K252072 · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · SGA · Sep 30, 2025 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K252072
Device Name
Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay
Applicant
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Product Code
SGA · Immunology
Decision Date
Sep 30, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.4000
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
PCCP
Indications for Use
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of chromosomal DNA sequences from Francisella tularensis. The assay can be used to test whole blood EDTA, pleural fluid, and bacterial culture isolates grown on agar from individuals suspected of having tularemia. Results generated from direct specimen testing are presumptive for the identification of Francisella tularensis. Results generated from culture isolate testing are used as part of the LRN Francisella tularensis Testing Algorithm. The diagnosis of Francisella tularensis infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence, in addition to the identification of Francisella tularensis from culture isolates or from clinical specimens. Negative results do not preclude infection with the biothreat microbial agents targeted by the device and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. Use is limited to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated laboratories.
Device Story
In vitro diagnostic assay for qualitative detection of Francisella tularensis DNA; utilizes real-time PCR technology. Input: extracted DNA from whole blood (EDTA), pleural fluid, or agar-grown bacterial culture isolates. Process: manual DNA extraction followed by real-time PCR amplification using Ft Pan1 and Ft Pan2 primer/probe sets; includes RNase P control for specimen integrity and Human Specimen Control for extraction validation. Output: fluorescent signal indicating presence of target DNA. Used in CDC-designated laboratories by trained personnel. Results are presumptive for direct specimens and part of LRN testing algorithm for culture isolates. Clinical decision-making relies on integration with patient history, symptoms, and other laboratory data. Benefits include rapid identification of biothreat agent to support clinical management and public health response.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluated using 100 contrived clinical specimens (50 whole blood EDTA, 50 pleural fluid) spiked with F. tularensis LVS at 3x and 10x LoD. PPA and NPA were calculated; results met acceptance criteria (PPA/NPA >96% when equivocal results treated as positive). Bench testing included inclusivity (37 strains), exclusivity (21 Francisellaceae, 24 non-Francisella), interference, and stability studies.
Technological Characteristics
Real-time PCR assay using oligonucleotide primers and dual-labeled hydrolysis (Taqman®) probes. Targets: F. tularensis subspecies (tularensis, holarctica, mediasiatica). Instrumentation: Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx or QuantStudio™ Dx Real-Time PCR instruments. Reagents: Quanta PerfeCTa MultiPlex qPCR SuperMix, Low ROX. Includes internal controls (RNase P, Human Specimen Control, plasmid-based positive control with VHSV contamination control).
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Francisella tularensis chromosomal DNA in individuals suspected of having tularemia. Specimens include whole blood (EDTA), pleural fluid, and bacterial culture isolates. Use limited to CDC-designated laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A biothreat microbial agent nucleic acid detection test is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device for the detection and identification of biothreat microbial agent–associated nucleic acids in human clinical specimens.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K252072
B Applicant
Center for Disease Control and Prevention
C Proprietary and Established Names
Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SGA | Class II | 21 CFR 21 CFR 866.4000
- Device To Detect And Identify Biothreat Microbial Agents In Human Clinical Specimens | |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
The purpose of this submission is to 1) obtain a substantial equivalence determination for the Francisella tularensis Real-Time PCR Assay, and 2) establish a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) to validate certain future device modifications for the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay.
B Measurand:
Target chromosomal DNA sequences from Francisella tularensis
C Type of Test:
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of chromosomal DNA sequences from *Francisella tularensis*. The assay can be used to test whole blood EDTA, pleural fluid, and bacterial culture isolates grown on agar from individuals suspected of having tularemia.
Results generated from direct specimen testing are presumptive for the identification of *Francisella tularensis*. Results generated from culture isolate testing are used as part of the LRN *Francisella tularensis* Testing Algorithm. The diagnosis of *Francisella tularensis* infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence, in addition to the identification of *Francisella tularensis* from culture isolates or from clinical specimens.
Negative results do not preclude infection with the biothreat microbial agents targeted by the device and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Use is limited to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated laboratories.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
Real-time PCR instrumentation:
- Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument
- QuantStudio Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The *Francisella tularensis* Real-time PCR Assay is composed of oligonucleotide primers and dual-labeled hydrolysis probes (Taqman) for use in real-time PCR. This assay is intended for the in vitro detection of *Francisella tularensis* chromosomal DNA targets in whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens from suspect infected persons with fever and other symptoms clinically compatible with acute tularemia. Extracted DNA samples are tested using the *Francisella tularensis* Real-time PCR Assay along with an extraction control primer and probe set to demonstrate adequate DNA extraction and isolation, specimen integrity, proper function of
K252072 - Page 2 of 27
{2}
common reagents and equipment, and the absence of inhibitory substances. The assay can also be used to test bacterial culture isolates grown on agar from individuals suspected of having tularemia.
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay includes:
- Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set, consisting of 4 primers and 2 probes (Ft Primer Set 1 and Ft Primer Set 2) which target genetic regions that are unique to strains of *F. tularensis*.
- RNase P Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set, consisting of two primers and one probe. The RNase P Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set detects human RNase P and is used with human clinical specimens to indicate that adequate isolation of nucleic acid resulted from the extraction of the clinical specimen.
- Human Specimen Control (HSC), consisting of noninfectious, cultured human cell material suspended in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). HSC is an extraction control to monitor for cross-contamination during extraction and to demonstrate successful recovery of nucleic acid by the extraction process. Purified nucleic acid from the HSC material should yield a positive result with the RNase P (RP) primer and probe set and a negative result with agent-specific primer and probe sets.
- Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Positive DNA Control (FtPC), consisting of a plasmid containing targets for the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay primer and probe sets that serves as a positive control for the assay.
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay is intended for the *in vitro* qualitative detection of Francisella tularensis DNA extracted from clinical specimens or culture isolates submitted to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated laboratory.
This device includes a PCCP for modifications to the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay. See Section V.C. for the changes included in the PCCP.
## B Principle of Operation:
The assay uses a fluorogenic probe, consisting of an oligonucleotide with a reporter dye attached to the 5′ end and a quencher dye attached at or near the 3′ end. The probe anneals to a specific target sequence located between the forward and reverse primers. During the extension phase of the PCR cycle, the 5′ nuclease activity of the Taq polymerase enzyme degrades the probe, causing the reporter dye to separate from the quencher dye, thereby generating a fluorescent signal. With each cycle, additional reporter dye molecules are cleaved from their respective probes, increasing the fluorescence intensity monitored during the PCR in real-time.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel
K252072 - Page 3 of 27
{3}
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K170883
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252072 | K170883 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Francisella tularensis
Real-time PCR Assay | FilmArray NGDS
Warrior Panel |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of chromosomal DNA sequences from Francisella tularensis. The assay can be used to test whole blood EDTA, pleural fluid, and bacterial culture isolates grown on agar from individuals suspected of having tularemia.
Results generated from direct specimen testing are presumptive for the identification of Francisella tularensis. Results generated from culture isolate testing are used as part of the LRN Francisella tularensis Testing Algorithm. The diagnosis of Francisella tularensis infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence, in addition to the identification of | The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel is a qualitative, multiplexed, nucleic acid-based in vitro diagnostic test intended for use with the FilmArray 2.0 system. The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel detects and identifies Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, Ebola virus, and Marburg virus nucleic acids directly from human whole blood (EDTA). The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel is also intended to be used to test for Bacillus anthracis or Yersinia pestis nucleic acids in blood cultures that are determined to be positive either by an automated system, by turbidity, or by daily Gram stain even without turbidity, and is indicated to be performed with concomitant Gram stain performed on positive blood culture specimens as per normal |
K252072 - Page 4 of 27
{4}
K252072 - Page 5 of 27
| | **Francisella tularensis** from cultures isolates or from clinical specimens.
Negative results do not preclude infection with the biothreat microbial agents targeted by the device and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Use is limited to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated laboratories. | laboratory procedure.
In addition, the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel may also be used to detect and identify *Yersinia pestis* and *Francisella tularensis* nucleic acids directly from sputum specimens.
The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel is intended to test individuals with signs and symptoms of infection from biothreat agents and/or individuals who are at risk for exposure or may have been exposed to these agents.
The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel is indicated as an aid in the diagnosis of anthrax, plague, tularemia, Q fever, and the hemorrhagic fevers caused by Ebola and Marburg viruses, in response to a suspected or confirmed bioterrorism event or outbreaks. It is for diagnostic use in conjunction with other clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory data, in accordance with the guidelines provided by the appropriate Department of Defense and public health authorities. |
| --- | --- | --- |
{5}
K252072 - Page 6 of 27
| | | Results are for the presumptive identification of Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, Ebola virus, and Marburg virus. The definitive identification of Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, Ebola virus, and Marburg virus requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with the appropriate Department of Defense and public health authorities for whom reports may be necessary. Negative results do not preclude infection with these biothreat agents and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel is solely for use by United States Department of Defense laboratories, and laboratories designated by the Department of Defense. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Analytes Detected | Nucleic acids from Francisella tularensis subspecies:
• F.t. tularensis,
• F.t. holarctica, | Nucleic acids from:
• Bacillus anthracis (virulence plasmids pXO1 & pXO2)
• Yersinia pestis
• Francisella |
{6}
| | F.t. mediasiatica | tularensis
• Coxiella burnetii
• Ebola Virus
• Marburg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Principle of Operation | Nucleic acid amplification and fluorescent probe detection | Nested multiplex RT-PCR followed by melting analysis to confirm identity of amplified product |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrumentation | • Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument
• QuantStudio Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument | FilmArray 2.0 system |
| Sample Types | Whole blood (EDTA), pleural fluid, culture isolates | Whole blood (EDTA), positive blood culture, sputum |
| Sample Preparation | Offboard manual or automated DNA extraction | Automated in the FilmArray NDGS Warrior pouch |
| Test Interpretation | A sample is considered:
• positive for F. tularensis DNA if both agent-specific primer sets are reactive,
• equivocal for F. tularensis DNA if only one agent-specific primer set is reactive,
• negative for F. tularensis DNA if both agent-specific primer sets are nonreactive. | Automated test interpretation and report generation. User cannot access raw data. |
In addition to the similarities and differences between the candidate and predicate devices listed in the table above, the candidate device has an authorized PCCP for modifications to the CDC
K252072 - Page 7 of 27
{7}
Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay. The PCCP specifies the validation protocols and acceptance criteria for evaluating the following modifications:
1. Addition of a real-time PCR instrument that is *in vitro* diagnostic (IVD)-labeled and used in accordance with its instructions for use.
2. Addition of PCR master mix that is IVD-labeled and used in accordance with its instructions for use or assessed and determined to be acceptable by the CDC Ancillary Reagent Qualification Program.
3. Addition of:
a) A manual extraction method that is IVD-labeled and used in accordance with its instructions for use or assessed and determined to be acceptable by the CDC Ancillary Reagent Qualification Program.
b) Nucleic acid extraction reagents that are IVD-labeled and used in accordance with their instructions for use or assessed and determined to be acceptable by the CDC Ancillary Reagent Qualification Program as part of a cleared manual extraction procedure.
c) An automated extraction instrument that is IVD-labeled and used in accordance with its instructions for use.
4. Addition of oligonucleotide chemistries that are manufactured under good manufacturing practices (GMP).
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
None referenced.
VII Validation Studies and Acceptance Criteria to Support PCCP Modifications:
Specific test methods for clinical and analytical validation are specified in the PCCP for modifications to the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay. The following validation studies will be performed in accordance with the PCCP depending on the device modification:
1. Clinical evaluation designed using established and FDA-accepted approaches, with pre-defined acceptance criteria cleared by FDA during this review, to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device. Clinical performance studies will be conducted to evaluate the following changes according to the established PCCP: addition of a real-time PCR instrument, addition of an automated extraction instrument, addition of nucleic acid extraction reagents or manual extraction method, addition of PCR master mix, or modification of the quencher on the oligonucleotide probes.
2. Limit of Detection (LoD) determination with representative, well-characterized strains of *F. tularensis* according to established and FDA-accepted approaches. Pre-defined acceptance criteria were found to be appropriate by FDA during this review to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device. An LoD study will be conducted, according to the established PCCP, to evaluate the addition of a real-time PCR instrument, addition of an automated extraction instrument, addition of nucleic acid extraction reagents or manual extraction method, addition of PCR master mix, or modification of oligonucleotide chemistries.
K252072 - Page 8 of 27
{8}
3. Reproducibility study that is designed according to established and FDA-accepted approaches. Pre-defined acceptance criteria were found to be appropriate by FDA during this review to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device. A reproducibility study will be conducted, according to the established PCCP, to evaluate addition of a real-time PCR instrument or addition of an automated extraction instrument.
4. Carry-over contamination study demonstrating agreement with expected results compared to the predicate device. A carry-over study will be conducted, according to the established PCCP, to evaluate addition of a real-time PCR instrument or addition of an automated extraction instrument.
This PCCP will enable CDC to address evolving public health needs more quickly by making device changes without premarket review. This will help prevent an interruption in testing capability when there is a discontinuation or supply issue for certain instruments and reagents.
# VIII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# A Analytical Performance:
# 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The reproducibility of the Francisella tularensis Real-Time PCR Assay was evaluated using the data from a multicenter study performed at seven different laboratory sites. Three laboratories performed testing using the Applied Biosystems (AB) 7500 Fast Dx instrument and four laboratories performed testing using the QuantStudio (QSDx) Real-time PCR instrument. Samples used in the study were contrived clinical whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens tested collectively as a panel. The panel was composed of twelve contrived clinical specimens spiked with $F$ . tularensis subspecies holarctica live vaccine strain (LVS) at concentrations near and above the limit of detection, and negative specimens (Table 1). The panel was tested using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay. Two operators at each study site evaluated one test panel per day for five non-consecutive days resulting in each study site testing a total of ten panels. Acceptance criteria required the reproducibility of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay to have less than $10\%$ coefficient of variation in test results across sites, operators, and days of testing. Results are shown in below in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 1. Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay Reproducibility Specimen Panel
| Sample | Matrix | F. tularensis LVS Concentration | Volume |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Whole blood EDTA | High positive (10x LoD) | 250 μL |
| 2 | Whole blood EDTA | Negative | 250 μL |
| 3 | Whole blood EDTA | Low positive (3x LoD) | 250 μL |
| 4 | Whole blood EDTA | Low positive (3x LoD) | 250 μL |
| 5 | Whole blood EDTA | High positive (10x LoD) | 250 μL |
| 6 | Whole blood EDTA | Negative | 250 μL |
| 7 | Pleural fluid | Negative | 250 μL |
| 8 | Pleural fluid | Low positive (3x LoD) | 250 μL |
K252072 - Page 9 of 27
{9}
Table 2. Summary of Reproducibility Testing of the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay using the QuantStudioDx
| Panel Sample | Target | Avg. Ct | Std. Dev. | %CV | Overall Agreement | 95% (CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Whole blood High Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 28.06 | 0.53 | 1.89 | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 28.40 | 0.95 | 3.33 | | |
| | Control | 23.45 | 0.69 | 2.93 | | |
| Whole blood Low Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 34.75 | 0.79 | 2.27 | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 35.11 | 1.01 | 2.86 | | |
| | Control | 23.73 | 0.72 | 3.03 | | |
| Whole blood Negative | Ft primer set 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | |
| | Control | 23.65 | 0.71 | 3.01 | | |
| Pleural Fluid High Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 26.24 | 0.62 | 2.35 | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 26.58 | 0.97 | 3.66 | | |
| | Control | 27.85 | 0.71 | 2.55 | | |
| Pleural Fluid Low Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 33.14 | 0.93 | 2.81 | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 33.5 | 1.08 | 3.22 | | |
| | Control | 27.77 | 0.74 | 2.68 | | |
| Pleural Fluid Negative | Ft primer set 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 80/80 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | |
| | Control | 28.14 | 0.75 | 2.68 | | |
All panel samples tested at each of the 4 sites using the QuantStudio Dx instrument produced the expected results with each target assay in the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay and with a $100\%$ overall agreement (80 out of 80). Coefficients of variation observed across operators, sites, and days of testing were less than $5\%$ .
Table 3. Summary of Reproducibility Testing of the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay using the AB 7500 Fast Dx
| Panel Sample | Target | Avg. Ct | Std. Dev. | %CV | Overall Agreement | 95% CI |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Whole blood High Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 27.59 | 0.61 | 2.21 | 60/60 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 27.86 | 0.68 | 2.45 | | |
| | Control | 23.19 | 0.74 | 3.17 | | |
| Whole blood Low Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 34.20 | 0.79 | 2.32 | 60/60 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 34.30 | 1.05 | 3.05 | | |
| | Control | 23.46 | 0.74 | 3.17 | | |
| Whole blood Negative | Ft primer set 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 59/60 | 98.33% (91.15-99.71) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | |
| | Control | 23.44 | 0.78 | 3.31 | | |
| | Ft primer set 1 | 25.95 | 0.75 | 2.89 | 60/60 | 100% |
K252072 - Page 10 of 27
{10}
| Pleural Fluid High Positive | Ft primer set 2 | 26.13 | 0.83 | 3.16 | | (95.42-100.0) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Control | 27.62 | 0.68 | 2.46 | | |
| Pleural Fluid Low Positive | Ft primer set 1 | 32.49 | 0.71 | 2.18 | 60/60 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | 32.76 | 0.90 | 2.74 | | |
| | Control | 27.54 | 0.68 | 2.45 | | |
| Pleural Fluid Negative | Ft primer set 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 60/60 | 100% (95.42-100.0) |
| | Ft primer set 2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | |
| | Control | 27.91 | 0.67 | 2.40 | | |
All panel samples tested at two of the three sites using an AB 7500 Fast Dx instrument produced the expected results with each target assay in the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay. One site produced a single inconclusive result on one of the days of testing with a negative whole blood sample. The inconclusive result was limited to one operator and was produced due to one of the two target assays showing an unexpected positive result. Therefore, the overall agreement for this sample across all three sites was 59 out of 60 (98.33%). Testing with all other samples in the panel showed 100% overall agreement (60 out 60). Coefficients of variation observed across operators, sites, and days of testing were less than 5%. The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay met the acceptance criteria and the data are acceptable.
## PCCP:
A reproducibility study will be conducted to evaluate addition of a real-time PCR instrument and addition of an automated nucleic extraction instrument, according to the established PCCP. Data which satisfies pre-specified acceptance criteria detailed in the PCCP will be considered acceptable to support these modifications to the device.
## 2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
### Inclusivity
### In silico Analyses
In silico analyses performed using the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Biotechnology Information's Nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool and the nonredundant nucleotide (nr/nt) and whole genome shotgun contigs (wgs) databases, indicate the amplicons from the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay primer sets share 100% sequence identity to amplicon sequences from 946 entries representing F. tularensis subsp. tularensis and F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, the two subspecies known to cause human tularemia. Six unique sequences for F. tularensis mediasiatica are predicted to share 99.2 and 100% sequence identity, respectively with amplicons from the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay primer sets.
Testing of F. tularensis strains
K252072 - Page 11 of 27
{11}
Inclusivity testing for the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay was performed using genomic DNA isolated from 37 F. tularensis strains and analyzed using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay on the AB 7500 Fast Dx instrument. Extracted DNA from the 37 F. tularensis strains was evaluated in PBS buffer (Table 4) and DNA from 10 of the 37 strains was evaluated in clinical matrix (Table 5).
Table 4. Inclusivity testing of F. tularensis subspecies in PBS buffer using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay on the AB 7500 Fast Dx
| | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | |
| Species | Strain | # Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. Dev | # Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. Dev |
| F. tularensis subsp. tularensis | ND00-0952 | 3/3 | 28.77 | 0.67 | 3/3 | 28.88 | 0.14 |
| | KS00-0948 | 3/3 | 28.19 | 0.21 | 3/3 | 28.44 | 0.28 |
| | UT98-3134 | 3/3 | 30.44 | 0.17 | 3/3 | 30.26 | 0.07 |
| | MO01-2148 | 3/3 | 26.74 | 0.07 | 3/3 | 26.68 | 0.10 |
| | AR99-3448 | 3/3 | 26.99 | 0.34 | 3/3 | 27.48 | 0.08 |
| | OK00-2731 | 3/3 | 29.05 | 0.26 | 3/3 | 29.10 | 0.21 |
| | MA00-2987 | 3/3 | 28.46 | 0.17 | 3/3 | 28.12 | 0.07 |
| | AR01-1117 | 3/3 | 26.80 | 0.08 | 3/3 | 27.13 | 0.04 |
| | NC97-3057 | 3/3 | 28.23 | 0.10 | 3/3 | 28.55 | 0.36 |
| | GA02-5426 | 3/3 | 27.77 | 0.29 | 3/3 | 28.45 | 0.19 |
| | NC99-3990 | 3/3 | 27.02 | 0.15 | 3/3 | 27.44 | 0.07 |
| | CO01-3713 | 3/3 | 27.55 | 0.04 | 3/3 | 28.17 | 0.05 |
| | WY96-3418 | 3/3 | 26.70 | 0.07 | 3/3 | 27.14 | 0.02 |
| | NM99-0295 | 3/3 | 27.05 | 0.13 | 3/3 | 27.28 | 0.04 |
| | UT02-1927 | 3/3 | 27.60 | 0.53 | 3/3 | 27.14 | 0.01 |
| | NM99-1823 | 3/3 | 27.60 | 0.50 | 3/3 | 27.46 | 0.10 |
| | ATCC 6223 | 3/3 | 27.41 | 0.12 | 3/3 | 27.52 | 0.18 |
| | TX00-1591 | 3/3 | 29.01 | 0.26 | 3/3 | 28.71 | 0.10 |
| F. tularensis subsp. holarctica | LVS | 3/3 | 27.18 | 0.10 | 3/3 | 27.58 | 0.16 |
| | RC 503 | 3/3 | 27.62 | 0.20 | 3/3 | 27.87 | 0.29 |
| | KY99-3387 | 3/3 | 27.27 | 0.42 | 3/3 | 27.83 | 0.07 |
| | OR96-0246 | 3/3 | 27.16 | 0.60 | 3/3 | 27.65 | 0.05 |
| | OR96-0463 | 3/3 | 28.34 | 0.11 | 3/3 | 28.68 | 0.11 |
| | CA97-0656 | 3/3 | 26.88 | 0.29 | 3/3 | 27.02 | 0.20 |
| | MO01-1673 | 3/3 | 27.71 | 0.24 | 3/3 | 27.25 | 0.03 |
| | GA02-5387 | 3/3 | 27.73 | 0.27 | 3/3 | 27.71 | 0.13 |
| | CA97-0657 | 3/3 | 27.47 | 0.39 | 3/3 | 27.43 | 0.33 |
| | AZ00-1324 | 3/3 | 27.47 | 0.18 | 3/3 | 27.79 | 0.24 |
| | SP98-2108 | 3/3 | 27.40 | 0.39 | 3/3 | 27.10 | 0.17 |
| | SP03-1781 | 3/3 | 27.21 | 0.05 | 3/3 | 27.11 | 0.45 |
| | KO97-1026 | 3/3 | 26.34 | 0.23 | 3/3 | 26.31 | 0.03 |
| | CN98-5979 | 3/3 | 27.65 | 0.05 | 3/3 | 27.77 | 0.07 |
| | JAP53 | 3/3 | 27.69 | 0.14 | 3/3 | 27.29 | 0.05 |
| F. tularensis subsp. | FSC147 | 3/3 | 28.72 | 0.45 | 3/3 | 28.19 | 0.08 |
K252072 - Page 12 of 27
{12}
The data in Table 4 indicate all 37 F. tularensis strains tested were detected by the Francisella tularensis Real-Time PCR Assay.
Ten of the strains evaluated in PBS buffer were also tested in clinical matrix. The ten F. tularensis strains evaluated were representative of all three subspecies. Whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens were spiked in triplicate with each F. tularensis strain at 3x limit of detection (LoD) and nucleic acid was extracted from each replicate. All strains were detected as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Inclusivity testing of F. tularensis subspecies in Clinical Matrix using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay on the AB 7500 Fast Dx
| Subspecies | Isolate | Clinical Matrix | Avg Ct Ft Primer Set 1 | Avg Ct Ft Primer Set 2 | Concentration (CFU/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| tularensis | CO01-3713 | Whole blood EDTA | 33.91 | 32.91 | 2.58E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 33.88 | 33.78 | 8.30E+02 |
| | NC97-3057 | Whole blood EDTA | 34.83 | 35.22 | 2.19E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 33.57 | 33.42 | 7.07E+02 |
| | ND00-0952 | Whole blood EDTA | 34.77 | 34.69 | 2.10E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 35.04 | 34.81 | 6.41E+02 |
| | MA00-2987 | Whole blood EDTA | 34.75 | 34.90 | 2.16E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 34.90 | 33.37 | 6.56E+02 |
| holarctica | KY99-3387 | Whole blood EDTA | 35.22 | 33.08 | 2.26E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 34.28 | 33.33 | 7.67E+02 |
| | CA97-0656 | Whole blood EDTA | 35.96 | 34.19 | 2.11E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 35.33 | 33.97 | 6.63E+02 |
| | SP03-1781 | Whole blood EDTA | 35.05 | 33.84 | 2.18E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 35.01 | 33.61 | 6.96E+02 |
| | JAP53 | Whole blood EDTA | 35.59 | 35.02 | 2.00E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 33.71 | 32.60 | 8.19E+02 |
| mediasiatica | FSC147 | Whole blood EDTA | 34.26 | 33.97 | 2.27E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 35.50 | 35.05 | 6.15E+02 |
| | FSC148 | Whole blood EDTA | 34.50 | 34.69 | 2.18E+03 |
| | | Pleural fluid | 35.65 | 35.81 | 6.04E+02 |
These results demonstrate acceptable inclusivity of the Francisella tularensis Real-Time PCR Assay.
## Exclusivity
Analytical exclusivity was evaluated by testing organisms that could potentially display cross reactivity with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay. A panel containing high concentrations of DNA from off-panel Francisella species and other potential organisms causing similar symptoms, and/or flora commonly observed in blood and pleural fluid were tested using the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QSDx real-time PCR instruments. Twenty-one strains,
K252072 - Page 13 of 27
{13}
representing nine Francisellaceae members, were tested using $1.84\mathrm{E} + 06\mathrm{GE / mL}$ with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay (Table 6). Nucleic acid from twenty-four non-Francisella species organisms was also tested (Table 7). The acceptance criteria required $100\%$ concordance with the expected negative result with off-panel Francisella and near-neighbor species and other common organisms associated with clinical specimens in the selected organism panel.
Table 6. Exclusivity Testing of $F$ . tularensis subspecies using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay
| | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | QSDx* | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Number of Positive Results / Total | | | |
| Species | Strain | Ft Primer Set 1 | Ft Primer Set 2 | Ft Primer Set 1 | Ft Primer Set 2 |
| F. novicida | GA99-3548 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | GA99-3549 | 0/7 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | GA99-3550 | 0/7 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | TX07-6608 | 0/7 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| F. novicida-like | Fx1 (TX05-2430) | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| F. philomiragia | GA01-2794 | 0/7 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | GA01-2801 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | ATCC-25015 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | ATCC-25016 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | ATCC-25017 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | ATCC-25018 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| F. salina | TX07-7308 | 0/7 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| F. uliginis | TX07-7310 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis | FSC770 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | FSC771 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | FSC769 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| | LMG 24256 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis | NO12-2005 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| F. hispanensis | FSC454 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Allofrancisella guangzhouensis | FSC996 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
| F. opportunistica | PA05-1188 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NT | NT |
NT- Not tested
*Due to limited availability, testing was performed on the AB 7500 Fast Dx only for some strains.
None of the off-panel Francisella strains tested with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay yielded a positive result, supporting that this assay does not cross react with off-panel species of Francisella.
K252072 - Page 14 of 27
{14}
Table 7. Exclusivity Testing of Non-Francisella organisms using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay.
| Organism | Strain | Genome GE/mL | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Ft Primer Set 1 | Ft Primer Set 2 | |
| | | | # Pos/Total | # Pos/Total | |
| Gram Negative Bacteria | Acinetobacter baumannii | ATCC 19606 | 8.16E+08 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Enterobacter cloacae | ATCC 13047 | 9.96E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Escherichia coli | ATCC 11775 | 9.32E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Haemophilus influenzae | b M05216 | 1.48E+08 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Klebsiella pneumoniae | ATCC 13883 | 7.20E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Proteus mirabilis | ATCC 29906 | 5.24E+08 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ATCC 10145 | 3.85E+08 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Gram Positive Bacteria | Actinomyces israelii | ATCC 12102 | 1.15E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Corynebacterium diphtheriae | ATCC 11913 | 1.50E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 19433 | 3.17E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Enterococcus faecium VRE | ATCC 700221 | 3.65E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC 12344 | 1.12E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 13813 | 1.44E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-1683 | 7.08E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Micrococcus luteus | ATCC 4698 | 7.60E+05 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Nocardia asteroides | ATCC 19247 | 5.72E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Propionibacterium acnes | ATCC 33179 | 1.17E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Staphylococcus aureus | F689 | 8.36E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Staphylococcus epidermidis | M22325 | 4.36E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Staphylococcus haemolyticus | ATCC 700564 | 5.08E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Streptococcus pneumoniae | 19A M17850 | 5.24E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| | Streptococcus mutans | ATCC 25175 | 8.20E+06 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Virus | Hepatitis C | ATCC VR-3233SD | 7.80E+07 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Yeast | Candida albicans | ATCC 18804 | 2.25E+05 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay did not react with any of the 24 non-
K252072 - Page 15 of 27
{15}
Francisella species organisms tested. Results from the exclusivity testing of the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay demonstrated 100% concordance with the expected results, met the acceptance criteria, and are acceptable.
## Interference
Potentially interfering substances encountered in blood specimens were evaluated for any impact on performance of the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay. Controls and contrived clinical samples were prepared in whole blood EDTA. Pleural fluid was not evaluated as 1) whole blood EDTA represents the more challenging matrix and 2) possesses higher concentrations of known potential interferents when compared to exudative pleural effusions. Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica (LVS) was used to contrive whole blood EDTA at a concentration of 3x the LoD to create positive samples. Potentially interfering endogenous and exogenous substances and corresponding diluent material are listed in Table 8 and were tested at concentrations recommended by CLSI in document EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
Table 8. Substances evaluated for potential interference with the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay
| Substance | | Test Concentration | Diluent |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Endogenous | Hemoglobin | 10 mg/mL | H₂O |
| | Bilirubin, conjugated | 0.4 mg/mL | H₂O |
| | Bilirubin, unconjugated | 0.4 mg/mL | NaOH |
| | Human serum albumin | 120 mg/mL | H₂O |
| | Human genomic DNA | 4 μg/mL | 1x Tris EDTA |
| | Triglycerides | 30 mg/mL | Sucrose |
| | Triglycerides | 3 mg/mL | Sucrose |
| | Triglycerides | 0.3 mg/mL | Sucrose |
| | Cholesterol | 5 mg/mL | H₂O |
| | Hemolyzed blood | N/A | N/A |
| Exogenous | Acetylsalicylic acid | 3620 μmol/L | EtOH |
| | Salicylic acid | 4340 μmol/L | H₂O |
| | Ibuprofen | 2425 μmol/L | EtOH |
| | Acetaminophen | 1323 μmol/L | H₂O |
| | Gentamicin | 62.8 μmol/L | H₂O |
| | Doxycycline | 67.5 μmol/L | EtOH |
| | Ciprofloxacin | 36.2 μmol/L | H₂O |
Four samples were prepared to test each potential interferent:
1. negative control consisting of whole blood EDTA with diluent
2. negative control consisting of whole blood EDTA and potentially interfering substance in diluent
3. Positive sample consisting of F. tularensis LVS spiked in whole blood EDTA with diluent
K252072 - Page 16 of 27
{16}
4. Positive sample consisting of $F$ tularensis LVS spiked in whole blood EDTA with potentially interfering substance in diluent.
Nucleic acid from three aliquots of each sample was extracted and tested on the AB 7500 Fast Dx instrument using the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay. Interference was assessed by agreement with the expected result and evaluating threshold cycle (Ct) values for statistically significant differences between samples with and without the potentially interfering substance. Acceptance criteria for interference testing required $100\%$ agreement with the expected qualitative result from the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay with samples containing potentially interfering substances.
All controls consisting of the clinical background matrix and either diluent alone or diluent with the potentially interfering substance were negative with the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay. Samples containing thirteen potentially interfering substances yielded positive results with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay and were without statistically significant differences when compared to their corresponding sample without the substance present. One out of three sample replicates containing cholesterol (5 mg/mL) produced a negative PCR result with the Ft Primer Set 2 assay and samples containing acetylsalicylic acid (3620 μmol/L) produced Ct results statistically significantly different (p value =0.0063) with the Ft Primer Set 2 assay than the corresponding sample without the substance present. Dilutions of cholesterol and acetylsalicylic acid were tested (in addition to the corresponding sample control) to determine the degree of interference as a function of the substance concentration. Neither substance was confirmed as interfering in the additional testing at the original level or with diluted levels of each substance (Table 9).
Table 9. Confirmatory testing and degree of interference of suspect interfering substances with CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay
| Substance | Test Concentration | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Pos/tested | Avg. Ct | St Dev | p-value | Pos/tested | Avg. Ct | St Dev | p-value |
| Cholesterol | 5 mg/mL | 3/3 | 34.76 | 0.09 | 0.6765 | 3/3 | 34.91 | 0.39 | 0.7357 |
| | 0.5 mg/mL | 3/3 | 34.93 | 0.37 | 0.5508 | 3/3 | 34.68 | 0.44 | 0.8767 |
| | 0.05 mg/mL | 3/3 | 35.17 | 0.14 | 0.3673 | 3/3 | 34.58 | 0.37 | 0.9329 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 3620 μmol/L | 3/3 | 34.83 | 1.84 | 0.3925 | 3/3 | 34.75 | 1.66 | 0.2563 |
| | 362 μmol/L | 3/3 | 34.26 | 0.17 | 0.8590 | 3/3 | 34.18 | 0.33 | 0.3138 |
| | 36.2 μmol/L | 3/3 | 34.23 | 0.71 | 0.7253 | 3/3 | 34.03 | 0.13 | 0.5369 |
Acetylsalicylic acid (3620 μmol/L) and cholesterol (5mg/mL) initially demonstrated possible interference with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay; however, neither substance demonstrated interference upon further testing. Samples containing the other thirteen substances tested showed no interference. No false-positive results were observed with any of the exogenous or endogenous substances tested alone in the background clinical matrix. Final results demonstrated 100% agreement with the expected positive qualitative results with samples containing potentially interfering substances and the data are acceptable.
# 4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable. This is a qualitative test.
K252072 - Page 17 of 27
{17}
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Assay Quality Controls
The quality controls are used to monitor reagent and assay performance as follows:
- Human Specimen Control (HSC), consisting of noninfectious, cultured human cell material suspended in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). HSC is an extraction control to monitor for cross-contamination during extraction and to demonstrate successful recovery of nucleic acid by the extraction process. Purified nucleic acid from the HSC material should yield a positive result with the RNase P (RP) primer and probe set and a negative result with agent-specific primer and probe sets.
- RNase P (RP) Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set, consisting of two primers and one probe. The RNase P Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set detects human RNase P and is used with human clinical specimens to indicate that adequate isolation of nucleic acid resulted from the extraction of the clinical specimen.
- Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Positive DNA Control (FtPC), consisting of a plasmid containing targets for the Ft Primer Set 1 and Ft Primer Set 2 primers and probes that serves as a positive control for the assay.
- PCR-grade, nuclease-free water is used as a negative, no template control (NTC) for the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay to show that the PCR reagents are working properly and have not been contaminated with target DNA.
Specimen Stability - Room temperature (15-30°C), Refrigerated (2-8°C), and Frozen (≤-20°C)
Contrived clinical specimens were prepared in whole blood EDTA or pleural fluid using Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica (LVS) at concentrations of 3.59E+03 CFU/mL (2.5E+02 Genome Equivalents (GE)/mL) and 1.20E+03 CFU/mL (8.33E+02 GE/mL) respectively to create positive samples at concentrations near the LoD. Five aliquots or each clinical matrix were evaluated at each predetermined timepoint for each storage temperature. The results of stability evaluations for each clinical specimen type under each storage condition and duration are summarized in Tables 10 and 11. Acceptance criteria for all stability evaluations required stored positive samples to show an average increase of no more than 3.0 Ct when compared to the original sample (Day 0) and agreement with the expected qualitative result with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay.
Table 10. Specimen Stability for Whole Blood EDTA
| Storage Temp | Assay Target | Day 0 | | Day 14 | | Day 30 | | Day 33 | | Delta Ct | Day 60 | | Day 66 | | Delta Ct |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | |
| -20°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 34.51 | 5/5 | 34.41 | 5/5 | 34.26 | | | | 5/5 | 34.33 | 5/5 | 33.85 | -0.65 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 34.20 | 5/5 | 34.65 | 5/5 | 34.19 | | | | 5/5 | 34.77 | 5/5 | 33.74 | -0.46 |
| | RP | 5/5 | 22.80 | 5/5 | 22.47 | 5/5 | 22.90 | | | | 5/5 | 23.15 | 5/5 | 22.80 | 0 |
| 4°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 34.51 | 5/5 | 34.71 | 5/5 | 34.74 | 5/5 | 35.14 | 0.63 | | | | | |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 34.20 | 5/5 | 34.52 | 5/5 | 34.45 | 5/5 | 35.18 | 0.97 | | | | | |
K252072 - Page 18 of 27
{18}
Ft P1 – Ft Primer Set 1
Ft P2 – Ft Primer Set 2
RP – RNase P Control
Table 11. Specimen Stability for Pleural Fluid
| Storage Temp | Assay Target | Day 0 | | Day 14 | | Day 30 | | Day 33 | | Delta Ct | Day 60 | | Day 66 | | Delta Ct |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | |
| -20°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 35.70 | 5/5 | 37.11 | 5/5 | 36.05 | | | | 5/5 | 35.88 | 5/5 | 36.68 | 0.97 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 35.56 | 5/5 | 36.30 | 5/5 | 36.09 | | | | 5/5 | 35.87 | 5/5 | 36.32 | 0.75 |
| | RP | 5/5 | 28.94 | 5/5 | 29.09 | 5/5 | 28.67 | | | | 5/5 | 29.18 | 5/5 | 28.84 | 0.10 |
| 4°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 35.70 | 5/5 | 35.72 | 5/5 | 35.90 | 5/5 | 35.64 | -0.06 | | | | | |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 35.56 | 5/5 | 36.04 | 5/5 | 35.69 | 5/5 | 35.82 | 0.25 | | | | | |
| | RP | 5/5 | 28.94 | 5/5 | 28.35 | 5/5 | 28.60 | 5/5 | 28.66 | -0.28 | | | | | |
| 30°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 35.70 | 5/5 | 31.38 | 5/5 | 31.90 | 5/5 | 31.29 | -4.41 | | | | | |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 35.56 | 5/5 | 31.44 | 5/5 | 31.98 | 5/5 | 32.00 | -3.56 | | | | | |
| | RP | 5/5 | 28.94 | 5/5 | 28.68 | 5/5 | 29.00 | 5/5 | 29.16 | 0.22 | | | | | |
Ft P1 – Ft Primer Set 1
Ft P2 – Ft Primer Set 2
RP – RNase P Control
All replicates produced the expected qualitative result and any increases in Ct values were less than 3.0 over the storage period when tested with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR Assay. The Ct values observed for the 30°C storage condition showed more change downward compared to the other storage conditions potentially indicating increased amounts of target DNA. This may be due to permissive growth conditions for the F. tularensis bacteria and does not negatively impact the detection of F. tularensis LVS by real-time PCR. The results from this specimen stability study are adequate to support the specimen stability claims in the device labeling.
## Specimen Stability – Freeze-Thaw
Freeze-thaw stability was evaluated with similarly contrived specimens subjected to multiple freeze thaw cycles at -20°C. Contrived specimens were retained at -20°C for at least 23 hours before each thaw cycle. At predefined timepoints and conditions, five aliquots of each sample were individually extracted and tested on the AB 7500 Fast Dx instrument using the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay. The results of stability testing of whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid contrived specimens subjected to multiple freeze-thaws are summarized in Table 12.
Table 12. Specimen Freeze-thaw Stability for Whole Blood EDTA and Pleural Fluid
| Sample Type | Assay Target | Unfrozen | | Freeze-Thaw 1 | | Freeze-Thaw 2 | | Freeze-Thaw 3 | | Delta Ct |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. Ct | |
| | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 34.51 | 5/5 | 34.47 | 5/5 | 34.56 | 5/5 | 34.80 | 0.29 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 34.20 | 5/5 | 31.62 | 5/5 | 31.73 | 5/5 | 32.97 | -1.23 |
| | RP | 5/5 | 22.80 | 5/5 | 22.48 | 5/5 | 22.41 | 5/5 | 22.82 | 0.02 |
K252072 - Page 19 of 27
{19}
| Whole Blood EDTA | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 34.20 | 5/5 | 34.33 | 5/5 | 34.21 | 5/5 | 34.73 | 0.53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | RP | 5/5 | 22.80 | 5/5 | 22.06 | 5/5 | 23.31 | 5/5 | 22.10 | -0.70 |
| Pleural Fluid | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 35.70 | 5/5 | 36.54 | 5/5 | 35.96 | 5/5 | 35.76 | 0.05 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | 35.56 | 5/5 | 36.16 | 5/5 | 36.21 | 5/5 | 36.03 | 0.46 |
| | RP | 5/5 | 28.94 | 5/5 | 28.21 | 5/5 | 29.36 | 5/5 | 27.86 | -1.08 |
Ft P1 - Ft Primer Set 1
Ft P2 - Ft Primer Set 2
RP - RNase P Control
All samples produced the expected qualitative result and minimal changes in Ct values when tested with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR Assay. The results from this freeze-thaw stability study are adequate to support the specimen stability claims in the device labeling.
## Specimen Stability - Agar Culture Isolate
Agar culture isolate sample stability was evaluated by streak-plating a characterized stock of $F.$ tularensis LVS for positive samples and Yersinia pestis A1122 for negative samples. Cultures were incubated for 48 hours prior to initiating stability evaluations. Five plates of each organism were placed in each storage condition including room temperature (30°C), incubation temperature (37°C), and refrigerated temperature (4°C). Samples were prepared for testing using single, picked colonies from a plate and processing using an established CDC bacterial cell lysate preparation procedure. DNA concentrations were determined with the lysates to enable estimates of genome equivalents/mL. Five samples representing each timepoint and storage condition were individually extracted and tested on the AB 7500 Fast Dx instrument using the CDC Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR Assay. The results of stability evaluations of bacterial culture isolates grown on agar and stored under each condition and duration are summarized in Table 13.
Table 13. Stability of $F$ . tularensis Bacterial Culture Isolates Grown on Agar
| Storage Temp | Assay Target | Day 0 | | | Day 2 | | | Day 7 | | | Day 8 | | | Delta Ct |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | #Pos/5 | Avg. GE/mL | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. GE/mL | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. GE/mL | Avg. Ct | #Pos/5 | Avg. GE/mL | Avg. Ct | |
| 4°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 1.73E+09 | 18.13 | 5/5 | 1.16E+09 | 17.39 | 5/5 | 6.08E+08 | 19.10 | 5/5 | 1.91E+09 | 16.92 | -1.21 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | | 17.89 | 5/5 | | 17.76 | 5/5 | | 18.39 | 5/5 | | 17.20 | -0.69 |
| 30°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 1.73E+09 | 18.13 | 5/5 | 3.37E+08 | 18.58 | 5/5 | 1.87E+08 | 29.37 | 5/5 | 2.89E+08 | 18.94 | 0.81 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | | 17.89 | 5/5 | | 18.92 | 5/5 | | 28.85 | 5/5 | | 18.73 | 0.84 |
| 37°C | Ft P1 | 5/5 | 1.73E+09 | 18.13 | 5/5 | 1.82E+09 | 16.85 | 5/5 | 1.01E+08 | 22.88 | 5/5 | 4.23E+08 | 17.50 | -0.63 |
| | Ft P2 | 5/5 | | 17.89 | 5/5 | | 17.29 | 5/5 | | 22.65 | 5/5 | | 17.59 | -0.30 |
Ft P1 - Ft Primer Set 1
Ft P2 - Ft Primer Set 2
All samples from all storage conditions and durations produced the expected qualitative result. The higher Ct values on Day 7 for the $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ storage condition exceeded the acceptance criteria of no greater than a $3.0\mathrm{Ct}$ increase relative to $\mathrm{T} = 0$ , however these results were acceptable due to the observed results from Day 8 which were less than $1\mathrm{Ct}$ different from the original, Day 0 results. The sponsor rationalized that Day 7 results were attributed to technician error in
K252072 - Page 20 of 27
{20}
processing samples collected from the agar plates. The results from this agar culture isolate stability study are adequate to support the specimen stability claims in the device labeling.
In conclusion, the following claims regarding storage and stability of specimens and samples used with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR Assay are supported by the stability evaluation data:
1. Refrigerated $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ or room temperature $(15 - 30^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ whole blood-EDTA and pleural fluid specimens tested within 30 days of collection.
2. Frozen whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens $(\leq -20^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ tested within 60 days of collection.
3. Frozen whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens $(\leq -20^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ that underwent no more than 3 freeze/thaw cycles.
4. Culture plates refrigerated $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , stored at room temperature $(15 - 30^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , or incubated at $35 - 38^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for up to 7 days.
# 6. Detection Limit:
The limit of detection (LoD) of the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay was determined in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), whole blood EDTA, and pleural fluid. To determine the LoD in PBS genomic DNA from $F$ .tularensis tularensis SchuS4, $F$ .tularensis holarctica LVS, and $F$ .tularensis mediasiatica FSC147 was purified and quantified. Dilutions of genomic DNA made in PBS buffer were tested using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay in 20 replicates. The LoD was determined from the lowest concentration of GE/mL that produced positive results in $\geq 95\%$ of replicate samples with both the Ft Primer Set 1 and Ft Primer Set 2 primers and probes of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay on both the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QSDx instruments (Table 14). The highlighted concentrations in Table 14 represent the LoD for each $F$ .tularensis strain in PBS.
Table 14. Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay LoD with Genomic DNA in PBS
| | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | | | | | QSDx | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | |
| Strain | Conc.(GE/mL) | #Pos/Total | Avg.Ct | Std.dev | #Pos/Total | Avg.Ct | Std.dev | #Pos/Total | Avg.Ct | Std.dev | #Pos/Total | Avg.Ct | Std.dev |
| SchuS4 | 9.62E+03 | 20/20 | 34.77 | 0.33 | NT | NT | NT | 20/20 | 34.18 | 0.29 | NT | NT | NT |
| | 4.81E+03 | 20/20 | 35.77 | 0.52 | 20/20 | 35.42 | 0.79 | 20/20 | 35.12 | 0.52 | 20/20 | 36.06 | 0.55 |
| | 2.41E+03 | 19/20 | 36.99 | 0.40 | 20/20 | 36.84 | 1.01 | 20/20 | 36.36 | 0.67 | 19/20 | 37.39 | 0.82 |
| | 9.62E+02 | 13/20 | 39.07 | 0.71 | 16/20 | 37.41 | 0.87 | 17/20 | 37.42 | 1.00 | 17/20 | 38.37 | 0.70 |
| | 9.62E+01 | 1/20 | 39.74 | N/A | 6/20 | 38.41 | 0.21 | 1/20 | 38.75 | N/A | 4/20 | 39.40 | 0.51 |
| LVS | 9.62E+03 | 20/20 | 34.08 | 0.84 | 20/20 | 34.46 | 0.30 | 20/20 | 33.91 | 0.39 | 20/20 | 34.53 | 0.29 |
| | 4.81E+03 | 20/20 | 34.91 | 0.39 | 20/20 | 35.70 | 0.38 | 20/20 | 35.21 | 0.44 | 20/20 | 35.78 | 0.32 |
| | 2.41E+03 | 20/20 | 35.98 | 0.58 | 20/20 | 36.64 | 0.44 | 20/20 | 35.90 | 0.76 | 19/20 | 37.06 | 1.74 |
| | 9.62E+02 | 17/20 | 37.65 | 1.24 | 15/20 | 37.71 | 0.68 | 20/20 | 37.19 | 0.85 | 19/20 | 38.03 | 0.77 |
| | 9.62E+01 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT |
| FSC147 | 9.62E+03 | 20/ 20 | 36.55 | 0.71 | 20/ 20 | 35.87 | 0.64 | 20/ 20 | 35.95 | 0.75 | 20/20 | 36.73 | 0.53 |
| | 4.81E+03 | 20/ 20 | 37.13 | 0.68 | 19/ 20 | 37.38 | 1.58 | 20/ 20 | 37.12 | 0.87 | 19/20 | 37.75 | 0.63 |
| | 2.41E+03 | 16/ 20 | 38.21 | 1.22 | 19/ 20 | 37.89 | 0.97 | 16/ 20 | 37.75 | 1.34 | 13/20 | 38.86 | 1.24 |
K252072 - Page 21 of 27
{21}
NT - Not Tested
Range-finding for the LoD of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay in clinical matrices was performed using 10-fold serial dilutions of whole blood EDTA spiked with whole cell $F$ tularensis from a frozen glycerol stock and tested in triplicate. Each dilution replicate was extracted and tested on the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay using the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QSDx real-time PCR instruments. The preliminary LoD was determined to be the lowest concentration to generate positive results from the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay on both instruments (5.20E+03 GE/mL). To confirm the LoD frozen glycerol stocks of $F$ tularensis LVS were used to prepare 3-fold dilution series in whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid. The concentration of $F$ tularensis LVS in the contrived samples was determined through enumeration of colony forming units (CFU/mL) by plating triplicate samples of serial dilutions in PBS. The concentration of $F$ tularensis LVS in GE/mL was determined by extracting DNA from the starting preparation of $F$ tularensis LVS and quantifying the DNA concentration. This preparation was used to generate a standard curve for both the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QuantStudio Dx instruments and to calculate the GE/mL. The confirmed LoD was determined to be the lowest concentration in CFU/mL that produced a positive result with the Francisella tularensis Real-time RT-PCR assay $\geq 95\%$ of the time when testing 20 replicates extracted individually. Results with each instrument are summarized in Tables 15 and 16 and include dilutions 3-fold above and 3-fold below the LoD concentration, which is highlighted for each sample matrix type in each table.
Table 15. LoD confirmation of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay with $F$ . tularensis subsp. holarctica (LVS) in whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid samples on the AB 7500 Fast Dx
| Sample Matrix | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | | | |
| | CFU/mL | Conc. (GE/mL) | #Pos/ Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev | CFU/mL | Conc. (GE/mL) | #Pos/ Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev |
| Whole blood (EDTA) | 2.53E+03 | 5.49E+03 | 19/20 | 34.78 | 1.11 | 2.53E+03 | 3.48E+03 | 19/20 | 35.11 | 0.98 |
| | 8.44E+02 | 3.11E+03 | 20/20 | 36.22 | 0.88 | 8.44E+02 | 3.05E+03 | 20/20 | 35.81 | 0.50 |
| | 2.81E+02 | 3.99E+02 | 15/20 | 37.63 | 0.93 | 2.81E+02 | 4.47E+02 | 8/20 | 37.74 | 0.65 |
| Pleural fluid | 5.67E+02 | 2.19E+03 | 20/20 | 35.68 | 0.62 | 5.67E+02 | 2.20E+03 | 20/20 | 34.58 | 0.56 |
| | 1.89E+02 | 7.91E+02 | 19/20 | 36.44 | 1.04 | 1.89E+02 | 1.03E+03 | 20/20 | 36.12 | 0.91 |
| | 7.57E+01 | 2.17E+04 | 11/20 | 36.90 | 1.21 | 7.57E+01 | 8.32E+03 | 12/20 | 37.03 | 0.81 |
Table 16. LoD confirmation of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay with $F$ . tularensis subsp. holarctica (LVS) in whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid samples on the QSDx
| Sample Matrix | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | | | |
| | CFU/mL | Conc. (GE/mL) | #Pos/ Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev | CFU/mL | Conc. (GE/mL) | #Pos/ Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev |
| | 2.53E+03 | 5.49E+03 | 19/20 | 34.78 | 1.11 | 2.53E+03 | 3.48E+03 | 19/20 | 35.11 | 0.98 |
| | 8.44E+02 | 3.11E+03 | 20/20 | 36.22 | 0.88 | 8.44E+02 | 3.05E+03 | 20/20 | 35.81 | 0.50 |
K252072 - Page 22 of 27
{22}
The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay LoD was approximately 4-fold lower in the pleural fluid clinical matrix in comparison to whole blood EDTA and similar assay performance was observed with the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QSDx instruments. The results from the LoD determination studies are acceptable.
## PCCP:
An LoD study will be conducted to evaluate the addition of a real-time PCR instrument, addition of an automated extraction instrument, addition of nucleic acid extraction reagents or manual extraction method, addition of PCR master mix, or modification of the oligonucleotide chemistries, according to the established PCCP. Data demonstrating LoD equivalency will be considered acceptable to support these modifications to the device.
## 7. Assay Performance with Culture Isolates:
Pure culture stocks of $F.$ tularensis LVS and SchuS4 were used to inoculate chocolate agar plates and incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 48-72 hours. After confirming purity and colony morphology five individual isolated colonies were used to create cell lysates for each $F.$ tularensis strain. Cell lysates were tested using the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay primer sets on the AB 7500 Fast Dx and QSDx instruments. Acceptance criteria required the positive identification of $F.$ tularensis strains prepared from isolated colonies collected from growth on chocolate agar. Table 17 shows the results for Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay testing with SchuS4 and LVS culture isolates.
Table 17. Testing of $F$ . tularensis subspecies culture isolates with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay
| F. tularensis subspecies(strain) | AB 7500 Fast Dx | | | | | | QSDx | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | | Ft Primer Set 1 | | | Ft Primer Set 2 | | |
| | #Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev | #Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev | #Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev | #Pos/Total | Avg. Ct | Std. dev |
| tularensis (SchuS4) | 5/5 | 15.81 | 0.75 | 5/5 | 15.85 | 0.78 | 5/5 | 15.70 | 1.13 | 5/5 | 15.37 | 1.06 |
| holarctica (LVS) | 5/5 | 13.69 | 0.45 | 5/5 | 13.96 | 0.52 | 5/5 | 12.90 | 0.54 | 5/5 | 14.04 | 0.66 |
All replicates tested were positive and produced low Ct values with the assay due to the high concentration of analyte collected from culture isolates. The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay positively identified $F.$ tularensis strains prepared from isolated colonies collected from culture on chocolate agar and the results from this study are acceptable.
K252072 - Page 23 of 27
{23}
K252072 - Page 24 of 27
8. Assay Cut-Off:
A PCR is considered reactive/detected if the exponential phase of its amplification curve crosses the threshold line within 40 cycles, nonreactive/not detected if the exponential phase of its amplification curve does not cross the threshold line within 40 cycles. If both Ft Primer Set 1 and Ft Primer Set 2 are reactive the sample is considered positive. If only one Ft Primer Set is reactive the sample is considered equivocal. If both Ft Primer Set 1 and Ft Primer Set 2 are nonreactive the sample is considered negative.
9. Carry-Over:
Carry-over data for instruments cleared for use with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay, the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR System (K080570) and the QuantStudio Dx Real-time PCR Instrument (K123998), were reviewed and found acceptable in previous clearances.
PCCP:
A carry-over study will be conducted to evaluate the addition of a real-time PCR instrument or addition of an automated extraction instrument, according to the established PCCP. Data demonstrating pre-specified agreement with the expected results will be considered acceptable to support these modifications to the device.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
As a supplementary analysis, performance characteristics for the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay were compared to the predicate device, the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel, by testing nine F. tularensis strains (inclusivity) and ten negative (exclusivity) samples (Table 18) including Francisellaceae strains not classified as F. tularensis. Samples were tested using the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel using a concentration of $1.0\mathrm{E} + 07\mathrm{GE / mL}$ .
Table 18. Organism Panel for Comparison of the Francisella tularensis Real- time PCR Assay and the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel
| Organism | Strain ID |
| --- | --- |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis | ND00-0952 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis | NC97-3057 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis | CO01-3713 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica | SP03-1781 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica | RC 503 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica | GA02-5387 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica | CA97-0656 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica | JAP53 |
| Francisella tularensis subsp. mediasiatica | FSC147 |
| Francisella novicida | GA99-3548 |
| Francisella novicida | TX07-6608 |
{24}
| Francisella hispaniensis | FSC454 |
| --- | --- |
| Francisella philomiragia | GA01-2794 |
| Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis | FSC770 |
| Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis | NO12-2005 |
| Francisella salina | TX07-7308 |
| Francisella uliginis | TX07-7310 |
| Allofrancisella guangzhouensis | FSC996 |
| Francisella opportunistica | PA05-1188 |
The overall agreement observed between the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay and FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel was 100% for all F. tularensis strains and 70% for the non-F. tularensis organisms on the panel (Table 19).
Table 19. Percent agreement between the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR Assay and the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel
| | | Comparator Method: FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Francisella tularensis Real- time PCR Assay | Assay target (result) | Positive | Negative | % Agreement |
| | Ft Primer Set 1 (+) | 9 | 0 | 100 |
| | Ft Primer Set 2 (+) | 9 | 0 | 100 |
| | Ft Primer Set 1 (-) | 3 | 7 | 70 |
| | Ft Primer Set 2 (-) | 3 | 7 | 70 |
The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel reacted with 3 non-F. tularensis Francisella strains. These three strains are classified as either Francisella novicida or Francisella hispaniensis. The Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay did not react with any of the non-F. tularensis Francisella species. The FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel was designed to detect Francisella novicida and Francisella hispaniensis strains and discordant results were expected with these strains. Results from this study support equivalent performance between the FilmArray NGDS Warrior Panel and Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay in detecting F. tularensis strains.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Performance
Due to the rare incidence of tularemia in humans, natural positive clinical specimens available for prospective collection and archived specimens for retrospective evaluation are difficult to obtain. Therefore, the clinical performance of the Francisella tularensis Real-Time PCR assay was evaluated using contrived clinical whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid specimens.
K252072 - Page 25 of 27
{25}
Fifty unique human whole blood-EDTA specimens and 50 unique human pleural fluid specimens were used to prepare contrived specimens for the study. The whole blood-EDTA and pleural fluid specimens were split into two aliquots. One aliquot of each unique specimen was contrived using a characterized and quantified whole cell preparation of $F$ tularensis LVS. For each sample type 25 contrived specimens were prepared at 10x LoD (high positive specimens) and 25 specimens were prepared at 3x LoD (low positive specimens). The remaining aliquot was used as a negative specimen. A total of 50 contrived positive specimens and 50 negative specimens were evaluated for each sample type. Contrived and negative specimens were labeled and assembled into a panel to allow randomization and blinding of samples prior to testing by laboratory technicians. Extractions were performed using the QIAGEN QIAamp DSP Blood Mini Kit and each sample tested with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay using the AB 7500 Fast Dx or QSDx instrument platforms. Specimen testing was divided among three laboratory technicians who each performed testing on three non-consecutive days using one of three separate instruments (one QSDx and two AB 7500 Fast Dx instruments).
The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) with the expected result and $95\%$ confidence intervals were calculated for each specimen type. Positive percent agreement was calculated using the equation $(\mathrm{TP} / (\mathrm{TP} + \mathrm{FN})) \times 100\%$ (where $\mathrm{TP} =$ true positive and $\mathrm{FN} =$ false negative). Negative percent agreement was calculated using the equation $(\mathrm{TN} / (\mathrm{TN} + \mathrm{FP})) \times 100\%$ (where $\mathrm{TN} =$ true negative and $\mathrm{FP} =$ false positive). The acceptance criteria for clinical performance of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay required a PPA and NPA greater than or equal to $96\%$ for each parameter. The results of whole blood EDTA and pleural fluid clinical specimen testing with the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay are summarized in Table 20. For equivocal results, the PPA was calculated with equivocal samples counted as either all positives or as all negatives to represent best- and worst-case scenarios.
Table 20. Clinical performance of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay
| Specimen | Total | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | PPA (95% CI) | | NPA (95% CI) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | Equivocal as Positive | Equivocal as Negative | | |
| Whole blood-EDTA | Low Positive | 25 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 100% (92.89-100%) | 96% (86.29-99.51%) | |
| | High Positive | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | | | |
| | Negative | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | | | 100% (92.89 - 100%) |
| Pleural Fluid | Low Positive | 25 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 98% (89.35-99.95%) | 94% (83.45-98.75%) | |
| | High Positive | 25 | 24 | 0 | 1 | | | |
| | Negative | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | | | 100% (92.89-100%) |
K252072 - Page 26 of 27
{26}
The results from the clinical performance evaluation met the acceptance criteria when equivocal results were treated as positives. Per the assay instructions for use, samples that yield equivocal results require further testing/analysis. These data support substantial equivalence of the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay to the predicate device.
**PCCP:**
Testing of clinical samples will be conducted to evaluate addition of a real-time PCR instrument, addition of an automated extraction instrument, addition of nucleic acid extraction reagents or manual extraction method, addition of PCR master mix, or modification of the quencher on the probes, according to the established PCCP. Data demonstrating that the performance meets or exceeds pre-specified point estimates for both positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA), and the associated lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals when compared to comparator will be considered acceptable to support these modifications to the device.
**D Clinical Cut-Off:**
Not applicable.
**E Expected Values/Reference Range:**
Not applicable.
**IX Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
If the validation studies are performed according to the specified protocols in the PCCP and the validation data meet the specified acceptance criteria established in the PCCP, the modification and supporting validation study results will be included in updated device labeling. The labeling will clearly describe the added modification(s).
**X Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification, which includes a PCCP for modifications to the Francisella tularensis Real-time PCR assay, is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K252072 - Page 27 of 27
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.