate device and reference device. The tensile strength testing showed applicant device has substantially equivalent tensile strength properties to the predicate devices despite the lower. |
| Chemical composition | P(LA/CL) L-lactide-ε-caprolactone copolymer | Synthetic polyglycolide, polylactide and D,L-lactide/glycolide copolymers | Pig collagen | Applicant device and primary device are the same in terms of synthetic materials which are made of polylactic acid-based bioresorbable synthetic polymer. |
| Sterility | Gamma irradiation Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶ | Ethylene Oxide Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶ | Gamma irradiation Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶ | All devices are the same in terms of Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶. Applicant device and reference device are the same in that the sterilization method is gamma irradiation. |
| Storage temperature | 4°C - 25°C | 15°C - 30°C | 15°C - 25°C | Storage temperature differs for the applicant device compared to the primary device and reference device. Test data is included to support that the applicant device meets its identified requirements when stored within the identified temperature range. |
| Shelf life | 2 years | 3 years | 3 years | Shelf life of applicant is shorter than predicate devices. |
p. 4
{8}
# 7. Performance Bench Tests:
Since there is no international standard, such as ISO, the physical properties of this product were established based on the company specification, ISO 22803.
Performance testing includes:
| Property | Test method | Specification |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Appearance | Visually check the appearance of the solid and porous layer surfaces. | **Solid layer (smooth surface):** No fracture or crack shall be found on the surface. (No metallic luster of alu-minum shall be visible when the film for aluminum mount is attached.) **Porous layer (porous surface):** -The surface shall be distinguishable from the solid layer surface without the glossiness of the solid layer. -No foreign matter shall be found. |
| Compositional analysis | Analyze product composition using an infrared spectrophotometer | In comparison with the infrared absorption spectrum of the standard product, peaks peculiar to L-lactic acid ε-caprolactone should be recognized. |
| Membrane thickness | Total membrane thickness: Measure the thickness at 5 points of the membrane using a micrometer. | 180 - 320 μm |
| | Solid layer thickness: Using a laser microscope, measure the thickness at 3 points of the solid layer by observing the cut-out cross section with a 50x objective lens. Measurements are taken in three non-overlapping fields of view. | 16 - 80 μm |
| Solid layer surface texture | The solid layer surface is observed under a laser microscope (50x objective lens) and measure the biggest pore size. Perform three views with no overlap. | 20 μm or less |
| Tensile strength | Both of specimen (2 x 15 mm) was fixed with jig at 12 mm intervals and its tensile strength at the 30% elongation point was measured at cross head speed of 20 mm/min by using universal testing machine. | 0.05 - 0.5 N *Without breaking at 30% elongation point. |
| Residual solvent | Measure residual amounts of the organic solvent 1,4-dioxane used in production by using GC-MS. | 100 ppm or less |
p. 5
{9}
| Size | Measured the length and width of a product using micrometer. | S: W 15 ± 1 mm, L 25 ± 1 mmM: W 25 ± 1 mm, L 25 ± 1 mmL: W 30 ± 1 mm, L 40 ± 1 mm |
| --- | --- | --- |
### 8. Biocompatibility
A biocompatibility assessment was completed according to ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.
Cytrans™ Elashield is a bioresorbable membrane for GBR or GTR. Medical device categorization by ISO 10993 for biological evaluation of medical devices is as follows.
Category : Implant medical device
Contact : Tissue/bone
Contact duration : Long term (>30 d)
In conclusion, biocompatibility of Cytrans™ Elashield is an acceptable device from the biological evaluation result.
### Cytotoxicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-5
### Sensitization
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-10
### Intracutaneous reactivity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-23
### Material mediated pyrogenicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO10993-11
### Acute systemic toxicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-11
### Subchronic toxicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO10993-11
### Implantation effects
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO10993-6
### Genotoxicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO10993-3
### 9. Animal Study:
An animal study was conducted to evaluate the substantial equivalence of Cytrans™ Elashield to the predicate device.
The study was performed using a beagle dog mandibular defect model consisting of a two-walled bone defect. Newly formed bone volume was assessed by CT evaluation, and residual material area and biological response were assessed by histological evaluation using H&E and Villanueva Goldner staining at 4, 12, and 26 weeks post-implantation.
No significant difference in newly formed bone volume was observed between Cytrans™ Elashield and the predicate device. Both Cytrans™ Elashield and the predicate device were gradually resorbed in vivo, with the residual
p. 6
{10}
material area decreasing over time. These findings indicate that the materials inhibited soft tissue invasion and maintained space for bone tissue regeneration.
Based on these results, the performance of Cytrans™ Elashield was determined to be substantially equivalent to that of the predicate device.
# 10. **Conclusion:**
Based on similarities in indications for use, technology, safety and effectiveness, the applicant device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
p. 7
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.