K233364 · Neuralace Medical, Inc. · QPL · Jan 10, 2024 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K233364
Device Name
Axon Therapy
Applicant
Neuralace Medical, Inc.
Product Code
QPL · Neurology
Decision Date
Jan 10, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5890
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Axon Therapy is intended to stimulate peripheral nerves for relief of chronic intractable pain, post-surgical pain and/or for relief of chronic painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities. The Axon Therapy is for use on patients 18 and older.
Device Story
Axon Therapy is a magnetic stimulator system for non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation to treat chronic pain. Used in pain management and physical therapy clinics by clinicians. System comprises a magnetic stimulation coil, liquid cooling unit, and cart. Device delivers brief, focused biphasic magnetic pulses (0-2 Hz, 290 µsec pulse width) to target areas (e.g., limbs, back). Thermal shutdown feature monitors coil temperature (45°C limit or 41°C for 9 minutes). Clinicians operate the device via LED interface to manage pain, potentially reducing reliance on pain medications and improving patient quality of life.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated Axon Therapy for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDN). Randomized trial compared Axon Therapy plus conventional medical management (CMM) vs. Sham plus CMM. Primary endpoint: proportion of responders (≥50% reduction in VAS pain score at Day 30). Results showed -57.6% VAS reduction for treatment vs. -12.5% for sham (p < 0.00001). Secondary endpoints (QoL-DN, PGIC) showed statistically significant improvements in quality of life.
Indicated for patients 18+ with chronic intractable pain, post-traumatic pain, post-surgical pain, or chronic painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in lower extremities.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief is a device used to apply an electrical current to electrodes on a patient's skin to treat pain.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
January 10, 2024
NeuraLace Medical Inc. % Allison Komivama, PhD, RAC VP, MedTech Innovation ROM+ 2251 San Diego Ave, Suite B-257 San Diego, California 92110
Re: K233364
Trade/Device Name: Axon Therapy Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5890 Regulation Name: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator For Pain Relief Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QPL, IPF Dated: September 29, 2023 Received: October 2, 2023
Dear Dr. Komiyama:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Lauren E. Woodard -S
for Amber Ballard, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation
{2}------------------------------------------------
and Rehabilitation Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K233364
Device Name Axon Therapy
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Axon Therapy is intended to stimulate peripheral nerves for relief of chronic intractable pain, post-surgical pain and/or for relief of chronic painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities. The Axon Therapy is for use on patients 18 and older.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> | <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY K233364
#### DATE PREPARED
January 10, 2024
#### MANUFACTURER AND 510(k) OWNER
NeuraLace Medical, Inc. 16990 Goldentop Road, San Diego, CA 92127 Telephone: +1 (858) 229-9218 Official Contact: Joe Milkovits, CTO Email: joe@neuralacemedical.com
#### REPRESENTATIVE/CONSULTANT
Allison C. Komiyama, Ph.D., RAC, VP, MedTech Innovation Charles Neitzel, Principal Consultant RQM+ Telephone: +1 (412) 816-8253 Email: akomiyama@rqmplus.com
#### DEVICE INFORMATION
| Proprietary Name/Trade Name: | Axon Therapy |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Electromagnetic stimulator, pain relief |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.5890 |
| Regulation Name: | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain Relief |
| Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | QPL<br>IPF |
| Review Panel: | Neurology<br>Physical Medicine |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION
The Axon Therapy is substantially equivalent to the following predicates:
| 510(k) Number | Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer | Primary Predicate |
|---------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------|
| K210021 | Axon Therapy / NeuraLace | ✓ |
The predicate device has not been subject to a design related recall.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Axon Therapy is a magnetic stimulator system that provides brief and focused magnetic pulses in order to non-invasively stimulate peripheral nerves and provide chronic nerve pain relief. The subject device is intended to be used in clinics such as pain management clinics and physical therapy clinics. The device consists of Magnetic Stimulation Coil, Liquid Cool Unit, and a Cart. The Axon Therapy includes a thermal shutdown feature which is activated once the inside temperature of the stimulation coil either: (A) reaches 45°C or (B) exceeds 41°C for a total of nine minutes during a 20-minute session.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Axon Therapy is intended to stimulate peripheral nerves for relief of chronic intractable pain, post-traumatic pain, post-surgical pain and/or for relief of chronic painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities. The Axon Therapy is for use on patients 18 and older.
#### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
NeuraLace believes that the Axon Therapy is substantially equivalent to the predicate device based on the information summarized here:
The subject device has an identical design and dimensions, and uses identical materials as the device cleared in K210021. The subject device has the same intended use and identical technological characteristics to the device cleared in K210021. The device has identical instrumentation to the device cleared in K210021.
| Comparison Topic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Statement of Equivalence |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Company Name<br>/ Device Name | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | N/A |
| Indications for Use | The Axon Therapy is intended<br>to stimulate peripheral<br>nerves for relief of chronic<br>intractable pain, post-<br>traumatic pain, post-surgical<br>pain and/or for relief of<br>chronic painful diabetic<br>peripheral neuropathy in the<br>lower extremities. The Axon<br>Therapy is for use on patients<br>18 and older. | The Axon Therapy is intended<br>to stimulate peripheral nerves<br>for relief of chronic<br>intractable, post-traumatic<br>and post-surgical pain for<br>patients 18 and older. | Substantially equivalent<br>to the predicate device.<br>Clinical testing<br>demonstrates that there<br>is no impact on safety and<br>effectiveness for<br>expanded indication. |
| Product Codes / Regulation<br>Numbers | QPL / 21 CFR 882.5890<br>IPF / 21 CFR 890.5850 | QPL / 21 CFR 882.5890<br>IPF / 21 CFR 890.5850 | Identical to predicate<br>device with no impact on<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Technological Characteristics | | | |
| Power Source | Power Supply: 110V to 240V<br>ac, 50/60Hz<br>Power consumption: 800VA<br>maximum, 115W idle | Power Supply: 110V to 240V<br>ac, 50/60Hz<br>Power consumption: 800VA<br>maximum, 115W idle | Identical to predicate<br>device with no impact on<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Comparison Topic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Statement of Equivalence |
| Company Name<br>/ Device Name | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | N/A |
| User Interface | LED display | LED display | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Waveform | Biphasic wave | Biphasic wave | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Software / Firmware /<br>Microprocessor Control? | Yes | Yes | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Indication Functions | On/off status<br>Ready status | On/off status<br>Ready status | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Time Range | 800 seconds (400 pulses at 0.5 Hertz) | 800 seconds (400 pulses at 0.5 Hertz) | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Housing Materials Construction | Stimulator: AL sheet EN AW 5754 H111<br>Coil: ABS | Stimulator: AL sheet EN AW 5754 H111<br>Coil: ABS | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Applied Part(s) | Coil 60BF-NL | Coil 60BF-NL | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Applied Part Area | 16 cm² | 16 cm² | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Treatment Area | Any area, such as Hand, Arm, Chest, Waist, Buttock, Thigh, Calf, Back and low back etc. | Any area, such as Hand, Arm, Chest, Waist, Buttock, Thigh, Calf, Back and low back etc. | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Weight | Stimulator: 17 kg<br>Coil: 3.2 kg<br>Full system (with cart): 54 kg | Stimulator: 17 kg<br>Coil: 3.2 kg<br>Full system (with cart): 54 kg | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Unit Dimensions | 485 x 380 x 165 mm | 485 x 380 x 165 mm | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Pulse Frequency | 0-2 Hz | 0-2 Hz | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Pulse Amplitude | 0 to 100%<br>A maximum of 80% intensity is recommended to reduce the risk of coil overheating | 0 to 100%<br>A maximum of 80% intensity is recommended to reduce the risk of coil overheating | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| On-Cycle Duty Period | 2-800 seconds | 2-800 seconds | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Maximum Repetition Rate | 2 pulses per second (pps) | 2 pulses per second (pps) | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Pulse Mode | Standard | Standard | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Comparison Topic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Statement of Equivalence |
| Company Name<br>/ Device Name | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | NeuraLace Medical Inc.<br>Axon Therapy | N/A |
| Pulse Width | Biphasic (290 µsec) | Biphasic (290 µsec) | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Maximum Output Power | 100% at 2 pps | 100% at 2 pps | Identical to predicate device with no impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Testing | | | |
| Non-Clinical Testing | Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1<br>EMC testing per IEC 60601-1-2<br>Software testing per IEC 62304<br>Usability testing per IEC 62366-1 | Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1<br>EMC testing per IEC 60601-1-2<br>Software testing per IEC 62304<br>Usability testing per IEC 62366-1 | Identical to predicate device, no new elements proposed for subject device requiring new non-clinical testing. No impact to safety and effectiveness. |
| Clinical Testing | Three previous studies that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the subject device.<br><br>One additional study for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDN) for the subject device. | Three studies that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the subject device. | Substantially equivalent to the predicate device. Performance and clinical testing demonstrate that there are no new questions of safety and effectiveness. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
### SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING
The Axon Therapy subject device had no design changes from the predicate device cleared in K210021 that required additional non-clinical testing for this submission to demonstrate safety and effectiveness:
Software Verification: The subject device did not undergo any new software verification testing due to substantial equivalence of the predicate device and no new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety: The subject device did not undergo any new electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety testing due to substantial equivalence of the predicate device and no new questions of safety and effectiveness.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Usability: The subject device did not undergo any new usability testing due to substantial equivalence of the predicate device and no new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Performance Testing: The subject device did not undergo any new performance testing due to substantial equivalence of the predicate device and no new questions of safety and effectiveness.
### SUMMARY OF CLINICAL TESTING
The goal of the Axon Therapy PDN clinical study was to expand the indications to include painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Axon Therapy was demonstrated to be effective and safe in the original clinical studies for chronic intractable post-traumatic and post-surgical pain. The primary efficacy objective of this trial was to compare the proportion of responders in the Axon Therapy plus CMM group, (responder is defined as a subject who experiences 50% or greater reduction from baseline in neuropathic pain intensity as measured by an in-clinic visual analog score (VAS) for the primary area of pain at Day 30, with no increase over baseline pain medications within four weeks of the Day 30 visit), to the Sham plus CMM group.
The results of the study demonstrate effectiveness of this non-invasive Treatment at statistically significant levels. The % reduction in VAS pain scores showed a -57.6% reduction for Treatment vs -12.5% for Sham at a p value of <0.00001. The -45.1% VAS pain reduction from Sham supports the argument that these are statistically significant improvements in patient care and not a placebo effect. In addition to pain relief, both the QoL-DN and PGIC scales show that this pain relief manifests into better quality of life outcomes at a statistically significant level.
### CONCLUSION
The Axon Therapy is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device based on the testing performed, the similar indications for use, and identical technological characteristics. Based on the testing performed it can be concluded that the subject device does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness compared to the predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.