K232749 · Ybrain, Inc. · PCC · Jun 11, 2024 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K232749
Device Name
DOOPANG
Applicant
Ybrain, Inc.
Product Code
PCC · Neurology
Decision Date
Jun 11, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5891
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) is indicated for: - The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older. - The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older.
Device Story
DOOPANG is a small, portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for migraine management. Device uses bipolar adhesive electrodes applied to the forehead to deliver electrical stimulation to the trigeminal nerve (orbital upper branch V1). Operated by the patient in home or healthcare settings. Device features two fixed programs: Program 1 (100Hz) for acute migraine treatment; Program 2 (60Hz) for prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine. Stimulation generates action potentials on nerves to modulate the trigeminal nervous system. Powered by a rechargeable 3.7V Lithium-Polymer battery. Output parameters include 16mA max current, 250μs pulse width, and biphasic, rectangular, symmetrical waveforms. Device provides non-pharmacological treatment, potentially reducing migraine frequency and severity.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing, including electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2), performance evaluation, real-time stability testing, biocompatibility (ISO 10993), and usability engineering (IEC 62366-1).
Technological Characteristics
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator; 3.7V LiPo battery; bipolar adhesive electrodes; biphasic, rectangular, symmetrical waveform. Max output 16mA. Program 1: 100Hz, 250μs. Program 2: 60Hz, 250μs. Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-1-11, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 62366-1. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993.
Indications for Use
Indicated for acute treatment of migraine with/without aura and prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years or older.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator to treat headache is a device used to apply an electrical current to a patient's cranium through electrodes placed on the skin.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Appropriate analysis/testing must validate electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety.
(3) The technical parameters of the device, including waveform, output modes, maximum output voltage and current (with 500, 2,000, and 10,000 ohm loads), pulse duration, frequency, net charge (µC) per pulse, maximum phase charge at 500 ohms, maximum current density (mA/cm
2 , r.m.s.), maximum average current (mA), maximum average power density (W/cm2 ), and the type of impedance monitoring system must be fully characterized.(4) Electrical performance, adhesive integrity, shelf life, reusability, and current distribution testing of the electrodes must be conducted.
(5) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective as a treatment for headache in the indicated patient population.
(7) Labeling must include the following:
(i) Appropriate contraindications such as not for use in subjects with an implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker, or an implanted or wearable defibrillator.
(ii) Appropriate warnings such as not to apply the device on the neck or chest, not to use the device in the presence of electronic monitoring equipment, not to use in the bath or shower, not to use while sleeping, not to use while driving, not to use while operating machinery.
(iii) Appropriate precautions such as the long-term effects of chronic use of the device are unknown.
(iv) A summary of the expected risks and benefits of using the device.
(v) A summary of the clinical performance data, including information on the patient population for which the device has and has not been demonstrated to be effective, and any adverse events and complications.
(vi) Information on how the device operates and the typical sensations experienced during treatment.
(vii) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters.
(viii) An expiration date/shelf life for the electrodes and the number of times they can be reused.
(ix) Disposal instructions.
In combination with the general controls of the Food Drug & Cosmetic Act, the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator to Treat Headache is subject to the following special controls:
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the FDA name and title on the right. The symbol on the left is a stylized representation of a human figure, while the text on the right reads "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue letters.
June 11, 2024
Ybrain, Inc. % Jonghyun Kim CEO, GMS Consulting #612, DE Riverwork Building B, 66, Cheongcho-ro, Deogyang-gu Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10543 Korea. South
Re: K232749
Trade/Device Name: Doopang Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5891 Regulation Name: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator to treat headache Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PCC Dated: May 24, 2024 Received: May 24, 2024
Dear Jonghyun Kim:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Jitendra V. Virani -S
CDR Jitendra Virani Assistant Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Rehabilitation Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K232749
Device Name
DOOPANG (YPS-301BD)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) is indicated for:
- The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older.
- The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
5. 510(K) Summary
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
[As Required by 21 CFR 807.92]
# 1. Date Prepared [21 CFR 807.92(a)(a)]
May 23, 2024
# 2. Submitter's Information [21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)]
- Name of Manufacturer: Ybrain, Inc. ●
- Address: 228, 54, Changeop-ro, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (zip code 13449) ● Kiwon, Lee/President Contact Name:
- Telephone No.: +82-70-4190-1899
- Email Address: ra@ybrain.com
- PCC Registration No.:
# 3. Trade Name, Common Name, Classification [21 CFR 807.92(a)(2)]
| 510(k) Number | K232749 |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade/Device/Model Name | DOOPANG/DOOPANG/YPS-301BD |
| Product Name | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator to Treat<br>Headache |
| Device Classification Name | Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 882.5891 |
| Classification Product Code | PCC |
| Device Class | Class II |
| 510(k) Review Panel | Neurology |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# 4. Identification of Predicate Device(s) [21 CFR 807.92(a)(3)]
The identified predicate device within this submission is shown as follow;
# Predicate Device
| 510(k) Number | K201895 |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade/Device/Model Name | Cefaly Dual |
| Product Name | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator to Treat<br>Headache |
| Device Classification Name | Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine |
| Requlation Number | 21 CFR 882.5891 |
| Classification Product Code | PCC |
| Device Class | Class II |
| 510(k) Review Panel | Neurology |
These predicate devices have not been subject to a design-related recall
{6}------------------------------------------------
### 5. Description of the Device [21 CFR 807.92(a)(4)]
This product is a small, portable product that uses the principle of transcutaneous nerve stimulation. By attaching an electrode to the forehead, it transmits electrical stimulation to the upper branch of the trigeminal nerve transdermally.
The electrode surface transmits electric current to the skin to generate action potentials on the nerves and adjusts the output mode (Program 1 and Program 2) to preventative treatment of episodic migraine(60Hz) and acute treatment of migraine(100Hz). Specially designed electrode of this product allows contact with the trigeminal nerve endings associated with migraine headaches. The electrodes give nerve stimulation to the orbital upper branch (V1) inside the forehead skin and transmit it to the trigeminal nervous system. This electrical stimulation is transmitted percutaneously through a bipolar adhesive electrode located on the forehead to preventative treatment of episodic migraine(60Hz) or acute treatment of migraine(100Hz).
# 6. Indications for use [21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)]
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) is indicated for:
- The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older.
- The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older.
# 7. Technological Characteristics (Equivalence to Predicate Device) [21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)]
There are no significant differences in the technological characteristics of these devices compared to the predicate device which adversely affect safety or effectiveness. Provided below is a table summarizing and comparing the technological characteristics of the DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) and the predicate device:
| | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Note |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| K Number | K232749 | K201895 | - |
| Manufacturer | Ybrain, Inc. | CEFALY Technology | - |
| Trade Name(Model Name) | DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) | Cefaly Dual | - |
| Product Name | Transcutaneous Electrical<br>Nerve Stimulator to Treat<br>Headache | Transcutaneous Electrical<br>Nerve Stimulator to Treat<br>Headache | - |
| Product Code | PCC | PCC | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 882.5891 | 21 CFR 882.5891 | Same |
| Regulatory Class | II | II | Same |
| | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Note |
| 510(k) Review Panel | Neurology | Neurology | Same |
#### [Table 1. Comparison of Proposed Device to Predicate Devices]
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) is | The Cefaly® Dual is | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Indications for Use | indicated for:<br>- The acute treatment of<br>migraine with or without<br>aura in patients 18 years<br>of age or older.<br>- The prophylactic<br>treatment of episodic<br>migraine in patients 18<br>years of age or older. | indicated for:<br>- The acute treatment of<br>migraine with or without<br>aura in patients 18 years<br>of age or older.<br>- The prophylactic<br>treatment of episodic<br>migraine in patients 18<br>years of age or older. | Similar |
| Intended Population | Patients 18 years of age<br>or older | Patients 18 years of age<br>or older | Same |
| Intended Use Environment | Home & Healthcare<br>settings | Home & Healthcare<br>settings | Same |
| Power Source | A rechargeable 3.7V<br>Lithium-Polymer Battery | 1 rechargeable LiPo<br>3.7 V battery | Same |
| Channels | 1 | 1 | Same |
| Software provided | 2 fixed programs:<br>- 1 fixed program for the<br>acute treatment of<br>migraine attacks(Program<br>1)<br>- 1 fixed program for<br>prophylactic treatment of<br>migraine(Program 2) | 2 fixed programs:<br>- 1 fixed program for the<br>acute treatment of<br>migraine attacks(Program<br>1)<br>- 1 fixed program for<br>prophylactic treatment of<br>migraine(Program 2) | Same |
| Program 1: | | | |
| Max. output current | 16 mA | 16 mA | |
| Pulse width | 250 μs,<br>fixed 100 Hz, | 250 μs,<br>fixed 100 Hz, | Similar |
| Pulse frequency | fixed 61 minutes | fixed 60 minutes | |
| Session duration | | | |
| Program 2: | | | |
| Max. output current | 16 mA | 16 mA | |
| Pulse width | 250 μs,<br>fixed 60 Hz, | 250 μs,<br>fixed 60 Hz, | Similar |
| Pulse frequency | fixed 21 minutes | fixed 20 minutes | |
| Session duration | Biphasic, rectangular,<br>symmetrical | Biphasic, rectangular,<br>symmetrical | Same |
| Waveform | | | |
| Net charge (µC) per pulse | 0 | 0 | Same |
| Maximum output current (mA): | | | |
| | 16 mA | 16 mA | Same |
| | | | |
| Maximum current density (mA/cm2,<br>r.m.s) at 500 ohms | 2.32 | 2.37 | Similar |
| Maximum average power density<br>(W/cm2, r.m.s) at 500 ohms | 0.000047 | 0.000047 | Same |
It is substantially equivalent to these devices in design, function, and intended use. The proposed device, DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) has been tested about electrical safety, EMC, and performance, and the software has been validated. Differences and Risks associated with that:
- There appears to be a slight difference in session duration between Program 1 and Program . 2 for both the predicate device and the proposed device. However, this discrepancy is not
{8}------------------------------------------------
expected to pose any significant additional risk, as the variation is within a minute or less.
- The Maximum current density (mA/cm2, r.m.s) at 500 ohms of the proposed device is 2.32, . while the predicate device has a value of 2.37. Although there is a slight difference, it can be arqued that the performance of the proposed device is less risky because it falls within the performance range of the predicate device.
There are no significant differences between the DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) and the predicate device that would adversely affect the product's use according to the test results. Therefore, these differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than the predicate.
### 8. Non-Clinical Test summary
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) complies with voluntary standards for electrical safety,
electromagnetic compatibility. The following data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
1) Electrical Safety, Electromagnetic Compatibility and Performance:
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) complies with the electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility requirements established by the standards.
| Standards<br>No. | Standards<br>Organization | Standard Title | Version | Publication<br>Year |
|------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| 60601-1 | AAMI/IEC | Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General<br>Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential<br>Performance (IEC 60601-1:2005, MOD) | ES60601-1:<br>2005(R)201<br>2 and<br>A1:2012 | 2014 |
| 60601-1-2 | IEC | Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General<br>Requirements for Safety – Collateral Standard:<br>Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements<br>and Tests | 60601-1-2<br>Edition 4.0<br>2014-02 | 2016 |
| 60601-1-6 | IEC | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General<br>requirements for basic safety and essential<br>performance - Collateral standard: Usability | 60601-1-6<br>Edition 3.0<br>2012-07 | 2012 |
| 60601-1-<br>11 | IEC | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-11: General<br>requirements for basic safety and essential<br>performance - Collateral Standard: Requirements<br>for medical electrical equipment and medical<br>electrical systems used in the home healthcare<br>environment | 60601-1-11<br>Edition 2.0<br>2015-01 | 2016 |
| 60601-2-<br>10 | IEC | Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-10:<br>Particular requirements for the basic safety and<br>essential performance of nerve and muscle<br>stimulators | 60601-2-10<br>Edition 2.1<br>2016-04 | 2018 |
| 62366-1 | IEC | Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability<br>engineering to medical devices | 62366-1<br>Edition 1.1<br>2020-06<br>CONSOLIDA<br>TED<br>VERSION | 2020 |
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### 2) Software Validation
The DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) contains MODERATE level of concern software. The software was designed and developed according to a software development process and was verified and validated. Software information is provided in accordance with FDA guidance:
- The content of premarket submissions for software contained in medical devices, on May 11, ● 2005
- 3) Biocompatibility
- ISO 10993-1 and series, Biological evaluation of medical devices
- 4) Cybersecurity
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, on October2, 2014
- 5) Label
- CFR Part 801
- 6) Performance
- Performance Evaluation Test
- Real Time Stability Test
- 7) Usability
- . Usability Test (IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 CSV)
# 9. Substantial Equivalence [21 CFR 807.92(b)(1) and 807.92]
There are no significant differences between the proposed device and the predicate device, K201895 that would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to these devices in indications for use and technology characteristics.
# 10. Conclusion [21 CFR 807.92(b)(3)]
In according with the Federal Food & Drug and cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807, and based on the information provided in this premarket notification, concludes that the DOOPANG(YPS-301BD) is substantially equivalent in safety and effectiveness to the predicate device as described herein.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.