0184 CO2 Sampling line; 0184T CO2 Sampling line; 0139 CO2 Sampling line; 0182 CO2 Sampling line
K251216 · Barbaras Development, Inc. · CCK · Jun 4, 2025 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K251216
Device Name
0184 CO2 Sampling line; 0184T CO2 Sampling line; 0139 CO2 Sampling line; 0182 CO2 Sampling line
Applicant
Barbaras Development, Inc.
Product Code
CCK · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Jun 4, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.1400
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The CO2 Sampling lines are the single patient, disposable device intended for monitoring expired gases from the patient. Environment of use – hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings. Patient population – Patients requiring expired gas monitoring.
Device Story
Device consists of flexible extruded PVC tubing with standard luer connectors; functions as conduit for sampling exhaled gases from patient breathing circuit to external capnograph monitor. Vacuum from monitor pulls gas sample through tube; exhaust-only flow prevents gas return to patient. Used in hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings by clinicians. Provides continuous end-tidal CO2 monitoring data to assist clinical decision-making regarding patient respiratory status. Disposable, single-patient use.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included mechanical strength, tensile strength of bonds, flow/leak resistance per ISO 80601-2-55, luer fitting compliance per ISO 80369-7, and environmental age testing. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation) performed per ISO 10993.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PVC tubing, Polypropylene and ABS connectors. Sensing principle: Passive gas conduit for external monitor. Dimensions: 1.0-1.5 mm ID, 3-3.25 m length. Connectivity: Standard luer slip/lock fitting. Software: None. Sterilization: Not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring expired gas monitoring in hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A carbon dioxide gas analyzer is a device intended to measure the concentration of carbon dioxide in a gas mixture to aid in determining the patient's ventilatory, circulatory, and metabolic status. The device may use techniques such as chemical titration, absorption of infrared radiation, gas chromatography, or mass spectrometry.
Predicate Devices
Tylenol Medical Instruments Co., Ltd - CO2 sampling line (K181981)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
June 4, 2025
Barbaras Development Inc.
% Paul Dryden
President
ProMedic, LLC
131 Bay Point Dr. NE
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704
Re: K251216
Trade/Device Name: 0184 CO2 Sampling line; 0184T CO2 Sampling line; 0139 CO2 Sampling line; 0182 CO2 Sampling line
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.1400
Regulation Name: Carbon Dioxide Gas Analyzer
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: CCK
Dated: April 16, 2025
Received: April 18, 2025
Dear Paul Dryden:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251216 - Paul Dryden
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K251216 - Paul Dryden
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Bradley Q. Quinn - S
Bradley Quinn
Assistant Director
DHT1C: Division of Anesthesia, Respiratory, and Sleep Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K251216 | |
| Device Name 0184 CO2 Sampling line; 0184T CO2 Sampling line; 0139 CO2 Sampling line; 0182 CO2 Sampling line | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The CO2 Sampling lines are the single patient, disposable device intended for monitoring expired gases from the patient. Environment of use – hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings. Patient population – Patients requiring expired gas monitoring. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(k) Summary
Page 1 of 5
Date Prepared: 16-Apr-25
Sponsor: Barbaras Development Inc.
3567 OLD CONEJO RD
Newbury Park, CA 91320
Sponsor Contact: Matthew Baile
Tel: 805-499-9194 & +86 186 7690 0100
Submission Correspondent: Paul Dryden
ProMedic, LLC
Proprietary or Trade Name: 0184 CO2 Sampling line, 0184T CO2 Sampling line,
0139 CO2 Sampling line, 0182 CO2 Sampling line
Common/Usual Name: CO2 Sampling Line
Classification Name: Analyzer, gas, carbon-dioxide, gaseous-phase (accessories)
Product Code: CCK
Predicate Device: Tylenol Medical Instruments Co., Ltd - K181981-
CO2 sampling line
Common/Usual Name: CO2 Sampling Line
Classification Name: Analyzer, gas, carbon-dioxide, gaseous-phase (accessories)
Product Code: CCK
Reference Device: ProMedic – Gas Sampling Lines – K023579
Common/Usual Name: CO2 Sampling Line
Classification Name: Analyzer, gas, carbon-dioxide, gaseous-phase (accessories)
Product Code: CCK
## Device Description
Barbaras Development Inc. CO2 Sampling lines are the accessories in breathing system and intended for sampling of exhaled gases for monitoring, typically end-tidal CO2.
The Barbaras Development Inc. CO2 sampling lines are used to connect between the patient’s end of the breathing system and the distant analyzer, such as the capnograph monitor, along this tube, the patient’s breath is continuously sampled. the gas sampling is exhaust only and there is no gas flow back to patient.
The Barbaras Development Inc. CO2 Sampling Lines are a disposable, single patient use that allows to sample of patients exhaled gases. It consists of flexible extruded plastic tubes with and standard connectors on each end. We will present several different configurations like have the filter or without filter in the middle which have been tested and compared to predicates.
{5}
510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 5
The Barbaras Development Inc. CO2 Sampling Lines are offered in the following models: 0184 CO2 Sampling line, 0184T CO2 Sampling line, 0139 CO2 Sampling line, 0182 CO2 Sampling line. Gas sampling devices are not specific to a particular exhaled gas monitor. Almost all gas sampling line are connected to the monitor via a standard luer fitting, whether it is a female or male fitting.
## Principle of Operation
The subject device is a gas sampling line that connects between the patient and the sampling monitor. The monitor uses vacuum to pull a small sample of expired gas from the patient through the breathing circuit. It is a conduit for a gas sample to be taken from the patient directly to the gas monitor.
## Indications for Use:
The CO2 Sampling lines are the single patient, disposable device intended for use when monitoring patient expired gases.
Environment of use – hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings.
Patient population – Patients requiring expired gas monitoring.
Patient Population: Patients requiring expired gas monitoring.
Environments of use: Hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings.
## Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The table below compares the key features of the proposed CO2 sampling lines with the identified predicate, K181981 and it demonstrates that the subject devices can be found to be substantially equivalent. The reference device – Gas Sampling Lines – K023579 – has the same size ID as the largest subject device ID. It also lists lines with in-line filter.
In summary, it can be concluded that substantial equivalence is met based on the following discussions:
## Indications for Use –
The indications for use are similar for the proposed device when compared to the predicate. Discussion – Each device is indicated for use sampling expired gases.
## Technology and construction –
The design, configurations, shape, size, etc. are equivalent to the predicate and reference.
## Discussion of Differences –
The design incorporates a simple means to interface with the patient interfaces with sampling ports such as breathing/ventilator circuit. There are virtually no differences between the proposed devices
{6}
510(k) Summary
Page 3 of 5
and the predicate. Any difference in performance does not raise any different risk concerns compared to the predicate or reference.
## Environment of Use –
The environments of use are identical to predicate.
Discussion – There are no differences in the requirements of each environment of use which would raise any new safety concerns when compared to the predicate.
## Patient Population –
The patient population of pediatrics to adults is equivalent to the predicate. However, the population is dictated by the gas monitor indications to which the sample line is attached.
Discussion – The patient populations are equivalent to the predicate.
## Non-Clinical Testing Summary –
We performed comparative testing of the appropriate performance functions and features.
The tests included:
- Age testing
- Mechanical testing
- Luer Fitting per ISO 80369-7
- Flow / leaks per ISO 80601-2-55
- Strength of bonds
- Tensile Strength
The results show that the subject devices performed equivalent to the predicate. All testing demonstrated that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate.
## Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The sponsor has demonstrated through performance testing, design and features, and non-clinical testing that the proposed device and predicate have been found to be substantially equivalent.
{7}
510(k) Summary
Table - Comparison of Subject vs. Predicate and Reference Devices
| Attributes | Predicate Device Tylenol Medical Instruments Co., Ltd CO2 Sampling line K181981 | Subject Device 0184 CO2 Sampling line 0184T CO2 Sampling line 0139 CO2 Sampling line 0182 CO2 Sampling line | Reference Device ProMedic, Inc. Gas Sampling Lines K023579 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The CO2 Sample Lines are intended to be used where exhaled gas is monitored. The intended population: Patients requiring expired gas monitoring, adult to pediatrics. The intended environment of use: Hospital-OR, sub-acute, and pre-hospital setting. | The CO2 Sampling lines are single patient, disposable device intended for use when monitoring patient expired gases. Environment of use – hospital, sub-acute, and pre-hospital settings. Patient population – Patients requiring expired gas monitoring. | The gas sampling lines are intended to connect from a port in the breathing circuit to the expired gas monitor. | All indicated to provide monitoring of exhaled gases The reference device is included only for the sampling tube ID specifications. |
| Environment of Use | Hospitals and / or sub-acute, pre-hospital | Hospital, sub-acute, clinic, physician offices, pre-hospital | Hospitals and / or sub-acute | Similar |
| Patient Population | Patient requiring sampling of expired gases | Patients requiring expired gas monitoring, adult to neonates | Not provided | Similar |
| Duration of Use | Single patient, disposable | Single patient, disposable | Single patient, disposable | Similar |
| Prescriptive | Yes | Yes | Yes | Similar |
| Sampling tubing specs | ID – 1.10 mm Length – 2 m | ID – 1.0 and 1.5 mm Length – 3~3.25m | ID – 0.050 inches (1.27mm) and 0.060 inches (1.524 mm) / Length – 8, 10, and 15 feet | The reference device has gas sampling lines cleared slightly above the maximum ID presented for the subject device. |
| Mode of Operation | Connector to sample from the patient Nasal cannula, nares connector or sampling Port Small bore tubing. Connects to expired gas monitor. | Monitoring exhaled gas via a gas sampling line connected from patient interface with sampling port to capnograph. | Connects to a port in the breathing circuit to the expired gas monitor. | Similar |
| Gas sampling connection | Luer slip fit or luer lock | Luer slip fit or luer lock | Luer slip fit or luer lock | Similar |
| Materials | Cannula and tubing - PVC Connectors – Polypropylene, ABS | Tubing - PVC Connectors – Polypropylene, ABS | Tubing – PVC Connectors – Not listed | Similar |
| Biocompatibility | Indirect contact and direct (skin) contact with the patient ISO 10993 testing | Skin contact: Limited duration of use (< 24 hours) ISO 10993 testing | Not listed | Similar (Note: the gas sampling line is exhaust only and there is |
{8}
510(k) Summary
Page 5 of 5
| Attributes | Predicate Device
Tylenol Medical Instruments Co., Ltd
CO2 Sampling line
K181981 | Subject Device
0184 CO2 Sampling line
0184T CO2 Sampling line
0139 CO2 Sampling line
0182 CO2 Sampling line | Reference Device
ProMedic, Inc.
Gas Sampling Lines
K023579 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | • Cytotoxicity
• Sensitization
• Irritation | • Cytotoxicity
• Irritation
• Sensitization | | no gas flow back to patient.)
Per the 4/6/24 clarification
call skin contact was agreed
as the only testing needed |
| Limited duration of use | Less than 24h | Less than 24h | Not listed | Similar |
| Performance testing | Resistance to flow
Tensile strength of connections
Luer fitting testing per ISO594-2
Age testing - Environmental
Mechanical testing | Back pressure (Resistance to flow)
Bond strength (Tensile strength of connections)
Luer fitting testing per ISO80369-7
Age testing - Environmental
Mechanical testing | Not listed | Performance testing
ISO 80369-7 and ISO
80601-2-55 |
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.