Codman Libertís Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal and Endexo Technology
K243531 · Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · JXG · Aug 8, 2025 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K243531
Device Name
Codman Libertís Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal and Endexo Technology
Applicant
Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation
Product Code
JXG · Neurology
Decision Date
Aug 8, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5550
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
For use in the treatment of hydrocephalus as a component of a shunt system when draining or shunting of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is indicated.
Device Story
The Codman Libertís Shunt Catheter is a component of a CSF shunt system used to treat hydrocephalus. It consists of ventricular and distal (peritoneal) drainage catheters that connect to a shunt valve. The ventricular catheter diverts excess CSF from brain ventricles through the valve; the distal catheter drains CSF into the peritoneal cavity for reabsorption. The catheters are made of platinum-cured silicone impregnated with rifampicin and clindamycin hydrochloride to reduce gram-positive bacterial colonization. Endexo polymer is blended into the silicone to improve hemocompatibility. The device includes a stylet for insertion and a right-angle adapter for cranial fixation. It is used by neurosurgeons in clinical settings. The device features radiopaque barium sulfate stripes and ink markings for positioning. By reducing bacterial colonization and thrombus deposition, the device aims to improve shunt performance and patient outcomes. It is MR-safe.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing, including ISO 7197, ASTM F647-94, ASTM D412-16, ASTM F2053-20, antimicrobial efficacy (ZOI), HPLC antibiotic content analysis, HS GC-FID residual solvents, IEC 62366-1 usability, and in vitro flow loop thrombogenicity testing. Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993 series) and sterilization validation (ISO 11137) were also performed.
Technological Characteristics
Implant-grade platinum-cured silicone with Endexo surface modifying macromolecule. Antimicrobials: rifampicin and clindamycin hydrochloride. Radiopacity: barium sulfate stripe. Dimensions: 14 cm and 23 cm ventricular catheter lengths. Sterilization: E-beam radiation (SAL 10^-6). MR-safe. Complies with ISO 7197, ASTM F647-94, ASTM D412-16, ASTM F2053-20, and ISO 10993 standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring treatment of hydrocephalus via CSF drainage or shunting.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A central nervous system fluid shunt is a device or combination of devices used to divert fluid from the brain or other part of the central nervous system to an internal delivery site or an external receptacle for the purpose of relieving elevated intracranial pressure or fluid volume (e.g., due to hydrocephalus). Components of a central nervous system shunt include catheters, valved catheters, valves, connectors, and other accessory components intended to facilitate use of the shunt or evaluation of a patient with a shunt.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
August 8, 2025
Integra LifeSciences Production Corporation
David Arroyo
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist
11 Cabot Boulevard
Mansfield, Massachusetts 02048
Re: K243531
Trade/Device Name: Codman Libertís Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal and Endexo Technology
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5550
Regulation Name: Central Nervous System Fluid Shunt And Components
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: JXG
Dated: November 14, 2024
Received: July 11, 2025
Dear David Arroyo:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K243531 - David Arroyo
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K243531 - David Arroyo
Page 3
Sincerely,
Yen-chih Lin - Digitally signed by Yen-chih Lin -S
Date: 2025.08.08 17:44:25
-04'00'
For
Adam Pierce, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K243531
Device Name
Codman Libertis Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal and Endexo Technology
Indications for Use (Describe)
For use in the treatment of hydrocephalus as a component of a shunt system when draining or shunting of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is indicated.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
> "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
Integra® LifeSciences Production Corporation
Codman® Libertis™ Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal® and Endexo® Technology
# 510(k) Summary
A summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
| 807.92(a) (1) Submitter Information | |
| --- | --- |
| Name and Address | Integra LifeSciences Production Corporation
11 Cabot Boulevard
Mansfield, MA 02048 |
| Telephone number | (609) 627-9053 |
| Primary Contact | David A. Arroyo |
| Date Summary Prepared | August 8, 2025 |
| 807.92(a) (2) Name of Device | |
| Trade or Proprietary Name | Codman® Libertis™ Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal® and Endexo® Technology |
| Common Name | Hydrocephalus Shunt System
Hydrocephalus Catheters |
| Classification Name | Shunt, Central Nervous System and Components (21 CFR 882.5550) |
| Device Class | II |
| Product Code | JXG |
| 807.92(a) (3) Predicate Information | |
| Predicate Device | Codman® Bactiseal® Shunt Catheter: K233445 |
| 807.92(a) (4) Device Description | |
| The Libertis™ Shunt Catheter includes a ventricular and distal (peritoneal) drainage catheter that are used as part of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting system to treat hydrocephalus. Both catheters are attached to the valve portion of a shunting system. The ventricular catheter diverts excess CSF from the ventricles of the brain through the valve. After passing through the valve, the excess CSF is drained through the distal catheter into another part of the body, such as the peritoneal cavity, where it is reabsorbed into the bloodstream. The catheters have Endexo® polymer, a surface modifying macromolecule, blended into their base silicone. The catheters are subjected to a treatment process by which the silicone is impregnated with two antimicrobials, rifampicin and clindamycin hydrochloride. The Libertis™ Shunt Catheter has been shown in laboratory studies to reduce the colonization of gram-positive bacteria on the tubing surface. The catheters contain barium sulfate for radiopacity and have ink markings on the silicone tubing to aid in positioning of the catheter. The catheters are packaged with two accessories, a stylet and a right-angle adapter. The stylet is used to help introduce the ventricular catheter into the brain’s ventricles. The right-angle adapter is used to fixate the ventricular catheter to the cranium. | |
| 807.92(a) (5) Indications for Use | |
| For use in the treatment of hydrocephalus as a component of a shunt system when draining or shunting of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is indicated. | |
| 807.92(a) (6) Technological Characteristics Compared to Predicate | |
| The Libertis™ Shunt Catheter has the same intended use, same functionality, same antibiotics, same radiopaque material, and similar design specifications as the predicate device. Compared to the predicate, the proposed device adds a new material, Endexo®, is made of an equivalent silicone, has markings made of ink instead of tantalum, offers a new length of ventricular catheter and stylet, and uses different packaging materials. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness, compared to the predicate. | |
Page 1 of 4
{5}
Integra® LifeSciences Production Corporation
Codman® Libertis™ Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal® and Endexo® Technology
| Component Affected | Proposed Modification | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Catheters Materials | The proposed device and the predicate device are made of base silicones from different manufacturers.
Addition of Endexo® additive to the base silicone in the proposed device. | The proposed device is made of implant-grade platinum-cured silicone, equivalent to that of the predicate.
Endexo® is a surface modifying macromolecule (SMM) polymer blended into the catheter’s base silicone. |
| Ventricular Catheter Markings | The proposed device’s markings consist of numbers with circumferential bands, which are made of implant-grade ink and silicone adhesive. The predicate device’s markings consist of tantalum dots.
The proposed device also has additional markings compared to the predicate device. | The addition of numerical markings and circumferential bands is part of continuous improvement in catheter usability. |
| Ventricular Catheter Length | The proposed device’s ventricular catheter comes in 14 cm and 23 cm lengths. In comparison, the predicate device’s ventricular catheter only has a 14 cm option. | Adding a 23 cm ventricular catheter supports the variety of approaches and valve placements used in hydrocephalus shunting. |
| Ventricular Catheter Inlet Holes | The proposed device has a smaller number of inlet holes, compared to the predicate devices. The inlet holes in the proposed device are of different size and shape, and have a different spatial arrangement, compared to the predicate. | The change in the number, size, shape, and spatial arrangement of the inlet holes is part of continuous improvement in catheter usability. |
| Stylet | The stylets of the proposed device have a square shaped cross section, compared to a circular shape in the proposed device’s stylet.
A longer stylet is paired with the longer ventricular catheter (23 cm). | The square shaped cross section of the stylet is part of continuous improvement in catheter usability.
The longer stylet is required for aiding the insertion of the new 23 cm ventricular catheter. |
| Ventricular and Distal Catheters Radiopacity | Both the proposed and predicate devices use barium sulfate for radiopacity. The proposed ventricular and distal catheters are translucent with a radiopaque stripe along the entire length of the catheter | The use of a barium sulfate stripe in a translucent catheter is part of continuous improvement in catheter usability. |
Page 2 of 4
{6}
Integra® LifeSciences Production Corporation
Codman® Libertis™ Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal® and Endexo® Technology
| | tubing. In comparison, the predicate device is fully radiopaque. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Packaging | The predicate and the proposed devices use a double sterile barrier system composed of a sealed tray/lid system inside a sealed pouch. Some of the components of the packaging systems are made with different materials. | The differences in packaging materials are intended to support sterilization and to reduce degradation of the antibiotics in the catheters. |
In addition to the differences in the materials and design of the proposed and the predicate devices, the devices are sterilized using different methods and have different MRI compatibility. The proposed device is sterilized using E-beam radiation while the predicate is sterilized using steam. Both sterilization methods achieve the same Sterility Assurance Level (SAL = 10⁻⁶). The proposed device has an MR-safe designation while the predicate has an MR-conditional designation. The difference in MRI compatibility is due to the absence of tantalum, a metallic alloy, in the markings of proposed device.
# 807.92(b) 1-2: Summary of Nonclinical and Clinical Testing Performed
The following performance testing has been conducted in support of the substantial equivalence determination. The testing was performed according to FDA-recognized consensus standards and internal test methods. All testing was performed on production equivalent devices.
| Performance Bench Test Results | |
| --- | --- |
| Test | Conclusion |
| Evaluation of Safety and Performance per ISO 7197 and ASTM F647-94 | Pass |
| Functional/Mechanical Performance per ASTM F647-94 and ASTM D412-16 | Pass |
| MRI Compatibility per ASTM F2053-20 | Pass |
| Antimicrobial Efficacy – Zone of Inhibition (ZOI) per internal methods | Pass |
| Antibiotic Content Analysis using High-performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), per internal methods | Pass |
| Residual Solvents Testing via Headspace Gas Chromatography – Flame Ionization Detection (HS GC-FID), per FDA guidance “Q3C – Tables and List Guidance for Industry | Pass |
| Usability Evaluation and Design Validation per IEC 62366-1 | Pass |
| In vitro flow loop thrombogenicity test | Observed significantly less thrombus deposition on Codman Libertis Distal Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal and Endexo Technology compared to predicate device |
Page 3 of 4
{7}
Integra® LifeSciences Production Corporation
Codman® Libertís™ Shunt Catheter with Bactiseal® and Endexo® Technology
| Biocompatibility Testing Results | |
| --- | --- |
| Test | Conclusion |
| Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5:2009 | Pass |
| Sensitization per ISO 10993-10:2021 | Pass |
| Irritation per ISO 10993-10:2021 and ISO 10993-23:2021 | Pass |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017 | Pass |
| Pyrogenicity per ISO 10993-11:2017 | Pass |
| Subacute/Subchronic Toxicity per ISO 10993-6:2016 and ISO 10993-11:2017 | Pass |
| Genotoxicity per ISO 10993-3:2014 | Pass |
| Implantation per ISO 10993-6:2016 | Pass |
| Chronic Toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017 | Pass |
| Hemocompatibility per ISO 10993-4:2017 | Pass |
| Carcinogenicity per ISO 10993-3:2014 | Pass |
**Sterilization/Cleaning**
The proposed device is sterilized via electron beam (E-beam) radiation. A sterilization validation was performed according to FDA recognized standards ISO 11137-1, ISO 11137-2, ISO 11737-1, and ISO 11737-2. The sterilization validation demonstrates that the proposed sterilization method achieves a sterility assurance level (SAL) of $10^{-6}$.
**Shelf Life**
The shelf-life established for the predicate and the proposed devices is the same, 1-year.
**Clinical Studies**
No clinical studies were required as appropriate verification of the subject devices was achieved based on the comparison to the predicate devices and from the results of the bench testing.
**807.92(b) (3) Conclusion**
Based upon the intended use, design, comparison to the predicate device, and testing performed, Integra LifeSciences believes that the proposed Libertís™ Shunt Catheter does not raise any different questions of safety and effectiveness, and is therefore, substantially equivalent to the predicate Bactiseal® Shunt Catheter.
Page 4 of 4
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.