K252128 · Uvx, Inc. · FRA · Sep 15, 2025 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K252128
Device Name
Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1)
Applicant
Uvx, Inc.
Product Code
FRA · General Hospital
Decision Date
Sep 15, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.6500
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, 3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1) is an ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended for the reduction of bacteria in air in medical facilities. Zener has demonstrated the ability to reduce Klebsiella aerogenes in air by 4.73 net log-reduction at 50% ± 10% relative humidity and 23°C ± 3°C (73°F ± 5°F). Zener is non sterile.
Device Story
Zener is a ceiling-mounted, mains-powered UV air purifier for medical facilities. It operates autonomously by exposing room air to UV-C light to kill microorganisms. The device features a quartz UV-C optic (four tubes, 11W total) and is managed via mobile/web applications. It is installed at a minimum height of 2.25m. The device provides continuous air purification; healthcare providers use the app to monitor status and control power. By reducing airborne bacterial load, the device aims to support infection control in clinical environments.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Efficacy demonstrated via performance testing per ASHRAE 241 (modified) and AHAM AC-5, achieving 4.73 net log-reduction of Klebsiella aerogenes in a 1,060 ft³ volume over 150 minutes.
Indicated for the reduction of bacteria in air in medical facilities. No specific patient population or contraindications described.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical ultraviolet air purifier is a device intended for medical purposes that is used to destroy bacteria in the air by exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
September 15, 2025
UVX Inc.
% Dave Yungvirt
CEO
Third Party Review Group, LLC
7 Giralda Farms, Suite 120A
Madison, NJ 07940
Re: K252128
Trade/Device Name: Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6500
Regulation Name: Medical ultraviolet air purifier
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FRA
Dated: July 7, 2025
Received: July 7, 2025
Dear Dave Yungvirt:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252128 - Dave Yungvirt
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K252128 - Dave Yungvirt
Page 3
Sincerely,
KATHARINE SEGARS -S
Katharine Segars, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4C: Division of Infection Control Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252128 | |
| Device Name Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1) | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1) is an ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended for the reduction of bacteria in air in medical facilities. Zener has demonstrated the ability to reduce Klebsiella aerogenes in air by 4.73 net log-reduction at 50% ± 10% relative humidity and 23°C ± 3°C (73°F ± 5°F). Zener is non sterile. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
UVX
# 510(k) Summary
# ZENER® model ZEN-001-B1
# K252128
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92, the following summary of information is provided:
## 1. Submission Sponsor
Company Name: UVX Inc.
Address: 049 - 2366 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada
Website: uvxinc.com
Email: wecare@uvxinc.com
Phone: +1 877 969 2345
Contact and Title: Kunal Sethi, CEO
Date Prepared: 12 September 2025
## 2. Device Identification
Trade/Proprietary Name: Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1)
Common/Usual Name: Medical ultraviolet air purifier
Classification Name: Purifier, Air, Ultraviolet, Medical
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6500
Product Code: FRA
Device Class: Class II
Classification Panel: General Hospital
## 3. Predicate Device(s)
### Predicate Device
510(k) Number: K133800
Device Name: Odorox® MDU/Rx™
Manufacturer: HGI Industries, Boyton Beach, FL, USA
### Reference Device
510(k) Number: K211194
Device Name: Molekule Air Pro
Manufacturer: Molekule, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
Page 1 of 6
{5}
UVX
## 4. Device Description Summary
Zener is a ceiling-mounted and mains-powered ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended to reduce bacteria in air in medical facilities. The device functions autonomously by exposing air in the room to UV light.
Physically, Zener measures 7" x 7" x 3.2", weighs 2.1 lbs, and mounts to ceilings using its backplate and an included ceiling bracket. The device's exterior surfaces are constructed with quartz glass, metal, and plastic. Device management is supported through a mobile and web application.
## 5. Intended Use / Indication for Use Statement
Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1) is an ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended for the reduction of bacteria in air in medical facilities. Zener has demonstrated the ability to reduce Klebsiella aerogenes in air by 4.73 net log-reduction at 50% ± 10% relative humidity and 23°C ± 3°C (73°F ± 5°F). Zener is non sterile.
## 6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The table below compares technological characteristics of the subject and predicate devices.
The differences identified in the table do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness as demonstrated by risk analysis, software verification and validation, comparison to the reference device, safety testing and certifications, and performance testing.
A reference device (Molekule Air Pro) has been included to demonstrate wireless communication for devices under product code FRA.
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Subject Device Zener (model ZEN-001-B1) K252128 | Predicate Device Odorox MDU/Rx K133800 | Reference Device Molekule Air Pro K211194 | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | Zener® (model ZEN-001-B1) is an ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended for the reduction of bacteria in air in medical facilities. Zener has demonstrated the ability to reduce Klebsiella aerogenes in air by 4.73 net log-reduction at 50% ± 10% relative humidity and 23°C ± 3°C (73°F ± 5°F). Zener is non sterile. | The MDU/Rx™ medical model is an ultraviolet (UV) air purifying device intended for the reduction of bacteria and the MS2 and Phi-X174 virus in air in medical facilities. The MDU/Rx™ medical device is non sterile. | N/A | Similar |
| Mechanism of action | UV light kills microorganisms. | UV light kills microorganisms. | N/A | Same |
Page 2 of 6
{6}
UVX
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Subject Device Zener (model ZEN-001-B1) K252128 | Predicate Device Odorox MDU/Rx K133800 | Reference Device Molekule Air Pro K211194 | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Elements of design | UV light irradiates microorganisms in the air already circulating in the room. | Internal fan circulates air through a shielded chamber where UV light irradiates microorganisms. Construction also includes a particulate filter. | N/A | Different. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through safety certifications and performance testing. |
| Germicidal UV | Yes | Yes | N/A | Same |
| UV optic type | Quartz UV-C | Quartz UV-C | N/A | Same |
| Number of optics, power consumption, and number of tubes | One UV-C optic consuming 11 W power. The optic comprises four cylindrical UV-C tubes. | Two UV-C optics consuming 48 W power each. Each optic comprises one U-shaped UV-C tube. | N/A | Different. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through safety certifications and performance testing. |
| Useful life of UV lamps | 10,000 hours of use. | 8,000 hours of use. | N/A | Different. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through safety certifications and performance testing. |
| UV wavelength | 200-235 nm | ~100-285 nm | N/A | Similar |
| Catalyst coated surfaces | No | No | N/A | Same |
| Electric discharge (i.e. Electrostatic precipitation) | No | No | N/A | Same |
| Chemical additives | No | No | N/A | Same |
| Types and materials of construction | Quartz UV optics, Metal or plastic structural case. | Quartz UV optics, Metal or plastic structural case and fan powered by electric motor. | N/A | Similar |
| Performance | 4.73 net log reduction of bacteria in 1,060 ft³ space within 2 hours. | 4 - 5 net log reduction of bacteria in 563 ft³ space within 1 hour. | N/A | Similar |
Page 3 of 6
{7}
UVX
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Subject Device Zener (model ZEN-001-B1) K252128 | Predicate Device Odorox MDU/Rx K133800 | Reference Device Molekule Air Pro K211194 | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| User controls | Software apps used to turn device on or off and show basic device information. | Knob to turn device on or off. LCD display on device shows basic device information. | LCD display and a capacitive touchscreen user interface with integrated WLAN which provides a secondary means for controlling the device from the Molekule Android or iOS software apps. | Different. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through risk analysis and software verification and validation. |
| Ozone emission | Does not exceed maximum concentration of 0.050 ppm in 21 CFR 801.415. | Does not exceed maximum concentration of 0.050 ppm in 21 CFR 801.415. | N/A | Same |
| Position | Fixed at minimum 2.25 m (7 ft 5 in) ceiling to floor. | Mobile and positioned such that inlet and outlet vents are free of obstruction. | N/A | Different. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through safety certifications and performance testing. |
# 7. Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
To demonstrate substantial equivalence of Zener to the predicate device, UVX Inc. completed the following non-clinical tests. Results confirm that the design inputs and performance specifications for the device are met. Zener model ZEN-001-B1 passed the testing in accordance with internal requirements, national standards, and international standards shown below, demonstrating substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
| Tests performed and test standards | Purpose | Acceptance criteria | Results (Pass/Fail) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Performance testing to:
- ASHRAE 241 (Modified for Klebsiella aerogenes which is a bacterium, instead of MS2 which is a virus)
- AHAM AC-5
- FDA Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) as defined in 21 CFR, Part 58 | Evaluating efficacy at reducing aerosolized bacteria. Specifically, Klebsiella aerogenes was tested. | At least 4-log (99.99%) net reduction of Klebsiella aerogenes in 150 mins in 30 m³ (1,060 ft³) volume of air in 50% ± 10% relative humidity and 23°C ± 3°C (73°F ± 5°F). | Pass |
Page 4 of 6
{8}
UVX
| Tests performed and test standards | Purpose | Acceptance criteria | Results (Pass/Fail) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Electrical safety testing to:
- UL 1598
- CSA C22.2 No. 250.0 | Confirming electrical safety. | Meets acceptance criteria specified in safety standards. | Pass |
| Photobiological safety testing to:
- [12-249] IEC 62471
- ANSI/CAN/UL 8802 | Confirming photobiological safety. | Meets acceptance criteria specified in safety standards. | Pass |
| Ozone safety testing to:
- UL 867, Section 40
- CSA C22.2 No. 187, Section 7 | Confirming ozone safety. | Meets acceptance criteria specified in safety standards and does not exceed maximum concentration of 0.050 ppm in 21 CFR 801.415. | Pass |
| Electromagnetic compatibility and interference to:
- [19-36] IEC 60601-1-2
- CISPR 11
- FCC Subpart C | Demonstrating electromagnetic compatibility of the device. | Meets acceptance criteria specified in standards. | Pass |
| Software verification and validation to:
- [13-79] IEC 62304
- FDA’s Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions | Demonstrating software security and good design. | Adequate software security and design as per standard and FDA guidance. | Pass |
| Cybersecurity verification and validation to:
- FDA’s Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions | Demonstrating cybersecurity and good design. | Adequate cybersecurity and design as per FDA guidance. | Pass |
| Risk management to:
- [5-125] ISO 14971 | Demonstrating risk mitigation. | Adequate risk mitigation as per standard. | Pass |
8. Summary of Clinical Testing
N/A.
Page 5 of 6
{9}
UVX
## 9. Conclusion
Based on the intended use, technological characteristics, and the non-clinical performance tests, the subject device, Zener model ZEN-001-B1, is as safe, as effective, and performs at least as safely and effectively as the predicate device.
Page 6 of 6
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.