BD® MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD® MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube
K252378 · Becton, Dickinson and Company · JKA · Apr 10, 2026 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K252378
Device Name
BD® MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD® MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube
Applicant
Becton, Dickinson and Company
Product Code
JKA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Apr 10, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1675
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is used to collect, separate, transport, and store capillary blood samples from individuals 18 years and older. The system is comprised of a capillary blood collection tube and the BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve that is intended for use by a trained healthcare worker. BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is intended for sample collection used in the measurement of Albumin (ALB), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALKP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Calcium (Ca), Chloride (Cl), Creatinine (CREAT), Glucose (GLU), Potassium (K), Sodium (Na), Total Bilirubin (TBIL), Total Protein (TP), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Total Cholesterol (CHOL), and Triglycerides (TRIG). BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is not intended for use with other parameters/analytes.
Device Story
System collects capillary blood via fingerstick for clinical chemistry analysis; includes plastic collection tube (435-635 µL capacity) and finger sleeve. Process: healthcare worker selects sleeve size; warms patient hand; attaches sleeve to tube; slides onto finger; lances finger; collects blood; inverts tube 5 times; allows clotting (45 mins); centrifuges (4000 RCF, 2.25 mins). Tube contains silica-based clot activator and gel separator. Output is serum sample for downstream laboratory testing of specified analytes (e.g., glucose, AST, potassium). Benefits include standardized capillary collection for patients 18+.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluation included method comparison (clinical equivalence), lot-to-lot variability, within-tube type stability, operator variability, venous surrogate, and shelf-life studies. Testing focused on AST, potassium (K), and glucose (GLU) analytes. Data demonstrated that specimens collected in the subject tube produced results substantially equivalent to capillary and venous comparator tubes, meeting predefined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Plastic blood collection tube with silica-based clot activator and gel separator. Dimensions: 435-635 µL fill volume. Mechanical operation: finger sleeve attachment, manual inversion, centrifugation. Shelf life: 12 months (4-25°C). No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for collection, separation, transport, and storage of capillary blood samples from individuals 18 years and older. Intended for use by trained healthcare workers for sample collection used in the measurement of Albumin (ALB), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALKP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Calcium (Ca), Chloride (Cl), Creatinine (CREAT), Glucose (GLU), Potassium (K), Sodium (Na), Total Bilirubin (TBIL), Total Protein (TP), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Total Cholesterol (CHOL), and Triglycerides (TRIG).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood specimen collection device is a device intended for medical purposes to collect and to handle blood specimens and to separate serum from nonserum (cellular) components prior to further testing. This generic type device may include blood collection tubes, vials, systems, serum separators, blood collection trays, or vacuum sample tubes.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K252378
B Applicant
Becton, Dickinson and Company
C Proprietary and Established Names
BD® MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD® MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JKA | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1675 - Blood Specimen Collection Device | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modified device
B Measurand:
Not applicable. Blood collection tube.
C Type of Test:
Not applicable.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252378 - Page 2 of 9
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is used to collect, separate, transport, and store capillary blood samples from individuals 18 years and older. The system is comprised of a capillary blood collection tube and the BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve that is intended for use by a trained healthcare worker.
BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is intended for sample collection used in the measurement of Albumin (ALB), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALKP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Calcium (Ca), Chloride (Cl), Creatinine (CREAT), Glucose (GLU), Potassium (K), Sodium (Na), Total Bilirubin (TBIL), Total Protein (TP), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Total Cholesterol (CHOL), and Triglycerides (TRIG).
BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube is not intended for use with other parameters/analytes.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
If the patient’s fingers do not fit in one of the four BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve sizes, the MiniDraw™ SST™ System should not be used.
### D Special Instrument Requirements:
Not applicable.
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube consists of the MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube and BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve. None of the components of the candidate device are provided sterile. The MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube is a plastic blood collection tube intended to collect 435 to 635 µL of whole blood, indicated by two fill lines on the tube. The BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve attaches the tube to the patient’s finger during sample collection. The single-use Finger Sleeves come in four sizes.
The following items are provided separately: BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sizing Tool, BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Tube Adapter SST™, and BD MiniDraw™ Cap Removal Tool.
{2}
K252378 - Page 3 of 9
## B Principle of Operation:
The BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sizing Tool is used to select the appropriately sized BD MiniDraw™ Finger Sleeve for the patient. After warming the patient’s hand, the Finger Sleeve is attached to the MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube and then the finger sleeve is slid onto the patient’s finger. The BD Microtainer® Contact-Activated Lancet (k223243), sold separately, is used to lance the finger. After puncture, the MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube is swung into position for blood collection. Immediately after the blood has been collected, the MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube is inverted 5 times to mix the blood with the additive. The MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube is placed in a cap-down orientation at room temperature for 45 minutes to allow for clotting. The MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube contains a silica-based clot activator solution and a gel that creates a barrier between serum and cells during centrifugation. After clotting is completed (<120 minutes from blood collection), the MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube should be centrifuged cap-down orientation. The recommended centrifugation conditions are: 4000 RCF (relative centrifuge force or g) for 2 minutes and 15 seconds.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K230391
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252378 | K230391 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Collect, transport, and store fingerstick capillary blood specimens for downstream testing | Same |
| Intended Use Environment | Ancillary healthcare facilities, clinical and laboratory environments | Same |
{3}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252378 | K230391 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Type | Capillary, fingerstick | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| MiniDraw™ SST™ System Shelf Life | 12 months | 9 months |
| Analytes Tested | ALKP, ALT, AST, Na, Cl, ALB, BUN, Ca, CREAT, Glu, K, TBIL, TP, HDL, LDL, CHOL, TRIG, | ALKP, ALT, Na, Cl, ALB, BUN, Ca, CREAT, TBIL, TP, HDL, LDL, CHOL, TRIG |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
EN ISO 14971:2019 Medical Devices - Application of risk management to medical devices
ASTM F1886/F1886M-16 Standard Test Method for Determining Section Integrity of Seals for Flexible Packaging by Visual Inspection
ISO 11607-1 Second edition 2019-02 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices - Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems
ASTM F1980-21 Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices
ANSI AAMI IEC 62366-1 :2015+AMD1:2020 (Consolidated Text) Medical devices Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices, including Amendment 1
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
a) Between Tube and Between Lot Variability
A study was conducted to assess the total variability, lot-to-lot variation (between lots), and tube-to-tube (between tube) variation in the candidate device for downstream testing of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and potassium (K). Samples were evaluated on two instrument platforms with at least three lots of BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Tubes to confirm tube performance. The study conducted on Platform 1 was performed using samples collected from 138 subjects. The study conducted on Platform 2 was performed using samples collected from 79 subjects. Contrived samples were also prepared in an effort to
K252378 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
cover extreme levels for the claimed analytes. Total, Between-Lot, and Between-Tube variability for each instrument platform are presented in the tables below.
## Instrument Platform 1
| Analyte | Source | Mean | SD | SD 95% Lower Bound | SD 95% Upper Bound | %CV | %CV 95% Lower Bound | %CV 95% Upper Bound |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AST (U/L) | Total | 24.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 4 |
| | Lot | | 0.2 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0 | 1.4 |
| | Tube | | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.7 |
| K (mmol/L) | Total | 4.155 | 0.019 | 0.017 | 0.022 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| | Lot | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | Tube | | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
## Instrument Platform 2
| Analyte | Source | Mean | SD | SD 95% Lower Bound | SD 95% Upper Bound | %CV | %CV 95% Lower Bound | %CV 95% Upper Bound |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AST (U/L) | Total | 24.83 | 1.33 | 1.14 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 5.4 | 7.5 |
| | Lot | | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.9 |
| | Tube | | 1.22 | 1.11 | 1.36 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 6.4 |
| K (mmol/L) | Total | 4.146 | 0.023 | 0.02 | 0.028 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| | Lot | | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| | Tube | | 0.023 | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
A separate study was conducted for glucose (Glu) using blood samples collected from 43 fasting participants (self-reported). Samples were evaluated on two instrument platforms to confirm tube performance. At least three of the candidate devices were evaluated. Contrived samples were prepared in an effort to cover extreme levels. Total, Between-Lot, and Between-Tube variability for each instrument platform are presented in the tables below.
## Instrument Platform 1
| Analyte | Source | Mean | SD | SD 95% Lower Bound | SD 95% Upper Bound | %CV | %CV 95% Lower Bound | %CV 95% Upper Bound |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glu (mg/dL) | Total | 117.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| | Lot | | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| | Tube | | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
K252378 - Page 5 of 9
{5}
Instrument Platform 2
| Analyte | Source | Mean | SD | SD 95% Lower Bound | SD 95% Upper Bound | %CV | %CV 95% Lower Bound | %CV 95% Upper Bound |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glu (mg/dL) | Total | 118.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| | Lot | | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| | Tube | | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
b) Operator Variability
A study was performed to evaluate operator-to-operator variability of the candidate device for AST, K and Glu using one instrument platform. A total of 257 participants were enrolled in the study. For each participant, two trained health care workers (e.g., pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, phlebotomists) each collected one sample into a single BD® MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube. Results from the same patient were compared to determine variability between operators. Results are presented in the table below.
| Analyte | Mean | SD (95% CI) | %CV (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AST (U/L) | 25.2 | 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) | 5.5 (4.8, 6.6) |
| Glu (mg/dL) | 115.2 | 4 (3.2, 6) | 3.3 (2.6, 4.8) |
| K (mmol/L) | 4.37 | 0.168 (0.144, 0.214) | 3.7 (3.2, 4.8) |
2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Refer to K230391 for Analytical Specificity/Interference.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Shelf-life:
Real Time stability testing of the BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System with the BD MiniDraw™ SST™ Capillary Blood Collection Tube showed that the candidate device is stable for 12 months when stored at 4 to 25°C. The stability study protocol and acceptance criteria has been reviewed and found to be acceptable.
Analyte Stability (within-tube stability):
Analyte stability studies were conducted to assess the analyte within-tube stability for AST, Glu and K. The study protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. These studies demonstrated within-tube type stability in the candidate
K252378 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
device for up to 4 hours at room temperature and up to 48 hours at refrigerated conditions. The following storage instructions are included in the device labeling:
- Remove samples from centrifuge as soon as centrifugation is completed.
- Samples stored and transported at room temperature between 20 and 27 °C (68.0–80.6 °F) must be tested within 4 hours of collection.
- Samples stored and transported at refrigerated temperature between 2 and 8 °C (35.6–46.4 °F) must be tested within 48 hours of collection.
- Exposing samples to temperatures below 2 °C (35.6 °F) or above 27 °C (80.6 °F) for prolonged duration may impact analyte results. Avoid exposure to direct light during sample storage and transport.
## Additional Testing
Refer to k230391 for flex studies and additional benchtop studies demonstrating device durability over the shelf life including cap lid closure force, accidental drop seal, reverse centrifuge seal, transit vibration seal, cap / container pull-off, de-capping, tube to collector pull-off force, latch press force, tube to collector axial removal force, pivot attachment force, collector to finger cuff snap de-latch, friction retention, and packaging ship testing.
6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
## B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Method Comparison studies were performed to evaluate equivalence between the BD MiniDraw™ and BD Microtainer (k991702) and Greiner Bio-One Vacuette® Blood Collection Tubes with Clot Activator and Gel Separator (K081929) for AST, Glu and K. Capillary blood was collected into the BD® MiniDraw™ SST™ Tube and BD Microtainer® SST™ by trained operators (e.g., healthcare workers) and venous blood was collected into Greiner Vacuette® Serum by phlebotomists. Blood from 129 participants in fasting state were collected for testing glucose levels while AST and K were tested on samples collected from 160 participants representative of different diseases to cover measuring intervals. All samples were tested on two different instrument platforms, only the number of subjects with valid results from both the candidate device and the comparator devices were included for final analysis. Results for samples collected in the candidate device were compared to results for samples collected in the BD Microtainer and to results for samples collected in the Greiner Vacuette. Data was analyzed using Passing Bablok (PaBa) or Weighted Deming (W Dem) regression. Biases at medical decision levels (MDLs) between tube types were estimated with 95% confidence intervals and determined to be acceptable. Regression analyses are provided in the tables below:
K252378 - Page 7 of 9
{7}
Instrument Platform 1
| Analyte | Comparison | N of pairs | Reg Type | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GLU (mg/dL) | vs BD Microtainer | 110 | W Dem | 1 (0.99, 1.0) | 0.01 (-0.81, 0.83) | 1 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 106 | W Dem | 1.01 (1.0, 1.02) | 0.39 (-0.65, 1.43) | 1 |
| AST (U/L) | vs BD Microtainer | 105 | PaBa | 1 (1.0, 1.01) | -1.0 (-2.04, -1.0) | 1.0 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 130 | PaBa | 1.0 (0.99, 1) | 1.0 (0, 1.05) | 1.0 |
| K (mmol/L) | vs BD Microtainer | 106 | PaBa | 0.96 (0.88, 1.01) | 0.06 (-0.17, 0.4) | 0.922 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 131 | PaBa | 0.98 (0.88, 1.06) | 0.17 (-0.18, 0.57) | 0.896 |
Instrument Platform 2
| Analyte | Comparison | N of pairs | Reg Type | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GLU (mg/dL) | vs BD Microtainer | 106 | W Dem | 1 (0.99, 1.01) | -0.22 (-1.03, 0.59) | 1 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 104 | W Dem | 1.01 (1.0, 1.02) | 0.18 (-0.93, 1.28) | 1 |
| AST (U/L) | vs BD Microtainer | 103 | W Dem | 0.99 (0.95, 1.02) | -0.75 (-1.62, 0.12) | 0.999 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 130 | PaBa | 1.0 (1, 1) | 1.0 (0, 1.0) | 1.0 |
| K (mmol/L) | vs BD Microtainer | 105 | PaBa | 0.95 (0.86, 1.02) | 0.08 (-0.21, 0.51) | 0.915 |
| | vs Greiner Vacuette | 130 | PaBa | 0.99 (0.89, 1.07) | 0.1 (-0.25, 0.5) | 0.9 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
K252378 - Page 8 of 9
{8}
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable.
D. Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E. Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not applicable.
VIII. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K252378 - Page 9 of 9
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.