K243841 · Deka Research and Development · FPA · Aug 1, 2025 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K243841
Device Name
Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin
Applicant
Deka Research and Development
Product Code
FPA · General Hospital
Decision Date
Aug 1, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5440
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin is indicated for the subcutaneous infusion of insulin, administered by an external pump. The infusion set is indicated for use with adult and pediatric users weighing greater than 10 kg. The infusion set is indicated for single-use.
Device Story
Sparta Infusion Set is a sterile, single-use subcutaneous infusion set; establishes sealed fluid path from external portable insulin pump to patient. Device consists of infusion site, preloaded single-use mechanical inserter, and 23-inch tubing with Luer connector. Inserter uses introducer needle to place 6 mm, 90° soft polypropylene cannula into subcutaneous tissue; features automatic needle retraction for safety and inserter lock. Used by patients in home or clinical settings. Healthcare provider or patient operates inserter to place cannula; tubing connects to pump. Output is continuous insulin delivery. Benefits include reliable subcutaneous access for insulin therapy.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials performed. Evidence consists of bench testing (leak resistance, insertion performance, needle safety, occlusion, particulate, coring, cannula strength, operating conditions, shipping/storage, biocompatibility, sterilization) and simulated-use human factors validation (n=33, including independent adult users and pediatric/caregiver dyads). Insulin compatibility testing confirmed preservative loss performance equivalent to marketed devices. Pump compatibility testing confirmed no adverse impact on DEKA ACE pump performance.
Technological Characteristics
Sterile, single-use subcutaneous infusion set. Materials: Polypropylene cannula, non-woven adhesive. 6 mm, 90° cannula. 23-inch (58.4 cm) tubing. Luer lock connection. Mechanical inserter with automatic needle retraction. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO) per ISO 11135. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1. Standards: ISO 11138, ISO 11737, ANSI/AAMI ST72, ASTM F1980, ISO 11607.
Indications for Use
Indicated for subcutaneous insulin infusion via external pump in adult and pediatric patients weighing >10 kg. Single-use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular administration set is a device used to administer fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system through a needle or catheter inserted into a vein. The device may include the needle or catheter, tubing, a flow regulator, a drip chamber, an infusion line filter, an I.V. set stopcock, fluid delivery tubing, connectors between parts of the set, a side tube with a cap to serve as an injection site, and a hollow spike to penetrate and connect the tubing to an I.V. bag or other infusion fluid container.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for pharmacy compounding systems within this classification is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Pharmacy Compounding Systems; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.” Pharmacy compounding systems classified within the intravascular administration set are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of this part and subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
Predicate Devices
Unomedical MiniMed Mio Advance infusion set (K173879)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K243841
B Applicant
DEKA Research and Development
C Proprietary and Established Names
Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FPA | Class II | 21 CFR 880.5440 - Intravascular Administration Set | General Hospital |
## II Purpose for Submission:
New Device
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin is indicated for the subcutaneous infusion of insulin, administered by an external pump. The infusion set is indicated for use with adult and pediatric users weighing greater than 10 kg. The infusion set is indicated for single-use.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
- The Sparta Infusion Set is indicated for subcutaneous infusion of insulin only. The Sparta Infusion Set is not intended for intravenous infusion, or for infusion of blood or blood products.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
- Change the infusion set at least every 72 hours.
- Do not expose the infusion set to alcohol, disinfectants, perfumes, deodorants, cosmetics, sunscreens, or insect repellents. These substances can cause damage to the infusion set and may lead to inaccurate therapy or delays in therapy.
## IV Device Description:
The Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin is a single-use, 23-inch subcutaneous infusion set that establishes a sealed fluid path from an external portable infusion pump to the patient. It is intended for use with insulin. The Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin is terminally sterilized via ethylene oxide. The Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin consists of the following elements:
**Tubing Set:** The Tubing Set provides a fluid pathway between the infusion pump and the Infusion Site. It consists of a female Luer connector, a 23-inch transparent tubing, a base connector, and a 27-gauge stainless steel connector needle.
**Infusion Site:** The Infusion Site maintains the Cannula’s position in the subcutaneous tissue and enables connection to, and temporary disconnection from, the Tubing Set. The Infusion Site is composed of the following components:
- Adhesive Patch: The Adhesive Patch secures the Infusion Site to the skin to maintain the Cannula’s position during use.
- Infusion Set Base: The Infusion Set base locates the cannula relative to the adhesive. Throughout the duration of therapy, latching features on the Infusion Set Base hold the Cannula in the subcutaneous tissue. Infusion Set Base also interacts with the Base Connector of the tubing set to securely connect the Infusion Site to the Tubing Set.
- Cannula Base: Features on the Cannula Base interact with the Infusion Set Base to secure the Cannula in the subcutaneous tissue after Insertion. Cannula Base also interacts with the Inserter to release the Infusion Set Base during Insertion leaving the Infusion Site secured to the patient’s skin.
- Cannula: The Cannula extends 6 mm into the subcutaneous tissue. It completes and maintains the fluid pathway into the patient.
- Septum: The septum creates a seal between the Tubing Set and the Infusion Site during therapy. It also self-seals when the Tubing Set is disconnected.
- Septum Retainer: Septum Retainer compresses the silicone Septum against the Cannula Base and the Cannula. This creates a leak tight seal in the Septum and allows it to self-seal when the Tubing Set is disconnected.
**Inserter:** The Inserter is a single-use mechanical device that inserts the Cannula into the subcutaneous tissue. The Infusion Site, including the cannula, comes pre-assembled within the Inserter. The user applies the adhesive patch to their skin and pulls the Inserter away from the body to activate it. The Inserter automatically retracts the introducer needle back into the device immediately following insertion, leaving the Infusion Site adhered to the skin.
K243841 - Page 2 of 7
{2}
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
MiniMed Mio Advance infusion set
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K173879
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K243841 | K173879 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Sparta Infusion Set for Insulin | MiniMed Mio Advance infusion set |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Intended for the subcutaneous delivery of insulin from an external pump. Single use. | Same |
| Anatomical Location | Abdomen, upper leg, upper buttocks, hips, upper arms and lower back. | Same |
| Duration of Use | Up to 72 hours | Same |
| Tubing set disconnection/reconnection | Tubing set can be disconnected from and reconnected to infusion site. | Same |
| Inserter lock | Inserter lock prevents inserter activation until removed. | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Cannula length | 6 mm | 6mm, 9mm |
| Tubing Length | 23 inch (58.4 cm) | 46 cm, 60 cm, 110 cm |
| Connection to external infusion pump | via standard Luer lock connection. | via standard Luer lock connection or P-Cap assembly. |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- ISO 10993-1 Fifth edition 2018-08, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
- ANSI AAMI ST67:2019, Sterilization of health care products - Requirements and guidance for selecting a sterility assurance level (SAL) for products labeled "sterile"
- ANSI AAMI ST72:2019, Bacterial endotoxins - Test methods, routine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing
- AAMI TIR17:2017/(R)2020, Compatibility of materials subjected to sterilization
- ASTM E3251:2020, Standard test method for microbial ingress testing on single-use systems
K243841 - Page 3 of 7
{3}
- ASTM F1140/F1140M-13 (Reapproved 2020)e1, Standard Test Methods for Internal Pressurization Failure Resistance of Unrestrained Package
- ASTM F1980-16, Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices
- ASTM F1608-21, Standard Test Method for Microbial Ranking of Porous Packaging Materials (Exposure Chamber Method)
- ASTM F2096-11 (Reapproved 2019), Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross Leaks in Packaging by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test)
- IEC 62366-1 Edition 1.1 2020-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION, Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices
- ISO 10993-3 Third edition 2014-10-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 3: Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity
- ISO 10993-4 Third edition 2017-04, Biological evaluation of medical devices--Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions with blood
- ISO 10993-5 Third edition 2009-06-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- ISO 10993-6 Third edition 2016-12-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 6: Tests for local effects after implantation
- ISO 10993-7 Second edition 2008-10-15, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals [Including: Technical Corrigendum 1 (2009), AMENDMENT 1: Applicability of allowable limits for neonates and infants (2019)]
- ISO 10993-9 Third edition 2019-11, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 9: Framework for identification and quantification of potential degradation products
- ISO 10993-10 Fourth edition 2021-11, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization
- ISO 10993-11 Third edition 2017-09, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity
- ISO 10993-12 Fifth edition 2021-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials
- ISO 10993-16 Third edition 2017-05, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 16: Toxicokinetic study design for degradation products and leachables
- ISO 10993-17 First edition 2002-12-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 17: Establishment of allowable limits for leachable substances
- ISO 10993-18 Second edition 2020-01 Amendment 1 2022-05, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 18: Chemical characterization of medical device materials within a risk management process [Including Amendment 1 (2022)].
- ISO TS 10993-19 Second edition 2020-03 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 19: Physico-chemical, morphological and topographical characterization of materials
- ISO TS 10993-20 First edition 2006-08-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 20: Principles and methods for immunotoxicology testing of medical devices
- ISO 10993-23 First edition 2021-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 23: Tests for irritation
- ISO TR 10993-33 First Edition 2015-03-01, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 33: Guidance on tests to evaluate genotoxicity - Supplement to ISO 10993-3
K243841 - Page 4 of 7
{4}
- ISO 11135 Second edition 2014-07-15, Sterilization of health-care products - Ethylene oxide - Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices [Including: Amendment 1 (2018)]
- ISO 11138-2:2017, Sterilization of health care products — Biological indicators Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization processes
- ISO 11607-1 Second edition 2019-02, Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices - Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems
- ISO 11737-1 Third edition 2018-01 [Including AMD1:2021], Sterilization of health care products - Microbiological methods - Part 1: Determination of a population of microorganisms on product [Including Amendment 1 (2021)]
- ISO 11737-2 Third edition 2019-12, Sterilization of medical devices - Microbiological methods - Part 2: Tests of sterility performed in the definition, validation and maintenance of a sterilization process
- ISO 14971 Third Edition 2019-12, Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices
- ISO 15223-1 Fourth edition 2021-07, Medical devices - Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer - Part 1: General requirements
- ISO TS 21726 First edition 2019-02, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for assessing biocompatibility of medical device constituents
- ISO 23908 First edition 2011-06-11, Sharps injury protection - Requirements and test methods - Sharps protection features for single-use hypodermic needles, introducers for catheters and needles used for blood sampling
- ISO 7864 Fourth edition 2016-08-01, Sterile hypodermic needles for single use - Requirements and test methods
- ISO 8536-8 Second Edition 2015-06-15, Infusion Equipment for Medical Use - Part 8: Infusion Sets for Single Use with Pressure Infusion Apparatus
- ISO 8536-9 Second Edition 2015-06-15, Infusion Equipment for Medical Use - Part 9: Fluid Lines for Single Use with Pressure Infusion Equipment
- ISO 80369-7 Second edition 2021-05, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications - Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications
- ISTA 3A 2018, Packaged-Products for Parcel Delivery System Shipment 70 kg (150 lb) or Less
- USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections
- ISO 11138-1 Third edition 2017-03, Sterilization of health care products - Biological indicators - Part 1: General requirements
- AAMI TIR28:2016(R2024), Product adoption and process equivalence for ethylene oxide sterilization
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
The following verification (bench) tests were conducted:
1. Leak resistance
2. Insertion performance
3. Needle safety
K243841 - Page 5 of 7
{5}
4. Occlusion
5. Particulate
6. Coring
7. Cannula strength
8. Operating conditions
9. Shipping and storage
10. Biocompatibility testing in accordance with ISO 10993-1
11. Sterilization
## B Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
### Insulin Compatibility Testing
To demonstrate compatibility of the Sparta infusion set with the intended use insulin products, an infusion simulation study was performed to evaluate the stability of insulin products that were delivered over a 7-day period using a clinically relevant infusion rate with bolus deliveries and infusion pause durations. Insulin product quality testing was performed for samples collected after the simulated infusion according to respective monographs for the insulin products. The tested attributes include potency, impurities, pH, appearance, high molecular weight proteins, preservative content, and zinc content. Sub-visible particle testing is also performed. For all the insulin product lots, no significant impact from simulated infusion is observed for any of the product quality attributes tested, except for a decrease in phenolic preservative content.
Loss of phenolic preservative is a well-known phenomenon in insulin infusion sets. To determine if the degree of preservative loss was substantially equivalent to on market devices, additional drug compatibility testing was conducted to compare preservative content of insulin delivered through the Sparta Infusion Set with those from two other commercially marketed infusion sets intended for subcutaneous delivery of insulin. The DEKA ACE Pump System (K241178) was used to deliver insulin through the Sparta Infusion Set as well as two other legally marketed infusion sets. Ten (10) infusion sets for each infusion set were connected to infusion pumps. Samples were collected over the labeled 72-hour use life from the end of the infusion sets. The drug preservative contents were measured for the collected samples and for controls. Results demonstrate that the Sparta Infusion Set has equivalent preservative content performance to other commercially available infusion sets indicated for subcutaneous delivery of insulin.
### Pump Compatibility Testing
To demonstrate compatibility with an FDA-cleared insulin infusion pump, the Sparta Infusion Set was tested with the DEKA ACE pump (K213536) to evaluate the ability of the pump to perform within its limits with regards to occlusion detection time and bolus upon occlusion release when connected to the Sparta System. Eight Sparta Infusion Set samples were tested. For each sample, three delivery rates that represent the full range of pump capability were tested using the same Infusion Set. Testing results demonstrated that the Sparta Infusion Set does not impact the DEKA ACE pump's performance and is therefore compatible.
### Human Factors Validation
A Human Factors validation testing was performed with 33 subjects of the intended user groups, including 16 independent use patients (≥17 years of age) and 17 dyads with pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) and their caregivers. The subjects include an even mix of participants from each user group with and without subcutaneous infusion set experience. The results of the
K243841 - Page 6 of 7
{6}
simulated-use Human Factors validation study for the Sparta Infusion Set support a substantial equivalence decision.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K243841 - Page 7 of 7
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.