K250714 · Centrix, Inc. · LBH · Nov 21, 2025 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K250714
Device Name
FluoroDose Varnish
Applicant
Centrix, Inc.
Product Code
LBH · Dental
Decision Date
Nov 21, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3260
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Treatment of dental hypersensitivity and reduction of post-operative sensitivity.
Device Story
FluoroDose Varnish is a fluoride-containing cavity varnish used by dental professionals (dentists, hygienists) in a clinical setting to treat dental hypersensitivity. The device is supplied in single-use Lollitrays containing a 0.3ml dose and a Benda Brush applicator. The varnish is applied to the dentin surface, where it acts by occluding dentin tubules. This physical occlusion, combined with the release of fluoride ions, reduces dentin permeability and alleviates patient sensitivity. The device is available in 2.1% and 5% sodium fluoride concentrations. It is non-sterile and intended for topical application. By sealing the tubules, the varnish prevents external stimuli from reaching the pulp, thereby reducing post-operative sensitivity and providing patient relief.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Studies included ISO 10993 biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity), SEM analysis of dentin tubule occlusion on human tooth samples, ISO 17730 fluoride release testing, and dentin permeability reduction testing. Results showed no statistically significant differences in dentin permeability reduction between the subject device and predicates. All tested varnishes successfully occluded tubules and met ISO 17730 requirements for fluoride release.
Technological Characteristics
Cavity varnish containing sodium fluoride (2.1% or 5%) in a rosin base. Additional ingredients include xylitol, denatured alcohol, sodium hydroxide, beeswax, sucralose, flavor, and coloring. Form factor is a single-use 0.3ml dose with a disposable brush applicator. Principle of operation is physical dentin tubule occlusion. Non-sterile. Shelf life is 24 months.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the treatment of dental hypersensitivity and reduction of post-operative sensitivity in patients requiring dental desensitization.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Cavity varnish is a device that consists of a compound intended to coat a prepared cavity of a tooth before insertion of restorative materials. The device is intended to prevent penetration of restorative materials, such as amalgam, into the dentinal tissue.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an external cleaning solution, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
November 21, 2025
Centrix, Inc.
% Joseph Azary
Regulatory Consultant
Aztech Regulatory & Quality LLC
543 Long Hill Avenue
Shelton, Connecticut 06484
Re: K250714
Trade/Device Name: FluoroDose Varnish
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3260
Regulation Name: Cavity Varnish
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: LBH
Dated: October 23, 2025
Received: October 23, 2025
Dear Joseph Azary:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}
K250714 - Joseph Azary
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250714 - Joseph Azary
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K250714 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| FluoroDose Varnish | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| Treatment of dental hypersensitivity and reduction of post-operative sensitivity. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
centrix®
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
# 510(k) Summary CENTRIX
K250714
# FLUORODOSE VARNISH
## 1. SUBMITTER/510(k) HOLDER
Centrix Inc
770 River Road
Shelton, CT 06484
FDA Registration# 1281412
Contact Name: Joseph Azary (Aztech Regulatory & Quality LLC)
Email: jazary@erols.com
Telephone: (203) 242-6670
Date Revised: November 21, 2025
## 2. DEVICE NAME
Proprietary Name: Centrix FluoroDose Varnish
Common/Usual Name: Cavity Varnish
Classification Name: Cavity Varnish
Classification Regulation: 21 CFR 872.3260
Product code: LBH
Classification: Class 2
Medical Specialty (Panel): Dental
## 3. PREDICATE DEVICES
- Primary Predicate: Varnish America (Young Dental / MPL) K040098
- Secondary Predicate: Elevate SmartCoat 2.5% (FluoriMax) K131376
- Reference Predicate: 3M Clinpro 2.1% K231338
{5}
centrix®
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
## 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The FluoroDose Varnish is a fluoride varnish available in mint flavor. FluoroDose varnish is sold in single-use Lollitrays, containing a 0.3ml dose and a Benda Brush applicator brush. The device is not sold as sterile and does not require sterilization prior to use. The product is offered in a 2.1% sodium fluoride variation and a 5% sodium fluoride variation. The device is used as a dentin desensitizer to be used by healthcare professionals including dentists and dental hygienists.
## 5. INDICATIONS FOR USE
Treatment of dental hypersensitivity and reduction of post-operative sensitivity.
## 6. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
Modifying the dentin surface to occlude the tubules is accepted as a useful approach to preventing dentin hypersensitivity. FluoroDose varnish contains suspensions of sodium fluoride in a rosin base.
The varnishes have identical regulatory classification, product codes, contraindications, mode of action, dispensing method, use of applicators, flavoring, shelf life, and being sold non-sterile.
While there may be some minor variations in wording the indications for use are equivalent in that all of the varnishes are for the treatment of hypersensitive teeth.
The fluoride amount and fluoride ions are equivalent between the 5% varnishes and the 2.1% varnishes.
The materials are equivalent in that all of the varnishes are based on the usage of rosin, sodium fluoride, beeswax, xylitol and flavor. There are some minor differences in the material formulations but are not considered significant concerns of safety or effectiveness.
The testing specifically included comparison to a predicate device to compare to a lower dose varnish and found that test results were equivalent.
{6}
centrix
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
| Device | Centrix Fluorodose Subject Device K250714 | K040098 MPL VarnishAmerica 5% Primary Predicate | SmartCoat 2.5% NaF Varnish (K131376) Reference Device | 3M Clinpro 2.1% (Reference, K231338) Reference Device | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product Code | LBH | LBH | LBH | LBH | IDENTICAL |
| Regulation | 21 CFR.872.3260 Cavity varnish | 21 CFR.872.3260 Cavity varnish | 21 CFR.872.3260 Cavity varnish | 21 CFR.872.3260 Cavity varnish | IDENTICAL |
| Indications For Use – 510(k) | Treatment of dental hypersensitivity and Reduction of Post-Operative Sensitivity. | Treatment of dental hypersensitivity and Reduction of Post-Operative Sensitivity. | Intended for use on sensitive teeth, over-exposed dentin and root sensitivity and under temporary restorations or cements where post-operative sensitivity is of concern. | Treatment of hypersensitive teeth | All three devices are indicated for use in the treatment of hypersensitive teeth. |
| Contraindication | Ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis Known allergic reactions to fluoride Avoid ingestion during | Ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis Known allergic reactions to fluoride Avoid ingestion during application | None known per 510(k) Summary IFU includes ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. | None known per 510(k) Summary IFU includes ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. | IDENTICAL between subject device and primary predicate. SIMILAR between subject device and reference predicate |
{7}
centrix
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
| Intended User | application | Dental professional | Dental professional | Dental professional | Dental professional | IDENTICAL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Substantial Equivalency – Technological Characteristics | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Device | Centrix Fluorodose | K040098 VarnishAmerica Primary Predicate | 3M Clinpro 2.1% (K231338) Reference Predicate | SmartCoat 2.5% NaF Varnish (K131376) Secondary Predicate | Comparison |
| Mode of Action | Dentin Tubule Occlusion | Dentin Tubule Occlusion | Dentin Tubule Occlusion | Dentin Tubule Occlusion | IDENTICAL |
| Dispensing Form | Single use of 0.3ml dose using supplied applicator brush | Single use of 0.4ml dose using supplied applicator brush | Single-use, unit-amount in LPop | Single Use Ampules of 1ml using supplied applicator
Also available in Multi-use, multi-unit bottle 8ml or 12ml based on information available on company website | Subject device identical to primary predicate and 3M reference.
The SmartCoat / FluoriMax is available for multiple use |
| Applicator | Disposable brush applicator | Disposable brush applicator | Disposable brush applicator | Disposable brush applicator | IDENTICAL |
| Fluoride Compound, Amount | Sodium fluoride (NaF), 2.1% and 5.0% | Sodium fluoride (NaF), 5% | Sodium fluoride (NaF), 2.1% (wt/wt) | Sodium fluoride (NaF), 2.5% (wt/wt) | IDENTICAL
Subject device and Varnish America are both offered in 5% versions.
SIMILAR
Subject device and ClinPro and SmartCoat / FluoriMax have are range between 2.1% and 2.5%. |
| Flavoring | Available in Mint | Available in Mint | Available in Mint | Available in Mint | IDENTICAL |
| Amount of fluoride Ion | 22,600 ppm for 5% version | 22,600 ppm for 5% version | 9,500 ppm for 2.1% version | 11,300 ppm for 2.5% version | The fluoride ions are identical |
{8}
centrix
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
| | 9500 ppm for 2.1% version | | | | between 5% versions and 2.1% versions. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Releases Fluoride | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | IDENTICAL |
| Sterility | Non-sterile | Non-Sterile | Non-sterile | Non-sterile | IDENTICAL |
| Shelf Life | 24 months | 24 months | 24 months | 24 months | IDENTICAL |
| Materials | Sodium Fluoride Xylitol
Rosin, Denatured Alcohol, Sodium Hydroxide, Beeswax, Sucralose, Flavor, Coloring | Sodium Fluoride Xylitol
Rosin, Denatured Alcohol, Beeswax, Sucralose, Flavor | Sodium Fluoride Xylitol
Polyacrylic acid, hydroxyethyl cellulose, calcium salt, phosphate salt, pH buffer, flavor, water, potassium sorbate | Sodium Fluoride Xylitol
Shellac, propylene glycol, ethyl alcohol, dibasic sodium phosphate, ammonium phosphate, sucralose, calcium hydroxyapatite, flavor | IDENTICAL
All of the products contain Sodium Fluoride, Xylitol and Flavoring.
The subject device and Varnish America device have almost identical ingredients.
DIFFERENCE
The reference predicates have some different ingredients.
The essential design of these products are the same as they are formulated with sodium fluoride with some different additives. |
{9}
centrix
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
| Substantial Equivalency – Performance Bench Studies | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Physical Properties | Test Method | Specification | Centrix Fluorodose | K040098 VarnishAmerica Primary Predicate | 3M Clinpro 2.1% (K231338) Reference predicate | SmartCoat 2.5% NaF Varnish (K131376) Secondary Predicate |
| Dentin tubule occlusion (In-vitro) | SEM | Comparison | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Dentin Permeability | Internal Test | Comparison
No statistically significant differences between the varnishes tested | 2.1% = Average 99.19%
5% = Average 99.99% | N/A | N/A | 2.5% = Average 99.89% |
| 3 Day Fluoride Release | Centrix Internal Test Method | Comparison for release of fluoride during first 2 hours | 2.1% and 5% Release burst of fluoride in first 2 hours | Not tested
Data not known | Not tested
Data not known | Release burst of fluoride in first 2 hours. |
| Fluoride Release | ISO 17730-2020 | Pass/Fail: Fluoride release per ISO 17330
*Confirmed through internal testing
++Confirmed through 510(k) Summary / Available Information | Pass* | Pass++ | Pass++ | Pass* |
{10}
centrix
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
# 7. PERFORMANCE TESTING
The following testing was performed and where applicable consensus standards were utilized.
Summary of Testing
| Standard | Description of Test | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ISO 10993-5 (2009) Cytotoxicity | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity | The testing found the subject device was classified as cytotoxic but performed similarly to the predicate devices.
The Biological Evaluation Report examined biocompatibility in its entirety and concluded that the materials did not exhibit concerns. |
| ISO 10993-10 (2021) | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 10: Tests for Skin Sensitization | The testing concluded that the subject device is NOT considered to be a sensitizer. |
| ISO 10993-23 (2021) | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 23: Tests for Irritation | The testing concluded that the subject device is considered to be a Non-Irritant to oral mucosa. |
| ISO 10993-11 (2017) | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 11: Tests for Systemic Toxicity | Systemic Injection testing concluded that the device did not induce significantly greater biological reaction than the control extracts following a single dose to albino Swiss mice. The testing met requirements of ISO 10993-11. |
| N/A | SEM Analysis of Subject Device (both 2.1% and 5%) and Predicate Device | The SEM report summarizes comparison between subject device and predicate device on human tooth samples. The testing concluded that all of the varnishes tested provided occlusion of open tubules. The Centrix product deposited observable varnish within tubules. |
| ISO 17730 | Fluoride Release Testing. Evaluation of fluoride release including the subject device (2.1% and 5%) and predicate device. | The study concluded that all varnishes tested passed requirements of ISO 17730 for fluoride release. |
| ISO 17730 | Total Fluoride Content testing of subject device (2.1% and 5%) | The study concluded that the fluoride content matched the labeled amount (for 2.1% and 5%) as required by ISO 17730. |
| N/A | Dentin Permeability. Human molar teeth samples were evaluated to calculate the % reduction of dentin permeability. The testing included the subject device (2.1% and 5%) and predicate device. | The results found that there was no statistically significant difference for reduction of dentin permeability between subject device (2.1% and 5%) and subject device. |
| N/A | 3 Day Fluoride Release test for subject device (2.1% and 5%) and predicate device. | The testing concluded that all varnishes tested released burst of fluoride within the first 2 hours. |
{11}
centrix®
MAKING DENTISTRY EASIER
## 8. SAFETY AND EFFICACY
The subject device is found to be equivalent to the primary predicate device, secondary predicate and reference predicate based on comparative evaluation and testing. The overall safety and efficacy of the subject device has been demonstrated through testing conducted on the subject device as well as comparative testing between subject and predicate device.
## 9. CONCLUSION
Information presented supports substantial equivalence of the subject device to the predicate devices based on similarities in intended use, design, principles of operation, performance specifications, and testing.
Centrix Inc believes that based on the indications for use, technological characteristics, and comparison to predicate devices the subject device has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the predicate and the minor differences do not impact safety and effectiveness.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.