The Auryon™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters with aspiration are indicated for use as atherectomy devices for arterial stenoses, including in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to aspirate thrombus adjacent to stenoses in native and stented infra-inquinal arteries. The Auryon ™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters without aspiration are indicated for use in the treatment, including atherectomy, of infra-inquinal stenoses and occlusions.
Device Story
Auryon Atherectomy System consists of laser console and single-use catheter; catheter features array of optic fibers surrounded by circumferential blunt blade. System operates over standard guidewire; delivers UV laser pulses (355 nm) to target site. Laser energy creates cavitation bubbles in fluid; collapse of bubbles generates photoacoustic shockwaves to disintegrate calcified lesions without thermal degradation. Used in clinical settings by physicians for peripheral artery disease treatment. Output is mechanical disintegration of stenotic material; aspiration feature (on specific models) removes debris/thrombus. Provides minimally invasive debulking of arterial occlusions; improves vessel patency.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Performance testing included catheter dimensions, trackability, pull tests, torque strength, fatigue, optical functionality/durability, and hydrophilic coating evaluation. Sterilization validated via bioburden and LAL testing.
Technological Characteristics
Laser atherectomy catheter; 355 nm wavelength; 50-60 mJ/mm² fluence; 40Hz pulse rate; 10-25ns pulse duration. Features optic fiber array and circumferential blunt blade. Available in multiple sizes (0.9mm-2.35mm) with/without hydrophilic coating. Operates via photoacoustic shockwave mechanism. Sterilized via validated process.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with infra-inguinal arterial stenoses and occlusions, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). Used for atherectomy and thrombus aspiration in native and stented arteries.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intraluminal artery stripper is a device used to perform an endarterectomy (removal of plaque deposits from arterisclerotic arteries.)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
June 27, 2024
Eximo Medical, Ltd. Kasey Newcomb Manager, Regulatory Affairs AngioDynamics, Inc 603 Oueensbury Ave Queensbury, New York 12804
Re: K241553
Trade/Device Name: Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm; Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm, Hydrophilic Coating Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.4875 Regulation Name: Intraluminal Artery Stripper Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MCW Dated: May 31, 2024 Received: May 31, 2024
Dear Kasey Newcomb:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ariel G. Ash- Digitally signed by
Ariel G. Ash-shakoor -S
shakoor -S Date: 2024.06.27
15:37:25 -04'00'
For
Gregory O'Connell Assistant Director
{2}------------------------------------------------
DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K241553
Device Name
Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm;
Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm, Hydrophilic Coating
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Auryon™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters with aspiration are indicated for use as atherectomy devices for arterial stenoses, including in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to aspirate thrombus adjacent to stenoses in native and stented infra-inquinal arteries.
The Auryon ™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters without aspiration are indicated for use in the treatment, including atherectomy, of infra-inquinal stenoses and occlusions.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY FOR THE AURYON ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
#### SPONSOR
Eximo Medical Ltd Pekeris St 3 Rehovot, Israel 7670203
#### CONTACT
| Yoel Zabar | Kasey E Newcomb |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Sr. Director, R&D & Site Manager | Manager, Global Regulatory Affairs |
| Eximo Medical Ltd. | AngioDynamics, Inc |
| Telephone: 972-8-6307639 | Tel: 508.658.7813 |
| Email: yoelz@eximomedical.com | Email: knewcomb@angiodynamics.com |
| DEVICE NAME | |
Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1 7mm
#### Trade Name
| Trade Name: | Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm;<br>Auryon Atherectomy Catheter 1.7mm with Hydrophilic Coating |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | Peripheral Atherectomy Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Intraluminal Artery Stripper<br>(21 CFR § 870.4875, Class II, Pro-Code MCW) |
| Classification Panel: | Cardiovascular |
| PREDICATE DEVICE | |
| 510(k): | K233668 |
| Trade Name: | Auryon™ Atherectomy System |
| Common/Usual Name: | Peripheral Atherectomy Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Intraluminal Artery Stripper<br>(21 CFR § 870.4875, Class II, Pro-Code MCW) |
| Classification Panel: | Cardiovascular |
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Auryon™ Atherectomy System consists of two sub-units: 1) a single use catheter ("Auryon catheter"); and 2) a laser console. The Auryon catheter is a single use catheter that is made of an array of optic fibers surrounded by a circumferential blunt blade at its distal tip. The Auryon™ catheter is connected to the laser system via its connector and transmits energy at pre-set fluence levels of 50 and 60 mJ/mm2 to the occluded or narrowed artery. The laser delivers very short high intensity pulses which travel from the laser, through the fibers, and emerge from the polished ends of the individual fibers. As the UV light emerges from the fiber end, it will be absorbed by the fluid, and create a cavitation bubble within the fluid. The collapse of this bubble results in a photoacoustic shockwave that disintegrates rigid materials such as calcified lesions without relying on thermal degradation to break down the stenotic material.
The Auryon™ Atherectomy System must work over a commercially available guide wire that crosses the lesion intra-luminally. The catheters are available in seven configurations (0.9mm, 0.9mm, 1.5mm, 1.5mm XL, 1.7mm, 2.0mm and 2.35mm), with and without hydrophilic coating.
For the small size catheters (i.e., 0.9mm.1.5mm, and 1.7mm), there is a designated lumen tube for a guidewire at the center of the inner blunt blade. The 0.9mm, 1.5mm, and 1.7mm catheters do not have an aspiration feature and have not been tested in ISR lesions.
The larger Auryon catheters (i.e., 2.0mm and 2.35mm) have an eccentric guidewire lumen and include additional features consisting of an aspiration feature (both catheters) and an "off-center" feature 2.35mm only. The aspiration feature is intended for debris and thrombus collection and removal from the vessel during the atherectomy procedure. These devices are also indicated for treatment of In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) lesions.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The "off-center" feature is included in the 2.35 mm catheter only and is designed to facilitate debulking of lesions in blood vessels beyond the catheter's diameter.
### INDICATION FOR USE
The Auryon™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters with aspiration are indicated for use as atherectomy devices for arterial stenoses, including in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to aspirate thrombus adjacent to stenoses in native and stented infra-inguinal arteries.
The Auryon™ Atherectomy System and Auryon Atherectomy Catheters without aspiration are indicated for use in the treatment, including atherectomy, of infra-inguinal stenoses and occlusions.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGY CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed Auryon Atherectomy System is substantially equivalent to the predicate Auryon Atherectomy K233668. Both laser atherectomy devices have identical laser wavelength (355 nm), laser fluence levels (50 and 60 ml/mm²), pulse rate (40Hz), pulse duration (10-25ns), maximum output (33.5ml) and materials. The difference between the proposed device and predicate device is the addition of a 1.7mm catheter (1.75mm/0.069inch diameter) with a 150cm long working length. The 1.7mm catheter is offered both with and without a hydrophilic coating. The technological characteristic of the proposed device is substantially equivalent with the respect of the system design and function to that of the specified predicate device.
### DEVICE MODIFICATIONS AND RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE DESIGN MODIFICATION(S)
Modifications made to the Auryon Atherectomy System were limited to introducing a 1.7mm Catheter. There is no change to the principles of operations, indications for use, intended purpose, technology characteristics, between the proposed system and the predicate.
The impact of the change as described within this submission were evaluated a part of the Risk analysis activity in terms of new/existing risks and new/existing failure modes. The results of this Risk Analysis activity were compared to the current risk Analysis; the conclusion drawn from this assessment, determined that the additional catheter size did not impact or modify an existing risk nor necessitate a new or modified risk.
#### COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE DATA
The new 1.7mm Aurvon Atherectomy System Catheter was tested using the same methods and acceptance criteria as the predicate device. Specific tests are listed below:
- . Catheter Shaft OD, ID, Working Length
- Guard Tube Length
- Catheter Trackability (Simulated Use)
- Shaft Pull Test
- . Inner Blade Pull Test
- Proximal Section Pull Test .
- . Luer Pull vs Handle Pull Test
- . Distal Tip Evaluation
- Optical Functionality Test
- Catheter Torque Strength
- Fatigue Test
- Catheter Optical Durability
- Evaluation of Hydrophilic Coating ●
### STERILIZATION VALIDATION
Both the proposed 1.7mm Auryon Atherectomy System Catheter and the predicate Auryon Atherectomy System Catheters will be sterilized via the same process. Sterilization Validation on the proposed 1.7mm Auryon Atherectomy System Catheter was conducted per the below:
- Bioburden Determination ●
- LAL Testing
{6}------------------------------------------------
## CONCLUSION
Assessment of the similarities and differences of the proposed Auryon Atherectomy System and the predicate Auryon Atherectomy System concludes that the devices are substantially equivalent to one another; specifically:
- . The proposed and predicate device have the identical Pro-Code, Regulation Number, Regulation Name, and Regulatory Class;
- . The proposed and predicate device have identical Indications for Use;
- . The proposed and predicate devices incorporate the identical operating principle, mechanism of action, and are intended for the same patient populations; and,
- . With the exception of the newly added catheter size, the proposed and predicate employ an identical overall design, materials of manufacture, performance testing, sizes, and configurations.
The sum of these evaluations and determinations lead Eximo Medical Ltd. to conclude that substantial equivalence has been demonstrated, and that the existing data and additional testing have confirmed that there are no new questions of safety or effectiveness.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.