ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-003); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-013)
K252893 · Aneuvo · SDO · Mar 27, 2026 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K252893
Device Name
ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-003); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-013)
Applicant
Aneuvo
Product Code
SDO · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Mar 27, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.5851
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ExaStim Stimulation System is indicated for the improvement of hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old who present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury, when used in conjunction with functional task practice.
Device Story
ExaStim Stimulation System delivers transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation to improve hand sensation and strength in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. System comprises a battery-operated portable stimulator, 16-channel ReCure electrode pad, stimulation/return cables, and a Bluetooth-enabled programmer. Clinician uses programmer to configure stimulation parameters; device delivers controlled electrical pulses to spinal cord and dorsal roots via surface electrodes. Used in conjunction with functional task practice. System monitors impedance to ensure stimulation control. Non-clinical testing confirms safety and performance equivalence to predicate. Benefits include potential improvement in hand function for patients with chronic neurological deficits.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evidence includes characterization of electrical stimulation parameters, impedance monitoring, electrode performance (adhesive integrity, shelf life, reusability), EMC/electrical safety (IEC 60601 series), wireless coexistence (ANSI C63.27), human factors validation (IEC 62366-1), packaging verification, and biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series).
Technological Characteristics
Transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulator. Components: portable stimulator, 16-channel multi-electrode array (TPU substrate, conductive silver ink, hydrogel), cables. Energy: battery-powered. Connectivity: Bluetooth. Standards: IEC 60601-1, 60601-1-2, 60601-1-11, 60601-2-10, ISO 10993, ASTM D4332/D4169-22. Output: Biphasic rectangular waveform, 1-100 Hz, 0.3-1 ms pulse width, up to 150 mA current.
Indications for Use
Indicated for individuals 18-75 years old with chronic, non-progressive neurological deficits from incomplete spinal cord injury to improve hand sensation and strength, used with functional task practice.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transcutaneous electrical spine stimulator to improve skeletal muscle strength and sensation is a device that can be programmed to apply an electrical current via electrodes on a patient's skin over the spine to improve muscle strength and sensation after neurological deficit. The ARCEX System is intended to deliver programmed, transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation in conjunction with functional task practice in the clinic to improve hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old that present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury (C2-C8 inclusive).
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the transcutaneous electrical spine stimulator to improve skeletal muscle strength and sensation is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated:
- (i) Characterization of the electrical stimulation parameters, including the following: waveforms; output modes; maximum output voltage and maximum output current; pulse duration; frequency; net charge per pulse; maximum phase charge, maximum current density, maximum average current, and maximum average power density:
- Characterization of the impedance monitoring system; and (ii)
- Characterization of electrode performance, including the electrical performance, (iii) adhesive integrity, shelf life, reusability, and current distribution of the electrode surface area.
- (2) Performance data must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety and performance, battery safety, and wireless compatibility of the device.
- Software verification, validation and hazard analysis must be performed. (3)
- (4) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
- (ર) Labeling must include:
- Summaries of electrical stimulation parameters; (i)
- Instructions for user management of the device in the event of adverse effects; (ii)
- A contraindication for patients with active implantable devices or wearable (iii) defibrillators:
- (iv) Information on the typical sensations experienced during treatment;
- Instructions for accurate placement of the device on the patient; and (v)
- Cleaning instructions. (vi)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
March 27, 2026
ANEUVO
Amelia Striegel
Regulatory Affairs Manager
10940 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 2030
Los Angeles, California 90024
Re: K252893
Trade/Device Name: ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-003); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-013)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5851
Regulation Name: Transcutaneous Electrical Spine Stimulator To Improve Skeletal Muscle Strength And Sensation
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Codes: SDO, GXY
Dated: February 23, 2026
Received: February 23, 2026
Dear Amelia Striegel:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252893 - Amelia Striegel
Page 2
Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn
{2}
K252893 - Amelia Striegel
Page 3
(https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by
ZACHARY MCKINNEY -S
Date: 2026.03.27
15:29:53 -04'00'
for Tushar Bansal, PhD
Acting Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team
DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and
Physical Medicine Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252893 | |
| Device Name ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-003); ReCure® Electrode Pad (PAD-013) | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The ExaStim Stimulation System is indicated for the improvement of hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old who present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury, when used in conjunction with functional task practice. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(k) Summary
K252893
March 27, 2026
I. Company: ANEUVO
10940 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 2030
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Telephone: (424) 256-2194
Contact: Amelia Striegel (Primary)
Regulatory Affairs Manager
Telephone: (424) 256-2194
II. Proprietary Trade Name: ExaStim Stimulation System
III. Classification Name: Transcutaneous electrical spine stimulator to improve skeletal muscle strength and sensation (21 CFR 890.5851)
IV. Classification: Class II
V. Product Codes: SDO (21 CFR 890.5851), GXY (21 CFR 882.1320)
VI. Product Description
The ExaStim® Stimulation System is designed to deliver transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation for therapeutic use in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). The ExaStim Portable Stimulator is a battery-operated medical device composed of specialized electronics and embedded firmware. It emits stimulation according to parameters configured by the ExaStim Programmer by a clinician.
The ExaStim Stimulation System consists of the components described in Table 1.
{5}
Table 1: ExaStim Stimulation System Components Summary
| | Part Name | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | ReCure® Electrode Pad | Non-invasive 16-channel multi-electrode array |
| | ExaStim® Portable Stimulator | Generates and delivers controlled electrical stimulation to the spinal cord and dorsal roots via the ReCure® Electrode Pad based on commands from the ExaStim® Programmer |
| | ReCure® Stimulation Cable | Connects the ExaStim® Portable Stimulator to the ReCure Electrode Pad |
| | ExaStim® Return Electrode Cable | Connects the return electrodes (i.e., PALS Neurostimulation Electrode) to the ExaStim® Portable Stimulator |
| | ExaStim® Programmer | Bluetooth‡-enabled mobile digital device preloaded with proprietary ExaStim® Programming Software; includes a charging cable. |
| | ExaStim® Charging Cable | Charger used to recharge the battery of the ExaStim Portable Stimulator |
{6}
In addition to the components listed above, the system requires two PALS‡ Neurostimulation Electrodes manufactured by Axelgaard, as shown in Table 2 which are not included with the system.
Table 2: Additional required components
| | Part Name | Catalog Number | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | PALS‡ Neurostimulation Electrode | 895240 | Return electrodes |
# VII. Indications for Use:
The ExaStim Stimulation System is indicated for the improvement of hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old who present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury, when used in conjunction with functional task practice.
{7}
# VIII. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
Table 3: Summary Comparison of ExaStim Stimulation System to Predicate Device
| Item | ExaStim® Stimulation System (Subject) | ARCEX System (Predicate) (DEN240014) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The ExaStim Stimulation System is a portable, non-invasive, medical device system that delivers multi-channel transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation. ExaStim is intended to be used in conjunction with functional task practice. | The ARCEX System is intended to deliver programmed, transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation in conjunction with functional task practice in the clinic to improve hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old that present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury (C2-C8 inclusive). | Similar |
| Indications for Use | The ExaStim Stimulation System is indicated for the improvement of hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old who present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury, when used in conjunction with functional task practice. | | |
| Mode of Action | Electrical stimulation via surface electrodes. | Electrical stimulation via surface electrodes. | Same |
{8}
| Item | ExaStim® Stimulation System (Subject) | ARCEX System (Predicate) (DEN240014) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IP Class | IP22 | IP22 | Same |
| Applied part | Type BF | Type BF | Same |
| Regulated Current/Voltage | Current | Current | Same |
| Waveform | Biphasic | Monophasic or Biphasic | Similar |
| Waveshape | Rectangular | Rectangular | Same |
| Biphasic Stimulation Maximum Current | 150 mA | 250 mA | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Biphasic Stimulation Maximum Voltage | 75 V @ 500 Ω
75 V @ 1 kΩ | 125 V @ 500 Ω | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance |
{9}
| Item | ExaStim® Stimulation System (Subject) | ARCEX System (Predicate) (DEN240014) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Pulse Frequency | 1 Hz – 100 Hz | 0.2 Hz – 100 Hz | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Pulse Width | 0.3 ms – 1 ms | 0.1 ms – 5 ms | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and |
| | | | performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
{10}
| Item | ExaStim® Stimulation System (Subject) | ARCEX System (Predicate) (DEN240014) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Ramp-up Duration | 2 s – 1 hr | 2 s – 60 s. For specific stimulation settings, the ramp-up duration can be lengthened up to 125 s. | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Program Duration | 1 s – 180 min | 1 min – 180 min | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
{11}
| Item | ExaStim® Stimulation System (Subject) | ARCEX System (Predicate) (DEN240014) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Output channels | Up to 16 | Up to 4 | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Active electrode | ReCure Electrode Pad | Axelgaard PALS electrode 879100 (K132422) | Different. Minor differences in design specifications and stimulation parameters do not significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the ExaStim System relative to the predicate, and the non-clinical performance testing (Section X) demonstrates acceptable safety and performance to support substantial equivalence. |
| Compatible return electrode | Axelgaard PALS electrode 895240 (K132422) | Axelgaard PALS electrode 895240 (K132422) | Same |
{12}
Although the subject device separates the Intended Use and the Indications for Use for clarity, the overall indications for use are equivalent. Both devices are indicated for the improvement of hand sensation and strength in individuals with chronic, non-progressive neurological deficits resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury and are to be used in conjunction with functional task practice.
Table 4: Summary Comparison of ReCure Electrode Pad to Reference Device
| Item | ReCure® Electrode Pad (Subject) | Axelgaard Electrode 879100 (Reference Device) (K132422) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technology | Cutaneous multielectrode pad that conducts an electrical signal from a neurostimulation device through a cable, which is dispersed across a stretchable conductive silver ink printed on a TPU substrate, then transmitted through the conductive adhesive gel to the surface of the user's skin. | Cutaneous electrode that conducts an electrical signal from a neurostimulation device through a lead wire, which is dispersed from the lead wire across a stretchable conductive fabric, then transmitted through the conductive adhesive gel to the surface of the user's skin. | Similar |
| Principles of Operation | Transcutaneous Neurostimulation Electrodes are passive devices serving as an interface between a user's skin and a neurostimulation device. | Transcutaneous Neurostimulation Electrodes are passive devices serving as an interface between a user's skin and a neurostimulation device. | Same |
{13}
| Item | ReCure® Electrode Pad (Subject) | Axelgaard Electrode 879100 (Reference Device) (K132422) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Maximum Allowable Power Density | 0.245 W/cm² | 0.1 W/cm² | Different. Neither the subject nor the reference device exceeds the maximum power density <0.25 W/cm² noted in the Guidance Document for Powered Muscle Stimulator 510(k)s. |
| Features/Materials | Four basic components:
• Top cover material
• Cable connection
○ Cable has insulation on female connector
• Stretchable conductive ink
• Conductive hydrogel | Four basic components:
• Top cover material
• Lead wire connection
○ Lead wire has insulation on female connector
• Stretchable conductive fabric
• Conductive hydrogel | Similar |
IX. Identification of Legally Marketed Device
Predicate: ARC$^{\text{EX}}$ System (DEN240014)
Reference: PALS Neurostimulation Electrodes (K132422)
X. Discussion of the Performance Testing
Testing conducted to demonstrate equivalency of the subject device to the predicate is summarized as follows:
- Characterization of Electrical Stimulation Parameters including the following: waveforms, output modes, maximum output voltage, maximum output current, pulse duration, frequency, maximum phase charge, maximum current density, maximum average current, maximum average power density
- Characterization of the Impedance Monitoring System including impedance measurement and stimulation control
{14}
- Characterization of Electrode Performance including electrical performance, adhesive integrity, shelf life, reusability, and current distribution of electrode surface area
- Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Electrical Safety, and Performance Testing (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-11, IEC 60601-2-10)
- Wireless Coexistence Testing (ANSI C63.27)
- Human Factors Validation (IEC 62366-1, IEC 60601-1-6)
- Packaging Verification (ASTM D4332, ASTM D4169-22)
- Biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-23)
XI. Conclusions
Non-clinical testing and technological comparison support the substantial equivalence of the subject device, the ExaStim Stimulation System, to the identified predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.