K251440 · Precision Biologic, Inc. · GGP · Aug 25, 2025 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K251440
Device Name
CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII
Applicant
Precision Biologic, Inc.
Product Code
GGP · Hematology
Decision Date
Aug 25, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7290
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII is for clinical laboratory use in the quantitative determination of factor VIII activity in 3.2% citrated human plasma. It is intended to be used in identifying factor VIII deficiency and as an aid in the management of hemophilia A in individuals aged 2 years and older. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Device Story
Quantitative chromogenic assay for Factor VIII (FVIII) activity; utilizes 3.2% citrated human plasma. Two-stage process: stage 1 activates patient FVIII and FIXa to convert FX to FXa; stage 2 adds chromogenic FXa substrate, releasing p-Nitroaniline (pNA). Color intensity measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm; proportional to FVIII activity. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by trained technicians on Instrumentation Laboratory (IL) ACL TOP CTS/50 CTS series analyzers. Output reported as percent activity (100% = 1.0 IU/mL). Assists clinicians in identifying FVIII deficiency and managing hemophilia A. Reagent 2 formulation updated to replace human FIXa with bovine FIXa.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance characteristics including precision, reproducibility, accuracy (method comparison), reference interval, shelf-life, in-use stability, linearity, and detection capability were evaluated on IL ACL TOP CTS/50 CTS instruments. Interference studies (CLSI EP07-A3) established thresholds for hemoglobin, Intralipid, bilirubin, von Willebrand factor, heparins, Fondaparinux, Lupus Anticoagulant, Emicizumab, Mim8, and Warfarin. Recovery studies evaluated 14 FVIII replacement therapies across various concentrations, demonstrating accurate potency evaluation for most products, with specific recovery profiles noted for ELOCTATE, XYNTHA, and OBIZUR.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative chromogenic assay. Components: Reagent 1 (Bovine FX, inhibitors), Reagent 2 (Human FIIa, bovine FIXa, calcium, phospholipids), Reagent 3 (FXa substrate), Diluent Buffer. Energy source: Spectrophotometric (405 nm). Connectivity: Integrated with IL ACL TOP CTS/50 CTS series analyzers. Storage: Frozen (≤-70°C).
Indications for Use
Indicated for individuals aged 2 years and older with suspected or diagnosed factor VIII deficiency or hemophilia A.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K251440
B Applicant
Precision BioLogic Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GGP | Class II | 21 CFR 864.7290
Factor deficiency test | HE - Hematology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Change in the formulation of the Reagent 2 component of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII to replace the human FIXa ingredient with bovine FIXa.
B Measurand:
Factor VIII activity (%)
C Type of Test:
Quantitative chromogenic assay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251440 - Page 2 of 10
## B Indication(s) for Use:
CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII is for clinical laboratory use in the quantitative determination of factor VIII activity in 3.2% citrated human plasma. It is intended to be used in identifying factor VIII deficiency and as an aid in the management of hemophilia A in individuals aged 2 years and older. For in vitro diagnostic use.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
Instrumentation Laboratory (IL) ACL TOP CTS Series and ACL TOP 50 CTS Series
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII is used for determination of FVIII activity. The assay contains the following four components, packaged in glass vials and provided frozen to preserve the integrity of the components:
| Reagent Name | Format (per vial set; each box contains 4 vials sets) | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent 1 | 1 x 1.25 mL | Bovine FX and a fibrin polymerization inhibitor, with activators and stabilizer. |
| Reagent 2 | 1 x 1.25 mL | Human FIIa, bovine FIXa, calcium chloride and phospholipids. |
| Reagent 3 | 1 x 1.25 mL | FXa substrate containing EDTA and a thrombin inhibitor. |
| Diluent Buffer | 1 x 7.0 mL | Tris buffer solution containing 1% BSA and a heparin antagonist. |
### B Principle of Operation:
The CRYOcheck Chromogenic FVIII is a two-stage factor VIII (FVIII) assay. In the first stage, patient plasma (containing an unknown amount of functional FVIII) is diluted with Diluent Buffer and combined with Reagents 1 and 2, containing Factors IXa and X, thrombin, calcium, and phospholipids. The FVIII in the patient's plasma is activated and works in concert with FIXa to cause the activation of FX to FXa. Following an incubation period to allow activation of FX to FXa, the second stage of the assay occurs through the addition of the chromogenic FXa Substrate to this mixture. The FXa, present from the previous step, hydrolyzes the substrate into a peptide and p-Nitroaniline (pNA). The color produced by the release of pNA is measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm and is proportional to the Factor VIII in the sample. FVIII results are reported in percent activity where 100% FVIII activity is equivalent to 1.0 IU/mL.
{2}
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s): Cryocheck Chromogenic Factor VIII
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s): K193204
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K251440 | K193204 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII | CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII is for clinical laboratory use in the quantitative determination of factor VIII activity in 3.2% citrated human plasma. It is intended to be used in identifying factor VIII deficiency and as an aid in the management of hemophilia A in individuals aged 2 years and older. For in vitro diagnostic use. | Same |
| Assay Type | Quantitative | Same |
| Measurand | Human Factor VIII activity | Same |
| Expression of results | Quantitative; results are expressed as percent activity interpreted relative to a calibration curve. | Same |
| Instrument(s) | IL ACL TOP CTS Series and IL ACL TOP 50 CTS Series | Same |
| Calibrator and control plasmas | CRYOcheck Reference Control Normal
CRYOcheck Abnormal 1 Reference Control
CRYOcheck Abnormal 2 Reference Control
CRYOcheck Reference | Same |
K251440 - Page 3 of 10
{3}
K251440 - Page 4 of 10
| | Control Normal, CRYOcheck Abnormal 1 Reference Control, and CRYOcheck Abnormal 2 Reference Control are traceable to the WHO International Standard for Factor VIII/VWF | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage | ≤-70°C until expiration | Same |
| Assay Reportable Range | 0–200% FVIII activity | Same |
| Reagents | Reagent 1: Bovine FX and a fibrin polymerization inhibitor, with activators and stabilizer.
Reagent 3: FXa substrate containing EDTA and a thrombin inhibitor.
Diluent Buffer: Tris buffer solution containing 1% BSA and a heparin antagonist. | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Reagents | Reagent 2: Human FIIa, bovine FIXa, calcium chloride and phospholipids | Reagent 2: Human FIIa, human FIXa, calcium chloride and phospholipids |
| Interferences | • Hemoglobin: ≤1000 mg/dL
• Intralipid: ≤830 mg/dL
• Bilirubin (unconjugated): ≤40 mg/dL
• Bilirubin (conjugated): ≤11 mg/dL
• von Willebrand factor: ≤20 µg/mL
• Unfractionated heparin: ≤3.3 IU/mL
• Low molecular weight heparin: ≤5 IU/mL
• Fondaparinux: ≤0.2 | • Hemoglobin: ≤500 mg/dL
• Intralipid: ≤500 mg/dL
• Bilirubin (unconjugated): ≤29 mg/dL
• Bilirubin (conjugated): ≤2 mg/dL
• von Willebrand factor: ≤20 µg/mL
• Unfractionated heparin: ≤2 IU/mL
• Low molecular weight heparin: ≤2 IU/mL
• Fondaparinux: ≤1.25 |
{4}
K251440 - Page 5 of 10
| | mg/L
• Lupus Anticoagulant: ≤1.8 dRVVT ratio
• Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban interfere with the quantification of FVIII activity.
• Emicizumab: ≤150 μg/mL
• Mim8: ≤8 μg/mL
• Warfarin: INR ≤7 | mg/L
• Lupus Anticoagulant: ≤1.8 dRVVT ratio
• Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban interfere with the quantification of FVIII activity. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recovery of FVIII Replacement Therapies | CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII evaluated the recovery of FVIII levels in replacement products including ADVATE, ADYNOVATE, AFSTYLA, ALTUVIIO, ESPEROCT, HUMATE-P, JIVI, KOVALTRY, Novoeight, Nuwiq, and wilate at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 IU/mL. It evaluated recovery of Factor VIII levels in replacement products ELOCTATE, and XYNTHA from 0.05 to 0.6 IU/mL, with an over recovery observed at 0.8 and 1.0 IU/mL. There was an underestimation of OBIZUR. | The performance of this device has not been established in evaluating the potency of FVIII concentrates. |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CLSI EP07, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline, Third Edition
- CLSI EP06, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline, Third Edition
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline, Second Edition
{5}
- CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Medical Laboratory Test Reagents; Approved Guideline, Second Edition
- CLSI EP28-A3c, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline, Third Edition
- CLSI EP-09, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline, Third Edition
- CLSI EP37, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline, First Edition
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## A Analytical Performance:
### 1. Precision
a) Repeatability: Study was conducted at one internal site over 20 days with two runs per day and two replicates per run with two operators. Panel of seven samples with one IL ACL TOP 700 CTS instrument and three lots of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII were used. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day, between-lot and total imprecision. Study met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
| Sample | N | Mean FVIII (%) | Within-Run | | Between- Run | | Between- Day | | Between- Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Plasma sample 1 | 240 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 10.6 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 11.4 |
| Plasma sample 2 | 240 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 6.8 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 0.4 | 9.3 |
| Plasma sample 3 | 240 | 145.8 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 8.1 | 5.6 |
| Plasma sample 4 | 240 | 24.1 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 7.2 |
| Normal reference control | 240 | 80.4 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 5.5 |
| Abnormal 1 reference control | 240 | 25.7 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 6.3 |
| Abnormal 2 reference control | 240 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 7.7 |
b) Reproducibility: Study was conducted at one site using a panel of six samples with two different instruments and three lots of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII. The study was performed over 5 days with two runs and three replicates per day by two operators. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day, between-site and total imprecision. Study met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
K251440 - Page 6 of 10
{6}
| Sample | N | Mean FVIII (%) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Plasma sample 1 | 180 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 13.4 | 0.1 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 15.4 |
| Plasma sample 2 | 180 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 6.0 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 9.6 |
| Plasma sample 3 | 180 | 145.3 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 6.4 |
| Normal reference control | 180 | 79.4 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 6.2 |
| Abnormal 1 reference control | 180 | 27.4 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 7.3 |
| Abnormal 2 reference control | 180 | 7.7 | 0.6 | 7.4 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 9.9 |
2. Linearity: The linearity study was performed following the CLSI EP06 (second edition) guideline using one reagent lot and instrument. Nine sample dilutions were prepared by combining high FVIII plasma ( $\sim 260\%$ ) with congenital FVIII deficient plasma ( $\sim 0\%$ ). Each dilution was tested in four replicates. Based on the results of the linearity study, the linear range for the assay is $0 - 200\%$ .
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference: The interference study was conducted in accordance with the CLSI EP07-A3 and CLSI EP37 guidelines. Study was performed with two plasma samples (normal, abnormal) spiked with potential interfering substances using a single lot of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII. Ten replicates were evaluated for each sample.
Rivaroxaban and dabigatran demonstrated interference with the assay.
Following endogenous or exogenous substances were found not to lead to clinically significant interference up to the concentrations indicated in the table below.
| Substance Tested | Concentration tested |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | ≤1000 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | ≤830 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | ≤40 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | ≤11 mg/dL |
| von Willebrand factor | ≤20 μg/mL |
| Unfractionated heparin | ≤3.3 IU/mL |
| Low molecular weight heparin | ≤5 IU/mL |
| Fondaparinux | ≤0.2 mg/L |
| Lupus Anticoagulant | ≤1.8 dRVVT ratio |
| Emicizumab | ≤150 μg/mL |
| Mim8 | ≤8 μg/mL |
| Warfarin | INR ≤7 |
4. Recovery of FVIII Replacement Therapies: A recovery study was conducted using a single lot of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII on an IL ACL TOP 550 CTS instrument. Congenital FIX deficiency plasma was used to prepare seven concentration levels for each
K251440 - Page 7 of 10
{7}
FIX replacement therapy (1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05 IU/mL). Five replicates of each level of each product were tested. Congenital FVIII deficient plasma was spiked with 14 FVIII replacement therapies. The FVIII percent recovery was determined from the mean measured versus expected FVIII activity of each product at each level. CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII recovered Factor VIII activity levels in plasma containing Advate, ADYNOVATE, AFSTYLA, ALTUVIIO, Esperoct, HUMATE-P, JIVI, KOVALTRY, Novoeight, Nuwiq, and wilate at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 IU/mL. CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII recovered Factor VIII activity levels in plasma containing ELOCTATE, and XYNTHA from 0.05 to 0.6 IU/mL, with an over recovery observed at 0.8 and 1.0 IU/mL. There was an underestimation of OBIZUR.
| Factor replacement product | Mean Percent Recovery (%) |
| --- | --- |
| Advate | 90.3 |
| ADYNOVATE | 97.7 |
| AFSTYLA | 89.8 |
| ALTUVIIO | 96.2* |
| ELOCTATE | 116.3 |
| Esperoct | 93.2 |
| HUMATE-P | 95.0 |
| JIVI | 98.5 |
| KOVALTRY | 92.0 |
| Novoeight | 115.6 |
| Nuwiq | 90.2 |
| OBIZUR | 49.5 |
| Wilate | 95.2 |
| XYNTHA | 114.7 |
*Per the manufacturer's recommendations, the mean percent recovery value includes dividing by a correction factor of 2.5 for chromogenic measurement.
5. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable
6. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
a) Sample stability: Please refer to K193204.
b) Shelf-life stability: The shelf-life of the CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII was conducted on six plasma samples with five replicates per sample using one instrument with three lots of. Product lots were stored at ≤-70°C and testing will continue for up to 37 months from the date of manufacture. The study is ongoing, and the current data supports a shelf-life stability of 6 months when the product is stored at ≤-70 °C.
c) In-use stability: Study was performed with six panel samples using one IL ACL TOP 700 CTS instrument with one lot of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII. The in-use
K251440 - Page 8 of 10
{8}
stability studies were performed to characterize in-use stability when maintained at three different conditions (on-board (12–18°C), refrigerated at 2-8°C, and refrozen at ≤-70°C). The study data supports on-board stability for 8 hours when the product is stored on-board (12–18°C), 120 hours at refrigerated conditions (2–8°C), and 1 month (4 hours from the initial thaw) for frozen conditions (≤-70°C).
7. Detection Limit: The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantification (LoQ) for test system was verified following the CLSI EP17-A2 guideline. Study was conducted with one instrument using three low positive samples (~0.5% FVIII) and three blank (~0% FVIII) plasma samples in triplicates using a single lot of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII for three days. The study verified the limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) determined in K193204. The LoB is 0.4% FVIII activity, LoD/LoQ is 0.5% FVIII activity.
8. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device: Study was conducted with 238 clinical plasma specimens collected from the intended use population at two testing sites using CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII (after reagent change) and CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII (current in-market product) as the comparator device. Each site used a different IL ACL TOP analyzer (700 CTS and 700 series). Assays were performed by one or more operators per site. The following tables summarize Passing-Bablok regression analysis performed for the combined dataset and predicted bias.
| | N | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Combined sites | 238 | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 0.32 (0.21, 0.52) | 0.996 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
K251440 - Page 9 of 10
{9}
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
1. Reference Interval: Reference verification study was conducted with 20 plasma samples collected from healthy normal adults (≥18 years) using one instrument. The study was performed using three lots of CRYOcheck Chromogenic Factor VIII. All samples were within the originally established reference interval of 43.2-159.3%.
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K251440 - Page 10 of 10
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.