The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neurovasculature.
Device Story
Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is a single-lumen, flexible, variable-stiffness catheter; 0.100-inch inner diameter; features radiopaque distal marker band and proximal luer hub. Distal shaft includes 14 cm lubricious coating to reduce friction. Used in neurovascular procedures to facilitate insertion and guidance of interventional devices. Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Device is compatible with introducer sheaths 9F or greater. Supplied sterile with dilator and two rotating hemostatic valves. Provides a pathway for interventional tools; assists in navigating neurovascular anatomy; benefits patient by enabling minimally invasive access for neurointerventional procedures.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data. Evidence consists of extensive bench testing (dimensional verification, tensile/torque/burst strength, kink resistance, coating integrity, particulate, leak testing, simulated use) and a GLP-compliant subacute animal study in healthy swine (n=2). Animal study evaluated vascular safety, vessel injury, and tissue response via angiography, necropsy, and histopathology, demonstrating performance comparable to control devices.
Technological Characteristics
Single-lumen catheter; stainless steel hypotube reinforcement; hydrophilic coating. Dimensions: 0.100 in ID, 0.118 in OD, 100/105 cm lengths. Materials: medical-grade plastics and metals. Sterilization: 100% Ethylene Oxide (SAL 10^-6). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1. Compatible with 9F+ introducer sheaths.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neurovasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
December 19, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: on the left, there is a seal with an abstract design, and on the right, there is the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. The text is arranged in three lines, with "FDA" on the first line, "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" on the second line, and "ADMINISTRATION" on the third line. The logo is clean and professional, reflecting the organization's role in regulating food and drugs.
Stryker Neurovascular Shameena Segui Senior Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist Stryker Neurovascular 47900 Bayside Pkwy Fremont, California 94538
Re: K241637
Trade/Device Name: Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OJP Dated: June 6, 2024 Received: November 15, 2024
Dear Shameena Segui:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
{1}------------------------------------------------
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rue"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
# Michael Mcknight -S
for Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K241637
Device Name Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neurovasculature.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
Stryker Neurovascular Premarket Notification, Traditional 510(k) Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter K241637
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the Stryker Neurovascular logo. The word "Stryker" is in a bold, sans-serif font, with the "s" connected to the "t". The word "Neurovascular" is in a smaller, sans-serif font, and is located below the word "Stryker". There is a registered trademark symbol to the right of the word "Stryker".
# Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter
## 510(k) Summary
{5}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Percutaneous Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature,<br>21CFR870.1250 – Class II |
| Product Code: | QJP |
| Submitter: | Stryker Neurovascular<br>47900 Bayside Parkway<br>Fremont, CA 94538-6515<br>(FDA Registration Number: 3008853977) |
| Contact: | Shameena Segui |
| Date Prepared: | December 18, 2024 |
| Predicate Device: | AXS Infinity LS® Plus Long Sheath (K193034) |
#### Device Description
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is a single lumen, flexible, variable stiffness catheter with a 0.100 inch inner diameter, designed for use in facilitating the insertion and guidance of appropriately sized interventional devices into the neurovascular system. It has a radiopaque marker band on the distal end a luer hub at the proximal end. The distal catheter shaft has a 14 cm lubricious coating to reduce friction during use. It is packaged with a dilator and two rotating hemostatic valves. The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is compatible with introducer sheaths with an inner diameter of 9F or greater. The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is supplied sterile, non-pyrogenic, and intended for single use only.
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neurovasculature.
#### Technological Characteristics and Product Feature Comparison
Stryker Neurovascular has demonstrated the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device, AXS Infinity LS Plus (K193034) based on the same or similar materials, similar design, and the same fundamental operating principles. The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter indication for use is limited to use in the neurovasculature, while the Predicate Device AXS Infinity LS Plus is indicated for use in the peripheral, coronary, and neurovasculature. A comparison of the Subject Device with the Predicate Device is summarized in Table 1 below.
| Detail | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Trade Name | Echo™ Intracranial Base Catheter | AXS Infinity LS® Plus Long Sheath |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 870.1250 | Same |
| Classification | II | Same |
| FDA Product Code | QJP | DQY |
| 510(k) Number | K241637 | K193034 |
| Intended Use/ Indications<br>for Use | The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is The AXS Infinity LS Plus is indicated<br>indicated for the introduction of<br>interventional devices into the<br>neurovasculature. | for the introduction of interventional<br>devices into the peripheral, coronary,<br>and neurovasculature. |
| Materials | Commonly used medical grade<br>plastics & metals. | Same |
| Coating | Hydrophilic coating | Same |
| Reinforcement | Stainless Steel Hypotube | Stainless Steel Coil |
| Outer Diameter | 0.118 in. | 0.109 in. |
| Inner Diameter | 0.100 in. | 0.091 in. |
| Effective Length(s) | 100, 105 cm | 70, 80, 90 cm |
| Sterilization Method | EO Sterilization | Same |
| How Supplied | Single Use/Sterile | Same |
| Accessory Devices<br>Provided | 2 Hemostasis Valves, 1 Dilator | 1 Hemostasis Valves, 1 Dilator |
#### Table 1: Comparison of Subject and Predicate Device
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Packaging | Tyvek/Nylon Pouch, Polyethylene<br>Support Tube, Packaging Card, SBS<br>Carton | Same |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
#### Risk Assessment
Risk assessment of the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter has been conducted in accordance with EN ISO 14971 and Stryker Neurovascular risk management procedures. Stryker Neurovascular has determined that the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter raises no new questions of safety or effectiveness. The risk assessment conducted on the Subject Device did not result in any new hazards or harms, and no significant changes to the occurrences of harm were identified when compared with the Predicate Device.
#### Performance Data- Bench Testing
The results of verification and validation testing conducted on the Subject Device demonstrate that it performs as designed and is suitable for its intended use. Table 2 provides a summary of testing performed on the Subject Device:
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusions |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Dimensional Verification | Verification of critical dimensions. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Tensile Strength | Tensile strength tested per ISO 10555-1. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Torque Strength | Measurement of torque strength. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Particulate | Particulate was collected from simulated use in<br>a tortuous model, characterized by size and<br>particulate type, and compared to<br>commercially available product. | Pass - Device comparable to<br>predicate |
| Coating Integrity | Hydrophilic coating was inspected before and<br>after simulated use in a tortuous model. | Pass - Device comparable to<br>predicate |
| Liquid Leak | Liquid leak tested per ISO 10555-1. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Air Leak | Air leak tested per ISO 10555-1. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Kink Resistance | Measurement of catheter kink radius. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Burst Strength | Burst strength was tested per ISO 10555-1. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Liner Lamination | Verification of inner liner adherence. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Tip Stiffness | Measurement of distal tip stiffness. | Pass - Device comparable to<br>predicate |
| Frictional Force | Measurement of coating frictional force. | Pass - Device comparable to<br>predicate |
#### Table 2: Performance Data- Bench Testing
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Chemical Compatibility | Catheter was measured and visually inspected<br>before and after exposure to various clinically<br>relevant chemicals. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Integrity Post-Removal | Catheter and accessories were inspected<br>following removal from packaging. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
| Simulated Use Testing | Simulated use testing in a bench anatomical<br>model with femoral artery access. | Pass - Samples met established<br>acceptance criteria |
#### Performance Data- Animal Safety Testing
A subacute animal study was conducted in compliance with applicable requirements in the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulation (21 CFR Part 58) to evaluate safety of the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter in clinically relevant vessel sizes of healthy swine. Two (2) animals were utilized to complete the study, and in each vessel, three (3) passes were conducted per device. Angiography, necropsy and histopathology of the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter were evaluated and compared to two (2) control devices. The vessels evaluated in the swine model included the renal, lingual, and internal maxillary arteries. Success criteria for all study end points were met. In regard to device safety, vessel injury and tissue response, the subject device performed comparably to both controls, demonstrating vascular safety of the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter.
#### Biocompatibility
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is categorized as a limited exposure (≤24 hours), externally communicating device with circulating blood contact in accordance with ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance, "Use of International ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation of testing within a risk management process." All patient contacting components used in the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter have a history of safe clinical use throughout the medical device industry and/or within Stryker Neurovascular and have supporting biocompatibility data. The results of the biocompatibility testing are summarized in Table 3 below.
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusion |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Extract and Direct Hemolysis<br>(performed separately) | ISO 10993-4 | Non-hemolytic |
| Thromboresistance | ISO 10993-4 | Non-thrombogenic |
| SC5b-9 Complement Activation<br>Assay | ISO 10993-4 | Non-activator |
| ASTM Partial Thromboplastin<br>Time | ISO 10993-4 | No enhancement or inhibition of<br>coagulation system |
| Cytotoxicity Study Using the ISO<br>Elution Method | ISO 10993-5 | Non-cytotoxic |
Table 3: Biocompatibility Tests and Results
{9}------------------------------------------------
| ISO Maximization Sensitization<br>Study | ISO 10993-10 | No evidence of sensitization |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| ISO Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11 | No mortality or evidence of acute<br>systemic toxicity |
| Material Mediated Pyrogenicity | USP <151> | Non-pyrogenic reactivity |
| ISO Intracutaneous Reactivity<br>Study - Extract | ISO 10993-23 | Non-irritant |
#### Sterilization and Shelf Life
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter and all device accessories are sterilized with 100% Ethylene Oxide to a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 104. The subject device and accessories meet EO residuals per EN ISO 10993-7 for a limited contact delivery system - externally communicating. The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter and accessories are provided for single use only.
The labeled shelf life for the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is 1-year. Shelf-life testing (product and packaging) and Distribution Shipping Challenge Conditioning testing were performed on the Subject Device, and the results met established criteria.
#### Conclusion
The Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device (K193034) based on similar intended use / indications for use, same or similar materials, same fundamental design, and the same operating principles. The conclusions drawn from risk assessments, the bench testing conducted using the Subject Device compared to the Predicate Device, and an animal safety study demonstrate that the Subject Device is suitable for the indication for use with the associated QJP Product Code. Additionally, the testing results summarized above along with the risk assessment demonstrate that the benefits of the device outweigh any residual risks when used in accordance with device Instructions for Use.
Stryker Neurovascular has demonstrated that the Echo Intracranial Base Catheter is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.