K232113 · Varian Medical Systems, Inc. · IYE · Nov 3, 2023 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K232113
Device Name
Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System
Applicant
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
Product Code
IYE · Radiology
Decision Date
Nov 3, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System are intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated.
Device Story
Single energy medical linear accelerator (linac) for Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT), stereotactic radiosurgery, and precision radiotherapy; utilizes Intensity Modulated and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT). Electron gun generates electrons accelerated by RF power from magnetron; electrons strike tungsten target to produce X-ray photons for treatment and MV imaging. Beam collimation via primary/secondary collimators and dual stacked multileaf collimators (MLCs). System includes kV imaging (X-ray tube, collimation, bowtie filter, y-blades, kV imager) and HyperSight CBCT imaging. Used in clinical radiation therapy settings by physicians and clinicians. HyperSight CBCT images enable primary treatment planning, replacing or supplementing conventional CT simulation. Treatment plans generated via Varian Eclipse (RapidPlan) based on physician prescription. Benefits include adaptive treatment capabilities (Ethos) and improved workflow by using CBCT for primary planning, reducing need for separate CT simulation.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study of 26 adult patients (16 men, 10 women) across three institutions. Evaluated HyperSight CBCT images for primary treatment planning compared to conventional CT simulation. Anatomical sites included head/neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Primary endpoints: patient-specific QA (ionization chamber dose ±3%, 2D gamma analysis 3%/2mm pass rate ≥95%), successful contouring, and clinical plan comparison (target coverage and normal tissue constraints). Results confirmed feasibility of producing treatment plans clinically equivalent to standard CT scanners. No adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Medical linear accelerator; tungsten target; RF magnetron; pressurized ion chamber; dual stacked MLCs; kV imaging system (X-ray tube, bowtie filter, y-blades). Connectivity: networked for treatment planning (Eclipse). Standards: ISO 13485, ISO 14971, IEC 62304, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-1, IEC 60601-2-68, IEC 60601-2-44. Software: IEC 62304 compliant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation is indicated for adults and pediatric patients. The system produces CBCT images used in Image Guided Radiation Therapy, and the simulation and planning for radiation therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
November 3, 2023
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a seal with an abstract design. To the right of the seal, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Next to the blue square, the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" are written in blue, with the word "ADMINISTRATION" written in a smaller font size below.
Varian Medical Systems Inc. % Lynn Allman Senior Director Regulatory Affairs 911 Hansen Way m/s E110 PALO ALTO, CA 94304
Re: K232113
Trade/Device Name: Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical Charged-Particle Radiation Therapy System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: IYE Dated: October 5, 2023 Received: October 6, 2023
Dear Lynn Allman:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming
{1}------------------------------------------------
product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Locon Weidner
Lora D. Weidner, Ph.D. Assistant Director Radiation Therapy Team DHT8C: Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232113
Device Name Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
Indications for Use:
Halcyon and Ethos radiotherapy system are indicated for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation is indicated for adults and pediatric patients.
The Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System produce CBCT images that can be used in Image Guided Radiation Therapy, and the simulation and planning for radiation therapy.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K232113
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. The word "varian" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "varian" is the text "A Siemens Healthineers Company" in a smaller font.
# PREMARKET NOTIFICATION
# 510(k) Summary
# Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System
# As required by 21 CFR 807.92
| Submitter's Name: | Varian Medical Systems<br>3100 Hansen Way, m/s E110<br>Palo Alto CA94304 |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Name: | Lynn Allman-Senior Director Regulatory Affairs<br>Phone: (650) 424-5369<br>Fax: 650/646.9200<br>E-mail: submissions.support@varian.com<br>Date: 01 Nov 2023 |
| Proprietary Name: | Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System |
| Classification Name: | Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system<br>21CFR892.5050, IYE, Class II |
| Common/Usual Name: | Medical Linear Accelerator |
| Predicate Devices: | Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (K222941) |
| Device Description: | Halcyon and Ethos radiotherapy system are single energy medical linear accelerators<br>(linacs) designed to deliver Image Guided Radiation Therapy and radiosurgery, using<br>Intensity Modulated and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy techniques. They consist of<br>the accelerator and patient support within a radiation shielded treatment room and a<br>control console outside the treatment room.<br>An electron gun generates electrons which are accelerated by radio frequency (RF)<br>power from a magnetron. The electrons strike a tungsten target producing photons (X-<br>rays) for treatment and MV Imaging. The photons produced by the target are monitored<br>and controlled by a pressurized ion chamber.<br>A beam collimation subsystem consisting of a primary and secondary collimator and two<br>stacked multileaf collimators (MLCs) shapes the photon beam to define the treatment<br>area.<br>X-Ray images of the patient are used by the treater to verify the correct treatment<br>location. MV Imaging uses the treatment beam and a flat panel imager whereas kV<br>imaging uses a high-capacity kV X-ray tube, a kV collimation system with full fan bowtie<br>filter with movable y-blades to define the imaging beam size and to capture the image, a<br>kV imager. |
| | Halcyon and Ethos radiotherapy system deliver a treatment generated by a Treatment<br>Planning System from a physician's prescription. kV CBCT images from HyperSight can<br>additionally be used for planning treatments. Ethos radiotherapy system is capable of<br>delivering adaptive treatments which can take into account changes in tumour geometry<br>between treatment sessions. |
| Intended Use | Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System are intended to provide stereotactic<br>radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in<br>the body where radiation treatment is indicated. |
| | The intended use is the same as the predicate. |
| Indications for Use: | Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System are indicated for the delivery of stereotactic<br>radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors and conditions anywhere in<br>the body where radiation is indicated for adults and pediatric patients.<br>The Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System produce CBCT images that can be used in<br>Image Guided Radiation Therapy, and the simulation and planning for radiation therapy. |
| Significant Differences: | The significant difference compared to the predicate is to remove the limitation to<br>simulation and planning for only adaptive radiation therapy for the CBCT images and to<br>reflect this in the Indications for Use. |
| | There are no technological differences in this device compared with the predicate. Use of<br>CBCT images for planning of adaptive treatments was covered in K222941. This 510(k)<br>includes further data to demonstrate feasibility to produce primary treatment plans using<br>the HyperSight imaging system that are clinically equivalent to plans generated from<br>conventional and simulator CT images. |
| Non-clinical Testing: | There was no non-clinical testing performed related to the significant change in the<br>device. Further cybersecurity information was provided to FDA including test reports, plan<br>and summary report and labelling in the form of a Security White Paper to address the<br>requirements of section 524B of the FD&C Act |
| Clinical Tests: | Overview:<br>The following information was acquired as evidence for the safe use of HyperSight images<br>for primary treatment planning:<br>•Images comparing sim CT vs Halcyon CBCTp in 26 patients including 16 men and 10<br>women for different anatomical sites<br>• Comparison of treatment plans (CT Sim-image based vs CBCTp image-based) for |
| | different anatomical sites created on those patients' images<br>• Specifications of dose calculation such as DVH and other measurements that can be<br>used to compare and validate these treatment plans |
| | Summary of the testing:<br>A data set consisting of 26 human subject cases was obtained from three institutions in<br>US and Europe utilizing HyperSight imaging in institutionally approved prospective single-<br>site clinical studies. The clinical studies included adult patients who were planned to<br>receive radiation therapy for conditions in the head/neck, thorax (including breast),<br>abdomen, or pelvis. Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups<br>were eligible for these trials. Prospective study participants were excluded due to<br>pregnancy or plans for pregnancy during the clinical study, or due to an unwillingness or |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. The word "varian" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the logo, the text "A Siemens Healthineers Company" is written in a smaller font.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. The word "Varian" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "Varian" is the text "A Siemens Healthineers Company" in a smaller font. The logo is simple and modern.
inability to provide informed consent to participate in the study. For two institutions, CBCT images were obtained using the CBCTp workflow, while the third captured images with the IGRT workflow. HyperSight images covered the same area of the body that was being treated with radiotherapy. The 26 cases are the first 26 patients submitted to Varian across the three studies; no selection of cases was made for this analysis.
For each case, planning CT and HyperSight CBCT image sets, contours, and clinical planning objectives were provided to Varian along with a summary list identifying the dosimetrist and physician involved with each case. Varian created radiation treatment plans for each type of image separately, using a standardized planning approach (RapidPlan) available in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Each type of plan (CT- and HyperSight-based) was evaluated against clinical objectives, consisting of
- target coverage goals and
- normal tissue constraints.
The clinical cases provide a range of commonly encountered anatomies from head to pelvis in actual clinical treatment conditions. In addition, these anatomies comprise a wide range of tissues to challenge the treatment planning tasks of organ segmentation and dose calculation, including metal artifacts (as in dentition, fiducials, or hip prosthesis). In regions where respiratory motion could occur (thorax and abdomen), breath-hold or a 5.9-second free-breathing CBCT acquisition was utilized to limit motion artifacts.
The acceptance criteria applied to the evaluation included the following:
- Patient-Specific QA
- lonization chamber measured dose ±3% as predicted by treatment O planning system
- O 2D gamma analysis of predicted planar dose distribution as compared to measured signal from the portal imaging panel - at least 95% of analyzed points passed 3%/2mm gamma criteria
- Image Acquisition and Contouring
- Successful creation of contours for each dataset O
- O All relevant organs-at-risk and targets are discernable
- Treatment Plan Comparison
- From established, published Clinical Goals for each anatomical site O
No adverse events were reported or observed.
#### Overall Conclusion:
The test results demonstrate the feasibility of the Halcyon 4.0 with HyperSight imaging system to produce primary treatment plans that are clinically equivalent to plans generated from conventional and simulator CT images.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. The word "Varian" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "Varian" is the text "A Siemens Healthineers Company" in a smaller font. The logo is simple and modern.
Standards Conformance: Halcyon and Ethos radiotherapy system conform to the same FDA recognised standards as the predicate device. See table below.
| EN ISO 13485:2016. | Quality management systems. Requirements for regulatory purposes. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| EN ISO 14971:2019. | Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices. |
| ISO 15223-1:2016. | Medical devices - Symbols to be used with medical device<br>labels, labelling and information to be supplied - Part 1: General requirements. |
| AAMI/ANSI/ISO 10993-1 | Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a<br>risk management process. (Biocompatibility) |
| IEC 62304: 2006+A1:2015 | Medical device software - Software Life Cycle processes. (Software/Informatics) |
| IEC 62366-1:2015 | Medical devices -Application of usability engineering to medical devices.<br>(General I (QS/RM)). |
| ANSI / AAMI ES60601-1:2005 (IEC<br>60601-1:2005, MOD) + A1 2012 | Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1: General requirements<br>for basic safety and essential performance. (General) |
| IEC 60601-2-1:2020 (Edition 4.0) | Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-1: Particular requirements for the basic<br>safety and essential performance of electron accelerators in the range 1 MeV to<br>50 MeV. (Radiology). |
| IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (4th Edition) | General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral<br>standard: Electromagnetic<br>compatibility - Requirements and tests. (General II (ES/EMC)) |
| IEC 60601-1-6 Edition 3.1 2013-10 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General requirements for basic safety<br>and essential performance - Collateral standard: Usability (General I (QS/RM)) |
| IEC 60601-1-3 Edition 2.1 2013-042 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-3 General requirements for basic safety<br>and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Radiation protection in<br>diagnostic X-ray equipment |
| IEC 60601-2-68:2014. | Medical electrical equipment –Part 2-68: Particular requirements for the basic<br>safety and essential performance of X-ray-based image guided radiotherapy<br>equipment for use with electron accelerators, light ion beam therapy<br>equipment and radionuclide beam therapy equipment |
| IEC 60601-2-<br>44:2009+AMD1:2012+AMD2:2016). | Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-44: Particular<br>requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment<br>for computed tomography |
| IEC 60976 Ed. 2.0 2007. | Medical electrical equipment - Medical electron accelerators - Functional<br>performance characteristics. (Radiology) |
| IEC 61217: 2011. | Radiotherapy equipment - Coordinates, movements, and scales. (Radiology) |
| IEC 62274: 2005 | (FDA Consensus Standard), Medical electrical equipment - Safety of<br>radiotherapy record and verify systems. (Radiology) |
| IEC 60825-1 Ed. 2.0 2007. | Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification, and requirements<br>[Including: technical corrigendum 1 (2008),<br>Interpretation sheet 1 (2007), Interpretation sheet 2 (2007)].<br>(Radiology) |
| AAMI RT2:2017 | Radiation therapy readiness check |
#### Argument for Substantial Equivalence to the Predicate Device:
Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System in this submission are the same devices with the same intended use, techological characteristic specifications and non-clinical testing as cleared in the predicate device, K22941. Further clinical data have been supplied to FDA
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. The word "Varian" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "Varian" is the text "A Siemens Healthineers Company" in a smaller, sans-serif font. The logo is black and white.
to demonstrate the suitability of the device for acquiring CBCT images with HyperSight for use in primary radiotherapy treatment planning. This includes
- . Images comparing sim CT vs Halcyon CBCTp in 26 patients including 16 men and 10 women for different anatomical sites
- . Comparison of treatment plans (CT Sim-image based vs CBCTp image-based) for different anatomical sites created on those patients' images
- . Specifications of dose calculation used to compare and validate these treatment plans.
The conclusion of the clinical testing is that, based on the results, Halcyon 4.0 with HyperSight imaging configuration, specifically for 125 and 140 kVp imaging energies, allows for creation of treatment plans that are equivalent in quality and accuracy of delivery to standard CT scanners.
Varian therefore believes that the expanded indications for use to include using HyperSight CBCT images for primary treatment planning does not affect the safety or effectiveness of the subject device compared to the predicate and therefore does not represent a new intended use or raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
Referring to the 510(k) Decision-Making Flowchart in "The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]" Guidance Notes:
- 1. The predicate (Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System 4.0) is a legally marketed device. (K222941).
- 2. The device and its predicate have the same intended use.
- 3. The device and its predicate have the same technological characteristics.
Varian therefore believes that Halcyon and Ethos Radiotherapy System are substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.